Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Healthc Manage Forum ; 25(1): 26-31, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22619877

RESUMEN

We describe an emergency department process using Advanced Care Paramedics in the management of patients identified as ambulatory and low acuity, or those able to be managed without an emergency nurse. Patients streamed in this way had shorter stays than other emergency patients, without affecting the care of the latter. The process was associated with improved patient flow indicators in spite of an increased patient burden.


Asunto(s)
Auxiliares de Urgencia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Atención al Paciente , Humanos , Rol Profesional
2.
CJEM ; 21(2): 235-242, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29759099

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: At the QEII Health Sciences Centre Emergency Department (ED) in Halifax, Nova Scotia, advanced care paramedics (ACPs) perform procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for many indications, including orthopedic procedures. We have begun using ACPs as sedationists for emergent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy. This study compares ACP-performed ED PSA for UGI endoscopy and orthopedic procedures in terms of adverse events, airway intervention, vasopressor requirement, and PSA medication use. METHODS: A data set was built from an ED PSA quality control database matching 61 UGI endoscopy PSAs to 183 orthopedic PSAs by propensity scores calculated using age, gender, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. Outcomes assessed were hypotension (systolic BP30 sec), vomiting, arrhythmias, death, airway intervention, vasopressor requirement, and PSA medication use. RESULTS: UGI endoscopy patients experienced hypotension more frequently than orthopedic patients (OR=4.11, CI: 2.05-8.22) and required airway repositioning less often (OR=0.24, CI: 0.10-0.59). They received ketamine more frequently (OR=15.7, CI: 4.75-67.7) and fentanyl less often (OR=0.30, CI: 0.15-0.63) than orthopedic patients. Four endoscopy patients received phenylephrine, and one required intubation. No patient died in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In ACP-led sedation for UGI endoscopy and orthopedic procedures, adverse events were rare with the notable exception of hypotension, which was more frequent in the endoscopy group. Only endoscopy patients required vasopressor treatment and intubation. We provide preliminary evidence that ACPs can manage ED PSA for emergent UGI endoscopy, although priorities must shift from pain control to hemodynamic optimization.


Asunto(s)
Técnicos Medios en Salud , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hipotensión/epidemiología , Hipoxia/epidemiología , Intubación Intratraqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Fenilefrina/administración & dosificación , Propofol/uso terapéutico , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA