Unrecognized cardiac arrests: A one-year review of audio from emergency medical dispatch calls.

OBJECTIVES: Immediate recognition of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) operators is crucial to facilitate timely initiation of telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) and to enable the appropriate level of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response. The goal of this study was to identify patterns that can increase EMD-level recognition of cardiac arrests prior to EMS arrival. METHODS: The Combined Communications Center in Alachua County, Florida provided audio recordings of all emergency calls from January 1, 2018 to November 16, 2018 dispatched as a chief complaint other than OHCA, but later identified as cardiac arrest. A multi-disciplinary medical team transcribed and analyzed the calls to determine common themes and trends. RESULTS: Out of an initial 81 calls meeting inclusion criteria, 69 were immediately recognized as OHCA by EMDs, leaving 12 calls of unrecognized OHCA. In 11 of 12 calls respiratory issues were described to EMD. In 10 of 12 calls the subject was described as unconscious, and in the other 2 calls, the subject lost consciousness during the call. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of recognition of OHCA by EMD occurred in most calls due to difficulty communicating the subject's respiratory status. Further emphasis should be placed on identifying non-viable respirations in unconscious patients in EMD training and algorithms to increase recognition of OHCA and initiation of T-CPR. A multi-year review of a comparable dataset from geographically and socioeconomically diverse regions in the United States can validate and expand these preliminary trends.

Cardiac arrest: An interdisciplinary scoping review of clinical literature from 2020.

Objectives: The Interdisciplinary Cardiac Arrest Research Review (ICARE) group was formed in 2018 to conduct an annual search of peer-reviewed literature relevant to cardiac arrest. Now in its third year, the goals of the review are to highlight annual updates in the interdisciplinary world of clinical cardiac arrest research with a focus on clinically relevant and impactful clinical and population-level studies from 2020. Methods: A search of PubMed using keywords related to clinical research in cardiac arrest was conducted. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance and sorted into 7 categories: Epidemiology & Public Health Initiatives; Prehospital Resuscitation, Technology & Care; In-Hospital Resuscitation & Post-Arrest Care; Prognostication & Outcomes; Pediatrics; Interdisciplinary Guidelines & Reviews; and a new section dedicated to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Screened manuscripts underwent standardized scoring of methodological quality and impact on the respective fields by reviewer teams lead by a subject matter expert editor. Articles scoring higher than 99 percentiles by category were selected for full critique. Systematic differences between editors' and reviewers' scores were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: A total of 3594 articles were identified on initial search; of these, 1026 were scored after screening for relevance and deduplication, and 51 underwent full critique. The leading category was Prehospital Resuscitation, Technology & Care representing 35% (18/51) of fully reviewed articles. Four COVID-19 related articles were included for formal review that was attributed to a relative lack of high-quality data concerning cardiac arrest and COVID-19 specifically by the end of the 2020 calendar year. No significant differences between editor and reviewer scoring were found among review articles (P = 0.697). Among original research articles, section editors scored a median 1 point (interquartile range, 0-3; P < 0.01) less than reviewers. Conclusions: Several clinically relevant studies have added to the evidence base for the management of cardiac arrest patients including methods for prognostication of neurologic outcome following arrest, airway management strategy, timing of coronary intervention, and methods to improve expeditious performance of key components of resuscitation such as chest compressions in adults and children.

Ultra-early serum concentrations of neuronal and astroglial biomarkers predict poor neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-a pilot neuroprognostic study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess ultra-early neuroprognostic significance of GFAP, NF-L, UCH-L1, tau, and S100B concentrations, change trajectory, and combination profile after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA). METHODS: Prospective enrollment of 22 OHCA and 10 control patients at an academic tertiary care center between May 1, 2017 and January 28, 2020. Blood was collected within one hour of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (H0), at hours 6 (H6), 12, 18, 24, and daily or until discharge or death. Biomarker concentrations, multifactor score, and trajectory change were assessed and compared to final neurologic status (good vs poor Cerebral Performance Category; CPC 1-2 vs CPC 3-5, respectively). RESULTS: 10 patients had good and 12 had poor neurologic outcomes. Poor outcome patients had higher biomarker concentrations and combined biomarker scores at early time points. The earliest significant difference between good and poor outcome patients' serum biomarkers were at H12 for GFAP (good median: 425 pg/mL [IQR:370-630] vs poor: 5954[1712-65,055] pg/mL; p < 0.001), H12 for NF-L (64[41-69] vs 898[348-1990] pg/mL; p < 0.001), H0 for Tau (31[8-51] vs 124[53-238] pg/mL; p = 0.025), H0 for UCH-L1 (898[375-1600] vs 2475[1898-4098] pg/mL; p = 0.008), and H6 for S100B (123[70-290] vs 895[360-1199] pg/mL; p = 0.002). Four biomarker composite scores differed by H12 (78.03[52.03-111.25] vs 749 [198.46-4870.63] pg/mL; p = 0.003). Machine-learning approach also identified that four-marker score trajectory group memberships are in concordance with patient outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-early serial serum concentrations of neuronal and astroglial biomarkers may be of neuroprognostic significance following OHCA.