Trilaciclib use in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): are clinical benefits seen in the real-world setting?

BACKGROUND: Trilaciclib, in comparison to placebo plus carboplatin, etoposide, ± atezolizumab (PEA), has shown significant reductions in incidence of severe neutropenia (SN) among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Despite these findings, real-world utility remains limited. METHODS: A single-center quasi-experimental study compared trilaciclib + PEA (PEAT) versus PEA in ES-SCLC patients. The study period ranged from April 1, 2021 to July 31, 2022, for the PEAT recipients and February 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021, for PEA recipients. The primary endpoint evaluated was incidence of SN after cycle 1 and during the treatment period. Secondary endpoints included measures related to myelopreservation and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Among 34 PEAT and 44 PEA patients, baseline characteristics were similar, except for a higher median age (69 vs 64 years) and more males (64.7% vs 38.6%) in the PEAT cohort. The PEAT cohort exhibited a lower SN rate (3%) versus the PEA cohort (18%), with statistical significance demonstrated on multivariate analysis (p = 0.015). Additionally, the PEAT cohort also demonstrated significant reductions in red blood cell transfusion requirements (3% vs 23%; p = 0.02), grade 3-4 anemia (6% vs 25%; p = 0.03), and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (0% vs 11%, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Trilaciclib, in combination with PEA, demonstrated an improvement in the safety profile without compromising survival outcomes in ES-SCLC patients. These findings underscore the potential benefits of incorporating trilaciclib in real-world clinical settings for enhanced patient care.

Evaluation of safety outcomes between nivolumab regimens with differing dosing patterns.

BACKGROUND: Real-world safety outcomes between the two flat-dose nivolumab regimens demonstrated to be similar in a study of adjuvant nivolumab recipients for melanoma. However, this study was limited by a single oncology patient population, a small sample size, and insufficient study power. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of immunotherapy-related adverse effects (irAEs) between nivolumab regimens with differing dosing patterns in various solid tumor patient populations. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients with solid tumor malignancies who received nivolumab 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W, or who were transitioned from 240 mg Q2W to 480 mg Q4W from March 1, 2018 to March 31, 2022 were selected for analysis from an electronic health record generated report. The primary endpoint evaluated was the incidence of irAEs. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of significant irAEs and reasons for treatment discontinuation. These endpoints were compared by univariate analysis between all three cohorts. A multivariate analysis was then conducted for the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Nivolumab 240 mg Q2W was associated with a statistically significant increase in the incidence of colitis whereas the 480 mg Q4W regimen was associated with a statistically significant increase in the incidence of pruritis. The incidence of irAEs was not different between the three cohorts, while the incidence of significant irAEs was higher in the 240 mg Q2W and 240 mg Q2W to 480 mg Q4W cohorts. CONCLUSION: Clinicians ought to be aware of differences in the irAE profiles between nivolumab regimens with differing dosing patterns.

Evaluation of biliary toxicity in patients with hepatic artery infusion pumps.

PURPOSE: Identify risk factors for biliary toxicity in patients with colorectal liver metastases who received floxuridine (FUDR) via a surgically implanted hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP). Describe the incidence of biliary toxicity and evaluate relevant patterns in the biliary toxicity cohort. METHODS: A single center, retrospective, case-control study included adult colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases who received at least one cycle of FUDR via a surgically implanted HAIP from 1 January 2017, to 1 October 2021. Patients were excluded if they had incomplete records, cholangiocarcinoma diagnosis, or received concurrent mitomycin and FUDR. Biliary toxicity criteria derived from existing HAIP literature were utilized to determine whether patients experienced biliary toxicity. Multiple variables were compared by univariate statistical analysis between the biliary toxicity and non-biliary toxicity cohorts to identify potential risk factors for development of FUDR-induced biliary toxicity. RESULTS: Out of 50 patients who had a HAIP implanted, 39 met the inclusion criteria. Five of the 39 patients (12.7%) included in the analysis met the pre-specified biliary toxicity criteria. No risk factors for biliary toxicity were identified. All five patients who developed biliary toxicity demonstrated elevations in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) prior to meeting the toxicity criteria. CONCLUSION: Biliary toxicity remains a significant and therapy-limiting consequence of FUDR administration. Rising ALP may be an early indicator of subsequent biliary toxicity. Future studies with more patients may identify risk factors that can facilitate risk mitigation strategies.

Use of CFTR modulators in special populations, part 1: Pregnancy and lactation.

Safety and efficacy data regarding cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator use in the setting of pregnancy or breastfeeding remains lacking due to exclusion from key trials and lack of multicenter prospective and retrospective studies in the post-CFTR modulator era. A scoping review of English articles from the period of January 1, 2012, to July 31, 2023, was conducted utilizing PubMed and EmBase databases with the following terms: "special population (pregnancy, lactation, breastfeeding)" AND "ivacaftor OR lumacaftor OR tezacaftor OR elexacaftor"; "cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator" AND "off label drug use." Search results were reviewed by title and abstract for duplications and relevance. Relative to pregnancy or breastfeeding, a total of 18 publications were included for review. Majority of case reports and surveys concluded maternal and infant health were preserved throughout gestation. Likewise, breastfeeding infant case reports show possible changes in liver function and lens opacities, though risk may be increased with both in-utero and breastfeeding exposure. Ivacaftor (IVA) and lumacaftor (LUM) concentrations in fetal cord blood and maternal blood were found to be equivalent. Yet, low concentrations of IVA and LUM were detectable in breastmilk and infant plasma. Current safety data surrounding CFTR modulator use in the setting of pregnancy and lactation is relatively reassuring; however, long-term safety remains unclear, necessitating ongoing observation, and reporting by care teams. As such, treatment decisions should be individualized and coproduced.

Use of CFTR modulators in special populations, part 2: Severe lung disease.

Safety and efficacy data surrounding cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) modulator administration for people with CF (pwCF) and severe lung disease elect has remained unclear as a result of exclusion from key trials. A scoping review of English language articles from the period of 1 January 2012, to 31 July 2023 was conducted utilizing PubMed and EmBase databases with the following terms: "severe lung disease" OR "advanced lung disease" AND "ivacaftor OR lumacaftor OR tezacaftor OR elexacaftor"; "cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator" AND "off label drug use." Search results were reviewed by title and abstract for relevance. Twenty articles specific to CFTR modulator use in the setting of severe lung disease were included for review, with few specific to pediatric-aged pwCF. PwCF and severe lung disease experienced significant improvement in pulmonary function, body weight, number of IV antibiotic days, and quality of life. A few studies reported a transient decline in pulmonary function among pwCF shortly after LUM/IVA initiation. However, preemptive reductions in the dose of LUM/IVA may mitigate this reaction. ELE/TEZ/IVA utilization in pwCF and severe lung disease appears to be devoid of the transient decline in pulmonary function observed with LUM/IVA while providing the same clinical benefit. Current available data regarding use of CFTR modulators in pwCF and severe lung disease is reassuring; however, there remains a lack data regarding outcomes among the pediatric population including long-term outcomes. Therefore, treatment decisions should be individualized and coproduced.

Use of CFTR modulators in special populations, part 3: Solid organ transplant.

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with cystic fibrosis (CF) may benefit from the pulmonary and extrapulmonary benefits associated with CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators. Nevertheless, evolution of modulator safety and efficacy data prompts consideration. METHODS: The search terms "transplant" AND "ivacaftor"(IVA) OR "lumacaftor"(LUM) OR "tezacaftor" (TEZ) OR "elexacaftor" (ELX) were utilized to conduct a scoping review of English articles from the period of January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2022. Search results from PubMed and Embase databases were reviewed by title and abstract for relevance. Included studies reported efficacy and safety outcomes of modulators in SOT recipients. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six patients from one cohort study (90 lung transplant recipients) and eight case reports and series (29 lung transplant recipients, 16 liver transplant recipients and one lung/liver transplant patient) were included. Post-modulator initiation, 33 patients did not necessitate tacrolimus dose adjustments, 10 required dose uptitration, and 43 required dose reductions. Moreover, LUM/IVA use with azole antifungals may lead to subtherapeutic levels but opposing effects sustained tacrolimus levels. Liver transplant recipients were more likely to experience elevations in transaminases requiring pharmacologic or medical interventions. Majority of patients experienced improvements in pulmonary function, fasting blood glucose, hemoglobin, body mass index, and rhinosinusitis symptoms. However, intolerance or lack of benefit prompted discontinuation of ELX/TEZ/IVA in over 40% of lung-transplant recipients in one study. CONCLUSION: Modulator therapy has been reported to produce pulmonary and extra-pulmonary benefits in the CF population with SOT. Considerations for modulator therapy initiation ought to include modulator pharmacokinetics, concomitant medications, and transplant type due to the complex nature of SOT recipients.

The Efficacy of Capsaicin on Sleep Quality and Fatigue in Fibromyalgia.

Capsaicin is a topical pain reliever that has been evaluated by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as a potential adjunctive therapy for treating unmitigated fibromyalgia. Therefore, a review of English articles using PubMed and Embase was conducted from January 1, 1990 to February 9, 2022 in order to evaluate the utility of capsaicin for improvement of sleep quality and fatigue associated with fibromyalgia. The search terms included: "fibromyalgia" and "capsaicin". Articles included were RCTs evaluating capsaicin in adult patients with fibromyalgia. Two studies met criteria and included 175 patients that received either capsaicin or placebo for an average total treatment length of 5 weeks. The treatment outcomes assessed were changes in quality of sleep and fatigue by several standardized modalities. These include visual analog scale (VAS) of sleep quality and fatigue, fatigue severity scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and global subjective improvement. Both studies demonstrated no changes in sleep quality, but one study did find a significant difference in global subjective improvement. This same study also found a significant improvement in fatigue. Consequently, this existing evidence is insufficient to warrant recommending capsaicin as adjunctive therapy for improvement in sleep quality and fatigue. Future studies regarding capsaicin therapy for fibromyalgia are needed.