Risk-adapted treatment of clinical stage 1 non-seminoma testis cancer.

250 patients with clinical stage 1 non-seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis (NSGCT 1) were included into a prospective multicentre protocol during 1990-1994 and treated according to three risk strata: patients without tumour cell invasion of vascular structures in the testis (VASC-) and elevated serum AFP levels (AFP+) at orchiectomy were considered low risk (LR) and only observed closely. VASC- and AFP- or VASC+ and AFP+ patients were presumed intermediate risk (IR) and pathologically staged (PS) by retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). VASC+ and AFP-patients were regarded as high risk (HR) and received adjuvant chemotherapy (PEB x 3). At a median observation time of 40 (7-68) months, all patients were alive and without evidence of active germ cell cancer. The actuarial relapse rate in the 106 LR patients was 22%, and 70% (14/20) had elevated serum tumour markers at relapse. One of 32 (3%) HR patients relapsed with a resectable retroperitoneal mature teratoma despite adjuvant chemotherapy. Only 14% of the 99 IR patients who underwent RPLND had PS2 disease, and the actuarial relapse rate in 85 PS1 patients was 18%. This multicentre study demonstrated that excellent therapeutic outcome is possible when 18 comparatively small urological and oncological centres follow a strict and formal cancer care programme. The useful prognostic effect of VASC was once again verified. Pathological staging by RPLND in NSGCT1 is, in our opinion, not necessary, with presumed low-risk patients offered surveillance and high-risk patients offered adjuvant chemotherapy.

Evaluation of new sclerotic bone metastases in breast cancer patients during treatment.

PURPOSE: According to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for response of bone metastases to therapy, new lesions indicate progressive disease. We intended to prove that a new sclerotic lesion on conventional radiography may also be a sign of a positive therapeutic response in a previously undetectable lytic metastasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a previous placebo-controlled clinical trial of clodronate (Ostac) therapy, 139 breast cancer patients with bone metastases underwent both conventional radiography and bone scan every 6 months for 2 years with 99mTc before and during clodronate treatment. WHO criteria were applied for therapy response evaluation. RESULTS: In 24 patients, 52 new sclerotic lesions observed during therapy were selected for re-evaluation of conventional radiographs and bone scans. In 8 of the 24 patients, 17 of 52 new sclerotic lesions (33%) had showed positive uptake on previous bone scans. These lesions were possibly misinterpreted as new when applying WHO criteria. CONCLUSION: For better assessment of new sclerotic lesions during treatment, more sensitive techniques, e.g. bone scan, are needed as a complement to conventional radiography.