Bedside Live-View Capsule Endoscopy in Evaluation of Overt Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Pilot Point-of-Care Study.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is an emerging tool in the diagnosis and management of occult bleeding and overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OOGIB). Maximizing the efficiency of CE can lead to rapid bleeding localization and shorter time to therapy. We investigated whether a trained registered nurse (RN) can accurately interpret bleeding by observing the CE findings in real time by measuring inter-observer agreement between RN and physician interpretation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of patients admitted for OOGIB who underwent live-view capsule endoscopy (LVCE) between December 2016 and November 2017. A matched control group who underwent standard CE was obtained through retrospective review. An RN received a 2-day training program for CE interpretation. RN bedside interpretation for bleeding was followed by interpretation by 2 gastrointestinal physicians blinded to LVCE findings. Outcomes were compared between groups using t-tests and χ2 tests. Cohen's kappa measured the agreement between the physicians and the RN. RESULTS: Ten subjects were in the LVCE group, and 12 subjects were in the standard-of-care group. The agreement between the physicians and the RN was 9/10 (90%), with a kappa of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.26-1.00; p = 0.016). Patients in the LVCE group had shorter duration to physician interpretation (0.6 vs. 0.7 days [p = 0.50]), shorter duration to endoscopy (1.8 days vs. 3 days [p = 0.240]), and shorter length of stay (8.1 vs. 11.4 days [p = 0.26]) compared to the standard-of-care group. CONCLUSION: This study utilizing an RN for LVCE interpretation found inter-observer agreement between RN and physician findings. Larger studies are needed to assess whether this RN-physician team approach can translate to improved outcomes.

Providing Hospitalized Patients With an Educational Booklet Increases the Quality of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Inadequate bowel preparation is a problem frequently encountered by gastroenterologists who perform colonoscopies on hospitalized patients. A method is needed to increase the quality of bowel preparation in inpatients. An educational booklet has been shown to increase the overall quality of bowel preparation for outpatients. We performed a prospective study to evaluate the effects of an educational booklet on the quality of bowel preparation in a group of hospitalized patients. METHODS: We performed a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial of all inpatients at a tertiary care medical center scheduled for inpatient colonoscopy from October 2013 through March 2014. They were randomly assigned to groups that were (n = 45) or were not (controls, n = 40) given the booklet before bowel preparation the evening before their colonoscopy. All patients received a standard bowel preparation (clear liquid diet the day before the procedure, followed by split-dose GoLYTELY). At the colonoscopy, the Boston Bowel preparation scale (BBPS) was used to assess bowel preparation. The primary outcome measure was adequate bowel preparation (a total BBPS score ≥6 with all segment scores ≥2). Secondary outcomes assessed included total BBPS score, BBPS segment score, and a total BBPS score of 0. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in age, race, sex, body mass index, history of colonoscopy, history of polyps, or time of colonoscopy. Twenty-eight patients who received the booklet (62%) and 14 who did not (35%) had an adequate bowel preparation (P = .012). The number needed to treat to attain adequate bowel preparation was 4. After adjusting for age and history of prior colonoscopies, the odds of achieving an adequate bowel preparation and a higher total BBPS score after receipt of the booklet were 3.14 (95% confidence interval, 1.29-7.83) and 2.27 (95% confidence interval, 1.05-4.88), respectively. Three patients in the booklet group and 9 in the no-booklet group had a BBPS score of 0 (P = .036). The mean BBPS segment score was greater for the booklet group than the no-booklet group (right colon, P = .097; transverse colon, P = .023; left colon, P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled trial, we found that providing hospitalized patients with an educational booklet on colonoscopy preparation increases the odds of a quality bowel preparation more than 2-fold.

Setting the stage: Surgery patients' expectations for greetings during routine office visits.

BACKGROUND: The need for surgeons to exhibit adequate communication skills is paramount to providing exemplary patient care. The manner in which patients are greeted by their surgeon sets the stage for the remainder of the clinical encounter. This study examined patients' expectations for greetings upon meeting a surgeon for the first time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A convenience sample of 152 English-speaking patients (> or =21 y of age) attending a university-based vascular surgery clinic were recruited to participate in this study. Eligible patients were interviewed prior to their consultation using valid and reliable questionnaires to obtain data about sociodemographic characteristics and expectations for greetings upon meeting a surgeon for the first time. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 61.4 +/- 14.6 approximately half (n = 81;54.3%) were male, and most were Caucasian (n = 148; 97.4%). Most (n = 132; 86.8%) patients wanted the surgeon to shake their hand, 113 (74.3%) wanted their first name to be used when a surgeon greets them, and 86 (56.6%) wanted a surgeon to introduce him/herself using his/her last name. Patients also desired for surgeons to be attentive/calm and make patient feel like a priority, adjust vocabulary and/or explain better, and be friendly, personable, polite, respectful, and/or courteous. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should shake hands, use patients' first names, and introduce themselves using their last names when greeting patients for the first time. They should also be pleasant, personable, and make the patient feel like a priority. Additionally, surgeons should be cognizant of the way in which they present information to patients and verify understanding.

Development and validation of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Vascular Surgery (REAL_VS).

The purposes of this study were to develop and validate the (1) Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Vascular Surgery (REAL_VS) for researchers studying the impact of literacy skills as related to vascular surgery-related knowledge and outcomes and (2) short version of the REAL_VS (REAL_VSs) to allow clinicians to gauge their patients' familiarity with vascular surgery-related terms. A three-phase process was used to identify potential words for inclusion in the REAL_VS, including reviewing Internet-based patient education material content and listening to a random sample of 50 archived audiorecordings of vascular surgeon-patient encounters. The REAL_VS was composed of 75 terms (e.g., stent, gangrene, invasive, aneurysm) of varying pronunciation difficulty. One hundred fifty-two English-speaking patients (>or=18 years of age) attending a university-based vascular surgery clinic were recruited to participate in this study (mean age = 61.4 +/- 14.6 years). During face-to-face interviews, patients' sociodemographic information was collected, and patients were administered the widely used Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) and REAL_VS. Mean scores on the REALM (56.9 +/- 14.0) and REAL_VS (63.3 +/- 15.6) were highly correlated (Spearmans rank correlation [rho] = 0.91; p < 0.00). Internal consistency of the REAL_VS (Cronbachs alpha = 0.98) was excellent. Mean scores on the REAL_VSs (4.1 +/- 2.7) were highly correlated with both the REALM (rho = 0.82; p < 0.00) and REAL_VS (rho = 0.94; p < 0.00). Internal consistency, measured using Cronbachs alpha, of the REAL_VSs was 0.86. This study demonstrates that both the REAL_VS and REAL_VSs are both promising tools for use in vascular surgery research and clinical practice, respectively.

Direct Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy for the Management of Gastroparesis in Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Providing meaningful nutrition in cases of refractory hyperemesis during pregnancy can be challenging; although intragastric enteral nutrition is the most common approach, it is contraindicated in certain cases and carries the risk of increased nausea and vomiting. CASE: A 36-year-old primigravid woman with a history of gastroparesis presented at 16 weeks of gestation with nausea and vomiting. With no improvement with conventional approaches and signs of malnutrition, a direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy was placed. Her nutritional status improved, and the pregnancy ended in the delivery of a healthy neonate. CONCLUSION: Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy in pregnancy is an option in patients in whom intragastric feeding is contraindicated and may offer a more secure approach than percutaneous gastrojejunostomy.