Use of Self-Efficacy Scale in Mass Casualty Incidents During Drill Exercises.

INTRODUCTION: Medical First Responders (MFRs) in the emergency department SUMMA 112 are tasked with handling the initial management of Mass Casualty Incidents (MCI) and building response capabilities. Training plays a crucial role in preparing these responders for effective disaster management. Yet, evaluating the impact of such training poses challenges since true competency can only be proven amid a major event. As a substitute gauge for training effectiveness, self-efficacy has been suggested. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to employ a pre- and post-test assessment of changes in perceived self-efficacy among MFRs following an intervention focused on the initial management of MCI. It also aimed to evaluate a self-efficacy instrument for its validity and reliability in this type of training. METHOD: In this study, we used a pretest (time 1 = T1) - post-test (time 2 = T2) design to evaluate how self-efficacy changed after a training intervention with 201 MFRs in initial MCI management. ANOVA within-subjects and between subjects analyses were used. RESULTS: The findings reveal a noteworthy change in self-efficacy before and after training among the 201 participants. This suggests that the training intervention positively affected participants' perceived capabilities to handle complex situations like MCI. CONCLUSION: The results allow us to recommend a training program with theory components together with practical workshops and live, large-scale simulation exercises for the training of medical first responders in MCI, as it significantly increases their perception of the level of self-efficacy for developing competencies associated with disaster response.

Extended reality training for mass casualty incidents: a systematic review on effectiveness and experience of medical first responders.

INTRODUCTION: Mass casualty incidents (MCI) are unforeseeable and complex events that occur worldwide, therefore enhancing the training that medical first responders (MFRs) receive is fundamental to strengthening disaster preparedness and response. In recent years, extended reality (XR) technology has been introduced as a new approach and promising teaching technique for disaster medicine education. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of XR simulation as a tool to train MFRs in MCIs, and to explore the perception and experience of participants to these new forms of training. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the "Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses" (PRISMA) statement. Four databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and LILACs) using a comprehensive search strategy to identify relevant articles, and MetaQAT was used as a study quality assessment tool. Data from included studies was not pooled for meta-analysis due to heterogeneity. Extracted data was synthesised in a narrative, semi-quantitative manner. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies were included from 8 different countries. Studies encompassed a variety of participants (e.g., nurses, paramedics, physicians), interventions (virtual, mixed and augmented reality), comparators (comparison between two groups and single groups with pre-post evaluation), and outcomes (effectiveness and MFR perception). The synthesis of data indicated that XR was an effective tool for prehospital MCI training by means of improved triage accuracy, triage time, treatment accuracy, performance correctness and/or knowledge acquired. These XR systems were well perceived by MFRs, who expressed their interest and satisfaction towards this learning experience and emphasized its usefulness and relevance. CONCLUSION: This research supports the usefulness and significance of XR technology that allows users to enhance their skills and confidence when facing forthcoming disasters. The findings summarize recommendations and suggestions for the implementation, upgrade and/or assessment of this novel and valuable teaching method.

Extended reality as a training method for medical first responders in mass casualty incidents: A protocol for a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Mass-casualty incidents (MCIs) and disasters require an organised and effective response from medical first responders (MFRs). As such, novel training methods have emerged to prepare and adequately train MFRs for these challenging situations. Particular focus should be placed on extended reality (XR), which encompasses virtual, augmented and mixed reality (VR, AR, and MR, respectively), and allows participants to develop high-quality skills in realistic and immersive environments. Given the rapid evolution of high-fidelity simulation technology and its advantages, XR simulation has become a promising tool for emergency medicine. Accordingly, this systematic review aims to: 1) evaluate the effectiveness of XR training methods and 2) explore the experience of MFRs undergoing such training. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy will encompass four distinct themes: MFRs, disasters/MCIs, education and simulation, and XR. Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and LILACs) will be searched along with an in-depth examination of the grey literature and reference lists of relevant articles. MetaQAT will be used as a study quality assessment tool and integrated into Covidence as part of the data extraction form. Given the predicted high heterogeneity between studies, it may not be possible to standardise data for quantitative comparison and meta-analysis. Thus, data will be synthesised in a narrative, semi-quantitative manner. DISCUSSION: This review will examine the existing literature on the effectiveness of XR simulation as a tool to train MFRs for MCIs, which could ultimately improve preparedness and response to disasters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Protocol registration: PROSPERO CRD42021275692.

Identifying archetypal cannabis consumers to inform drug policy design: a Q-sort assessment of young adults' attitudes in Mexico City's metropolitan area.

BACKGROUND: As the legalization of cannabis moves forward in many countries, it is important to highlight the potential harm that excessive use can cause on young consumers. Crafting effective policy interventions to reduce the harm stemming from excessive use requires an understanding of the attitudes and motivations of young consumers. METHODS: This article uses Q methodology to study four aspects of cannabis use among young adults from Mexico City's metropolitan area: motivations for use, perceived consequences of use, reasons that would increase willingness to reduce consumption, and attitudes towards government regulation. A total of 110 cannabis users between 18 and 21 years old were recruited using chain-referral sampling. Using a Q methodology, we captured the relative importance that participants assigned to a series of statements and identified archetypal profiles of young adults who use cannabis for each of the four aspects mentioned above. RESULTS: The sample for this research study included 76 men and 34 women. The average age of participants was 20 years old, and the average age when cannabis consumption started was 15 years old. For each of the four Q-sort factor analyses, we identified 4 distinct factors based on explained variance and interpretability. The Q factor analysis indicated that attenuation of a negative affect (i.e., anxiety, stress) and relaxation were primary motivations for cannabis use. Understood consequences of cannabis use ranged across aspect-archetype, reflecting legal (i.e., interacting with law enforcement), financial, familial (i.e., disappointing family members), and educational performance concerns. Participants indicated that finding alternative relaxation strategies, receiving credible evidence of the health harms of cannabis use, increased financial burden of purchasing, and increased inaccessibility of cannabis products would motivate reductions in use. Across archetypes, participants indicated a willingness to comply with cannabis policies which are simple and easy to understand, which do not lead to discrimination or law enforcement involvement, and which provide for legal places to purchase and use safe (i.e., free of adulterants) cannabis products. CONCLUSIONS: We posit that these archetypes could be useful to inform cannabis policy design. As the study reveals, participants' cannabis use was primarily motivated by perceived improvements to mental health. Furthermore, participant responses indicated that they viewed cannabis use as a health matter, not a criminal one. Policies which aim to promote alternative mental health wellness and relaxation mechanisms, which aim to improve communication of potential health harms of cannabis, and which allow for the safe and legal purchase and use of cannabis may be effective in reducing cannabis-associated harms. Though our findings shed light on important aspects of cannabis users' attitudes and perspectives, the sample size does not allow for a generalization of the findings and the drawing of conclusions about the population under scrutiny. Further research should consider the application of the Q methodology used in this article to a larger and more representative sample of cannabis users.

[Effect of statin treatment begun early after acute myocardial infarction on endothelial function in patients with normal levels of cholesterol. VAATOPE Study (VAlue of ATOrvastatin in Postinfarction Endothelium)]. / Influencia del tratamiento temprano con estatinas en la función endotelial tras el infarto de miocardio en pacientes con valores normales de colesterol. Estudio VAATOPE (VAlue of ATOrvastatin in Postinfarction Endothelium).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have suggested that statins reduce the rate of subsequent coronary events when these drugs are indicated early alter an acute coronary event. One potential mechanism by which these drugs might reduce the likelihood of such events is by enhancing endothelial function. The aim of this study was to determine whether early cholesterol reduction with atorvastatin improved endothelial function after acute myocardial infarction in patients with normal cholesterol levels. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Patients with a first acute myocardial infarction and normal levels of cholesterol were assigned to treatment with 10 mg atorvastatin (n = 15) or placebo (n = 15) for 8 weeks. Patients who had previously received treatment with statins were excluded. Brachial ultrasound was used to measure endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation and response to endothelium-independent nitroglycerin. Total and LDL cholesterol levels and the distribution of risk factors were similar on admission and before randomization in both groups. All patients were assessed between 5 and 7 days postinfarction and after 8 weeks. RESULTS: Total and LDL cholesterol levels were significantly decreased after atorvastatin treatment. Total cholesterol decreased by 11% (p < 0.01) and LDL cholesterol by 18% (p < 0.01). Without atorvastatin flow-mediated dilation was unchanged (mean [SEM] 9.3 [1.7%] to 10.6 [1.7%]) but it increased with atorvastatin (8.9 [1.4%] to 16.5 [1.7%], p < 0.05). The response to nitroglycerin was similar in both groups during the period of study. CONCLUSIONS: The early administration of atorvastatin appears to enhance endothelial function in patients with acute myocardial infarction and normal levels of cholesterol.