Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
N Engl J Med ; 389(6): 491-503, 2023 Aug 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37272513

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Among patients with resectable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a perioperative approach that includes both neoadjuvant and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition may provide benefit beyond either approach alone. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial to evaluate perioperative pembrolizumab in patients with early-stage NSCLC. Participants with resectable stage II, IIIA, or IIIB (N2 stage) NSCLC were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo once every 3 weeks, each of which was given with cisplatin-based chemotherapy for 4 cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg) or placebo once every 3 weeks for up to 13 cycles. The dual primary end points were event-free survival (the time from randomization to the first occurrence of local progression that precluded the planned surgery, unresectable tumor, progression or recurrence, or death) and overall survival. Secondary end points included major pathological response, pathological complete response, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 397 participants were assigned to the pembrolizumab group, and 400 to the placebo group. At the prespecified first interim analysis, the median follow-up was 25.2 months. Event-free survival at 24 months was 62.4% in the pembrolizumab group and 40.6% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for progression, recurrence, or death, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.72; P<0.001). The estimated 24-month overall survival was 80.9% in the pembrolizumab group and 77.6% in the placebo group (P = 0.02, which did not meet the significance criterion). A major pathological response occurred in 30.2% of the participants in the pembrolizumab group and in 11.0% of those in the placebo group (difference, 19.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 13.9 to 24.7; P<0.0001; threshold, P = 0.0001), and a pathological complete response occurred in 18.1% and 4.0%, respectively (difference, 14.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 10.1 to 18.7; P<0.0001; threshold, P = 0.0001). Across all treatment phases, 44.9% of the participants in the pembrolizumab group and 37.3% of those in the placebo group had treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher, including 1.0% and 0.8%, respectively, who had grade 5 events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with resectable, early-stage NSCLC, neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by resection and adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved event-free survival, major pathological response, and pathological complete response as compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone followed by surgery. Overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups in this analysis. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme; KEYNOTE-671 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03425643.).


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Cisplatino , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada
2.
Ann Hematol ; 94 Suppl 2: S133-40, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25814079

RESUMEN

For patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia who fail first-line therapy, several factors should be considered for the decision of the next treatment option. Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) dasatinib, nilotinib, and bosutinib offer improved potency and a high likelihood of success for these patients. Overall, efficacy data are comparable for these agents, and so physicians should consider the BCR-ABL1 mutation profile and the patient's history to make a decision on the best choice. Only a few BCR-ABL1 mutations seem to be less responsive to any of the three drugs, and it is recommended to choose the second-line TKI that has shown clinical activity against the specific mutation in these cases. For patients with all other mutations and for patients with no mutations, it is recommended to choose the second-generation TKI based on the patient's disease history. The third-generation TKI ponatinib is available after dasatinib or nilotinib failure or for patients with T315I mutations. However, optimal dose of ponatinib is still under investigation. Overall, it is recommended to select a drug that minimizes the likelihood of worsening the patient's past side effects or comorbid conditions. In any case, chance and risk of allogeneic stem cell transplantation should be compared with the long-term outcome of TKI therapy in patients eligible for this procedure.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Anilina/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Anilina/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Dasatinib , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Monitoreo de Drogas , Proteínas de Fusión bcr-abl/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas de Fusión bcr-abl/genética , Proteínas de Fusión bcr-abl/metabolismo , Humanos , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/enzimología , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/genética , Mutación , Nitrilos/efectos adversos , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Piridazinas/efectos adversos , Piridazinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Tiazoles/efectos adversos , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico
3.
JAMA Oncol ; 7(2): 255-262, 2021 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33355646

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Pazopanib and gemcitabine have shown good tolerability, albeit modest single-agent activity in pretreated soft tissue sarcoma. A combined regimen to improve outcomes is required. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of gemcitabine and pazopanib compared with pazopanib alone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, randomized phase 2 clinical trial was conducted in Germany from September 2011 to July 2014 and included patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 to 2, adequate organ function, measurable lesion, and progression after at least 1 prior treatment with anthracyclines and/or ifosfamide. Data analysis was performed during 2019 and 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to pazopanib with gemcitabine (A) or without gemcitabine (B). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was progression-free survival rate (PFSR) at 12 weeks; secondary end points included toxicity, quality of life, overall survival, and response rates. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were randomized, and 86 eligible patients (43 women [50%]) were evaluable, with a median age of 57 (range, 22-84) years and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0/1 in 77 participants (90%). The predominant histological subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (22 [26%]) and liposarcoma (16 [19%]). After a median follow-up of 12.4 (range, 1-48) months, the primary end point was met, with a PFSR at 12 weeks of 74% (A) vs 47% (B) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 90% CI, 1.15-2.23; P = .01). In the combination arm, PFSR was significantly longer, with a median of 5.6 vs 2.0 months (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92; P = .02) compared with single-agent pazopanib, whereas overall survival was similar, with 13.1 vs 11.2 months (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.60-1.58; P = .83). The objective response rate was overall low, with 11% (A) vs 5% (B) (P = .10). The toxicity of the combination of pazopanib and gemcitabine was increased, but it was manageable and mainly hematological. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This phase 2 randomized clinical trial of patients with soft tissue sarcoma found that the addition of gemcitabine to pazopanib was tolerable, and PFSR at 12 weeks was significantly higher compared with pazopanib alone. These results suggest clinical activity of the combination, but they should be confirmed in a phase 3 trial in a more homogeneous population (eg, leiomyosarcoma). TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Identifier: DRKS00003139.


Asunto(s)
Ifosfamida , Sarcoma , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antraciclinas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Humanos , Ifosfamida/efectos adversos , Indazoles , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirimidinas , Calidad de Vida , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , Gemcitabina
4.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 143(18): 1304-1310, 2018 09.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30199910

RESUMEN

The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has improved prognosis and outcome of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) considerably. In comparison to imatinib, first line use of second generation inhibitors nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib lead to faster and deeper molecular remissions accompanied by a novel adverse event profile. Essential part of the management of CML patients is a consequent use of cytogenetic and molecular follow up with standardized methods to regularly assess the remission status. Long lasting remission without treatment in an important minority of patients prompted the hope for curability of CML. The use of interferon alpha in parallel with or after TKI therapy is associated with the induction of an immune response against the leukemic clone with further improved remission rate. The cooperative management of CML patients permits the early use of novel treatment options in patients at risk.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Anilina/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Anilina/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Crisis Blástica/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Citogenético , Dasatinib/efectos adversos , Dasatinib/uso terapéutico , Monitoreo de Drogas , Femenino , Humanos , Mesilato de Imatinib/efectos adversos , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/genética , Mutación/efectos de los fármacos , Nitrilos/efectos adversos , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Pronóstico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico
5.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 143(9): 1879-1889, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28534171

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients over 70 years of age are characterised by diminished long-term survival rates following resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to younger patients. The aim of this study was to clarify whether reduced survival is a result of malignancy, comorbidities or the treatment received. METHODS: All patients with CRC, who were admitted to our institution over a period of 10 years, were selected from a prospectively maintained database. Disease-specific, disease-free and overall survival rates were calculated dependent on variables considered potentially relevant for the patients' prognosis. RESULTS: 915 patients were included in the study. Observed 5- and 10-year survival rates for the whole group were 48 ± 2% and 40 ± 2%, respectively, but 10-year survival rates dropped to 14 ± 4% for patients aged 80 and older. Resection of the primary tumour was attempted in all cases independent of age. Emergency admission, Charlson index ≥2, ECOG ≥2, old age, second malignancies, distant metastases, high grading and non-resective surgery were identified as independent prognostic parameters associated with decreased overall survival. In contrast, disease-specific and disease-free survival rates for patients after elective radical resection in UICC-stage I-III did not show significant differences related to age. Tumour site, UICC-stage and resection status were independent statistically significant predictors of disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Similar disease-specific survival rates in all age groups speak in favour of tumour resection in curative intent even in old patients. Better outcome may be achieved, if regular screening for colorectal cancer is considered even in the elderly to avoid late presentation requiring emergency surgery.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 142(4): 885-93, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26711282

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the best lymph node (LN) metastasis predictor for overall survival (OS) in head neck cancer (HNC): pN classification, number of positive lymph nodes (PNOD), lymph node ratio (LNR), or log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS). METHODS: In total, 225 surgically treated HNC patients were evaluated for the different LN classifications and OS. RESULTS: Five-year OS was 71.8 %. Mean number of yielded LN and PNOD was 25.3 ± 16.7 and 2.7 ± 5.9, respectively. 64.8 % had a LNR > 0.10 and 64.4 % a LODDS > 10. In univariable analysis, multimodal therapy (p = 0.039), advanced pT (p < 0.0001), advanced UICC stage (p = 0.029), LNR > 0.10 (p = 0.049), and LODDS > -1.0 (p = 0.021) were associated with lower OS. In multivariable analysis, advanced pT [hazard ratio (HR) 2.194; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.294-3.722; p = 0.004] and LODDS > -1.0 (HR 1.634; 95 % CI 1.002-2.665; p = 0.059) remained independent predictors for lower OS. CONCLUSIONS: It seems useful to analyze the prognostic significance of LODDS in other samples of HNC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Sistema de Registros
7.
Cancer Med ; 5(11): 3260-3271, 2016 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27726294

RESUMEN

To examine the impact of comorbidity on overall survival (OS) in a population-based study of patients with head and neck cancer who were treated between 2009 and 2011. Data of 1094 patients with primary head and neck carcinomas without distant metastasis from the Thuringian cancer registries were evaluated concerning the influence of patient's characteristics and comorbidity on OS. Data on comorbidity prior to head and neck cancer diagnosis was adapted to the Charlson Comorbidity (CCI), age-adjusted CCI (ACCI), head and neck CCI (HNCCI), simplified comorbidity score (SCS), and to the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27). Most patients were male (80%; median age: 60 years; 50% stage IV tumors). Smoking, alcohol abuse, and anemia were registered for 38%, 33%, and 23% of the patients, respectively. Predominant therapy was surgery + radiochemotherapy (30%), surgery (29%), and surgery + radiotherapy (21%). Mean CCI, ACCI, HNCCI, SCS and ACE-27 were 1.0 ± 1.5, 2.6 ± 2.1, 0.6 ± 0.8, 4.4 ± 4.2, and 0.9 ± 0.9, respectively. Median follow-up was 25.7 months. Multivariable analyses showed that higher age, higher UICC stage, no therapy, including surgery or radiotherapy, alcohol abuse, and anemia, higher comorbidity were independent risk factors for worse OS (all P < 0.05). According to the discriminatory power analysis none of the five comorbidity scores was superior to the other scores to prognosticate OS. This population-based study showed that comorbidity is frequent in German patients with head and neck cancer and is an important risk factor for poor OS. Comorbidity should be routinely assessed and taken into account in prospective clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/etiología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Vigilancia de la Población , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema de Registros
8.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 108(7)2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26944912

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of treating incident chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) with generic imatinib when it becomes available in United States in 2016. In the year following generic entry, imatinib's price is expected to drop 70% to 90%. We hypothesized that initiating treatment with generic imatinib in these patients and then switching to the other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), dasatinib or nilotinib, because of intolerance or lack of effectiveness ("imatinib-first") would be cost-effective compared with the current standard of care: "physicians' choice" of initiating treatment with any one of the three TKIs. METHODS: We constructed Markov models to compare the five-year cost-effectiveness of imatinib-first vs physician's choice from a US commercial payer perspective, assuming 3% annual discounting ($US 2013). The models' clinical endpoint was five-year overall survival taken from a systematic review of clinical trial results. Per-person spending on incident CML-CP treatment overall care components was estimated using Truven's MarketScan claims data. The main outcome of the models was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). We interpreted outcomes based on a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. A panel of European LeukemiaNet experts oversaw the study's conduct. RESULTS: Both strategies met the threshold. Imatinib-first ($277 401, 3.87 QALYs) offered patients a 0.10 decrement in QALYs at a savings of $88 343 over five years to payers compared with physician's choice ($365 744, 3.97 QALYs). The imatinib-first incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was approximately $883 730/QALY. The results were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: When imatinib loses patent protection and its price declines, its use will be the cost-effective initial treatment strategy for CML-CP.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Medicamentos Genéricos , Mesilato de Imatinib/economía , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapéutico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/economía , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/mortalidad , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Econométricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 87(12): 5695-701, 2002 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12466373

RESUMEN

The 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11beta-HSD) system plays a pivotal role in glucocorticoid (GC) and mineralocorticoid (MC) action. Although 11beta-HSD activities are important determinants for the efficacy of synthetic MCs and GCs, corresponding pharmacokinetic data are scanty. Therefore, we characterized 11beta-HSD profiles for a wide range of steroids often used in clinical practice. 11beta-HSD1 and 11beta-HSD2 were selectively examined in 1) human liver and kidney cortex microsomes, and 2) Chinese hamster ovarian cells stably transfected with 11beta-HSD1 or 11beta-HSD2 expression vectors. Both systems produced concordant evidence for the following conclusions. Oxidation of steroids by 11beta-HSD2 is diminished if they are fluorinated in position 6alpha or 9alpha (e.g. in dexamethasone) or methylated at 2alpha or 6alpha (in methylprednisolone) or 16alpha or 16beta, by a methylene group at 16 (in prednylidene), methyloxazoline at 16, 17 (in deflazacort), or a 2-chlor configuration. Whereas the methyl groups also decrease reductase activity (steric effects), fluorination increases reductase activity (negative inductive effect), leading to a shift to reductase activity. This may explain the strong MC activity of 9alpha-fluorocortisol and should be considered in GC therapy directed to 11beta-HSD2-expressing tissues (kidney, colon, and placentofetal unit). 11beta-HSD2 oxidation of prednisolone is more effective than that of cortisol, explaining the reduced MC activity of prednisolone compared with cortisol. Reduction by 11beta-HSD1 is diminished by 16alpha-methyl, 16beta-methyl, 2alpha-methyl, and 2-chlor substitution, whereas it is increased by the Delta(1)-dehydro configuration in prednisone, resulting in higher hepatic first pass activation of prednisone compared with cortisone. To characterize a GC or a MC as substrate for the different 11betaHSDs may be essential for an optimized steroid therapy.


Asunto(s)
Glucocorticoides/metabolismo , Hidroxiesteroide Deshidrogenasas/metabolismo , Mineralocorticoides/metabolismo , 11-beta-Hidroxiesteroide Deshidrogenasa de Tipo 1 , 11-beta-Hidroxiesteroide Deshidrogenasa de Tipo 2 , Animales , Células CHO , Cricetinae , Humanos , Corteza Renal/metabolismo , Microsomas/metabolismo , Microsomas Hepáticos/metabolismo , Mineralocorticoides/síntesis química , Oxidación-Reducción , Especificidad por Sustrato , Transfección
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA