Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(13): 338-341, 2023 Mar 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36995965

RESUMEN

Nearly one in four (24.4%) U.S. adults aged 20-69 years show evidence of noise-induced hearing loss (1). Among those reporting exposure to noise outside of work, 19.9% showed possible noise-induced hearing loss. Exposure to non-job-related noise can be substantial (2). Loud music from personal listening devices and entertainment venues might place more than 1 billion teenagers and young adults at risk for hearing loss worldwide (3). Early noise exposure might increase the risk for age-related hearing loss later in life (4). CDC analyzed data from the 2022 FallStyles survey (conducted by Porter Novelli via the Ipsos' KnowledgePanel) on U.S. adult perceptions regarding preventing hearing loss from amplified music at venues or events. More than one half of U.S. adults agreed with one or more of the following protective actions: limiting sound levels, posting warning signs, and using hearing protection when music at such events reaches potentially hazardous levels. Hearing and other health professionals can make use of existing materials available from the World Health Organization (WHO), CDC, and other professional organizations to raise awareness about noise risks and promote protective behaviors.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido , Música , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/etiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Ruido , Actividades Recreativas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(48): 1822-1826, 2020 Dec 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33270617

RESUMEN

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a substantial, often unrecognized, health problem. Various learning environments and activities in school settings are loud. Researchers have reported the prevalence of NIHL among U.S. adolescents ranging between 12.8% and 17.5%, suggesting that one in every six to eight middle and high school students (aged 12-19 years) has measurable hearing loss likely resulting from excessive noise exposure (1). Evidence suggests that even mild levels of hearing loss negatively affect auditory perception and cognitive skills.* CDC analyzed data from a sample of 817 youths aged 12-17 years who responded to the web-based YouthStyles survey in 2020. The survey measured the frequency of exposure to loud noise in school settings, the provision of hearing protection devices (HPDs) during exposure, and whether prevention techniques were part of their educational curriculum. Approximately three in four teenage students reported being exposed to loud sound at school, and nearly one half (46.5%) of respondents reported exposure to loud sounds at school on a regular basis. A majority of students (85.9%) reported that their school did not provide HPDs during classes or activities where they were exposed to loud sounds, and seven out of 10 reported they were never taught how to protect their hearing. Increasing youth's awareness about the adverse health effects of excessive noise exposure and simple preventive measures to reduce risk can help prevent or reduce NIHL. Health care providers and educators have resources and tools available to prevent NIHL among school-aged children. Increased efforts are needed to promote prevention.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Protección de los Oídos/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/estadística & datos numéricos , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Ruido , Instituciones Académicas , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ruido/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
3.
Psychol Med ; 49(6): 962-968, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29909806

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression is a common and significant health problem. Hearing loss is the third most common chronic physical condition in the USA and might be a factor in depression. To determine whether hearing loss is associated with depressive symptoms in US adults ages 20-69 years. METHODS: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data (2011-2012) were used to assess the potential relationship between hearing loss and depression, in adults (20-69 years) who answered the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) depression screening module, with pure tone audiometry measurements, and complete information on the co-variates data (n = 3316). The degree of speech-frequency hearing loss (SFHL) and high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) were defined as slight/mild hearing loss ⩾26-40 dB; moderate/worse hearing loss ⩾41 dB by pure tone audiometry examination. RESULTS: Moderate/worse HFHL was statistically significantly associated with depressive symptoms (OR 1.54, 95% CL 1.04-2.27) when the analyses were conducted among all participants. Further stratification by gender and age groups found that moderate/worse HFHL (OR 3.85, 95% CL 1.39-10.65) and moderate/worse SFHL (OR 5.75, 95% CL 1.46-22.71) were associated with depressive symptoms in women ages 52-69 years. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate/worse speech frequency and HFHL are associated with depression in women ages 52-69 years, independent of other risk factors. Hearing screenings are likely to reduce delays in diagnosis and provide early opportunities for noise prevention counseling and access to hearing aids. Health professionals should be aware of depressive signs and symptoms in patients with hearing loss.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/etiología , Pérdida Auditiva/complicaciones , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Audiometría , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(41): 1151-1155, 2018 Oct 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30335738

RESUMEN

Tens of millions of U.S. residents have a range of adverse health outcomes caused by noise exposure (1). During 2011-2012, 21 million U.S. adults who reported no exposure to loud or very loud noise at work exhibited hearing damage suggestive of noise-induced hearing loss (2). In addition to the known risk for hearing damage, nonauditory adverse health outcomes and health risks from excessive environmental sound exposure can include effects on the cardiovascular system, metabolism, blood pressure, body weight, cognition, sleep, mental health, quality of life, and overall well-being (1,3,4). CDC analyzed a representative sample of the U.S. adult population (aged ≥18 years) from a 2018 national marketing survey (50 states and the District of Columbia) that included questions about use of hearing protection devices (HPDs) (e.g., ear plugs or ear muffs) during recreational exposure to loud athletic and entertainment events; approximately 8% of respondents reported consistent use of an HPD at these types of events. Among those adults more likely to wear an HPD, 63.8% had at least some college education, and 49.1% had higher income levels. Women and older adults were significantly less likely to use HPDs. These findings suggest a need to strengthen a public health focus on the adverse health effects of excessive noise exposure at home and in recreational settings as well as a need for continued efforts to raise public awareness about the protective value of HPDs.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos de Protección de los Oídos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ruido , Recreación , Deportes , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido/efectos adversos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(8): 243-246, 2018 Mar 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29494567

RESUMEN

Globally, one in three adults has some level of measurable hearing loss, and 1.1 billion young persons are at risk for hearing loss attributable to noise exposure. Although noisy occupations such as construction, mining, and manufacturing are primary causes of hearing loss in adults, nonoccupational noise also can damage hearing. Loud noises can cause permanent hearing loss through metabolic exhaustion or mechanical destruction of the sensory cells within the cochlea. Some of the sounds of daily life, including those made by lawn mowers, recreational vehicles, power tools, and music, might play a role in the decline in hearing health. Hearing loss as a disability largely depends on a person's communication needs and how hearing loss affects the ability to function in a job. The loss of critical middle and high frequencies can significantly impair communication in hearing-critical jobs (e.g., law enforcement and air traffic control).


Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Femenino , Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido en el Ambiente de Trabajo/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(5): 139-144, 2017 Feb 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28182600

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The 2016 National Academies of Sciences report "Hearing Health Care for Adults: Priorities for Improving Access and Affordability" included a call to action for government agencies to strengthen efforts to collect, analyze, and disseminate population-based data on hearing loss in adults. METHODS: CDC analyzed the most recent available data collected both by questionnaire and audiometric tests of adult participants aged 20-69 years in the 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to determine the presence of audiometric notches indicative of noise-induced hearing loss. Prevalence of both unilateral and bilateral audiometric notches and their association with sociodemographics and self-reported exposure to loud noise were calculated. RESULTS: Nearly one in four adults (24%) had audiometric notches, suggesting a high prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss. The prevalence of notches was higher among males. Almost one in four U.S. adults who reported excellent or good hearing had audiometric notches (5.5% bilateral and 18.0% unilateral). Among participants who reported exposure to loud noise at work, almost one third had a notch. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE: Noise-induced hearing loss is a significant, often unrecognized health problem among U.S. adults. Discussions between patients and personal health care providers about hearing loss symptoms, tests, and ways to protect hearing might help with early diagnosis of hearing loss and provide opportunities to prevent harmful noise exposures. Avoiding prolonged exposure to loud environments and using personal hearing protection devices can prevent noise-induced hearing loss.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
7.
Hear J ; 75(10): 18-21, 2022 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37215299
8.
Hear J ; 74(7): 38-40, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35929011
9.
Hear J ; 73(10)2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35928763
10.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 20(2): 220-3, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23803975

RESUMEN

Longitudinal research suggests that efforts at the national, state, and local levels are leading to improved follow-up and data reporting. Data now support the assumption that the number of deaf or hard-of-hearing infants identified through newborn hearing screening increases with a reduction in the number of infants lost to follow-up. Documenting the receipt of services has made a noticeable impact on reducing lost to follow-up rates and early identification of infants with hearing loss; however, continued improvement and monitoring of services are still needed.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Neonatal/normas , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Perdida de Seguimiento , Tamizaje Neonatal/métodos , Tamizaje Neonatal/tendencias
11.
J Environ Health ; 80(8): 34-35, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31749462
12.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 1877, 2019 02 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30755633

RESUMEN

Hearing loss (HL) is the third most common chronic physical condition in the United States. Obesity has become an increasingly important public health concern, as the prevalence in children, adolescents and adults has increased over the past few decades. The objectives of this study is to investigate whether obesity is associated with audiometric notches indicative of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL), speech frequency hearing loss (SFHL), and high frequency hearing loss (HFHL) in adolescent participants of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2010. The prevalence of overall audiometric notches in the adolescent population was 16.0% with higher prevalence in females than males. The prevalence of SFHL and HFHL were higher in males than females (SFHL, 7.3% vs. 5.4%, respectively; and HFHL 14.3% vs. 8.1%, respectively). Obese adolescents had a higher adjusted OR to have audiometric notches (OR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.33-2.81) and HFHL (OR = 1.95; 95% CI: 1.19-3.21). Continued preventative efforts towards reducing obesity might also help to reduce the risk for HL and NIHL.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva de Alta Frecuencia/complicaciones , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/complicaciones , Obesidad Infantil/complicaciones , Adolescente , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Pérdida Auditiva de Alta Frecuencia/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva Provocada por Ruido/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Encuestas Nutricionales , Obesidad Infantil/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Clase Social , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
13.
Semin Perinatol ; 34(2): 170-9, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20207267

RESUMEN

Identifying and treating children with congenital hearing loss during the first few months of life is a relatively new concept. To assist states in the development of statewide Early Hearing Detection and Intervention programs, the federal government provides grants and/or cooperative agreements to almost all states and has established "National Goals, Program Objectives and Performance Measures" to guide the development and implementation of those systems. This article reviews the history of newborn hearing screening programs in the United States, summarizes the content of legislation and regulations passed by states related to universal newborn hearing screening, and describes how well each National Goal has been addressed. Although substantial progress has been made in the percentage of infants screened for hearing loss before hospital discharge, significant improvement is needed with respect to the availability of pediatric audiologists, implementation of effective tracking and data management systems, program evaluation and quality assurance, availability of appropriate early intervention programs, and linkages with medical home providers.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Pérdida Auditiva/congénito , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pruebas Auditivas/métodos , Tamizaje Neonatal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estados Unidos
14.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc ; 2010: 1-5, 2010 Nov 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21346929

RESUMEN

Newborn screening (NBS) is a complex process that has high-stakes health implications and requires rapid and effective communication between many people and organizations. Currently, each NBS laboratory has its own method of reporting results to state programs, hospitals and individual providers, with wide variation in content and format. Pediatric care providers receive reports by mail, email, fax or telephone, depending on whether the results are normal or abnormal. This process is slow and prone to errors, which can lead to delays in treatment. Multiple agencies worked together to create national guidance for reporting newborn screening results with HL7 messages that contain a prescribed set of LOINC and SNOMED CT codes, report quantitative test results, and use standardized units of measure. Several states are already implementing this guidance. If the guidance is used nationally, office EHRs could capture NBS results more efficiently, and regional and national registries could better analyze aggregate results to facilitate improvements in NBS and further research for these rare conditions.


Asunto(s)
Intercambio de Información en Salud , Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes , Comunicación , Correo Electrónico , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Tamizaje Neonatal , Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine , Estados Unidos
16.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 54(1): 18-26, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19114235

RESUMEN

Universal newborn hearing screening is becoming the standard of care in the United States. However, there has been some controversy around this pediatric preventive health care practice. In 2001, the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF), the leading independent panel of experts on prevention and primary care in the United States, reviewed the scientific literature and found inconclusive evidence to recommend for or against universal newborn hearing screening. As a result of this lack of recommendation, some pediatric providers were not screening the hearing of all newborn infants. The USPSTF released an update in July 2008 concluding there is scientific evidence to recommend newborn hearing screening for all infants. Universal newborn hearing screening is the first step in the national Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) program. EHDI includes not only universal newborn hearing screening but also diagnostic evaluation for any infant failing the initial hearing screen and intervention services for any infant diagnosed with hearing loss. During the prenatal and postnatal periods, obstetric care providers can play a vital role in the EHDI process through education, screening, referral, and assistance with follow-up. Through these services, clinicians can work with parents and pediatric care providers to help newborns and infants develop communication and language skills that will last a lifetime.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pruebas Auditivas/métodos , Tamizaje Neonatal , Diagnóstico Precoz , Audición/fisiología , Pérdida Auditiva/congénito , Pérdida Auditiva/terapia , Pruebas Auditivas/historia , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Partería , Tamizaje Neonatal/economía , Tamizaje Neonatal/historia , Tamizaje Neonatal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Rol Profesional , Estados Unidos
17.
Pediatrics ; 117(2): 284-9, 2006 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16390918

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: More than 11000 children in the United States with severe-to-profound hearing loss have cochlear implants. A 2002 investigation involving pediatric cochlear implant recipients identified meningitis episodes from January 1, 1997, through September 15, 2002. The incidence of pneumococcal meningitis in the cohort was 138.2 cases per 100000 person-years, >30 times higher than that for children in the general US population. Children with implants with positioners were at higher risk than children with other implant models. This higher risk of bacterial meningitis continued for up to 24 months after implantation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate additional reported cases to determine whether the increased rate of bacterial meningitis among children with cochlear implants extended beyond 24 months after implantation. METHODS: Our study population consisted of the cohort of children identified through the 2002 investigation; it included 4265 children who received cochlear implants in the United States between January 1, 1997, and August 6, 2002, and who were <6 years of age at the time of implantation. We calculated updated incidence rates and incidence according to time since implantation. RESULTS: We identified 12 new episodes of meningitis for 12 children. Eleven of the children had implants with positioners; 2 children died. Six episodes occurred >24 months after implantation. When cases identified in the 2002 and 2004 investigations were combined, the incidence rate of > or =24-months postimplantation bacterial meningitis among children with positioners was 450 cases per 100000 person-years, compared with no cases among children without positioners. CONCLUSIONS: Our updated findings support continued monitoring and prompt treatment of bacterial infections by health care providers and parents of children with cochlear implants. This vigilance remains important beyond 2 years after implantation, particularly among children with positioners. The vaccination recommendations for all children with implants, with and without positioners, and all potential recipients of implants continue to apply.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear/efectos adversos , Implantes Cocleares/efectos adversos , Meningitis Bacterianas/etiología , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Meningitis Neumocócica/etiología
18.
Am J Public Health ; 95(11): 1923-7, 2005 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16195524

RESUMEN

The Health Resources and Services Administration and All Kids Count (a national technical assistance center fostering development of integrated child health information systems) have been working together to foster development of integrated child health information systems. Activities have included: identification of key elements for successful integration of systems; development of principles and core functions for the systems; a survey of state and local integration efforts; and a conference to develop a common vision for child health information systems to meet medical care and public health needs. We provide 1 state (Utah) as an example that is well on the way to development of integrated child health information systems.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño/organización & administración , Sistemas de Información/organización & administración , Informática en Salud Pública/organización & administración , Niño , Preescolar , Agencias Gubernamentales/organización & administración , Humanos , Inmunización , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados/organización & administración , Tamizaje Neonatal/organización & administración , Práctica de Salud Pública , Integración de Sistemas , Estados Unidos
19.
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet ; 125C(1): 28-34, 2004 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14755431

RESUMEN

A multistate Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study was designed to investigate the etiology of congenital hearing loss in infants ascertained through state-mandated hearing screening or early hearing loss detection and intervention (EHDI) programs. At least 50% of permanent childhood-onset hearing loss is due to genetic causes, and approximately 20% of all infants with congenital hearing loss have mutations in the GJB2 gene. Another 1% of childhood hearing loss is due to mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations. The specific aims of this study are to 1) classify the etiology of congenital hearing loss in infants by doing prospective genetic evaluations of all newborns with permanent hearing loss from defined geographic areas, 2) determine the frequency of mutations in GJB2 and two common mitochondrial mutations in these populations, and 3) establish a model infrastructure linking genetic services to statewide EHDI programs. As of April 2003, Utah is the only center evaluating patients. Study subjects identified through the Utah Department of Health EHDI program are contacted by letter and offered a comprehensive medical genetics evaluation with DNA testing for GJB2 and mitochondrial mutations A1555G and A7445G. To date, 25 probands and their immediate family members have been evaluated. We have identified 20 cases with nonsyndromic hearing loss (7 multiplex and 13 simplex), 4 with syndromic hearing loss, and 1 with presumed cytomegalovirus (CMV)-induced hearing loss. Six of 19 (32%) nonsyndromic cases with sensorineural hearing loss have mutations of one or both alleles of the GJB2 gene, and 21% are homozygous or compound heterozygotes for the 35delG mutation. No A1555G or A7445G mtDNA mutations have been found. Data reported to date include only children born in Utah, but EHDI programs in Hawaii, Rhode Island, and designated areas of Georgia have begun enrolling children in what is now a multistate collaborative study. This is the first comprehensive investigation to determine the etiology of hearing loss from populations ascertained through EHDI programs. The results of this study will facilitate the incorporation of genetic services into EHDI programs.


Asunto(s)
Conexinas/genética , Pruebas Genéticas , Pérdida Auditiva/congénito , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva/genética , Tamizaje Neonatal/métodos , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Estudios de Cohortes , Conexina 26 , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , ADN Mitocondrial/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Gobierno Estatal , Estados Unidos , Utah
20.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; Suppl: S52-6, 2004 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15643359

RESUMEN

Infants undergo a series of preventive and therapeutic health interventions and activities. Typically, each activity includes collection and submission of data to a dedicated information system. Subsequently, health care providers, families, and health programs must query each information system to determine the child's status in a given area. Efforts are underway to integrate information in these separate information systems. This requires specifying the core functions that integrated information systems must perform.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño/organización & administración , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados/organización & administración , Tamizaje Neonatal/organización & administración , Informática en Salud Pública , Integración de Sistemas , Niño , Servicios Genéticos/organización & administración , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Recién Nacido , Administración en Salud Pública , Sistema de Registros
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA