Safety and Efficacy of Warfarin Therapy in Kawasaki Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety and efficacy of warfarin for patients with Kawasaki disease and giant coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs, ≥8 mm). Giant aneurysms are managed with combined anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapies, heightening risk of bleeding complications. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed the time in therapeutic range; percentage of international normalization ratios (INRs) in range (%); bleeding events, clotting events; INRs ≥6; INRs ≥5 and <6; and INRs <1.5. RESULTS: In 9 patients (5 male), median age 14.4 years (range 7.1-22.8 years), INR testing was prescribed weekly to monthly and was done by home monitor (n = 5) or laboratory (n = 3) or combined (1). Median length of warfarin therapy was 7.2 years (2.3-13.3 years). Goal INR was 2.0-3.0 (n = 6) or 2.5-3.5 (n = 3), based on CAA size and history of CAA thrombosis. All patients were treated with aspirin; 1 was on dual antiplatelet therapy and warfarin. The median time in therapeutic range was 59% (37%-85%), and median percentage of INRs in range was 68% (52%-87%). INR >6 occurred in 3 patients (4 events); INRs ≥5 <6 in 7 patients (12 events); and INR <1.5 in 5 patients (28 events). The incidence of major bleeding events and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events were each 4.3 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 0.9-12.6). New asymptomatic coronary thrombosis was detected by imaging in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding and clotting complications are common in patients with Kawasaki disease on warfarin and aspirin, with INRs in range only two-thirds of the time. Future studies should evaluate the use of direct oral anticoagulants in children as an alternative to warfarin.

Low molecular weight heparin as an anticoagulation strategy for left-sided ablation procedures.

OBJECTIVE: This quality improvement study was implemented to demonstrate consistent and reliable post procedure anticoagulation for patients undergoing left-sided ablations. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation practice during a transition from anticoagulation with overnight infusion of unfractionated heparin to a single subcutaneous injection of low molecular weight heparin. METHODS: Outcomes for patients who received unfractionated heparin from January 2014 to October 2014, were compared with outcomes of patients who received low molecular weight heparin from October 2014 to October 2015. Complications prepractice and postpractice change were documented and compared to establish confidence in the practice change and confirm the safety of the anticoagulation therapy management. RESULTS: There were no differences in the type or frequency of complications/adverse events demonstrated between the patients who had received unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation prophylaxis and those who received low molecular weight heparin. No thromboembolic events were reported or documented with either anticoagulation strategy. After confidence in the safety and efficacy of the practice change was established, a decision was made to discharge patients home the same day as there procedure, effectively reducing inpatient bed days and overall costs. CONCLUSION: Administration of low molecular weight heparin provides predictable anticoagulation and equally safe as unfractionated heparin when administered to patients post left-sided ablation. A secondary gain has been reduction of procedural costs by elimination of the previously required inpatient observation stay.