T-cell/histiocyte-rich B-cell lymphoma: Clinical presentation, management and prognostic factors: report on 61 patients and review of literature.

T-cell/histiocyte-rich B-cell lymphoma (TC/HRBCL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (DLBCL) with characteristic morphologic and immunophenotypic features, often misdiagnosed as Hodgkin's lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Few and conflicting clinical data are available in the literature addressing optimal treatment, prognosis and outcome. We retrospectively reviewed all patients diagnosed and managed at our institution between 1995 and 2004 diagnosed with T-cell-rich-B-cell lymphoma by WHO criteria. Sixty-one patients were identified. Initial pathology was incorrect in 82% of referred cases. The median age was 30 years. Seventy-one patients were males. Stage distribution was I - II in 21 patients, and III - IV in 40. Fifty-two percent of patients (32) had splenic involvement and thirty-seven patients (61%) presented with extranodal disease (22 >or= 2 sites). The International Prognostic Index (IPI) score was >or=2 in 62% of patients. All 59 newly diagnosed TC/HRBCL patients were treated with CHOP or R-CHOP combination chemotherapy +/- radiation therapy. The overall response rate was 85% and nine patients progressed on therapy. Fourteen patients relapsed with a median time of relapse of 6 months (range, 2 - 28). At a median follow-up of 22 months (range 1 - 132); 32 patients (52%) are alive with no evidence of disease. The 5-year overall survival and event free survival rates were 46% and 39% respectively. To conclude, TC/HRBCL is difficult to recognize without immunohistochemistry. It has an aggressive course and poor outcome; with most of patients presenting with advanced disease stage together with high IPI score. Treatment outcome seems to be similar to IPI matched DLBCL counterpart.

HER-2/Neu overexpression does not predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or prognosticate survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Data about the prognostic and predictive value of HER-2/neu overexpression in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with primary chemotherapy is limited. Therefore, this retrospective study was performed to examine this issue. Fifty-four consecutive patients with LABC were prospectively managed using a uniform multimodality approach. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival were examined against HER-2/neu overexpression as determined by an immunohistochemistry method on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples of breast cancer using the commercially available, United States Food and Drug Administration-approved kit HercepTest (Dako Corp, Carpinteria, CA). The number of patients in each HercepTest immunostaining group were as follows; 0 in 12 patients (22%), 1+ in 8 (15%), 2+ in 12 (22%), and 3+ in 22 (41%). None of the clinical variables was significantly associated with HER-2/neu expression. After primary therapy, 22% of patients attained clinical complete response and an additional 70% achieved clinical partial response with an overall response rate of 92% (95% confidence interval: 100% to 79%). There was no significant correlation between clinical response and HercepTest positivity (p = 0.85). Of 52 patients with complete pathological data, there was no significant difference in HercepTest status between those who attained complete pathological response (46%) and those who did not (38%) (p = 0.74). Moreover, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival (75% vs 84%, [p = 0.26]) or overall survival (81% vs 84% [p = 0.31]) between those who overexpressed HER-2/neu and those with negative HercepTest, respectively. In patients with LABC, HER-2/neu overexpression determined using HercepTest assay and according to the manufacturer's approved guidelines failed to demonstrate a predictive or a prognostic role.

Intracranial germ cell tumors: a single-institution experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intracranial germ cell tumors (GCTs) are not a common disease. We reviewed the experience of a single institution to determine the variables that affect treatment outcome. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective review of patients with the diagnosis of intracranial germ cell tumors treated in a single institution (KFSHRC) during the period from March 1985 to December 2007. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with the diagnosis of intracranial GCT were recorded in the KFSHRC Tumor Registry during the period from 1985 to 2007. Seven patients with a pineal region tumor treated as germinomas in the earlier years without a tissue diagnosis were excluded. This retrospective study was restricted to the remaining 50 patients with a tissue or marker diagnosis: 31 germinomas and 19 non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs). RESULTS: The 10-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 87%, 88% and 96% for patients with germinoma, with a median follow-up of 4.5 (range 2-17) years, compared with 26%, 29% and 46% for patients with NGGCT with a median follow-up of 3 (range 1.5-13) years. For NGGCT, variables favorably influencing OS were younger age (< 16 y vs ≥16 y, P=.01), higher radiation dose (>50 Gy vs ≤50 Gy; P=.03) and later year of diagnosis (>1990 vs <1990 P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: Tissue diagnosis of GCTs is mandatory prior to treatment except for patients with elevated markers. In germinoma, localized radiotherapy (RT) for M0 patients may be adequate. Long-term follow-up is needed to define the benefit of adding chemotherapy. For NGGCT, the use of combined modality treatment and RT dose ;gt;50 Gy are important factors that influence the outcome. Second-look surgery and resection of residual/ refractory tumors is always recommended.

Improved survival with combined chemo-radiotherapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive primary brain tumor. Cranial irradiation alone rarely results in long-term disease control or prolonged survival. We retrospectively analyzed data on the effect of adding high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) prior to whole brain irradiation (WBI). METHODS: All patients with PCNSL diagnosed and managed during 1991-2004 were identified and demographic characteristics, prognostic factors, treatment and outcome were reviewed. Of 62 patients, 10 were excluded (4 had WBI<40 Gy and 6 had no treatment). Radiation alone was considered curative with a dose>40 Gy. Combined modality therapy included 3-4 cycles of HDMTX (3 g/m2) followed by WBI. RESULT: Of 52 patients analyzed for outcome, 36 had WBI (dose>40 Gy), 16 received 3-4 cycles of HDMTX followed by WBI (combined modality therapy [CMT]). Median age was 48.2 years; 42 years in the CMT group, 51 years in WBI. Patient characteristics were comparable between two groups except for higher multifocal tumor in the CMT group (92% vs. x22%, p=.029). Median follow up was 12.83±6.4 months. The hazard ratio for an event was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.52-0.98) and for death 0.58 (95% CI, 0.48-0.92), both in favor of CMT. Univariate regression analysis using one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate Cox regression analysis for prognostic factors including age (<60 vs. >60 years), ECOG PS (0-2 vs. 3-4), extent of surgery (biopsy vs. debulking), solitary vs multifocal tumor and dose of radiation therapy (<50 Gy vs. >50 Gy) failed to identify any prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: This retrospective comparison supports phase II trial results that indicate that high-dose methotrexate followed by WBI in PCNSL improves outcome.

Morphologic, immunphenotypic and clinical discriminators between T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma and lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Features of T-cell/histiocyte rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL) overlap with those of lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (LPHL). The two lymphomas may represent a spectrum of the same disease, and differentiation between the two can sometimes be difficult. We looked at histomorphologic, immunophenotypic and clinical information that may help differentiate the two entities. METHODS: Cases of THRLBCL and LPHL were blindly reviewed and studied for histological pattern (nodular vs. diffuse), nuclear features and pattern of expression of CD20, CD30, CD57, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). A score encompassing diffuse histology, high nuclear grade, CD20 single-cell pattern, CD30+, CD57-, EMA-, and EBV+ was estimated for the diagnosis of TCHRLBCL. RESULTS: There were 58 cases, including 30 cases of TCHRLBL and 28 cases of LPHL. The median age was 36 years for TCHRLBCL and 21 years for LPHL (P = 0.0001). Three types of nuclei were identified (lymphocytic/histocytic, Reed-Sternberg and centroblast-like). The latter two high-grade nuclei were suggestive of TCHRLBCL. TCHRLBCL and LPHL, respectively, showed diffuse histology, 90% vs. 4% (P = 0.001), single CD20+ cells, 93% vs. 3.5% (P = 0.00004), CD30+ cells, 30% vs. 0% (P = 0.01), CD57+ cells, 41% vs. 93% (P = 0.008), EMA+ cells, 27% vs. 60% (P = 0.113), EBV+ cells, 24% vs. 0% (P = 0.117), high nuclear grade, 70% vs. 0% (P = 0.001), total score 2-7 (mean 4.68) vs. 0-2 (mean 0.72) (P = 0.001), high stage, 86% vs. 7% (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that a combination of multiple parameters can help differentiate between the two diseases. Two cases originally diagnosed as LPHL were re-assigned the diagnosis of THRLBCL.

Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast clinical presentation, treatment results and prognostic factors.

Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast (MCB) is a rare form of cancer containing mixture of epithelial and mesenchymal elements in variable combinations. Few and conflicting clinical data are available in the literature addressing optimal treatment modalities, prognosis and outcome. A retrospective study was conducted to review all patients with MCB diagnosed and treated at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center between 1994-2004. The aim is to describe patient's clinicopathologic features and to analyze treatment results. Nineteen female patients were studied. The median age was 48 years (range, 14-58). The median tumor size was 9 cm (range, 3-18). Stage distribution was II in 8 patients, III in 9 and IV in 2. Nine cases were identified as purely epithelial and 10 (53%) as mixed epithelial and mesenchymal metaplasia. Hormone receptors were positive in only 2 patients. Modified radical mastectomy performed in 11 patients and 15 underwent axillary node dissection. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 9 patients and postoperative radiotherapy to 8. Twelve patients relapsed with median time of relapse of 12 months (range, 2-28). At a median follow-up of 21 months (range, 7-83), the 3-year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival for the patients diagnosed with loco-regional disease were 15% and 48% respectively. Tumor size correlated significantly with EFS. MCB is an aggressive form of breast cancer associated with poor outcome, high incidence of local recurrence and pulmonary metastases. The disease tends to be estrogen/progesterone receptor negative. Tumor size has an important impact on outcome. The best treatment approach is yet to be defined.

VIP (etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin) in adult patients with recurrent or refractory Ewing sarcoma family of tumors.

Despite the fact that Ewing sarcoma family of tumors (ET) is chemosensitive, long-term survival is extremely rare for patients with primary refractory or recurrent disease. There is no standard salvage chemotherapy regimen available in this context. In this study the authors reviewed their experience with the combination of etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin in adult patients with recurrent or refractory disease. From February 1997 through December 2001, they evaluated the efficacy of etoposide (75 mg/m2/day for 5 days), ifosfamide (1,200 mg/m2/day for 5 days), and cisplatin (20 mg/m2/day for 5 days) combination chemotherapy (VIP regimen), as second-line salvage therapy in 27 patients with recurrent or refractory ET. All patients were evaluated for response, time to progression, and overall survival. Twenty-one male and 6 female patients with recurrent (n = 14) and refractory (n = 13) disease were treated with the VIP regimen. Median age was 18 years (range, 16-34 years). Twenty-two patients were previously treated with vincristine, Adriamycin, ifosfamide, and actinomycin-D; and 5 patients were treated with cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, and vincristine. Sites of recurrent or progressive disease included local (n = 3), distant (n = 11), and both local and distant (n = 13). A total of 129 cycles of VIP were given (median, 5 cycles/patient; range, 1-14 cycles/patient). One patient (4%) had a complete response (CR) and 8 patients (30%) had a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 34%. The median number of cycles given to patients with CR + PR was 6 (range, 3-14 cycles). Nine patients (33%) had stable disease and 9 (33%) had disease progression. Median time to progression and median overall survival were 6.6 months and 8.1 months respectively for all patients, and 12.8 months and 14.2 months respectively for responders. There were no toxic deaths. Major toxicities included grade IV granulocytopenia in 19 patients and grades III/IV thrombocytopenia in 15 patients. At a median follow-up of 8 months (range, 2-56 months), 24 patients died of disease progression, 2 patients are alive with disease, and 1 patient is alive with no evidence of disease. The authors conclude that the VIP combination is active in patients with recurrent/refractory ET, with acceptable toxicity, and offers good palliation. Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy merits further investigation, possibly as first-line treatment in this disease.

A pilot trial of combination cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and interferon-alpha in the treatment of advanced esophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Based on the synergistic effect between cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and between 5-FU and interferon-alpha, we conducted a trial to assess the response rate and toxicity of the combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and interferon-alpha in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were eligible. No prior chemotherapy or interferon were allowed. Patients received cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1, 5-FU 750 mg/m(2)/day by continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days, and interferon-alpha 5 x 10(6) units/m(2)/day by subcutaneous injection on days 1-5 of each cycle. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a total of 6 cycles. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled. Median age was 57.5 years (range 30-70). 33 had squamous carcinoma and 7 adenocarcinoma; 15 were male; the locoregional metastatic ratio was 1:39; median ECOG performance status was 2 (range 1-3). Grade 3-4 toxicities were: leukopenia (9 cases), thrombocytopenia (4), electrolyte imbalance (11), febrile neutropenia (11), vomiting (5), diarrhea (4), and mucositis (11). There were 3 early deaths, most probably related to therapy. Five patients (13%) achieved a complete response and 17 (42%) achieved a partial response, yielding an overall response rate of 55%. Response rates for squamous and adeno histology were 61% and 29%, respectively. Median survival was 6.4 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin, 5-FU and interferon-alpha produces a high response rate in advanced squamous cell esophageal carcinoma, but with considerable toxicity. A modified combination of the above agents is presently being evaluated at our institution.