Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 4, 2024 01 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38167516

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Group A Streptococcus is responsible for severe and potentially lethal invasive conditions requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, such as streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome (STSS). A rebound of invasive group A streptococcal (iGAS) infection after COVID-19-associated barrier measures has been observed in children. Several intensivists of French adult ICUs have reported similar bedside impressions without objective data. We aimed to compare the incidence of iGAS infection before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, describe iGAS patients' characteristics, and determine ICU mortality associated factors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study in 37 French ICUs, including all patients admitted for iGAS infections for two periods: two years before period (October 2018 to March 2019 and October 2019 to March 2020) and a one-year after period (October 2022 to March 2023) COVID-19 pandemic. iGAS infection was defined by Group A Streptococcus isolation from a normally sterile site. iGAS infections were identified using the International Classification of Diseases and confirmed with each center's microbiology laboratory databases. The incidence of iGAS infections was expressed in case rate. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-two patients were admitted to ICU for iGAS infections: 73 before and 149 after COVID-19 pandemic. Their case rate during the period before and after COVID-19 pandemic was 205 and 949/100,000 ICU admissions, respectively (p < 0.001), with more frequent STSS after the COVID-19 pandemic (61% vs. 45%, p = 0.015). iGAS patients (n = 222) had a median SOFA score of 8 (5-13), invasive mechanical ventilation and norepinephrine in 61% and 74% of patients. ICU mortality in iGAS patients was 19% (14% before and 22% after COVID-19 pandemic; p = 0.135). In multivariate analysis, invasive mechanical ventilation (OR = 6.08 (1.71-21.60), p = 0.005), STSS (OR = 5.75 (1.71-19.22), p = 0.005), acute kidney injury (OR = 4.85 (1.05-22.42), p = 0.043), immunosuppression (OR = 4.02 (1.03-15.59), p = 0.044), and diabetes (OR = 3.92 (1.42-10.79), p = 0.008) were significantly associated with ICU mortality. CONCLUSION: The incidence of iGAS infections requiring ICU admission increased by 4 to 5 after the COVID-19 pandemic. After the COVID-19 pandemic, the rate of STSS was higher, with no significant increase in ICU mortality rate.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Choque Séptico , Infecciones Estreptocócicas , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Streptococcus pyogenes , Choque Séptico/epidemiología
2.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(6): 104435, 2024 Aug 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226772

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) is a progressive condition that can cause dysphagia and aspiration. Endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy (ECPM) is the gold standard treatment for ZD, but there are various techniques available. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the ultrasonic harmonic scalpel (UHS) versus the CO2 laser (CO2L) for ECPM in ZD. DESIGN: We led an observational study. The main composite outcome consisted in persistence of postoperative dysphagia OR recurrence/reoperation of symptomatic ZD within two years postoperatively. Surgery was considered effective when no dysphagia within two years postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of acute mediastinitis within 72 h postoperatively. A propensity score was built to adjust for differences observed between non-randomized groups. Additional sensitivity analyses were performed. SETTING: All patients with ECPM surgery for ZD were included from 2011 to 2018 in a single tertiary center. Patients with failure of endoscopic exposition were excluded. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 86 patients who underwent ECPM with either the CO2L (n = 53) or UHS (n = 33) technique. ZD size and other demographic variables were comparable between the groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: UHS had superior efficacy compared to CO2L (relative risk of failure = 0.29; 95 % confidence interval: 0.05-1.0; p = 0.05), but there was a higher incidence of mediastinitis in the UHS group (12 % vs. 4 %), although this was not statistically significant. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The UHS technique appears to be an effective technique for ECPM in ZD patients but its safety remains to explore by further larger studies.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA