Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Health Promot Pract ; 11(6): 845-51, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19116425

RESUMEN

This research was conducted to determine the impact of voting for clean indoor air ordinance on a local-level policy maker's re-election status. Secondary data were used to identify local tobacco ordinances in Arizona proposed between 2001 and 2005, score ordinance content for comprehensiveness, identify policy makers who voted and how they voted, and determine if the measure passed or failed. Participation in and outcomes of subsequent elections were documented from public records. Ninety-two local-level policy makers in 15 local jurisdictions considered clean indoor air laws between 2001 and 2005. Policy makers who voted for these ordinances were more likely to be re-elected than those who voted against them. Structured interviews revealed that policy makers did not believe the issue had an impact on re-election results and believed that although the issue may have been contentious, it was no longer salient in the community.


Asunto(s)
Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Arizona , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto
2.
Health Promot Pract ; 10(2): 284-92, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18340084

RESUMEN

Because of the growing focus on the production of favorable academic standardized test scores, schools have become increasingly resistant to sponsoring nonacademic programming, such as tobacco cessation services for students. Nevertheless, the need for such programs has not diminished. The purpose of this article is to provide descriptive information about the logistics of establishing and delivering a health intervention in schools that are resistant to nonacademic programming. The data were collected as part of a qualitative retrospective process evaluation of Full Court Press, a 5-year youth tobacco demonstration project funded by the Robert Woods Johnson Foundation and implemented in Tucson, Arizona. Lessons learned about recruiting schools, integrating programs, and managing facilitators are presented.


Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Escolar/organización & administración , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Adolescente , Arizona , Niño , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar
3.
Am J Health Promot ; 22(1): 22-4, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17894259

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To learn how worksite tobacco policies in Arizona changed between 1998 and 2001. DESIGN: Telephone survey panel design. SETTING: Arizona. SUBJECTS: Private workplaces with at least five employees (N = 1008). MEASURES: Workplace policies were rated as "smoke free" (no smoking by employees in any indoor areas or in company vehicles except for designated smoking areas enclosed by physical barriers and having separate ventilation systems), "partial" policies (restrictive tobacco policies that did not meet the "smoke-free" standard), or no tobacco policy. ANALYSIS: Bivariate statistical tests included chi2 and analysis of variance. Logistic regression was performed to identify the variables that best predicted the workplaces that weakened or eliminated their policies. RESULTS: . Tobacco policy in Arizona worksites improved overall, but 10.8% of worksites had weakened or eliminated tobacco policies present at baseline. Among worksites that were smoke free at baseline, 15.5% were no longer smoke free at follow-up. CONCLUSION: . Policy regression is a disturbing finding that should be further explored. Our findings suggest that efforts to promote workplace tobacco policies should not end when policies are in place.


Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Salud Laboral , Política Organizacional , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/prevención & control , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Análisis de Varianza , Arizona/epidemiología , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Política de Salud , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Modelos Logísticos , Cultura Organizacional , Fumar/epidemiología , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
Ethn Dis ; 15(4): 720-6, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16259499

RESUMEN

Little is known about the factors associated with delayed or incomplete adherence to recommendations for follow-up when breast abnormalities are seen in minority women. This study examines barriers to follow-up in a cohort of predominantly minority women, with input from providers, using quantitative and qualitative methods. We conducted telephone interviews with 535 women and inperson, unstructured interviews with 31 providers from three medical facilities in the Los Angeles area. Most patient respondents were <50 years old (59.6%), Latina (84.2%), and unmarried (60.9%); half (49.1%) had six or fewer years of education, and most were foreign-born (83.4%). Data from patient and provider groups identified race/ethnicity, country of birth, financial issues, fear of pain, and difficulty navigating the healthcare system as barriers to follow-up, though certain provider-identified barriers did predict adherence among women. System barriers, not individual patient characteristics, were more salient factors in the follow-up of breast abnormalities.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Mama/terapia , Mama/anomalías , Factores de Edad , Enfermedades de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de la Mama/etnología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Personal de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Los Angeles , Mamografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Minoritarios , Cooperación del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Pobreza , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Factores Socioeconómicos
5.
Cancer ; 107(8 Suppl): 1980-6, 2006 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16929483

RESUMEN

This paper describes the development of the American Indian Oncology Program (AIOP) and presents the accomplishments of a participatory research approach that involved an integrated network for cancer care and research. AIOP used a participatory process to develop infrastructure, identify research questions, develop methodologies, write supplemental grants, and evaluate accomplishments based on community defined measures of success. Partnerships between University and Indian Health Service, private, and state institutions led to improved collaboration. Health services delivery improved by increasing provider involvement at multiple institutions via a Tumor Board. Community awareness improved through workshops addressing community-specific cancer concerns. Collectively, these resulted in an environment receptive to the development of research activities. The AIOP team, through a participatory process, developed infrastructure at each institution that facilitated interaction, community-based education, and improved patient care; identified new partners; raised community-level knowledge and awareness about cancer; encouraged a research-friendly environment and building research capacity; and increased the cultural competency of researchers wishing to work in American Indian communities and created a cadre of future American Indian cancer researchers. As evidenced by successful pilot project development and formation of ongoing research and funding applications, the authors created a research-receptive environment and promoted potentially sustainable research capacity in the community. Much of their success is the result of utilizing a participatory model for capacity building that included not only communities but institutions. Cancer 2006. Published 2006 by the American Cancer Society.


Asunto(s)
Redes Comunitarias/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Indígenas Norteamericanos , Neoplasias/etnología , United States Indian Health Service , Arizona , Participación de la Comunidad , Humanos , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Estados Unidos
6.
J Health Commun ; 9(3): 223-31, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15360035

RESUMEN

In 2000, the American Legacy Foundation (Legacy) launched truth, a national, multi-medium tobacco control social marketing campaign targeting youth age 12-17. This paper provides a brief description of one aspect of that campaign, the truth tour, and compares and contrasts the truth tour with commercial field marketing approaches used by the tobacco industry. The methods used for the tour's process evaluation are also described, and two important lessons learned about using field marketing techniques and using youth to implement field marketing techniques in social marketing campaigns are discussed. Social marketing campaigns that target youth may want to launch field marketing activities. The truth tour experience can inform the development of those efforts.


Asunto(s)
Fundaciones , Educación en Salud/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Mercadotecnía/métodos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Mercadeo Social , Industria del Tabaco , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente/psicología , Antropología Cultural , Niño , Humanos , Comunicación Persuasiva , Práctica de Salud Pública , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA