Efficacy of ruxolitinib in the treatment of relapsed/refractory large granular lymphocytic leukaemia.

Large granular lymphocytic (LGL) leukaemia is a rare chronic lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by an expansion of cytotoxic T or NK cells. Despite a usually indolent evolution, most patients will require a treatment over the course of the disease because of cytopenia or symptomatic associated autoimmune disorders. First-line treatment is based on immunosuppressive agents, namely cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and ciclosporin. However, relapses are frequent, and there is no consensus on the management of relapsed/refractory patients. The implication of the JAK/STAT pathway in the pathogenesis of this disease has prompted our group to propose treatment with ruxolitinib. A series of 21 patients who received this regimen is reported here. Ten patients (47.6%) were refractory to the three main immunosuppressive drugs at the time of ruxolitinib initiation. Ruxolitinib yielded an overall response rate of 86% (n = 18/21), including 3 complete responses and 15 partial responses. With a median follow-up of 9 months, the median response duration was 4 months. One-year event-free survival and 1-year overall survival were 57% and 83% respectively. Mild side effects were observed. Biological parameters, notably neutropenia and anaemia, improved significantly, and complete molecular responses were evidenced. This study supports ruxolitinib as a valid option for the treatment of relapsed/refractory LGL leukaemia.

Hypercalcemia is associated with a poor prognosis in lymphoma a retrospective monocentric matched-control study and extensive review of published reported cases.

The prognostic significance of hypercalcemia in lymphoma has only been studied on small series to date. We conducted a retrospective, monocentric, matched-control study that aimed to compare the outcome of patients diagnosed with any histological subtype of lymphoma associated with hypercalcemia, at diagnosis or relapse, with a group of controls matched for histological and prognostic factors. Sixty-two and 118 comparable patients treated between 2000 and 2016 were included in hypercalcemia and control cohorts, respectively. Hypercalcemia was found mainly at diagnosis (71%) in higher-risk patients (prognosis scores ≥ 3, 76%) and those with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (67.7%), stage III/IV disease (91.9%), and elevated LDH (90.3%). Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) was shorter in the hypercalcemia than control cohort [30.1% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 18.3-41.9) vs 63.9% (95% CI 5.1-72.7), p < 0.001]. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 40.6% (95% CI 28.1-53.1) and 77.7% (95% CI 70.1-85.3) in the hypercalcemia and control cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). Hypercalcemia was independently associated with poor PFS [HR = 2.5 (95% CI 1.4-3.5)] and OS [HR = 4.7 (95% CI 2.8-7.8)] in multivariate analysis. Among the 40 patients who received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), hypercalcemia was still associated with shorter OS [2-year OS: 65% (95% CI 40.1-89.9) vs 88.0 (95% CI 75.3-100), p = 0.04]. Hypercalcemia may be associated with chemo-resistance, given its impact on PFS and OS. Hence, these data suggest that alternate strategies for lymphoma patients with hypercalcemia should be developed.

Characteristics, combinations, treatments, and survival of second primary hematological neoplasm: a retrospective single-center cohort of 49 patients (Hemo2study).

The coexistence of dual hematological neoplasms is very rare. Sequential or synchronous neoplasms in hematology are an uncommon and complex clinical situation. The aim of the Hemo2 study was to describe the clinical characteristics and analyze the outcome of these patients. We performed a retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with sequential or synchronous hematological malignancies in the university hospital of Tours, between 2007 and 2018. We identified 49 patients in our study, with a prevalence of 0.89%. Sequential and synchronous combinations were found in 36 (73%) and 13 (27%) patients, respectively. One patient presented three sequential neoplasms. The median cumulative incidence was 6 years (95% CI 3-7). Among all neoplasms diagnosed (n = 99), we found 79 lymphoid neoplasms (LNs) (80%) and 20 myeloid neoplasms (MNs) (20%). Sex ratio was 1.88 with 65% of males and 35% of females. The most common LNs were Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 16; 16%) and multiple myeloma (n = 11; 11%). The most frequent MN was essential thrombocythemia (n = 5; 5%). The most common combination was Hodgkin lymphoma and follicular lymphoma in five (10%) patients. The overall survival from the first diagnosis (OS1) at 5 years was 82.4% (95% CI 72.1-94.3). The median overall survival from the second diagnosis (OS2) was 98 months (95% CI 44-NR) and 5-year OS2 was 58.7% (95% CI 45.5-75.7). Median progression-free survival from the second diagnosis (PFS) was 47 months (95% CI 27-NR) with 5-year PFS of 49% (95% CI 35.9-67). OS and PFS did not statistically differ between synchronous and sequential dual neoplasms. In this cohort, that the death relative risk (RR) was significantly lower if the second neoplasm appeared after more than 4 years following the first diagnosis (OR 0.37 (95% CI 0.16-0.90)). The Hemo2study confirmed the rarity of dual hematological neoplasms. In this cohort, HL and FL were the most frequent combinations. Our results may support that synchronous and sequential dual neoplasms bear the same prognosis. Further studies are needed to better characterize these uncommon clinical situations.

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura prognosis is affected by blood pressure.

Background: The prevalence, prognostic role, and diagnostic value of blood pressure in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) and other thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) remain unclear. Methods: Using a national cohort of iTTP (n = 368), Shigatoxin-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome (n = 86), atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (n = 84), and hypertension-related thrombotic microangiopathy (n = 25), we sought to compare the cohort's blood pressure profile to assess its impact on prognosis and diagnostic performances. Results: Patients with iTTP had lower blood pressure than patients with other TMAs, systolic (130 [interquartile range (IQR) 118-143] vs 161 [IQR 142-180] mmHg) and diastolic (76 [IQR 69-83] vs 92 [IQR 79-105] mmHg, both p < 0.001). The best threshold for iTTP diagnosis corresponded to a systolic blood pressure <150 mmHg. iTTP patients presenting with hypertension had a significantly poorer survival (hazard ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.04), and this effect remained significant after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio = 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.30). Addition of a blood pressure criterion modestly improved the French clinical score to predict a severe A disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 deficiency in patients with an intermediate score (i.e., either platelet count <30 × 109/L or serum creatinine <200 µM). Conclusions: Elevated blood pressure at admission affects the prognosis of iTTP patients and may help discriminate them from other TMA patients. Particular attention should be paid to blood pressure and its management in these patients.