RESUMEN
Ovarian cancer is classified as type 1 or 2, representing low- and high-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC and HGSC), respectively. LGSC arises from serous borderline tumor (SBT) in a stepwise manner, while HGSC develops from serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). Rarely, HGSC develops from SBT and LGSC. Herein, we describe the case of a patient with HGSC who presented with SBT and LGSC, and in whom we analyzed the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis. We performed primary debulking surgery, resulting in a suboptimal simple total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy due to strong adhesions. The diagnosis was stage IIIC HGSC, pT3bcN0cM0, but the tumor contained SBT and LGSC lesions. After surgery, TC (Paclitaxel + Carbopratin) + bevacizumab therapy was administered as adjuvant chemotherapy followed by bevacizumab as maintenance therapy. The tumor was chemo-resistant and caused ileus, and bevacizumab therapy was conducted only twice. Next-Generation Sequencing revealed KRAS (p.G12V) and NF2 (p.W184*) mutations in all lesions. Interestingly, the TP53 mutation was not detected in every lesion, and immunohistochemistry showed those lesions with wild-type p53. MDM2 was amplified in the HGSC lesions. DNA methylation analysis did not show differentially methylated regions. This case suggests that SBT and LGSC may transform into HGSC via p53 dysfunction due to MDM2 amplification.
RESUMEN
Although endometriosis is a benign disease, it is associated with cancer-related gene mutations, such as KRAS or PIK3CA. Endometriosis is associated with elevated levels of inflammatory factors that cause severe pain. In a previous study, we demonstrated that KRAS or PIK3CA mutations are associated with the activation of cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in a patient-derived immortalized endometriotic cell line, HMOsisEC10. In this study, we investigated the effects of these mutations on progesterone resistance. Since the HMOsisEC10 had suppressed progesterone receptor (PR) expression, we transduced PR-B to HMOsisEc10 cell lines including KRAS mutant and PIK3CA mutant cell lines. We conducted a migration assay, invasion assay, and MTT assay using dienogest and medroxyprogestrone acetate. All cell lines showed progesterone sensitivity with or without mutations. Regarding inflammatory factors, real-time quantitative RT-PCR revealed that the KRAS mutation cell line exhibited no suppression of Cox-2 and mPGES-1 on progesterone treatment, whereas IL-6, MCP-1, VEGF, and CYP19A1 were significantly suppressed by progesterone in both mutated cell lines. Our results suggest that KRAS mutation and PIK3CA mutation in endometriotic cells may not be associated with progesterone resistance in terms of aggressiveness. However, KRAS mutations may be associated with progesterone resistance in the context of pain.