CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR versus Invasive FFR for Hemodynamic Relevance of Coronary Artery Disease.

Background CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging enhance the specificity of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for ruling out coronary artery disease (CAD). However, evidence on comparative diagnostic value remains scarce. Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA plus CT-FFR, CCTA plus CT perfusion, and sequential CCTA plus CT-FFR and CT perfusion for detecting hemodynamically relevant CAD with that of invasive angiography. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis of a prospective study included patients with chest pain referred for invasive coronary angiography at nine centers from July 2016 to September 2019. CCTA and CT perfusion were performed with third-generation dual-source CT scanners. CT-FFR was assessed on-site. Independent core laboratories analyzed CCTA alone, CCTA plus CT perfusion, CCTA plus CT-FFR, and a sequential approach involving CCTA plus CT-FFR and CT perfusion for the presence of hemodynamically relevant stenosis. Invasive coronary angiography with invasive fractional flow reserve was the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy metrics and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were compared with the Sign test and DeLong test. Results Of the 105 participants (mean age, 64 years ± 8 [SD]; 68 male), 49 (47%) had hemodynamically relevant stenoses at invasive coronary angiography. CCTA plus CT-FFR and CCTA plus CT perfusion showed no evidence of a difference for participant-based sensitivities (90% vs 90%, P > .99), specificities (77% vs 79%, P > .99) and vessel-based AUCs (0.84 [95% CI: 0.77, 0.91] vs 0.83 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.91], P = .90). Both had higher participant-based specificity than CCTA alone (54%, both P < .001) without evidence of a difference in sensitivity between CCTA (94%) and CCTA plus CT perfusion (P = .50) or CCTA plus CT-FFR (P = .63). The sequential approach combining CCTA plus CT-FFR with CT perfusion achieved higher participant-based specificity than CCTA plus CT-FFR (88% vs 77%, P = .03) without evidence of a difference in participant-based sensitivity (88% vs 90%, P > .99) and vessel-based AUC (0.85 [95% CI: 0.77, 0.93], P = .78). Compared with CCTA plus CT perfusion, the sequential approach showed no evidence of a difference in participant-based sensitivity (P > .99), specificity (P = .06), or vessel-based AUC (P = .54). Conclusion There was no evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between CCTA plus CT-FFR and CCTA plus CT perfusion for detecting hemodynamically relevant CAD. A sequential approach combining CCTA plus CT-FFR with CT perfusion led to improved participant-based specificity with no evidence of a difference in sensitivity compared with CCTA plus CT-FFR. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT02810795 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sinitsyn in this issue.

Comparison of automated kidney stone size measurement and volumetry in photon counting CT compared to 3rd generation dual energy CT and physically measurements - an ex vivo study.

PURPOSE: This ex vivo study aimed to compare a newly developed dual-source photon-counting CT (PCCT) with a 3rd generation dual-source dual-energy CT (DECT) for the detection and measurement (stone lengths and volumetrics) of urinary stones. METHODS: 143 urinary stones with a known geometry were physically measured and defined as reference values. Next, urinary stones were placed in an anthropomorphic abdomen-model and were scanned with DECT and PCCT. Images were read by two experienced examiners and automatically evaluated using a specific software. RESULTS: DECT and PCCT showed a high sensitivity for manual stone detection of 97.9% and 94.4%, and for automatic detection of 93.0% and 87.4%, respectively. Compared to that uric acid and xanthine stones were recognized slightly worse by DECT and PCCT with manual stone detection (93.3% and 82.2%), and with automatic detection (77.8% and 60.0%). All other stone entities were completely recognized. By comparing the maximum diameter of the reference value and DECT, Pearson-correlation was 0.96 (p < 0.001) for manual and 0.97 (p < 0.001) for automatic measurement, and for PCCT it was 0.94 (p < 0.001) for manual and 0.97 (p < 0.001) for automatic measurements. DECT and PCCT can also reliably determine volume manually and automatically with a Pearson-correlation of 0.99 (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Both CTs showed comparable results in stone detection, length measurement and volumetry compared to the reference values. Automatic measurement tends to underestimate the maximum diameter. DECT proved to be slightly superior in the recognition of xanthine and uric acid stones.

Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT in evaluating coronary stent patency: a comparison to invasive coronary angiography.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT angiography (UHR PCD-CTA) for evaluating coronary stent patency compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). METHODS: Consecutive, clinically referred patients with prior coronary stent implantation were prospectively enrolled between August 2022 and March 2023 and underwent UHR PCD-CTA (collimation, 120 × 0.2 mm). Two radiologists independently analyzed image quality of the in-stent lumen using a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("excellent") to 5 ("non-diagnostic"), and assessed all coronary stents for the presence of in-stent stenosis (≥ 50% lumen narrowing). The diagnostic accuracy of UHR PCD-CTA was determined, with ICA serving as the standard of reference. RESULTS: A total of 44 coronary stents in 18 participants (mean age, 83 years ± 6 [standard deviation]; 12 women) were included in the analysis. In 3/44 stents, both readers described image quality as non-diagnostic, whereas reader 2 noted a fourth stent to have non-diagnostic image quality. In comparison to ICA, UHR PCD-CTA demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100% (95% CI [confidence interval] 47.8, 100), 92.3% (95% CI 79.1, 98.4), and 93.2% (95% CI 81.3, 98.6) for reader 1 and 100% (95% CI 47.8, 100), 87.2% (95% CI 72.6, 95.7), and 88.6% (95% CI 75.4, 96.2) for reader 2, respectively. Both readers observed a 100% negative predictive value (36/36 stents and 34/34 stents). Stent patency inter-reader agreement was 90.1%, corresponding to a substantial Cohen's kappa value of 0.72. CONCLUSIONS: UHR PCD-CTA enables non-invasive assessment of coronary stent patency with high image quality and diagnostic accuracy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT angiography represents a reliable and non-invasive method for assessing coronary stent patency. Its high negative predictive value makes it a promising alternative over invasive coronary angiography for the rule-out of in-stent stenosis. KEY POINTS: • CT-based evaluation of coronary stent patency is limited by stent-induced artifacts and spatial resolution. • Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT accurately evaluates coronary stent patency compared to invasive coronary angiography. • Photon-counting detector CT represents a promising method for the non-invasive rule-out of in-stent stenosis.

Automatic Detection of Directional Lead Orientation in Deep Brain Stimulation using Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study.

INTRODUCTION: Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) represents the next generation of CT technology, offering enhanced capabilities for detecting the orientation of directional leads in deep brain stimulation (DBS). This study aims to refine PCD-CT-based lead orientation determination using an automated method applicable to devices from various manufacturers, addressing current methodological limitations and improving neurosurgical precision. METHODS: An automated method was developed to ascertain the orientation of directional DBS leads using PCD-CT data and grayscale model fitting for devices from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Abbott. A phantom study was conducted to evaluate the precision and accuracy of this method, comparing it with the stripe artifact method across different lead alignments relative to the CT gantry axis. RESULTS: Except for the Medtronic Sensight™ lead, where detection was occasionally unfeasible if aligned normal to the z-axis of the CT gantry, a clinically very unlikely alignment, the lead orientation could be automatically determined regardless of its position. The accuracy and precision of this automated method was comparable to those of the stripe artifact method. CONCLUSION: PCD-CT enables the automatic determination of lead orientation from leading manufacturers with an accuracy comparable to the stripe artifact method, and it offers the added benefit of being independent of the clinically occurring orientation of the head and, consequently, the lead relative to the CT gantry axis.

Value of virtual non-contrast images to identify uncomplicated cystic renal lesions: photon-counting detector CT vs. dual-energy integrating detector CT.

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) derived virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstructions to identify renal cysts in comparison with conventional dual-energy integrating detector (DE EID) CT-derived VNC reconstructions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with simple renal cysts (Bosniak classification-Version 2019, density ≤ 20 HU and/or enhancement ≤ 20 HU) who underwent multiphase (non-contrast, arterial, portal venous phase) PCD-CT and for whom non-contrast and portal venous phase DE EID-CT was available. Subsequently, VNC reconstructions were calculated for all contrast phases and density as well as contrast enhancement within the cysts were measured and compared. MRI and/or ultrasound served as reference standards for lesion classification. RESULTS: 19 patients (1 cyst per patient; age 69.5 ± 10.7 years; 17 [89.5%] male) were included. Density measurements on PCD-CT non-contrast and VNC reconstructions (arterial and portal venous phase) revealed no significant effect on HU values (p = 0.301). In contrast, a significant difference between non-contrast vs. VNC images was found for DE EID-CT (p = 0.02). For PCD-CT, enhancement for VNC reconstructions was < 20 HU for all evaluated cysts. DE EID-CT measurements revealed an enhancement of > 20 HU in five lesions (26.3%) using the VNC reconstructions, which was not seen with the non-contrast images. CONCLUSION: PCD-CT-derived VNC images allow for reliable and accurate characterization of simple cystic renal lesions similar to non-contrast scans whereas VNC images calculated from DE EID-CT resulted in substantial false characterization. Thus, PCD-CT-derived VNC images may substitute for non-contrast images and reduce radiation dose and follow-up imaging.

Photon-counting detector computed tomography for metal artifact reduction: a comparative study of different artifact reduction techniques in patients with orthopedic implants.

PURPOSE: Artifacts caused by metallic implants remain a challenge in computed tomography (CT). We investigated the impact of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) for artifact reduction in patients with orthopedic implants with respect to image quality and diagnostic confidence using different artifact reduction approaches. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective study, consecutive patients with orthopedic implants underwent PCD-CT imaging of the implant area. Four series were reconstructed for each patient (clinical standard reconstruction [PCD-CTStd], monoenergetic images at 140 keV [PCD-CT140keV], iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) corrected [PCD-CTiMAR], combination of iMAR and 140 keV monoenergetic [PCD-CT140keV+iMAR]). Subsequently, three radiologists evaluated the reconstructions in a random and blinded manner for image quality, artifact severity, anatomy delineation (adjacent and distant), and diagnostic confidence using a 5-point Likert scale (5 = excellent). In addition, the coefficient of variation [CV] and the relative quantitative artifact reduction potential were obtained as objective measures. RESULTS: We enrolled 39 patients with a mean age of 67.3 ± 13.2 years (51%; n = 20 male) and a mean BMI of 26.1 ± 4 kg/m2. All image quality measures and diagnostic confidence were significantly higher for the iMAR vs. non-iMAR reconstructions (all p < 0.001). No significant effect of the different artifact reduction approaches on CV was observed (p = 0.26). The quantitative analysis indicated the most effective artifact reduction for the iMAR reconstructions, which was higher than PCD-CT140keV (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PCD-CT allows for effective metal artifact reduction in patients with orthopedic implants, resulting in superior image quality and diagnostic confidence with the potential to improve patient management and clinical decision making.

Accuracy of Ultrahigh-Resolution Photon-counting CT for Detecting Coronary Artery Disease in a High-Risk Population.

Background Recently introduced photon-counting CT may improve noninvasive assessment of patients with high risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). Purpose To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in the detection of CAD compared with the reference standard of invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Materials and Methods In this prospective study, participants with severe aortic valve stenosis and clinically indicated CT for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning were consecutively enrolled from August 2022 to February 2023. All participants were examined with a dual-source photon-counting CT scanner using a retrospective electrocardiography-gated contrast-enhanced UHR scanning protocol (tube voltage, 120 or 140 kV; collimation, 120 × 0.2 mm; 100 mL of iopromid; no spectral information). Subjects underwent ICA as part of their clinical routine. A consensus assessment of image quality (five-point Likert scale: 1 = excellent [absence of artifacts], 5 = nondiagnostic [severe artifacts]) and a blinded independent reading for the presence of CAD (stenosis ≥50%) were performed. UHR CCTA was compared with ICA using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results Among 68 participants (mean age, 81 years ± 7 [SD]; 32 male, 36 female), the prevalence of CAD and prior stent placement was 35% and 22%, respectively. The overall image quality was excellent (median score, 1.5 [IQR, 1.3-2.0]). The AUC of UHR CCTA in the detection of CAD was 0.93 per participant (95% CI: 0.86, 0.99), 0.94 per vessel (95% CI: 0.91, 0.98), and 0.92 per segment (95% CI: 0.87, 0.97). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, were 96%, 84%, and 88% per participant (n = 68); 89%, 91%, and 91% per vessel (n = 204); and 77%, 95%, and 95% per segment (n = 965). Conclusion UHR photon-counting CCTA provided high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of CAD in a high-risk population, including subjects with severe coronary calcification or prior stent placement. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Williams and Newby in this issue.

Impact of different metal artifact reduction techniques in photon-counting computed tomography head and neck scans in patients with dental hardware.

OBJECTIVES: Metal artifacts remain a challenge in computed tomography. We investigated the potential of photon-counting computed tomography (PCD-CT) for metal artifact reduction using an iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) algorithm alone and in combination with high keV monoenergetic images (140 keV) in patients with dental hardware. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with dental implants were prospectively included in this study and received PCD-CT imaging of the craniofacial area. Four series were reconstructed (standard [PCD-CTstd], monoenergetic at 140 keV [PCD-CT140keV], iMAR corrected [PCD-CTiMAR], combination of iMAR and 140 keV monoenergetic [PCD-CTiMAR+140keV]). All reconstructions were assessed qualitatively by four radiologists (independent and blinded reading on a 5-point Likert scale [5 = excellent; no artifact]) regarding overall image quality, artifact severity, and delineation of adjacent and distant anatomy. To assess signal homogeneity and evaluate the magnitude of artifact reduction, we performed quantitative measures of coefficient of variation (CV) and a region of interest (ROI)-based relative change in artifact reduction [PCD-CT/PCD-CTstd]. RESULTS: We enrolled 48 patients (mean age 66.5 ± 11.2 years, 50% (n = 24) males; mean BMI 25.2 ± 4.7 kg/m2; mean CTDIvol 6.2 ± 6 mGy). We found improved overall image quality, reduced artifacts and superior delineation of both adjacent and distant anatomy for the iMAR vs. non-iMAR reconstructions (all p < 0.001). No significant effect of the different artifact reduction approaches on CV was observed (p = 0.42). The ROI-based analysis indicated the most effective artifact reduction for the iMAR reconstructions, which was significantly higher compared to PCD-CT140keV (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PCD-CT offers highly effective approaches for metal artifact reduction with the potential to overcome current diagnostic challenges in patients with dental implants. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Metallic artifacts pose a significant challenge in CT imaging, potentially leading to missed findings. Our study shows that PCD-CT with iMAR post-processing reduces artifacts, improves image quality, and can possibly reveal pathologies previously obscured by artifacts, without additional dose application. KEY POINTS: • Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) offers highly effective approaches for metal artifact reduction in patients with dental fillings/implants. • Iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR) is superior to high keV monoenergetic reconstructions at 140 keV for artifact reduction and provides higher image quality. • Signal homogeneity of the reconstructed images is not affected by the different artifact reduction techniques.

Myeloma bone disease imaging on a 1st-generation clinical photon-counting detector CT vs. 2nd-generation dual-source dual-energy CT.

OBJECTIVE: Subjective and objective image quality comparison of bone microstructure and disease-related abnormalities in multiple myeloma patients using a 1st-generation dual-source photon-counting detector CT(DS-PCD-CT) and a 2nd-generation dual-source dual-energy (energy-integrating detector) CT (DS-EID-CT). METHODS: Fifty multiple myeloma patients (mean age 67.7 ± 10.9 years,16 females) were prospectively enrolled. Unenhanced whole-body CTs were clinically indicated and performed on DS-EID-CT and DS-PCD-CT (median time difference: 12 months). DS-PCD-CT was performed in Quantumplus UHR mode and DS-EID-CT was performed using dual-energy mode. DS-PCD-CT kernel was set at Br64 with Quantum iterative reconstruction strength Q1; for DS-EID-CT a comparable I70f kernel with SAFIRE iterative reconstruction strength 1 was used. Two independent radiologists assessed image quality subjectively using a 5-point Likert scale considering delineation and sharpness of trabecular bone and lytic bone lesions in the spine and pelvic bones. Additionally, ImageJ was used for quantification of bony septa inside the cancellous bone and through or the edges of osteolysis. RESULTS: Overall quality as well as detectability and sharpness in the delineation of lytic bone lesions were superior for DS-PCD-CT compared with DS-EID-CT (p < 0.0001). The inter-reader agreement for subjective image quality readings showed excellent consistency(α = 94.2-98.8). CTDI and DLP mean values for DS-PCD-CT and DS-EID-CT were 1107.4 ± 247.6 mGy*cm and 8.2 ± 1.8 mGy vs. 1344.3 ± 204.6 mGy*cm and 10.1 ± 1.9 mGy. The quantitative metric for bone microstructure in the femoral head showed significantly better visualization of trabeculae in DS-PCD-CT compared with DS-EID-CT (p < 0.0001). Quantitative analyses of edge sharpness of osteolysis showed significant steeper edges for DS-PCD-CT (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: DS-PCD-CT significantly improves spatial resolution of bony microstructure and lytic bone lesions compared to DS-EID-CT. KEY POINTS: • Application of photon-counting detector CT is superior to dual-source dual-energy integrating detector in clinical workup of multiple myeloma patients. • Compared to energy integrating detectors, photon-counting detectors significantly increase the spatial resolution of bone microstructure including disease-related lytic bone lesions in patients with multiple myeloma.

Photon-Counting Computed Tomography (PC-CT) of the spine: impact on diagnostic confidence and radiation dose.

OBJECTIVES: Computed tomography (CT) is employed to evaluate surgical outcome after spinal interventions. Here, we investigate the potential of multispectral photon-counting computed tomography (PC-CT) on image quality, diagnostic confidence, and radiation dose compared to an energy-integrating CT (EID-CT). METHODS: In this prospective study, 32 patients underwent PC-CT of the spine. Data was reconstructed in two ways: (1) standard bone kernel with 65-keV (PC-CTstd) and (2) 130-keV monoenergetic images (PC-CT130 keV). Prior EID-CT was available for 17 patients; for the remaining 15, an age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched EID-CT cohort was identified. Image quality (5-point Likert scales on overall, sharpness, artifacts, noise, diagnostic confidence) of PC-CTstd and EID-CT was assessed by four radiologists independently. If metallic implants were present (n = 10), PC-CTstd and PC-CT130 keV images were again assessed by 5-point Likert scales by the same radiologists. Hounsfield units (HU) were measured within metallic artifact and compared between PC-CTstd and PC-CT130 keV. Finally, the radiation dose (CTDIvol) was evaluated. RESULTS: Sharpness was rated significantly higher (p = 0.009) and noise significantly lower (p < 0.001) in PC-CTstd vs. EID-CT. In the subset of patients with metallic implants, reading scores for PC-CT130 keV revealed superior ratings vs. PC-CTstd for image quality, artifacts, noise, and diagnostic confidence (all p < 0.001) accompanied by a significant increase of HU values within the artifact (p < 0.001). Radiation dose was significantly lower for PC-CT vs. EID-CT (mean CTDIvol: 8.83 vs. 15.7 mGy; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PC-CT of the spine with high-kiloelectronvolt reconstructions provides sharper images, higher diagnostic confidence, and lower radiation dose in patients with metallic implants. KEY POINTS: • Compared to energy-integrating CT, photon-counting CT of the spine had significantly higher sharpness and lower image noise while radiation dose was reduced by 45%. • In patients with metallic implants, virtual monochromatic photon-counting images at 130 keV were superior to standard reconstruction at 65 keV in terms of image quality, artifacts, noise, and diagnostic confidence.

Evaluation of perivascular fat attenuation with coronary CT angiography in cardiac transplantation patients: an imaging biomarker candidate for prediction of cardiac mortality and re-transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: In cardiac transplant recipients, non-invasive allograft surveillance for identifying patients at risk for graft failure remains challenging. The fat attenuation index (FAI) of the perivascular adipose tissue in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) predicts outcomes in coronary artery disease in non-transplanted hearts; however, it has not been evaluated in cardiac transplant patients. METHODS: We followed 39 cardiac transplant patients with two or more CCTAs obtained between 2010 and 2021. We performed FAI measurements around the proximal 4 cm segments of the left anterior descending (LAD), right coronary artery (RCA), and left circumflex artery (LCx) using a previously validated methodology. The FAI was analyzed at a threshold of - 30 to - 190 Hounsfield units. RESULTS: FAI measurements were completed in 113 CCTAs, obtained on two same-vendor CT models. Within each CCTA, the FAI values between coronary vessels were strongly correlated (RCA and LAD R = 0.67 (p < 0.0001), RCA and LCx R = 0.58 (p < 0.0001), LAD and LCx R = 0.67 (p < 0.0001)). The FAIs of each coronary vessel between the patient's first and last CCTA completed at 120 kV were also correlated (RCA R = 0.73 (p < 0.0001), LAD R = 0.81 (p < 0.0001), LCx R = 0.55 (p = 0.0069). Finally, a high mean FAI value of all three coronary vessels at baseline (mean ≥ - 71 HU) was predictive of cardiac mortality or re-transplantation, however, not predictive of all cause-mortality. CONCLUSION: High baseline FAI values may identify a higher-risk cardiac transplant population; thus, FAI may support the implementation of CCTA in post-transplant surveillance. KEY POINT: • Perivascular fat attenuation measured with coronary CT is feasible in cardiac transplant patients and may predict cardiac mortality or need for re-transplantation.

Comparison of the spectral performance between two dual-source CT systems on low-energy virtual monoenergetic images: A phantom study.

PURPOSE: To compare the spectral performance of two different DSCT (DSCT-Pulse and DSCT-Force) on virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at low energy levels. METHODS: An image quality phantom was scanned on the two DSCTs at three dose levels: 11/6/1.8 mGy. Level 3 of an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm was used. Noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function were computed on VMIs from 40 to 70 keV to assess noise magnitude and noise texture (fav) and spatial resolution (f50). A detectability index (d') was computed to assess the detection of one contrast-enhanced abdominal lesion as a function of the keV level used. RESULTS: For all dose levels and all energy levels, noise magnitude was significantly higher (p < 0.05) with DSCT-Pulse than with DSCT-Force (12.6 ± 2.7 % at 1.8 mGy, 9.1 ± 2.9 % at 6 mGy and 4.0 ± 2.7 % at 11 mGy). For all energy levels, fav values were significantly higher (p < 0.05) with DSCT-Pulse than with DSCT-Force at 1.8 mGy (4.8 ± 3.9 %) and at 6 mGy (5.5 ± 2.5 %) but similar at 11 mGy (0.2 ± 3.6 %; p = 0.518). For all energy levels, f50 values were significantly higher with DSCT-Pulse than with DSCT-Force (12.7 ± 5.6 % at 1.8 mGy, 17.9 ± 4.5 % at 6 mGy and 13.1 ± 2.6 % at 11 mGy). For all keV, similar d' values were found with both DSCT-Force and DSCT-Pulse at 11 mGy (-1.0 ± 3.1 %; p = 0.084). For other dose levels, d' values were significantly lower with DSCT-Pulse than with DSCT-Force (9.1 ± 3.2 % at 1.8 mGy and -6.3 ± 3.9 % at 6 mGy). CONCLUSION: Compared with the DSCT-Force, the DSCT-Pulse improved noise texture and spatial resolution, but noise magnitude was slightly higher and detectability slightly lower, particularly when the dose level was reduced.

Comparison of low-energy virtual monoenergetic images between photon-counting CT and energy-integrating detectors CT: A phantom study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess image quality and dose level using a photon-counting CT (PCCT) scanner by comparison with a dual-source CT (DSCT) scanner on virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at low energy levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom was scanned using a DSCT and a PCCT with a volume CT dose index of 11 mGy, and additionally at 6 mGy and 1.8 mGy for PCCT. Noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function were evaluated from 40 to 70 keV on VMIs to assess noise magnitude and noise texture (fav) and spatial resolution on two iodine inserts (f50), respectively. A detectability index (d') was computed to assess the detection of two contrast-enhanced lesions according to the energy level used. RESULTS: For all energy levels, noise magnitude values were lower with PCCT than with DSCT at 11 and 6 mGy, but greater at 1.8 mGy. fav values were higher with PCCT than with DSCT at 11 mGy (8.6 ± 1.5 [standard deviation [SD]%), similar at 6 mGy (1.6 ± 1.5 [SD]%) and lower at 1.8 mGy (-17.8 ± 2.2 [SD]%). For both inserts, f50 values were higher with PCCT than DSCT at 11- and 6 mGy for all keV levels, except at 6 mGy and 40 keV. d' values were higher with PCCT than with DSCT at 11- and 6 mGy for all keV and both simulated lesions. Similar d' values to those of the DSCT at 11 mGy, were obtained at 2.25 mGy for iodine insert at 2 mg/mL and at 0.96 mGy for iodine insert at 4 mg/mL at 40 keV. CONCLUSION: Compared to DSCT, PCCT reduces noise magnitude and improves noise texture, spatial resolution and detectability on VMIs for all low-keV levels.

Abdominal image quality and dose reduction with energy-integrating or photon-counting detectors dual-source CT: A phantom study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess image-quality and dose reduction potential using a photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) system by comparison with two different dual-source CT (DSCT) systems using two phantoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Acquisitions on phantoms were performed using two DSCT systems (DSCT1 [Somatom Force] and DSCT2 [Somatom Pro.Pulse]) and one PCCT system (Naeotom Alpha) at four dose levels (13/6/3.4/1.8 mGy). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were computed to assess noise magnitude and noise texture and spatial resolution (f50), respectively. Detectability indexes (d') were computed to model the detection of abdominal lesions: one unenhanced high-contrast task, one contrast-enhanced high-contrast task and one unenhanced low-contrast task. Image quality was subjectively assessed on an anthropomorphic phantom by two radiologists. RESULTS: For all dose levels, noise magnitude values were lower with PCCT than with DSCTs. For all CT systems, similar noise texture values were found at 13 and 6 mGy, but the greatest noise texture values were found for DSCT2 and the lowest for PCCT at 3.4 and 1.8 mGy. For high-contrast inserts, similar or lower f50 values were found with PCCT than with DSCT1 and the opposite pattern was found for the low-contrast insert. For the three simulated lesions, d' values were greater with PCCT than with DSCTs. Abdominal images were rated satisfactory for clinical use by the radiologists for all dose levels with PCCT and for 13 and 6 mGy with DSCTs. CONCLUSION: By comparison with DSCTs, PCCT reduces image-noise and improves detectability of simulated abdominal lesions without altering the spatial resolution and image texture. Image-quality obtained with PCCT seem to indicate greater potential for dose optimization than those obtained with DSCTs.

Potential dose reduction and image quality improvement in chest CT with a photon-counting CT compared to a new dual-source CT.

PURPOSE: To compare potential dose reduction and quality improvement in chest CT images with Photon-Counting CT (PCCT) versus a Dual-Source CT (DSCT). METHODS: Acquisitions on phantoms were performed on a DSCT and a PCCT at 5 dose levels (9.5/7.5/6.0/2.5/0.4 mGy). Noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were calculated to assess noise magnitude and noise texture (fav) and spatial resolution (f50), respectively. Computed detectability indexes (d') modelled the detection of 2 chest lesions: subsolid pulmonary nodules (SPN) and high-contrast pulmonary nodules (HCN). Two radiologists subjectively assessed the quality of chest images on an anthropomorphic phantom. RESULTS: For all dose levels, noise magnitude was significantly lower with PCCT than with DSCT (-44.7 ± 3.0 %; p < 0.05). Identical outcomes were found for noise texture (fav; -6.2 ± 0.5 %; p < 0.05). f50 values were significantly higher with DSCT than with PCCT from 9.5 to 6 mGy for iodine insert (p < 0.05) and from 7.5 to 2.5 mGy for air insert (p < 0.05), but similar for both inserts at other dose levels. For all dose levels, d' values were significantly higher with PCCT than DSCT (71.9 ± 5.4 % for HCN and 65.6 ± 13.5 % for SPN). From 9.5 to 2.5 mGy, the potential dose reduction was -59.0 ± 3.9 % for both lesions with PCCT compared to DSCT. Chest images were rated satisfactory for clinical use by the radiologists with both CTs for all dose levels, except at 0.4 mGy. CONCLUSION: Noise magnitude and detectability of chest lesions were better with PCCT than with the DSCT. PCCT may offer great potential for dose reduction in patients undergoing chest CT examinations.

Photon-counting CT-angiography in pre-TAVR aortic annulus assessment: effects of retrospective vs. prospective ECG-synchronization on prosthesis valve selection.

To compare the diagnostic value of ultrahigh-resolution CT-angiography (UHR-CTA) compared with high-pitch spiral CTA (HPS-CTA) using a first-generation, dual-source photon-counting CT (PCD-CT) scanner for preprocedural planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Clinically referred patients with severe aortic valve stenosis underwent both, retrospective ECG-gated cardiac UHR-CTA (collimation: 120 × 0.2 mm) and prospective ECG-triggered aortoiliac HPS-CTA (collimation: 144 × 0.4 mm, full spectral capabilities) for TAVR planning from August 2022 to March 2023. Radiation dose was extracted from the CT reports, and the effective dose was calculated. Two radiologists analyzed UHR-CTA and HPS-CTA datasets, assessing the image quality of the aortic annulus, with regard to the lumen visibility and margin delineation using a 4-point visual-grading scale (ranges: 4 = "excellent" to 1 = "poor"). Aortic annulus area (AAA) measurements were taken for valve prosthesis sizing, with retrospective UHR-CTA serving as reference standard. A total of 64 patients were included (mean age, 81 years ± 7 SD; 28 women) in this retrospective study. HPS-CTA showed a lower radiation dose, 4.1 mSv vs. 12.6 mSv (p < 0.001). UHR-CTA demonstrated higher image quality to HPS-CTA (median score, 4 [IQR, 3-4] vs. 3 [IQR, 2-3]; p < 0.001). Quantitative assessments of AAA from both CTA datasets were strongly positively correlated (mean 477.4 ± 91.1 mm2 on UHR-CTA and mean 476.5 ± 90.4 mm2 on HPS-CTA, Pearson r2 = 0.857, p < 0.001) with a mean error of 22.3 ± 24.6 mm2 and resulted in identical valve prosthesis sizing in the majority of patients (91%). Patients with lower image quality on HPS-CTA (score value 1 or 2, n = 28) were more likely to receive different sizing recommendations (82%). Both UHR-CTA and HPS-CTA acquisitions using photon-counting CT technology provided reliable aortic annular assessments for TAVR planning. While UHR-CTA offers superior image quality, HPS-CTA is associated with lower radiation exposure. However, severely impaired image quality on HPS-CTA may impact on prosthesis sizing, suggesting that immediate post-scan image evaluations may require complementary UHR-CTA scanning.

Photon-counting computed tomography - clinical application in oncological, cardiovascular, and pediatric radiology. / Photon-Counting Computertomographie ­ klinische Anwendungen in der onkologischen, kardiovaskulären und pädiatrischen Radiologie.

BACKGROUND: Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) is a promising new technology with the potential to fundamentally change workflows in the daily routine and provide new quantitative imaging information to improve clinical decision-making and patient management. METHOD: The contents of this review are based on an unrestricted literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar using the search terms "photon-counting CT", "photon-counting detector", "spectral CT", "computed tomography" as well as on the authors' own experience. RESULTS: The fundamental difference with respect to the currently established energy-integrating CT detectors is that PCD-CT allows for the counting of every single photon at the detector level. Based on the identified literature, PCD-CT phantom measurements and initial clinical studies have demonstrated that the new technology allows for improved spatial resolution, reduced image noise, and new possibilities for advanced quantitative image postprocessing. CONCLUSION: For clinical practice, the potential benefits include fewer beam hardening artifacts, a radiation dose reduction, and the use of new or combinations of contrast agents. In particular, critical patient groups such as oncological, cardiovascular, lung, and head & neck as well as pediatric patient collectives benefit from the clinical advantages. KEY POINTS: · Photon-counting computed tomography (PCD-CT) is being used for the first time in routine clinical practice, enabling a significant dose reduction in critical patient populations such as oncology, cardiology, and pediatrics.. · Compared to conventional CT, PCD-CT enables a reduction in electronic image noise.. · Due to the spectral data sets, PCD-CT enables fully comprehensive post-processing applications.. CITATION FORMAT: · Hagen F, Soschynski M, Weis M et al. Photon-counting computed tomography - clinical application in oncological, cardiovascular, and pediatric radiology. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 25 - 34.

Impact of Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography on Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography (CT) is an established method for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of multiple myeloma. Here, we investigated the potential of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) in terms of image quality, diagnostic confidence, and radiation dose compared with energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, patients with known multiple myeloma underwent clinically indicated whole-body PCD-CT. The image quality of PCD-CT was assessed qualitatively by three independent radiologists for overall image quality, edge sharpness, image noise, lesion conspicuity, and diagnostic confidence using a 5-point Likert scale (5 = excellent), and quantitatively for signal homogeneity using the coefficient of variation (CV) of Hounsfield Units (HU) values and modulation transfer function (MTF) via the full width at half maximum (FWHM) in the frequency space. The results were compared with those of the current clinical standard EID-CT protocols as controls. Additionally, the radiation dose (CTDIvol) was determined. RESULTS: We enrolled 35 patients with multiple myeloma (mean age 69.8 ± 9.1 years; 18 [51%] males). Qualitative image analysis revealed superior scores (median [interquartile range]) for PCD-CT regarding overall image quality (4.0 [4.0-5.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-4.0]), edge sharpness (4.0 [4.0-5.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-4.0]), image noise (4.0 [4.0-4.0] vs. 3.0 [3.0-4.0]), lesion conspicuity (4.0 [4.0-5.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-4.0]), and diagnostic confidence (4.0 [4.0-5.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-4.0]) compared with EID-CT (P ≤ 0.004). In quantitative image analyses, PCD-CT compared with EID-CT revealed a substantially lower FWHM (2.89 vs. 25.68 cy/pixel) and a significantly more homogeneous signal (mean CV ± standard deviation [SD], 0.99 ± 0.65 vs. 1.66 ± 0.5; P < 0.001) at a significantly lower radiation dose (mean CTDIvol ± SD, 3.33 ± 0.82 vs. 7.19 ± 3.57 mGy; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Whole-body PCD-CT provides significantly higher subjective and objective image quality at significantly reduced radiation doses than the current clinical standard EID-CT protocols, along with readily available multi-spectral data, facilitating the potential for further advanced post-processing.

Radiation Dose Reduction in Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal CT: Comparison of Photon-Counting Detector CT with 2nd Generation Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT in an oncologic cohort.

RATIONAL AND OBJECTIVES: Comparison of radiation dose and image quality in routine abdominal and pelvic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) between a photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and a dual energy dual source CT (DSCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 70 oncologic patients (mean age 66 ± 12 years, 29 females) were prospectively enrolled between November 2021 and February 2022. Abdominal CECT were clinically indicated and performed first on a 2nd-generation DSCT and at follow-up on a 1st-generation dual-source PCD-CT. The same contrast media (Imeron 350, Bracco imaging) and pump protocol was used for both scans. For both scanners, polychromatic images were reconstructed with 3mm slice thickness and comparable kernel (I30f[DSCT] and Br40f[PCD-CT]); for PCD-CT data from all counted events above the lowest energy threshold at 20 keV ("T3D") were used. Results were compared in terms of radiation dose metrics of CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP) and size-specific dose estimation (SSDE), objective and subjective measurements of image quality were scored by two emergency radiologists including lesion conspicuity. RESULTS: Median time interval between the scans was 4 months (IQR: 3-6). CNRvessel and SNRvessel of T3D reconstructions from PCD-CT were significantly higher than those of DSCT (all, p < 0.05). Qualitative image noise analysis from PCD-CT and DSCT yielded a mean of 4 each. Lesion conspicuity was rated significantly higher in PCD-CT (Q3 strength) compared to DSCT images. CTDI, DLP and SSDE mean values for PCD-CT and DSCT were 7.98 ± 2.56 mGy vs. 14.11 ± 2.92 mGy, 393.13 ± 153.55 mGy*cm vs. 693.61 ± 185.76 mGy*cm and 9.98 ± 2.41 vs. 14.63 ± 1.63, respectively, translating to a dose reduction of around 32% (SSDE). CONCLUSION: PCD-CT enables oncologic abdominal CT with a significantly reduced dose while keeping image quality similar to 2nd-generation DSCT.

Reduced versus standard dose contrast volume for contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in overweight and obese patients using photon counting detector technology vs. second-generation dual-source energy integrating detector CT.

PURPOSE: To compare image quality of contrast-enhanced abdominal-CT using 1st-generation Dual Source Photon-Counting Detector CT (DS-PCD-CT) versus 2nd-generation Dual-Source Energy Integrating-Detector CT (DS-EID-CT) in patients with BMI ≥ 25, applying two different contrast agent volumes, vendor proposed protocols and different virtual monoenergetic images (VMI). METHOD: 68 overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kgm2) patients (median age: 65 years; median BMI 33.3 kgm2) who underwent clinically indicated, portal-venous contrast-enhanced abdominal-CT on a commercially available 1st-generation DS-PCD-CT were prospectively included if they already have had a pre-exam on 2nd-generation DS-EID-CT using a standardized exam protocol. Obesity were defined by BMI-calculation (overweight: 25-29.9, obesity grade I: 30-34.9; obesity grade II: 35-39.9; obesity grade III: > 40) and by the absolute weight value. Body weight adapted contrast volume (targeted volume of 1.2 mL/kg for the 1st study and 0.8 mL/kg for the 2nd study) was applied in both groups. Dual Energy mode was used for both the DS-PCD-CT and the DS-EID-CT. Polychromatic images and VMI (40 keV and 70 keV) were reconstructed for both the DS-EID-CT and the DS-PCD-CT data (termed T3D). Two radiologists assessed subjective image quality using a 5-point Likert-scale. Each reader drew ROIs within parenchymatous organs and vascular structures to analyze image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). RESULTS: Median time interval between scans was 12 months (Min: 6 months; Max: 36 months). BMI classification included overweight (n = 10, 14.7 %), obesity grade I (n = 38, 55.9 %), grade II (n = 13, 19.1 %) and grade III (n = 7, 10.3 %). The SNR achieved with DS-PCD-CT at QIR level 3was 12.61 vs. 11.47 (QIR 2) vs. 10.53 (DS-EID-CT), irrespective of parenchymatous organs. For vessels, the SNR were 16.73 vs. 14.20 (QIR 2) vs. 12.07 (DS-EID-CT). Moreover, the obtained median noise at QIR level 3 was as low as that of the DS-EID-CT (8.65 vs. 8.65). Both radiologists rated the image quality higher for DS-PCD-CT data sets (p < 0.05). The highest CNR was achieved at 40 keV for both scanners. T3D demonstrated significantly higher SNR and lower noise level compared to 40 keV and 70 keV. Median CTDIvol and DLP values for DS-PCD-CT and DS-EID-CT were 10.90 mGy (IQR: 9.31 - 12.50 mGy) vs. 16.55 mGy (IQR: 15.45 - 18.17 mGy) and 589.50 mGy * cm (IQR: 498.50 - 708.25 mGy * cm) vs. 848.75 mGy * cm (IQR: 753.43 - 969.58 mGy * cm) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Image quality can be maintained while significantly reducing the contrast volume and the radiation dose (27% and 34% lower DLP and 31% lower CDTIvol) for abdominal contrast-enhanced CT using a 1st-generation DS-PCD-CT. Moreover, polychromatic reconstruction T3D on a DS-PCD-CT enables sufficient diagnostic image quality for oncological imaging.