Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 55
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Europace ; 25(2): 676-681, 2023 02 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36372986

RESUMEN

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major challenge for the healthcare field. Pulmonary vein isolation is the most effective treatment for the maintenance of sinus rhythm. However, clinical endpoints for the procedure vary significantly among studies. There is no consensus on the definition of recurrence and no clear roadmap on how to deal with recurrences after a failed ablation. The purpose of this study was to perform a survey in order to show how clinicians currently approach this knowledge gap. An online survey, supported by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Scientific Initiatives Committee, was conducted between 1 April 2022 and 8 May 2022. An anonymous questionnaire was disseminated via social media and EHRA newsletters, for clinicians to complete. This consisted of 18 multiple-choice questions regarding rhythm monitoring, definitions of a successful ablation, clinical practices after a failed AF ablation, and the continuance of anticoagulation. A total of 107 replies were collected across Europe. Most respondents (82%) perform routine monitoring for AF recurrences after ablation, with 51% of them preferring a long-term monitoring strategy. Cost was reported to have an impact on the choice of monitoring strategy. Self-screening was recommended by most (71%) of the respondents. The combination of absence of symptoms and recorded AF was the definition of success for most (83%) of the respondents. Cessation of anticoagulation after ablation was an option mostly for patients with paroxysmal AF and a low CHA2DS2-VASc score. The majority of physicians perform routine monitoring after AF ablation. For most physicians, the combination of the absence of symptoms and electrocardiographic endpoints defines a successful result after AF ablation.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Recurrencia
2.
Europace ; 25(2): 667-675, 2023 02 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36512365

RESUMEN

Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is the therapy of choice for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with symptomatic AF. Time towards interventional treatment and peri-procedural management of patients undergoing AF ablation may vary in daily practice. The scope of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to report the current clinical practice regarding the management of patients undergoing AF ablation and physician's adherence to the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines and the EHRA/HRS/ECAS expert consensus statement on the CA for AF. This physician-based survey was conducted among EHRA members, using an internet-based questionnaire developed by the EHRA Scientific Initiatives Committee. A total of 258 physicians participated in the survey. In patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF, 42 and 9% of the physicians would routinely perform AF ablation as first-line therapy respectively, whereas 71% of physicians would consider ablation as first-line therapy in patients with symptomatic AF and left ventricular ejection fraction <35%. Only 14% of the respondents manage cardiovascular risk factors in patients referred for CA using a dedicated AF risk factor management programme. Radiofrequency CA is the preferred technology for first-time AF (56%), followed by cryo-balloon CA (40%). This EHRA survey demonstrated a considerable variation in the management of patients undergoing AF ablation in routine practice and deviations between guideline recommendations and clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación , Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Selección de Paciente , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Europace ; 25(4): 1277-1283, 2023 04 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36196613

RESUMEN

Electrical storm (ES) is a predictor of mortality, and its treatment is challenging. Moreover, not all potential therapeutic strategies are available in all hospitals, and a standardized approach among European centres is lacking. The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to assess the current management of patients with ES both in the acute and post-acute phases in 102 different European centres. A 20-item online questionnaire was sent out to the EHRA Research Network Centres. The median number of patients with ES treated annually per centre is 10 (IQR 5-15). The possibility of using autonomic modulation (e.g. percutaneous stellate ganglion block or thoracic epidural anaesthesia) for the acute ES treatment is available in only 29.3% of the centres. Moreover, although over 80% of centres perform ventricular tachycardia ablation, this procedure is available 24/7 in only 16.5% of the hospitals. There is a significant heterogeneity among centres regarding the availability of AADs and their use before deciding to proceed with a non-AAD strategy; specifically, 4.4% of centres use only one drug, 33.3% use two drugs, and 12.2% >two drugs, while about 50% of the centres decide based on individual patient's characteristics. Regarding the type of AADs used for the acute and post-acute management of ES patients, important variability is reported depending upon the underlying heart disease. Most patients considered for percutaneous ablation have structural heart disease. Only 46% of centres refer patients to psychological counselling after ES.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter , Cardiopatías , Taquicardia Ventricular , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/epidemiología , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Cardiopatías/cirugía , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología
4.
Europace ; 25(3): 1144-1151, 2023 03 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36691111

RESUMEN

AIMS: Information provided to patients prior to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion and their participation in the decision-making process are crucial for understanding ICD function and accepting this lifelong therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the extent to which different aspects related to ICD and quality of life were transmitted to patients prior to ICD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective, multicenter European study with an online questionnaire initiated by the European Heart Rhythm Association. The questionnaire was filled-in directly and personally by the ICD patients who were invited to participate. A total of 1809 patients (majority in their 40s-70s, with 624 women, 34.5%) from 10 European countries participated in the study. The median time from first ICD implantation was 5 years (interquartile range 2-10). Overall, 1155 patients (71.5%) felt optimally informed at the time of device implantation, however many respondents received no information about ICD-related complications (n = 801, 49.6%), driving restrictions (n = 718, 44.5%), and possibility of end-of-life ICD deactivation (n = 408, 25.4%). Of note, women were less frequently involved in the decision-making process than men (47.3% vs. 55.9%, P = 0.003) and reported to be less often optimally informed before ICD implantation than men (61.2% vs. 76.8%, P < 0.001). More women mentioned the desire to have learned more about ICD therapy and the benefit/risk balance (45.4% vs. 33.7% of men; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This patient-based evaluation provides alarming findings on the lack of information provided to patients prior ICD implantation, particularly for women.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Calidad de Vida , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control
5.
Europace ; 25(9)2023 08 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37498147

RESUMEN

AIMS: Electrophysiology (EP) is a growing field in cardiology, with an increasing involvement of young people. Nevertheless, concerns about radiation exposure and its impact on reproduction and pregnancy may discourage the choice of an EP career. The study is aimed at investigating the level of awareness and main sources of concern about the effects of radiation on reproductive potential and pregnancy, exploring the safety measures adopted in different EP labs, and verifying the adherence to the current guidelines. METHODS AND RESULTS: An online survey was conducted using the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) infrastructure from April to June 2022. A total of 252 EP personnel (42% women) participated, from 50 countries and different professional roles. Most participants expressed concerns regarding the effects of radiation on reproductive capacity (67.1%) and offspring diseases (68.2%). Only 37.9% of participants were aware of the EHRA 2017 consensus document about occupational radiation exposure. Most participants (80.9%) considered that occupational radiation during pregnancy is not safe. EP female staff were not allowed to work in the EP lab during pregnancy in 48.1% of cases. Zero-fluoroscopy was the preferred choice to continue working in the EP lab during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: EP staff, including both men and women, have concerns about the effects of radiation on reproductive capacity. Despite the recommendations issued by international bodies, implementation of the policies regarding pregnancy and occupational radiation exposure is heterogeneous. Zero-fluoroscopy is the preferred approach to ensure safety during pregnancy in the EP lab.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Exposición a la Radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación , Masculino , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Adolescente , Exposición a la Radiación/efectos adversos , Exposición a la Radiación/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reproducción , Electrofisiología Cardíaca , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Dosis de Radiación
6.
Europace ; 25(10)2023 10 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37789664

RESUMEN

AIMS: Electrophysiological (EP) operations that have traditionally involved long hospital lengths of stay (LOS) are now being undertaken as day case procedures. The coronavirus disease-19 pandemic served as an impetus for many centres to shorten LOS for EP procedures. This survey explores LOS for elective EP procedures in the modern era. METHODS AND RESULTS: An online survey consisting of 27 multiple-choice questions was completed by 245 respondents from 35 countries. With respect to de novo cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantations, day case procedures were reported for 79.5% of implantable loop recorders, 13.3% of pacemakers (PMs), 10.4% of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and 10.2% of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. With respect to CIED generator replacements, day case procedures were reported for 61.7% of PMs, 49.2% of ICDs, and 48.2% of CRT devices. With regard to ablations, day case procedures were reported for 5.7% of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablations, 10.7% of left-sided ablations, and 17.5% of right-sided ablations. A LOS ≥ 2 days for CIED implantation was reported for 47.7% of PM, 54.5% of ICDs, and 56.9% of CRT devices and for 54.5% of AF ablations, 42.2% of right-sided ablations, and 46.1% of left-sided ablations. Reimbursement (43-56%) and bed availability (20-47%) were reported to have no consistent impact on the organization of elective procedures. CONCLUSION: There is a wide variation in the LOS for elective EP procedures. The LOS for some procedures appears disproportionate to their complexity. Neither reimbursement nor bed availability consistently influenced LOS.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , COVID-19 , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Humanos , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , COVID-19/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Europace ; 25(5)2023 05 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37140046

RESUMEN

AIMS: The aim of this study was to identify potential regional disparities in characteristics of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients, patient perceptions and perspectives after implantation and level of information provided to patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The prospective, multicentre, and multinational European Heart Rhythm Association patient Survey 'Living with an ICD' included patients already implanted with an ICD (median ICD dwell time - 5 years, interquartile range 2-10). An online questionnaire was filled-in by patients invited from 10 European countries. A total of 1809 patients (the majority in their 40s to 70s, 65.5% men) were enrolled, with 877 (48.5%) from Western Europe (group 1), followed by 563 from Central/Eastern Europe (group 2, 31.1%), and 369 from Southern Europe (group 3, 20.4%). A total of 52.9% of Central/Eastern Europe patients reported increased satisfaction after ICD placement compared with 46.6% from Western and 33.1% from Southern Europe (1 vs. 2 P = 0.047, 1 vs. 3 P < 0.001, 2 vs. 3 P < 0.001). About 79.2% of Central/Eastern and 76.0% of Southern Europe patients felt optimally informed at the time of device implantation compared with just 64.6% from Western Europe (1 vs. 2 P < 0.001, 1 vs. 3 P < 0.001, 2 vs. 3 P = ns). CONCLUSIONS: While physicians in Southern Europe should address the patients' concerns about the impact of the ICD on quality of life, physicians from Western Europe should focus on improving the quality of information provided to their prospective ICD patients. Novel strategies to address regional differences in patients' quality of life and provision of information are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología
8.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther ; 37(1): 159-168, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34669102

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare effectiveness of different treatments for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who were scheduled for cardioversion (CV) or ablation (CA) presenting with left atrium appendage (LAA) thrombus despite chronic oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed 2014-2019 medical records of patients scheduled for CV or CA of AF who were diagnosed with LAA thrombus despite optimal OAC and had a follow-up transesophageal echocardiogram (TOE). Changes in treatment were divided into the following groups: switch to a drug with different mechanism of action, switch to a drug with similar mechanism of action, initiation of combination therapy, or deliberate no change in treatment. Patients with contraindications to non-vitamin K antagonists were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed data of 129 patients comprising 181 cycles of treatment. The overall effectiveness of LAA thrombus dissolution was 51.9% regardless of the number of cycles and 42.6% for the first cycle of treatment. Any change of treatment was more effective than deliberate no change-OR 2.97 [95% CI: 1.07-8.25], P = 0.031, but no particular strategy seemed to be more effective than the other. Left atrium area (OR 0.908 [95% CI: 0.842-0.979]) and number of treatment cycles (OR 0.457 [95% CI: 0.239-0.872]) were both adversely related to thrombus resolution. There was one ischemic and three bleeding adverse events during the treatment. CONCLUSION: LAA thrombus resolution in patients already on OAC may require a change of previous OAC treatment but the overall effectiveness of dissolution seems to be about 50%.


Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Cardiopatías , Trombosis , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Anticoagulantes
9.
Europace ; 24(6): 1006-1014, 2022 07 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35060596

RESUMEN

On behalf of the European Heart Rhythm Association, we designed a survey, whose aim was to understand the trend(s) in the clinical management of idiopathic monomorphic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) among European cardiologists and cardiac electrophysiologists. A total of 202 participants in the survey answered 27 multiple-choice questions on the clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic monomorphic PVCs. The most common symptom in patients with idiopathic monomorphic PVCs is palpitations, according to the majority of responders (87%), followed by fatigue (29%) and dizziness (18%). Complete blood cell count, renal function with electrolytes levels, and thyroid function are the blood tests requested by the majority of respondents (65%, 92%, and 93%, respectively). Coronary artery disease and structural heart disease needs to be ruled out, according to the vast majority of participants (99%). A 24-h Holter ECG is the preferred ECG modality to assess the burden of PVCs (86% of respondents). Among the different option treatments, beta-blockers and class I antiarrhythmic drugs are by far (81% of respondents) the preferred pharmacological option in comparison with calcium antagonists and class III antiarrhythmic drugs. Catheter ablation has also a good reputation: 99% of responders are keen to use it, especially in patients with high burden of PVCs and when signs of cardiomyopathy occur.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/diagnóstico , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/terapia
10.
Europace ; 24(5): 860-867, 2022 05 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35167672

RESUMEN

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) may impact patients' life significantly. The aim of this survey was to analyse the impact of the ICD on quality of life (QoL) metrics from the patient's perspective. 'Living with an ICD' was a prospective, multicentre study with an online questionnaire submitted to the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Research Network centres as well as patient associations from 10 European countries; it was filled-in directly and personally by the patients that were invited to participate, with a minimal interaction or influence from the healthcare professionals. Overall, the questionnaire was completed by 1809 patients (624 women, 34.5%). Patients in their 60s and 70s and from Western Europe were the most represented. The median time from first ICD implantation was 5 years (IQR 2-10). Device-related complications were reported by 505 patients (22.4%), including one or more inappropriate shocks (n = 209, 11.6%). Almost half the respondents reported improved QoL, with a more favourable impact for those receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D), and only a 10th experienced a significant decrease in QoL. The occurrence of complications remained a major predictor of deteriorated QoL (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4-3.0, P < 0.001). In conclusion, most patients have a globally positive view and acceptance of ICD therapy, reporting preserved to improved QoL after device implantation. Complications, namely inappropriate shocks, affect the expectation of living a normal life post-implant and are associated with a significant decrease in QoL. Our findings also highlight the importance of a detailed informed consent process and the involvement of the patient in the decision-making process.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/métodos , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Europace ; 24(10): 1684-1690, 2022 10 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35942585

RESUMEN

The use of a blanking period (BP) after an atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure is a common practice, but recent data questions the benign nature of early recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ERATs). A physician-based survey was carried out by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) to investigate the current definition and applicability of BP and ERAT management. An online questionnaire was sent to clinical and interventional electrophysiologists. A total of 436 respondents (88% interventional electrophysiologists) reported observing ERATs in 25% (interquartile range 15-35) of patients, less commonly in paroxysmal AF (PAF) compared with persistent AF (persAF). The median reported duration of BP used by respondents was 90 days, with 22% preferring a shorter BP duration for PAF patients compared with persAF. Half of the patients with ERATs are expected to also experience late recurrences (LR). Isolated episodes of ERATs are treated conservatively by 99% of the respondents, but repeat ablation during the BP is preferred by 20% of electrophysiologists for multiple ERATs and by 16% in patients with organized atrial tachyarrhythmias. In conclusion, ERATs are commonly observed after AF ablation, particularly in persAF patients, and are perceived as predictors of LR by half of the respondents. A general adherence to a 90-day BP duration was observed. During this time period, ERAT is mainly treated conservatively, but repeat ablation during the BP is occasionally offered to patients with multiple ERATs and those with organized atrial tachyarrhythmias.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Criocirugía , Venas Pulmonares , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Criocirugía/métodos , Humanos , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Recurrencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Europace ; 23(5): 806-814, 2021 05 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34020460

RESUMEN

The aim of this survey is to provide a snapshot of current practice regarding antithrombotic therapy (ATT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) comorbid with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). An online survey was distributed to members of the European Heart Rhythm Association. A total of 163 clinicians responded, mostly cardiologists or electrophysiologists (87.7%), predominantly working in University hospitals (61.3%). Most respondents (47.2%) had seen one to five patients with AF comorbid with ICH in the last 12 months. Among patients sustaining an ICH on oral anticoagulation (OAC), 84.3% respondents would consider some form of ATT post-ICH, with 73.2% preferring to switch from a vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) to a non-VKA oral anticoagulant (NOAC) and 37.2% preferring to switch from one NOAC to another. Most (36.6%) would restart OAC >30 days post-ICH. Among patients considered unable to take OAC, left atrial appendage occlusion procedure was the therapy of choice in 73.3% respondents. When deciding on ATT, respondents considered patient's CHA2DS2-VASc score, ICH type, demographics, risk factors, and patient adherence. The main reason for not restarting or commencing ATT was concern about recurrent ICH (80.8%). National or international clinical guidelines would be advantageous to support decision-making (84.3%). Other helpful resources reported were multidisciplinary team involvement (46.9%) and patient education (82%). In summary, most survey respondents would prescribe OAC therapy for patients with AF who have sustained an ICH on OAC and would restart OAC >30 days post-ICH. The risk of recurrent ICH was the main reason for not prescribing any ATT post-ICH.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia Cerebral/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiología , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
Europace ; 23(9): 1502-1507, 2021 09 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33990842

RESUMEN

Data supporting the safety of cardioversion (CV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) without anticoagulation in patients with AF duration <48 h are scarce. Observational studies suggest that the risk of stroke in these patients is very low when the definite duration of the AF episode is of <48 h and the clinical risk profile as estimated through the CHA2DS2VASc score is low (a score of 0 for men and 1 for women). As the recent 2020 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines indication for this clinical scenario is based mainly on consensus, we sent out a survey to assess the current clinical practice on anticoagulation prior to and post-CV in patients with AF <24-48 h duration and low stroke risk across centres in Europe. Of the 136 respondents, half were affiliated to university hospitals (68/136; 50%). Non-university hospitals (50/136; 36%) and private hospitals (2/136; 1.4%) accounted over a third of respondents. The main findings of our survey were (i) heterogeneity in the anticoagulation management both before and post-CV in low stroke-risk patients with AF <48 h, (ii) higher utilization of periprocedural low-molecular-weight heparin than of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant, (iii) higher utilization of pre-CV transoesophageal echocardiography for electrical CV than for pharmacological CV regardless of the duration of AF, (iv) high adherence to a 4-week post-CV oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy, mainly for electrical CV, and finally, (v) perceived higher acceptance of lack of post-CV OAC therapy in patients with <24 h than 24-48 h episode duration. The results obtained in this survey highlight the need for more research providing definitive clarification on the safety of CV without anticoagulation in patients with short duration AF.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Europace ; 22(1): 162-169, 2020 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31501852

RESUMEN

Practices regarding indications and timing for transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) before cardioversion (CV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) or left atrial (LA) interventional procedures, and preferred imaging techniques and pharmacotherapy, in cases of thrombus resistant to chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) treatment, are largely unknown. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) conducted a survey to capture contemporary clinical practice in those areas of AF care. A 22-item online questionnaire was developed and distributed among the EHRA electrophysiology research network centres. The survey contained questions regarding indications, type and timing of imaging before CV or LA procedures and management of LA appendage (LAA) thrombus with special emphasis on thrombus resistant to OAC. Of 54 responding centres 63% were university hospitals. Most commonly, TOE would be performed in cases of inadequate or unclear pre-procedural anticoagulation, even in AF lasting <48 h (52% and 50%, respectively), and 15% of centres would perform TOE before AF ablation in all patients. If thrombus was diagnosed despite chronic OAC, the prevalent strategy was to change current OAC to another with different mechanism of action; 51% of centres would wait 3-4 weeks after changing the OAC before using another imaging test, and 60% of centres reported two attempts to dissolve the thrombus. Our survey showed a significant utilization of TOE before CV or AF ablation in European centres, extending beyond AF guidelines-suggested indications. When thrombus was diagnosed despite chronic pre-procedural OAC, most centres would use another anticoagulant drug with different mode of action.


Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Trombosis , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trombosis/diagnóstico por imagen
15.
Europace ; 2020 Aug 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32853369

RESUMEN

AIMS: A plethora of mobile health applications (m-health apps) to support healthcare are available for both patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) but content and quality vary considerably and few have undergone formal assessment. The aim is to systematically review the literature on m-health apps for managing atrial fibrillation (AF) that examine the impact on knowledge of AF, patient and HCP behaviour, patients' quality-of-life, and user engagement. METHODS AND RESULTS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsychInfo were searched from 1 January 2005 to 5 September 2019, with hand-searching of clinical trial registers and grey literature. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported changes in any of the following: (i) knowledge of AF; (ii) provider behaviour (e.g. guideline adherence); (iii) patient behaviour (e.g. medication adherence); (iv) patient quality-of-life; and (v) user engagement. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for eligibility. A narrative review was undertaken as included studies varied widely in their design, interventions, comparators, and outcomes. Seven studies were included; six m-health apps aimed at patients and one at HCPs. Mobile health apps ranged widely in design, features, and method of delivery. Four studies reported patient knowledge of AF; three demonstrated significant knowledge improvement post-intervention or compared to usual care. One study reported greater HCP adherence to oral anticoagulation guidelines after m-health app implementation. Two studies reported on patient medication adherence and quality-of-life; both showed improved quality-of-life post-intervention but only one observed increased adherence. Regarding user engagement, five studies reported patient perspectives on usability, three on acceptability, and one on feasibility; overall all m-health apps were rated positively. CONCLUSION: Mobile health apps demonstrate improvements in patient knowledge, behaviour, and quality of life. Studies formally evaluating the impact of m-health on HCP behaviour are scarce and larger-scale studies with representative patient cohorts, appropriate comparators, and longer-term assessment of the impact of m-health apps are warranted.

16.
Europace ; 22(6): 980-987, 2020 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32449760

RESUMEN

Syncope is a heterogeneous syndrome encompassing a large spectrum of mechanisms and outcomes. The European Society of Cardiology published an update of the Syncope Guidelines in 2018. The aim of the present survey was to capture contemporary management of syncope and guideline implementation among European physicians. A 23-item questionnaire was presented to 2588 European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) members from 32 European countries. The response rate was 48%, but only complete responses (n = 161) were included in this study. The questionnaire contained specific items regarding syncope facilities, diagnostic definitions, diagnostic tools, follow-up, and therapy. The survey revealed that many respondents did not have syncope units (88%) or dedicated management algorithms (44%) at their institutions, and 45% of the respondents reported syncope-related hospitalization rates >25%, whereas most (95%) employed close monitoring and hospitalization in syncope patients with structural heart disease. Carotid sinus massage, autonomic testing, and tilt-table testing were inconsistently used. Indications were heterogeneous for implanted loop recorders (79% considered them for recurrent syncope in high-risk patients) or electrophysiological studies (67% considered them in bifascicular block and inconclusive non-invasive testing). Non-pharmacological therapy was consistently considered by 68% of respondents; however, there was important variation regarding the choice of drug and device therapy. While revealing an increased awareness of syncope and good practice, our study identified important unmet needs regarding the optimal management of syncope and variable syncope guideline implementation.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Médicos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Síncope/diagnóstico , Síncope/epidemiología , Síncope/terapia
17.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 30(10): 2034-2040, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31402513

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Fluoroscopy guidance alone is not sufficient for the accurate localization of the pacing lead (PL) in the right ventricle (RV) during implantation of the cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). The aim of this study was to create a surface electrocardiogram (ECG) algorithm based on paced QRS (pQRS) morphology to accurately localize PL position in the RV. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty consecutive patients scheduled for catheter ablation of right heart arrhythmias were enrolled. After the elimination of index arrhythmia pacing from the RV interventricular septum (IVS), apex and free wall was performed and pQRS were recorded. The pacing site was verified both by fluoroscopy and transthoracic echocardiography. After a careful analysis of pQRS, a stepwise algorithm was developed to aid the proper positioning of the PL in RV. The algorithm was later prospectively validated in 31 pacemaker patients undergoing an elective generator exchange. A clear R wave in I, II, and V5 leads indicated proximal IVS. For a reliable indication of other RV sites, four ECG leads were crucial I, II, V5, and V6. A prospective evaluation of the algorithm revealed 90.3% agreement between RV lead localization obtained by ECG and echocardiography, with sensitivity of 92.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.2%-100.0%) and a positive predictive value of 96.0% (95% CI, 89.0%-100.0%) for desired lead locations in RV. CONCLUSION: A simple ECG algorithm can reliably differentiate between the sites of permanent PL implantation in the RV in CIED recipients.


Asunto(s)
Potenciales de Acción , Algoritmos , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Electrocardiografía , Marcapaso Artificial , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Función Ventricular Derecha , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
18.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 85(7): 1552-1558, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30920001

RESUMEN

AIMS: Antazoline is a first-generation antihistaminic drug used primarily in eye drop formulations. When administered intravenously, antazoline displays antiarrhythmic properties resulting in a rapid conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm (SR). The aim of the study was to assess the influence of antazoline on atrio-venous conduction and other electrophysiological parameters in patients undergoing AF ablation. METHODS: An experimental prospective study. Patients scheduled for the first-time AF ablation, in SR and not on amiodarone were enrolled. Atrio-venous conduction assessment and invasive electrophysiological study (EPS) were performed before and after intravenous administration of 250 mg of antazoline. In case of AF induction during EPS, antazoline was administered until conversion to SR or a cumulative dose of 300 mg. RESULTS: We enrolled 14 patients: 13 (93%) men, mean age 63.4 (59.9-66.8) years, mean CHA2 DS2 -VASc score 1.6 (1.0-2.2). Antazoline was administered in a mean dose 257.1 (246.7-267.6) mg. Pulmonary vein potentials and atrial capture during pulmonary vein stimulation were present before and after the administration of antazoline. Wenckebach point and atrial conduction times did not change significantly, but atrio-ventricular node effective refractory period improved-324.7 (275.9-373.5) ms vs 284.3 (256.2-312.4) ms, P = 0.02. Antazoline was effective in all 5 (100%) cases of AF induction during EPS. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Due to the lack of influence on atrio-venous conduction and high clinical effectiveness, antazoline may be suitable for pharmacological cardioversion of AF occurring during AF ablation.


Asunto(s)
Antazolina/administración & dosificación , Antiarrítmicos/administración & dosificación , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Criocirugía/métodos , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Antazolina/farmacología , Antiarrítmicos/farmacología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Femenino , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos H1/farmacología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía
19.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 53(6): 323-328, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31407601

RESUMEN

Objectives. The aim of the study was to assess the long-term influence of catheter ablation (CA) of different arrhythmias on cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) endocardial leads durability. Design. This was a retrospective case-control study. Ablation protocols and in- or outpatient medical records were reviewed to identify and extract data on adult patients with CIED undergoing a CA. A cohort of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) served as a historical control group. The primary endpoint was the diagnosis of lead damage defined as permanent loss of proper function demanding replacement or removal. Results. Among 145 patients n = 177 catheter ablations were performed. Patients' mean age was 66.4 ± 10.5, 66.1% had an ICD or ICD with cardiac resynchronization function (CRT-D), 18.1% had >1 CA. During median 812 days [IQR 381-1588] of follow-up, there were 11 (6.2%) cases of lead damage in the examined and 13 cases (13%) in the control group, p = 0.054. None of the technical aspects of the CA (indication, type of catheter, transseptal sheath) influenced the primary outcome. Both the number of leads and observation time after CA were significantly related to the risk of endocardial lead damage. Conclusion. This study did not find any significant influence of CA on the long-term durability of CIED endocardial leads. Reported risk factors were consistent with general population of CIED patients.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Criocirugía/efectos adversos , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Marcapaso Artificial , Falla de Prótesis , Adulto , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
20.
Neurol Neurochir Pol ; 53(3): 181-189, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31145466

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Stroke remains one of the main causes of death and the most common cause of long-term disability in adults. Embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) amount to a significant proportion of all ischaemic strokes. Detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) in this group of patients would allow for a major therapeutic decision to switch from antiplatelets to oral anticoagulants and therefore significantly reduce the risk of recurrence. STATE OF THE ART: Current technology allows long-term continuous ECG monitoring with different systems, including implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). However, in Poland lack of reimbursement does not allow their use in everyday clinical practice. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This is a statement by a Working Group conceived by the Polish National Consultants in Cardiology and Neurology addressing the use of ICM in patients after ischaemic embolic strokes of undetermined source. The aim was to develop reasonable and comprehensive guidance on how to select and manage candidates for ICM in order to obtain the maximum benefit for Polish public health. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: This expert opinion is not intended as a guideline but it provides advice as to how to optimise the potential use of ICM in patients after ESUS in the Polish setting.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Embolia Intracraneal , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central , Consultores , Cardiopatías , Humanos , Polonia , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA