Oral health and quality of life of people living with human T-cell leukemia virus-1 in Salvador, Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the oral health status and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with human T-cell leukemia virus-1 (HTLV-1). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 204 seropositive patients, classified into two groups, symptomatic and asymptomatic. The first group included patients with neurological symptoms associated with HTLV-1 (n = 69), and the second group, asymptomatic HTLV-1 carriers (n = 135). We evaluated the total unstimulated saliva flow, oral mucosa, the Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) index, and Periodontal Screening and Recording (PSR). The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP14) measured the oral health-related quality of life. General health-related quality of life was measured by the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Variables with a value of p < 0.25 in bivariate analysis were selected, together with SF-36 summaries' scores and total OHIP-14, for composing a logistic regression model that had symptomatology as the dependent variable. RESULTS: The OHIP-14 total score was poor in symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, but with no marked difference between them. Symptomatic patients showed significantly lower SF-36 scores (P ≤ 0.05) compared to asymptomatic ones, except for mental component summary (MCS). Family income (1-2.99 minimal wages), reduced salivary flow, flossing, and lower physical component summary (PCS) were associated (P ≤ 0.05) with symptomatology. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic individuals living with HTLV-1 showed lower HRQoL and poorer OHRQoL compared to asymptomatic ones. Family income, flossing, reduced salivary flow, and lower PCS were associated with symptomatic HTLV-1 individuals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In the present study, symptomatic individuals with HTLV-1 showed higher family income, poorer oral health status, lower salivary flow, poorer OHRQoL, and lower HRQoL compared to asymptomatic ones.

Orofacial manifestations of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis: a case series from Brazil.

The dental surgeon plays a fundamental role in the early diagnosis of oral leishmaniasis, since oral mucosa may be the primary site of the disease manifestation. This study reports seven clinical cases of orofacial mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. All had mucocutaneous leishmaniasis with oropharyngeal involvement confirmed by laboratory tests. Five out of the seven cases were males, and in four cases, patients had associated comorbidities. Late diagnosis was observed, resulting in treatment delay and increased hospitalization stay. One patient had severe psychological consequences due to facial deformity. The lack of differential diagnosis due the great variability of clinical presentation of the lesions and frequent unspecific histopathology represent a challenge for the dental surgeon. In two reported cases, there were unspecific biopsy results. The multidisciplinary approach plays an important role in orofacial leishmaniasis diagnosis and treatment. Leishmaniasis should be investigated in case of atypical and persistent lesions in patients from endemic regions. This recommendation may avoid diagnosis delays and decrease dissemination of the disease.

Pleomorphic adenoma in the oral mucosa of a young adult: a case report

Introduction: The pleomorphic adenoma (PA) is the most common benign neoplasia in salivary glands, affecting most commonly the parotid gland of females between the 4th and 6th decades of life. PA can less commonly affect the minor salivary glands; in these cases the main site of attack is the palate. Objective: This study aims are twofold: to report a clinical case of PA involving minor salivary glands in the oral mucosa, treated conservatively; and to emphasize the importance of pathologic examination in defining the correct diagnosis. Case report: A 22 year-old melanoderm male patient sought emergency room due to asymptomatic swelling in the right side of the face. After comprehensive clinical examination, it was decided to perform an incisional biopsy to confirm the diagnosis and further treatment. After confirming the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma, we opted for enucleation of the lesion to avoid possible complications such as scar retraction and salivary fistula. Conclusion: It is very important that the dentist early diagnoses the neoplasia to perform more conservative treatments and achieve a better prognosis for the patient, always following-up the case for a period from five to ten years to ensure the non-recurrence of this neoplasia.