Sentinel node mapping decreases the risk of failed detection of isolated positive para-aortic lymph node in endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND: Isolated positive para-aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer is an uncommon event, ranging from 1% to 3%. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping on the risk of isolated positive para-aortic lymph node metastasis. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a series of 426 patients who underwent SLN mapping with at least one SLN detected from January 2013 to December 2021 (SLN group) compared with a historical series of 209 cases who underwent a systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy between June 2007 and April 2015 (LND group). Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis recurrences were included in the SLN group analysis. RESULTS: In the SLN group, 168 cases (39.4%) had backup systematic lymphadenectomy, and 56 (13.1%) had positive lymph nodes compared with 34 (16.3%) in LND group (p=0.18). The SLN group had higher rates of minimally invasive surgeries (p<0.001) and presence of lymphovascular space invasion (p<0.001). Moreover, SLN group had fewer other uterine risk factors, such as high-grade tumors (p<0.001), and deep myometrial invasion (p<0.001). We found that SLN mapped outside the pelvis at pre-sacral, common iliac areas, and para-aortic regions in 2.8% (n=12), 11.5% (n=49), and 1.6% (n=7) of cases, respectively. Overall, 52 (12.2%) patients had positive SLNs, and 3 (5.7%) positive SLNs were found outside the pelvis-one in the pre-sacral region, one in the common iliac area, and one in the para-aortic region. An isolated para-aortic lymph node was found in only 2 (0.5%) cases in the SLN group compared with 7 (3.3%) cases in the LND group (p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: SLN protocol accurately predicts lymph node status and may decrease the risk of failed identification of isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis compared with systematic lymphadenectomy.

Can mismatch repair status be added to sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrioid endometrial cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relation between mismatch repair (MMR) status and the risk of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer, and whether this additional data can be incorporated to current SLN (sentinel lymph node) algorithm. METHODS: We included a series of 332 women that underwent SLN mapping ± systematic lymphadenectomy from January 2013 to December 2021. Protein expressions of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 were examined by immuno-histochemistry and considered MMRd (deficient) when at least one protein was not expressed. RESULTS: MMRd was noted in 20.8% of cases and correlated to grade 3 (p = 0.018) and presence of lymphovascular space invasion (p = 0.032). Moreover, MMRd was an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.36-5.62). Notably, 21.7% (15/69) cases with MMRd had lymph node metastasis compared to 9.5% (25/263) of cases with MMRp (proficient) (p = 0.005). The overall and bilateral SLN detection rates were 91.9% and 75.9%, respectively. Of the 80 (24%) cases of non-bilateral SLN detection, 66.2% had low-grade tumors (G1/G2) and myometrial invasion <50%. Considering MMR status an independent prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis, a systematic lymphadenectomy (side specific or bilateral) would forgo in 53.7% (43/80) of cases with non-bilateral detection, representing 13% (43/332) of all endometroid tumors. CONCLUSION: MMR status was independently related to lymph node metastasis in endometrioid EC. Moreover, MMR status may help to select patients that can forgo systematic lymphadenectomy in case of undetected SLN.

Does sentinel node mapping impact morbidity and quality of life in endometrial cancer?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of post-operative complications and quality of life (QoL) related to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy vs systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. METHODS: A prospective cohort included women with early-stage endometrial carcinoma who underwent lymph node staging, grouped as follows: SLN group (sentinel lymph node only) and SLN+LND group (sentinel lymph node biopsy with addition of systematic lymphadenectomy). The patients had at least 12 months of follow-up, and QoL was assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cervical Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and EORTC-QLQ-Cx24. Lymphedema was also assessed by clinical evaluation and perimetry. RESULTS: 152 patients were included: 113 (74.3%) in the SLN group and 39 (25.7%) in the SLN+LND group. Intra-operative surgical complications occurred in 2 (1.3%) cases, and all belonged to SLN+LND group. Patients undergoing SLN+LND had higher overall complication rates than those undergoing SLN alone (33.3% vs 14.2%; p=0.011), even after adjusting for confound factors (OR=3.45, 95% CI 1.40 to 8.47; p=0.007). The SLN+LND group had longer surgical time (p=0.001) and need for admission to the intensive care unit (p=0.001). Moreover, the incidence of lymphocele was found in eight cases in the SLN+LND group (0 vs 20.5%; p<0.001). There were no differences in lymphedema rate after clinical evaluation and perimetry. However, the lymphedema score was highest when lymphedema was reported by clinical examination at 6 months (30.1 vs 7.8; p<0.001) and at 12 months (36.3 vs 6.0; p<0.001). Regarding the overall assessment of QoL, there was no difference between groups at 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher overall rate of complications for the group undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy, as well as higher rates of lymphocele and lymphedema according to the symptom score. No difference was found in overall QoL between SLN and SLN+LND groups.

Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: The CIRCOL Group Study.

PURPOSE: To analyze the survival outcomes of patients in a Brazilian cohort who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared with open surgery for early stage cervical cancer. METHODS: A multicenter database was constructed, registering 1280 cervical cancer patients who had undergone radical hysterectomy from 2000 to 2019. For the final analysis, we included cases with a tumor ≤ 4 cm (stages Ia2 to Ib2, FIGO 2018) that underwent surgery from January 2007 to December 2017. Propensity score matching was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 776 cases were ultimately analyzed, 526 of which were included in the propensity score matching analysis (open, n = 263; MIS, n = 263). There were 52 recurrences (9.9%), 28 (10.6%) with MIS and 24 (9.1%) with open surgery (p = 0.55); and 34 deaths were recorded, 13 (4.9%) and 21 (8.0%), respectively (p = 0.15). We noted a 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 88.2% and 90.3% for those who received MIS and open surgery, respectively (HR 1.32; 95% CI: 0.76-2.29; p = 0.31) and a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 91.8% and 91.1%, respectively (HR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.40-1.61; p = 0.53). There was no difference in 3-year DFS rates between open surgery and MIS for tumors ≤ 2 cm (95.7% vs. 90.8%; p = 0.16) or > 2 cm (83.9% vs. 85.4%; p = 0.77). Also, the 5-year OS between open surgery and MIS did not differ for tumors ≤ 2 cm (93.1% vs. 93.6%; p = 0.82) or > 2 cm (88.9% vs. 89.8%; p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Survival outcomes were similar between minimally invasive and open radical hysterectomy in this large retrospective multicenter cohort.

Prognostic factors in locally advanced cervical cancer with pelvic lymph node metastasis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic impact of clinical and pathological variables and patterns of recurrence in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer with pelvic lymph node involvement (stage IIIC1 according to the 2018 FIGO Staging System). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 62 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with curative intent with radiotherapy associated with chemotherapy in AC Camargo Cancer Center from January 2007 to December 2018. RESULTS: Lymph node involvement was assessed by CT, MRI and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in 28 (45.2%), 20 (32.3%) and 14 (22.6%) patients, respectively. The median tumor size was 5.0 cm and 72.6% of cases were squamous cell carcinomas. The median number of positive pelvic lymph nodes was three, and the median size of lymph nodes was 24 mm. Twenty-two (35.5%) patients had recurrence and 50% had only one site of recurrence. The sites of recurrence were pelvic, para-aortic and distant in 12 (19.4%), 6 (9.7%) and 16 (25.8%) patients, respectively. The 3 year overall and disease-free survival were 70.8% and 64.6%, respectively. Patients with adenocarcinoma had worse disease-free survival (HR 2.38; 95% CI 1.01 to 5.60; p=0.047) and overall survival (HR 2.99; 95% CI 1.14 to 7.75; p=0.025) compared with squamous cell carcinoma. In multivariate analysis, metastatic pelvic lymph node size of >2.5 cm (HR 4.38; 95% CI 1.65 to 11.6; p=0.003) and incomplete response to radiotherapy (HR 5.14; 95% CI 1.60 to 16.4; p=0.006) maintained the negative impact for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: We found that pelvic lymph node size and incomplete response to radiotherapy negatively impact overall survival in patients with advanced cervical cancer with pelvic lymph node involvement. This finding may help to stratify risk in this group of patients.

Sentinel lymph node mapping versus sentinel lymph node mapping with systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized trial (ALICE trial).

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggest that sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in endometrial cancer accurately detects lymph node metastasis. However, prospective randomized trials addressing the oncological outcomes of SLN biopsy in endometrial cancer without lymphadenectomy are lacking. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to confirm that SLN biopsy without systematic node dissection does not negatively impact oncological outcomes. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that there is no survival benefit in adding systematic lymphadenectomy to sentinel node mapping for endometrial cancer staging. Additionally, we aim to evaluate morbidity and impact in quality of life (QoL) after forgoing systematic lymphadenectomy. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a collaborative, multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized trial. After total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and SLN biopsy, patients will be randomized (1:1) into: (a) no further lymph node dissection or (b) systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. MAJOR INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria are patients with high-grade histologies (endometrioid G3, serous, clear cell, and carcinosarcoma), endometrioid G1 or G2 with imaging concerning for myometrial invasion of ≥50% or cervical invasion, clinically suitable to undergo systematic lymphadenectomy. PRIMARY ENDPOINTS: The primary objective is to compare 3-year disease-free survival and the secondary objectives are 5-year overall survival, morbidity, incidence of lower limb lymphedema, and QoL after SLN mapping ± systematic lymphadenectomy in high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer. SAMPLE SIZE: 178 participants will be randomized in this study with an estimated date for completing accrual of December 2024 and presenting results in 2027. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03366051.

Predictive Factors for Residual Disease After Conization in Cervical Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate predictive factors for the presence of residual disease after conization followed by definitive surgery in cervical cancer, and suggest a margin distance threshold that could predict residual disease. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a series of 42 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent primary conization before definitive surgical treatment from March 2009 to May 2020. All conization specimens were reviewed for endocervical, ectocervical, and radial margins. Cases with residual disease in magnetic resonance imaging before definitive surgery were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty-three (78.6%) patients underwent hysterectomies and 9 (21.4%) trachelectomies ± lymph node staging. Twelve (28.6%) cases were stage IA1, 5 (11.8%) cases were stage IA2, 13 (31%) cases were stage IB1, 11 (26.2%) cases were stage IB2, and 1 (2.4%) case was stage IIIC1 [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2019]. We found residual disease in 17 (40.4%) surgical specimens. Of the 20 patients with negative margins, there were still 3 (15%) cases with residual disease. Conversely, residual disease was identified in 14 (63.6%) of the 22 patients with positive cone margins (p = 0.001). Tumor size [odds ratio (OR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.33] and positive endocervical margin status (OR 33.6, 95% CI 3.85-293.3) were related to a higher risk of residual disease in multivariate analysis. Notably, all patients with tumors larger than 2 cm had residual disease, in contrast to 29.4% in lesions up to 2 cm (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: We found that tumor size and positive margin were predictive factors for residual disease. We could not suggest a reliable minimum margin distance threshold that could predict residual disease.

Impact of Sentinel Node Mapping in Decreasing the Risk of Lymphocele in Endometrial Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Due to the growing evidence of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in endometrial cancer (EC), our aim was to evaluate the impact of SLN mapping and other clinical-pathological variables in the risk of developing lymphocele. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a series of patients with ECs who underwent lymph node staging with SLN mapping with or without systematic pelvic ± para-aortic lymphadenectomy from November 2012 to January 2020. The lymphocele diagnosis was performed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Of 348 patients included, 178 underwent SLN mapping only and 170 underwent SLN mapping and systematic lymphadenectomy (46.5% pelvic only; 53.5% pelvic and para-aortic). Seventy-three (21%) patients had open surgery and 275 (79%) had a minimally invasive approach. After a median follow-up of 25.4 months, the overall prevalence of lymphocele was 8.6% (n = 30), with 29 cases in a pelvic location. Lymphocele was found in 3.4% (n = 6/178) of patients submitted to SLN mapping only, compared with 14.1% (n = 24/170) among those who underwent SLN with lymphadenectomy (p = 0.009). Among those patients with lymphocele, seven (23.3%) were symptomatic and five (16.6%) required drainage. All symptomatic cases occurred in lymphoceles larger than 4 cm (p = 0.001). Neither resected lymph node count nor the type of systematic lymphadenectomy were related to the presence of lymphocele. Systematic lymphadenectomy was the only factor that emerged as a risk factor for the presence of lymphocele in multivariate analysis (odds ratio 3.68, 95% confidence interval 1.39-9.79; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that SLN mapping independently decreases the risk of lymphocele formation compared with full lymphadenectomy in EC.

Size of Sentinel Node Metastasis Predicts Non-sentinel Node Involvement in Endometrial Cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyze the relationship between the size of metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and the risk of non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastasis in endometrial cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From a total of 328 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent SLN mapping from January 2013 to April 2019, 142 patients also underwent systematic completion pelvic ± paraaortic node dissections, and they form the basis of this study. The SLNs were examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) when the hematoxylin-eosin stain was negative. RESULTS: The median age was 60 years. The overall detection rate for SLNs was 87.5%, and bilateral SLNs were observed in 66.2%, with a median of 2 SLNs resected (range 1-8). Twenty-nine (20.4%) cases had positive SLNs, with a median of one positive SLN. Regarding the size of SLN metastasis, 5 (3.5%) cases had isolated tumor cells (ITCs), 13 (9.2%) had micrometastases, and 11 (7.7%) had macrometastases. Notably, 14/29 (48.3%) had node metastases that were detected after IHC. Eight (27.6%) patients had positive non-SLNs, with a median count of 7 positive nodes (range 2-23). Regarding the size of SLN metastasis, non-SLN involvement was not present in cases with ITC (0/5) but was present in 15.4% (2/13) of cases with micrometastases and 54.5% (6/11) of cases with macrometastases. The only risk factor for positive non-SLNs was the size of SLN metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that size of SLN metastasis is associated with the risk of non-SLN metastasis. No patients with ITCs in SLNs had another metastatic lymph node in this study.

Adnexal Involvement in Endometrial Cancer: Prognostic Factors and Implications for Ovarian Preservation.

PURPOSE: To determine the risk factors related to adnexal involvement in endometrial cancer (EC) and its implications for ovarian preservation in young women. METHODS: We analyzed a series of 802 patients who were treated at AC Camargo Cancer Center from July 1991 to July 2017. Patients who had peritoneal or systemic dissemination (stage IV) were excluded. Chi square and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze the correlations between categories and clinicopathological variables. Multivariate analysis was performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Forty-nine (6.2%) patients had adnexal involvement-43 (5.4%) ovarian and 24 (2.9%) tubal. After excluding the 14 (28%) cases with suspicious findings, 788 subjects were analyzed and adnexal involvement found in 35 (4.4%) cases. Adnexal involvement was statistically related to non-endometrioid histologies (12.6% vs. 3.1%; p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (17% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.001), histological grade 3 tumors (9.4% vs. 2.1%; p < 0.001), presence of LVSI (14.2% vs. 2.4%; p < 0.001), and deep myometrial invasion (≥ 50%) (10.8% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.001). Although age younger than 45 years had higher risk of adnexal involvement, it was not statistically significant (8.9% vs. 4.2%; p = 0.13). Seven (14.2%) patients with adnexal involvement were aged < 45 years, 3 of whom (42.8%) had suspicious adnexal masses that were detected before surgery. Notably, all patients aged < 45 years and with adnexal involvement had at least 1 risk factor, such as presence of LVSI, grade 3 disease, node metastasis, or deep myometrial invasion. No patient with clinically normal ovaries and aged under 45 years, with endometrioid grades 1 and 2, superficial myometrial invasion, or node negativity had adnexal involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian preservation may be considered for patients younger than 45 years old with low-risk EC (grades 1 and 2 tumors, absence of LVSI, and myometrial invasion < 50%).

Uterine transposition after radical trachelectomy.

Objective: To report the first uterine transposition for fertility sparing in cervical cancer. Methods: We report a 33-year-old woman with stage Ib1 cervical cancer (b2 cm in size) who had a radical trachelectomy that, after the definitive pathological report, fulfilled the criteria for adjuvant radiotherapy. Results: The patient had eggs retrieval and received gosereline 10.8 mg before surgery. The uterine corpus and ovaries were detached from the previous vaginal anastomosis, laparoscopically mobilized, and sutured in the right upper abdominal wall with non-absorbable transparietal suture. The adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (45 Gy) was delivered in the pelvis. One week after, the uterus and ovaries were repositioned and sutured in the vagina. The patient had hospital discharged in the 2° post-operative day and no early complications. After 6 months of follow-up the patient has regular menses and no evidence of recurrence. Conclusions: Uterine transposition is feasible after radical trachelectomy in selected patients who still desire to preserve fertility. However, further studies that address its effectiveness and safety are required.

The Impact of Sentinel Node-Mapping in Staging High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the impact of sentinel lymph node (SLN)-mapping on the staging of high-risk endometrial cancer (endometrioid grade 3, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, deep myometrial invasion, or angiolymphatic invasion). METHODS: The study analyzed a series of 236 patients treated at AC Camargo Cancer Center from June 2007 to February 2017. The compared 75 patients who underwent SLN-mapping (SLN group) with 161 patients who received pelvic ± para-aortic lymphadenectomy (N-SLN group). Patients with adnexal, peritoneal, or suspicious node metastases were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The groups did not differ in terms of age, histologic type, or presence of deep myometrial invasion. The overall detection rate for SLNs was 85.3%, and bilateral SLNs were observed in 60% of the patients. Of 20 positive SLNs, 8 (40%) were detected only after immunohistochemistry (IHC). The findings showed an overall sensitivity of 90%, a negative predictive value of 95.7%, and a false-negative predictive value of 4.3%. The SLN group had more pelvic node metastases detected than the N-SLN group (26.7 vs 14.3%; p = 0.02). However, the rate of para-aortic node metastases did not differ between the two groups (13.5 vs 5.6%; p = 0.12). Five patients (3.5%) in the N-SLN group had isolated para-aortic node metastases versus none in the patients with SLN mapped. Additionally, the SLN group received more adjuvant chemotherapy (48 vs 33.5%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that SLN-mapping identifies more pelvic node metastases than lymph node dissection alone and increases the node detection rate by 12.5% after IHC. Furthermore, no isolated para-aortic node metastases are observed when SLN is detected.

Is parametrectomy always necessary in early-stage cervical cancer?

OBJECTIVE: Increasing data suggest that patients with early-stage cervical cancer and favorable pathological characteristics have a low risk of parametrial invasion (PI) and benefit from less radical surgery. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical-pathological factors that are related to PI and identify a group of patients who are at low risk for PI. METHODS: We analyzed a series of 345 patients with stage Ia2 to Ib2 cervical cancer, for which they underwent radical surgery from January 1990 to October 2016 at AC Camargo Cancer Center. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze the correlations between PI and clinicopathological variables. RESULTS: A total of 217 (62.9%) patients were classified as having squamous cell carcinoma, and 128(37.1%) had adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma. Sixteen (4.6%) patients had PI. The presence of perineural invasion (p=0.003), tumor size >2cm (p=0.044), depth of invasion >10mm (p=0.004), the presence of lymphovascular space invasion(LVSI) (p<0.001), and lymph node metastasis (p<0.001) were related to PI. However, only LVSI (p=0.043) and lymph node metastasis (p<0.001) remained risk factors for PI in the multivariate analysis. Of the patients with tumors ≤2cm and no LVSI, only 1(1.2%) had PI; however, this patient had lymph node metastasis and deep stromal invasion (>10mm). No patient with tumor size ≤2cm and negative lymph nodes had PI. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with tumors ≤2cm and those who lack LVSI are unlikely to have PI, unless lymph node metastasis or deep stromal invasion is present. Our data can help select patients in whom a more conservative approach is warranted, such as simple hysterectomy and simple trachelectomy that is associated with pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy can be omitted in most endometrial cancer patients at risk of lymph node metastasis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the predictive factors of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastasis in endometrial cancer (EC) and recommend a subgroup of patients who can safely forgo PALN dissection. METHODS: We analyzed a series of 255 patients who were at risk of lymph node metastasis and treated from June 2007 to June 2015. All patients underwent systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: The median number of pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) and PALNs that were resected was 33 and 15, respectively. Fifty (19.6%) patients had LN metastasis-43 (16.9%) pelvic, 28 (11%) para-aortic, 21 (8.2%) pelvic and para-aortic, and 7 (2.7%) isolated PALN metastasis. PALN metastasis was significantly associated with PLN metastasis, the presence of lymphovascular space invasion, deep myometrial invasion (MI), and histological grade 3. In the multivariate analysis, only pelvic LN metastasis and deep MI remained independent risk factors of PALN metastasis. For patients without LN enlargement ± adnexal metastasis, when deep MI and PLN metastasis were absent, the risk of PALM was 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our series supports that PALN metastasis is a rare event in the absence of PLN metastasis and that most patients can safely forego PALN dissection. This subgroup can be identified by the combined absence of PLN metastasis and deep MI.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy after Secondary Cytoreduction in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Single-center Comparative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although the standard of care after recurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is chemotherapy, increasing data suggest that combining cytoreductive surgery with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising option for patients with recurrent EOC. Our aim was to determine the prognostic value of the addition of HIPEC to secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCR) in recurrent EOC. METHODS: We analyzed a series of 79 patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC who were treated from May 2000 to January 2014. Fifty patients who underwent SCR were compared to 29 who had SCR in combination with HIPEC. RESULTS: The SCR group had a higher median age (58.4 years) compared to the SCR + HIPEC group (51.6 years) (p = 0.006). The median hospital stay length was longer for SCR + HIPEC versus SCR patients (11 and 8 days, respectively; p = 0.009). More subjects experienced National Cancer Institute grade III-IV morbidity in the SCR + HIPEC group (34.5 %) compared to the SCR group (10.6 %) (p = 0.015). Conversely, there were no deaths in the SCR + HIPEC group and 2 (4.0 %) deaths the SCR group. The median disease-free survival did not differ between SCR and SCR + HIPEC patients (18.6 and 15.8 months, respectively; p = 0.82); nor did median overall survival (59.3 and 58.3 months, respectively; p = 0.95). The presence of carcinomatosis was the only variable that remained linked to a higher risk of recurrence and death in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the addition of HIPEC to cytoreduction in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC does not improve survival.

Does histologic type correlate to outcome after pelvic exenteration for cervical and vaginal cancer?

BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma (AC) of the cervix comprises 15-20 % of all cervical carcinomas, and data regarding the prognostic value of histologic type after pelvic exenteration (PE) are lacking. Our aim was to analyze the prognostic value of histologic type in overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) after PE and correlate it to clinical and pathologic variables. METHODS: We reviewed a series of 77 individuals who underwent PE for cervical or vaginal cancer from January 1980 to December 2010. RESULTS: Mean age was 54.5 years. Fifty-three patients (68.9 %) had cervical and 24 (31.1 %) vaginal cancer. Fifty-six (72.7 %) were squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 21 (27.3 %) ACs. We performed 42 (54.5 %) total, 18 anterior, 8 posterior, and 9 lateral extended PE. Median tumor size was 5 cm. Surgical margins were negative in 91.7 % of cases. Median operative time, length of hospital stay, and blood transfusion volume were, respectively, 420 (range 180-720) mins, 13.5 (range 4-79) days, and 900 (range 300-3900) ml. Median follow-up was 13.7 (range 1.09-114.3) months. SCC statistically correlated with presence of perineural invasion (p = 0.004). Five-year OS and DSS were, respectively, 24.4 and 37.1 %. SCC (p = 0.003) and grade 3 (p = 0.001) negatively affected OS in univariate analysis. SCC (p = 0.006), grade 3 (p = 0.003), perineural invasion (p = 0.03), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.02), and positive margins (p = 0.04) negatively affected DSS in univariate analysis. SCC and grade 3 retained the higher risk of death (OS and DSS) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: AC histology in cervical and vaginal cancer is associated with better outcome after PE compared to SCC.

The value of PET/CT for cytoreductive surgery selection in recurrent ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in predicting no residual disease (NRD) after secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) compared with MSK criteria, the iMODEL, and the AGO score. METHODS: We analyzed 112 patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinoma who underwent SCS. We excluded patients for whom PET/CT was not performed, those without sufficient data, and who received chemotherapy before SCS. Ultimately, 69 patients were included. RESULTS: Variables that correlated with NRD were peritoneal carcinomatosis index (odds ratio [OR]=0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.83-0.99; p=0.044), European Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) 0 (OR=8.0; 95% CI=1.34-47.5; p=0.022), and ≤2 lesions by PET/CT (OR=4.36; 95% CI=1.07-17.7; p=0.039). Of the patients with ≤2 lesions by PET/CT, 48 (92.3%) underwent complete SCS. The sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of PET/CT for NRD were 85.7%, 92.3%, 33.3%, and 81.2%, respectively. NRD was achieved after fulfilling the MSK criteria, iMODEL and AGO Score in 89.1%, 88.1% and 85.9%, respectively. The accuracy of the MSK criteria, iMODEL, and AGO score in predicting NRD was 87%, 83.3%, and 77.3%, respectively. The PET/CT findings agreed well with the AGO score and iMODEL. The addition of PET/CT to these models increased the NRD rates (92.2%, 91.8%, and 89.4% for MSK+PET/CT, iMODEL+PET/CT, and AGO+PET/CT, respectively), but lowered their accuracy. CONCLUSION: We observed NRD in 92.3% of patients with ≤2 lesions by PET/CT, with an accuracy of 81.2%. PET/CT did not increase the accuracy of the MSK criteria, iMODEL, or AGO score models.

Intraoperative ultrasound for benign cystic teratoma. Report of two cases.

PURPOSE: Teratoma is one of the most common ovarian neoplasms and frequently leads to laparoscopic surgical procedure. When this tumor is small and the ovarian surface seems regular during the surgery, it is difficult to localize the tumor. METHODS: We used a standard transvaginal ultrasound probe during the procedure and filled the pelvic cavity with saline solution of 0.9% in order to create an interface between the saline solution and the surgical instruments. RESULTS: We could localize the teratoma with confidence and precision, allowing to perform a sparing surgery. CONCLUSION: This is a simple, secure and efficient technique that can be performed in most of the institutions.

Conservative management of extramammary paget disease with imiquimod.

OBJECTIVE: Extramammary Paget disease is a rare cutaneous neoplasm that most frequently affects the vulva. Surgery remains the preferred treatment, despite its association with high recurrence rates. Few reports have described conservative treatments for vulvar Paget disease. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of conservative treatment with imiquimod. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 4 patients who were treated with topical imiquimod 5% cream. RESULTS: One patient underwent vulvectomy after imiquimod therapy, and 3 patients experienced extensive recurrent disease that was unsuitable for surgical resection and were treated successfully with imiquimod. CONCLUSIONS: Imiquimod is an effective therapeutic agent for the conservative treatment of vulvar Paget disease.

Surgical implications of mesenteric lymph node metastasis from advanced ovarian cancer after bowel resection.

BACKGROUND: Studies addressing mesenteric and mesocolic lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced ovarian cancer that have undergone bowel resection are lacking. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in a series of 50 individuals who underwent surgical cytoreduction for epithelial ovarian cancer that included bowel resection from April 2004 to September 2010. RESULTS: Forty-one patients had bowel resection with mesenteric lymph nodes that were suitable for analysis. Twenty-four (58.5%) patients underwent retosigmoidectomies, 14 (34.1%) received other types of colectomies, and three (7.3%) underwent small bowel resection. There was serosal involvement in 14 cases (34.1%), muscularis propria invasion in 13 cases (31.7%), submucosa invasion in six cases (14.6%), and mucosa in eight cases (19.5%). Lymphatic invasion was observed in 24 patients (58.5%). A median of 14 mesenteric lymph nodes were analyzed. Metastatic lymph nodes were observed in 29 (70.7%) cases. Invasion into the muscularis propria (P = 0.036), lymphatic invasion (P = 0.045), and retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis (P = 0.002) correlated significantly with mesenteric lymph node involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of regional lymph nodes of affected organs that is similar to surgical procedures that are performed for colorectal carcinoma is an appropriate, optimal debulking surgery for patients with ovarian carcinoma.