Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 30(2): 373-381, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31563987

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) has the objective to maintain the range of motion of the tibiotarsal joint and to preserve the nearby joints. However, the complication rate and failures remain quite high after TAA. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the improvement in the functional scores of the tibiotarsal arthrodesis after TAA failure. The secondary objective was to assess the specific complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This monocentric retrospective series includes 12 patients (nine men, three women, average age 52.5 years) operated between 2003 and 2018. An iliac graft was used in all cases. The arthrodesis was stabilized either by screws or by retrograde nailing. RESULTS: The reoperation was due to painful malleolar conflicts or loosening. The AOFAS score increased from 38/100 to 67/100 (51-86) post-operatively. The fusion was acquired at 3.7 months (3-6) except in two cases. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The 83% primary fusion rate is in the low average of the literature and 92% fusion rate in the high average after reoperation. All patients were improved even in two non-unions. The results of this study confirm that the arthrodesis after TAA failure is a reliable alternative to the TAA replacement. However, they are lower than those after a first-line arthrodesis.


Asunto(s)
Articulación del Tobillo/fisiopatología , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Artrodesis , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Articulación del Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Artritis/etiología , Artritis/cirugía , Artrodesis/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Prótesis Articulares/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Huesos Tarsianos/cirugía , Tibia/cirugía , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
2.
Biomed Res Int ; 2019: 1932191, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30984776

RESUMEN

Two-dimensional (2D) planning on standard radiographs for total hip arthroplasty may not be sufficiently accurate to predict implant sizing or restore leg length and femoral offset, whereas 3D planning avoids magnification and projection errors. Furthermore, weightbearing measures are not available with computed tomography (CT) and leg length and offset are rarely checked postoperatively using any imaging modality. Navigation can usually achieve a surgical plan precisely, but the choice of that plan remains key, which is best guided by preoperative planning. The study objectives were therefore to (1) evaluate the accuracy of stem/cup size prediction using dedicated 3D planning software based on biplanar radiographic imaging under weightbearing and (2) compare the preplanned leg length and femoral offset with the postoperative result. This single-centre, single-surgeon prospective study consisted of a cohort of 33 patients operated on over 24 months. The routine clinical workflow consisted of preoperative biplanar weightbearing imaging, 3D surgical planning, navigated surgery to execute the plan, and postoperative biplanar imaging to verify the radiological outcomes in 3D weightbearing. 3D planning was performed with the dedicated hipEOS® planning software to determine stem and cup size and position, plus 3D anatomical and functional parameters, in particular variations in leg length and femoral offset. Component size planning accuracy was 94% (31/33) within one size for the femoral stem and 100% (33/33) within one size for the acetabular cup. There were no significant differences between planned versus implanted femoral stem size or planned versus measured changes in leg length or offset. Cup size did differ significantly, tending towards implanting one size larger when there was a difference. Biplanar radiographs plus hipEOS planning software showed good reliability for predicting implant size, leg length, and femoral offset and postoperatively provided a check on the navigated surgery. Compared to previous studies, the predictive results were better than 2D planning on conventional radiography and equal to 3D planning on CT images, with lower radiation dose, and in the weightbearing position.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Osteoartritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Prótesis de Cadera , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Diseño de Prótesis , Programas Informáticos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Soporte de Peso
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA