Angiographic challenges of spinal dural and epidural arteriovenous fistulas: report on 45 cases.

PURPOSE: The localization of the fistula level in spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) and epidural arteriovenous fistulas (edAVFs) remains a diagnostic challenge. METHODS: Consecutive patients with spinal dAVFs and edAVFs in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral regions were included. The primary endpoint was to describe the characteristics of patients who required angiography with multiple catheterizations of segmental arteries (10 or more). RESULTS: Forty-five patients (median age 69 years; male 89%; dAVFs, n = 31; edAVFs, n = 14) were included. Spinal dAVFs commonly developed in the thoracic region and edAVFs in the lumbosacral region. Fistulas were predicted at the correct level or plus/minus 2 level in less invasive examinations using multi-detector CT angiography (n = 28/36, 78%) and/or contrast-enhanced MR angiography (n = 9/14, 64%). We encountered diagnostic challenges in the localization of fistulas in 6 patients. They underwent angiography a median of 2 times. In each patient, spinal levels were examined at a median of 25 levels with a median radiation exposure of 3971 mGy and 257 ml of contrast. Fistulas were finally localized at the high thoracic region (T4-6) in 3 patients, the sacral region (S1-2) in 2, and the lumbar region (L3) in 1. Four patients were diagnosed with edAVFs and 2 with dAVFs. The correlation coefficient between the fistula level and the rostral end of the intramedullary T2 high-signal intensity on MRI was interpreted as none. CONCLUSION: In patients in whom less invasive examinations failed for fistula localization, high thoracic or sacral AVFs need to be considered.

Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome After a Burr Hole Drainage Surgery for Chronic Subdural Hematoma.

BACKGROUND: Although chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has a good prognosis after classical minimally-invasive drainage surgery, severe complications still occur at a substantial rate. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS), which is a common severe complication after carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting for cervical carotid artery stenosis, is rare after drainage surgery for a CSDH. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe the case of an 82-year-old woman who presented with ipsilesional symptoms including contralateral hemiparesis and dysarthria, progressively worsening consciousness, and status epilepticus after a burr hole drainage surgery for CSDH. Magnetic resonance fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging showed diffuse subcortical low intensity in the ipsilesional hemisphere almost simultaneously with the appearance of the symptoms. Arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance perfusion imaging showed the abnormal increase of cerebral blood flow in the hemisphere. Continuous propofol administration and blood pressure management improved the symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: CHS can cause severe postoperative complications after drainage surgery for CSDH. Subcortical low-intensity fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging is a useful investigation for early detection of CHS in CSDH, and arterial spin labeling imaging is an effective minimally-invasive modality for confirming the diagnosis.