RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to compare how likely positive tuberculin skin test (TST) and T-SPOT(®).TB (TSPOT) results predict risk factors for tuberculosis in a predominantly immigrant patient population at risk of latent TB infection (LTBI) and with rheumatologic conditions requiring immunomodulatory therapy (IMT). METHODS: Prospective study conducted at a referral rheumatology clinic. Inclusion criteria included patients on various IMT, including immunosuppressive drugs that could predispose to TB progression. We studied risk factors associated with LTBI, test results, and tests' agreement. RESULTS: We studied 101 patients. Eighty (79.2 %) were from countries where TB is prevalent and Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination is placed routinely. Seventy-four (73.3 %) had rheumatoid arthritis and 92 (90.7 %) were on IMT. Among patients with both TST and TSPOT results, 25 (30.9 %) were TST(+) and 20 (24.7 %) had TSPOT(+) results. Fifteen patients (18.5 %) had TST(+)/TSPOT(+) results, and 51 (63.0 %) had TST(-)/TSPOT(-) results (agreement = 81.5 %; kappa = .54 [95 % CI, .34-.74; P < .001]). Each TSPOT(+) and TST(+) results were independently associated with immigrant status and prior residence in a TB prevalent country after adjustment for immunosuppressive therapy: Adjusted OR(TSPOT+)=6.6 (95 % CI, 1.2-123.3; P = .027); and adjusted OR(TST+)=11.2 (95 % CI, 2.0-209.5; P = .003). Seven out of 10 TST(+)/TSPOT(-) cases had a TST ≥15 mm induration, including three cases with history of TST conversion. CONCLUSIONS: TST(+) and TSPOT(+) results predict risk factors associated with LTBI independent of immunosuppressive IMT. Some TST(+)/TSPOT(-) results were unlikely to be false-negatives. The combined use of TST and TSPOT appears to be a reasonable diagnostic strategy to evaluate for LTBI in this population.
Asunto(s)
Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Ensayo de Immunospot Ligado a Enzimas , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Tuberculosis Latente/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Tuberculosis Latente/epidemiología , Tuberculosis Latente/inmunología , Minnesota/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades Reumáticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Reumáticas/inmunología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Prueba de TuberculinaRESUMEN
We describe a patient with a long history of familial Mediterranean fever who developed proteinuria as a result of secondary AA amyloidosis. In this patient, the inflammatory process, including recurrent attacks of arthritis, abdominal pain, nephrotic syndrome secondary to amyloidosis, and high sedimentation rate, was rapidly suppressed by treatment with infliximab and there was remarkable improvement of the proteinuria.Because TNF-alpha is a proinflammatory cytokine that plays a major role in FMF and secondary amyloid, it is an appropriate target for therapy. Our case is the first case of reactive systemic amyloidosis secondary to familial Mediterranean fever, which responded favorably to infliximab.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether synovial fluid (SF) levels and cell-surface expression of B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) protein and SF levels of APRIL are elevated in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA). METHODS: Same-day blood and SF samples from 89 patients with 103 knee effusions (81 knees with IA and 22 with noninflammatory arthritis [NIA]) were evaluated for BLyS protein and APRIL levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Blood and SF mononuclear cells were double-stained for surface BLyS protein and surface CD14 (monocyte marker) and were analyzed by flow cytometry. Complete blood cell counts and SF nucleated cell counts were performed by the clinical hematology laboratory. RESULTS: BLyS protein levels were higher in SF than in corresponding serum samples from both IA and NIA patients. SF BLyS protein levels, but not surface expression of BLyS protein, were disproportionately elevated in IA patients. APRIL levels were higher in SF than in corresponding serum samples from most IA patients but not NIA patients. SF BLyS protein and APRIL levels correlated with each other, and each correlated with SF monocyte, lymphocyte, neutrophil, and total nucleated cell counts. Although SF and serum BLyS protein levels correlated with each other, SF and serum APRIL levels did not, suggesting that SF BLyS protein levels are more dependent upon systemic factors than are SF APRIL levels. Moreover, in 8 patients who underwent sequential arthrocenteses, changes in SF BLyS protein levels did not immutably parallel changes in SF APRIL levels, indicating their differential regulation. CONCLUSION: BLyS protein and APRIL are locally produced in inflamed joints. Their respective SF levels are differentially regulated, suggesting that they serve different functions. Together, their local production may foster survival and/or expansion of B cells that produce pathogenic autoantibodies and/or promote local T cell activation and consequent joint destruction.