New Predictive Equation for the Estimation of Plasma Concentrations of Formed Colistin in Patients Treated With Colistimethate Sodium for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections.

BACKGROUND: The clinical use of colistin methanesulphonate (CMS) is limited by potential nephrotoxicity. The selection of an efficient and safe CMS dose for individual patients is complicated by the narrow therapeutic window and high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. In this study, a simple predictive equation for estimating the plasma concentration of formed colistin in patients with multidrug and extremely drug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections was developed. METHODS: The equation was derived from the largest clinical cohort of patients undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of colistin for over 8 years in a tertiary Spanish hospital. All variables associated with C ss,avg were selected in a multiple linear regression model that was validated in a second cohort of 40 patients. Measured C ss,avg values were compared with those predicted by our model and a previous published algorithm for critically ill patients. RESULTS: In total, 276 patients were enrolled [the mean age was 67.2 (13.7) years, 203 (73.6%)] were male, and the mean (SD) C ss,avg was 1.12 (0.98) mg/L. Age, gender, estimated glomerular filtration rate, CMS dose and frequency, and concomitant drugs were included in the model. In the external validation, the previous algorithm appeared to yield more optimized colistin plasma concentrations when all types of C ss,avg values (high and low) were considered, while our equation yielded a more optimized prediction in the subgroup of patients with low colistin plasma concentrations (C ss,avg <1.5 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed equation may help clinicians to better use CMS among a wide variety of patients, to maximize efficacy and prevent nephrotoxicity. A further prospective PK study is warranted to externally validate this algorithm.

Dispensation of outpatient hospital medicines by hospital only versus hospital-community pharmacies collaboration: a cross-sectional study and survey of patient's satisfaction.

Goal: To describe the experience of a dispensing model of outpatient hospital medicines (OHM) via collaboration of hospital and community pharmacies, and to explore patient satisfaction with the strategy as compared with the hospital pharmacy only service. Background: Patient satisfaction is an important component of the quality of health care. Study: A new model of dispensing OHM was conducted in the Outpatients Unit of the Service of Hospital Pharmacy of Hospital del Mar, in Barcelona, Spain. Participants were patients on stable chronic treatment with clinical or social fragility, immunocompromised patients, and those whose residence was located at a distance from the hospital that justified drug delivery through the community pharmacy. A cross sectional study was done using an ad hoc 14-item questionnaire collecting demographic data, duration of treatment, usual mode of collecting medication, and the degree of satisfaction regarding waiting time for the collection of medication, attention received by professionals, information received on treatment, and confidentiality. Results: The study population included a total of 4,057 patients (66.8% men) with a mean age of 53 (15.5) years, of whom 1,286 responded, with a response rate of 31.7%. Variables significantly associated with response to the survey were age over 44 years, particularly the age segment of 55-64 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.51) and receiving OHM via the community pharmacy (OR 12.76). Patients in the community pharmacy group (n = 927) as compared with those in the hospital pharmacy group (n = 359) showed significantly higher percentages of 'satisfied' and 'very satisfied' (p < 0.001) in the waiting time for the collection of OHM (88.1% vs. 66%), attention received by professionals (92.5% vs. 86.1%), and information received on treatment (79.4% vs. 77.4%). In relation to confidentiality, results obtained were similar in both pharmacy settings. Conclusion: Dispensing OHM through the community pharmacy was a strategy associated with greater patient satisfaction as compared with OHM collection at the hospital pharmacy service, with greater accessibility, mainly due to close distance to the patient's home. The participation of community pharmacists could further optimize the care received by patients undergoing OHM treatment.

Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting Non-Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy.

Several patient-related factors that influence adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) have been described. However, studies that propose a practical and simple tool to predict nonadherence after ART initiation are still scarce. In this study, we develop and validate a score to predict the risk of nonadherence in people starting ART. The model/score was developed and validated using a cohort of people living with HIV starting ART at the Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, between 2012 and 2015 (derivation cohort) and between 2016 and 2018 (validation cohort),. Adherence was evaluated every 2 months using both pharmacy refills and patient self-reports. Nonadherence was defined as taking <90% of the prescribed dose and/or ART interruption for more than 1 week. Predictive factors for nonadherence were identified by logistic regression. Beta coefficients were used to develop a predictive score. Optimal cutoffs were identified using the bootstrapping methodology, and performance was evaluated with the C statistic. Our study is based on 574 patients: 349 in the derivation cohort and 225 in the validation cohort. A total of 104 patients (29.8%) of the derivation cohort were nonadherent. Nonadherence predictors were patient prejudgment; previous medical appointment failures; cultural and/or idiomatic barriers; heavy alcohol use; substance abuse; unstable housing; and severe mental illness. The cutoff point (receiver operating characteristic curve) for nonadherence was 26.3 (sensitivity 0.87 and specificity 0.86). The C statistic (95% confidence interval) was 0.91 (0.87-0.94). These results were consistent with those predicted by the score in the validation cohort. This easy-to-use, highly sensitive, and specific tool could be easily used to identify patients at highest risk for nonadherence, thus allowing resource optimization and achieving optimal treatment goals.

Impact of non-formulary drugs on pharmacological prescription in hospitalised patients.

OBJECTIVES: The growing number of drugs on the market makes it necessary to adapt hospital formularies in order to ensure consistent drug coverage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the prescription of non-formulary drugs (NFD) on the therapeutic management of admitted patients. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included NFD prescriptions in patients hospitalised in a tertiary university hospital during the period 2012-2015. NFD prescriptions are displayed on the computerised medical order as a pending alert to be reviewed by the clinical pharmacists, who make a notation to the clinical course that includes a recommendation for an available therapeutic alternative when available in the hospital formulary. The degree of acceptance of the recommendation by physicians is recorded. RESULTS: Approximately 0.5% of patients hospitalised during the study period were affected by an NFD prescription. A total of 52 (9.5%) NFD were of doubtful therapeutic efficacy, five (0.9%) were non-replaceable drugs and 490 (89.4%) were prescriptions for drugs with an alternative available in the hospital formulary. The acceptance rate for the recommended alternative was 34.9% in the evaluable NFD prescriptions. No correlation was observed between the number of NFD prescriptions or the number of NFD and the availability index (drugs included in the hospital formulary in relation to the total number of drugs marketed). CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients with a NFD prescription was very low. The lack of correlation between the number of NFD or NFD prescriptions and the availability index demonstrated that the hospital formulary covers practically all therapeutic needs.

Effectiveness and safety of a novel dexamethasone mouthwash formulation in managing stomatitis in cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: To present a new dexamethasone mouthwash formulation and  analyze its effectiveness and safety among patients receiving stomatitis-producing antineoplastic agents. METHOD: Prospective observational study conducted in a university hospital between March 2017 and November 2019. Consecutive patients starting everolimus were enrolled. Patients were instructed to rinse dexamethasone mouthwash formulation twice daily until discontinuation of everolimus. A second cohort of patients with existing stomatitis induced by  high probability of producing stomatitis chemotherapy therapies was also  recruited to assess treatment effectiveness. Effectiveness and safety of dexamethasone mouthwash formulation was assessed. RESULTS: Dexamethasone mouthwash formulation was prescribed in nine patients as prophylaxis. Six patients were diagnosed with breast cancer, two with neuroendocrine tumor and one with renal cell carcinoma. Four patients developed mild stomatitis (grade 1-2) and three patients  discontinued everolimus due to other treatment-related adverse events. In  addition, dexamethasone mouthwash formulation was prescribed as treatment in five patients with existing stomatitis. All patients achieved a significant reduction in the severity of stomatitis after starting the  dexamethasone mouthwash formulation. In both cohorts, dexamethasone  mouthwash formulation was well tolerated and neither dose reduction nor  discontinuation related to stomatitis was required. CONCLUSIONS: Dexamethasone mouthwash formulation could be considered as a  suitable alternative for stomatitis management.

Objetivo: Describir una nueva formulación de enjuague bucal con dexametasona y analizar su efectividad y seguridad en pacientes que reciben agentes antineoplásicos que producen estomatitis.Método: Estudio observacional prospectivo realizado en un hospital universitario entre marzo de 2017 y noviembre de 2019. Se incluyeron los pacientes que  iniciaron everolimus. El tratamiento consistió en enjuagar con solución oral de  dexametasona dos veces al día hasta la interrupción del tratamiento con  everolimus. Se reclutó una segunda cohorte de pacientes con estomatitis  inducida por otros agentes antineoplásicos con alta probabilidad de provocar  estomatitis. Se evaluó la efectividad y seguridad del enjuague bucal con  dexametasona.Resultados: Se reclutaron nueve pacientes en profilaxis con formulación de  enjuague bucal con dexametasona; seis pacientes presentaban un diagnóstico  de cáncer de mama, dos de tumor neuroendocrino y uno de carcinoma renal.  Cuatro pacientes desarrollaron estomatitis leve (grado 1-2) y tres pacientes  descontinuaron everolimus por otros eventos adversos relacionados con el  tratamiento. Se prescribió enjuague bucal con dexametasona en cinco pacientes  con estomatitis existente como tratamiento. Todos los pacientes lograron una  reducción significativa de la gravedad de la estomatitis tras iniciar el enjuague  bucal con dexametasona. En general, el nuevo enjuague bucal con  dexametasona fue bien tolerado y no se requirieron reducción de dosis ni  interrupción debido a estomatitis.Conclusiones: La nueva formulación de enjuague bucal con dexametasona podría considerarse una alternativa adecuada para el manejo de la estomatitis.

Propensity-Score Matched Comparative Study on Effects of Intravenous Human Serum Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Adult Patients Receiving Parenteral Nutrition.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of intravenous human serum albumin administration (IV HSA) on nutrition markers, including non-serum-albumin plasma protein levels, in adult critically ill patients receiving parenteral nutrition (PN). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. Patients included in an initial cohort were patients who initiated IV HSA within 24 hours of start of PN. A second cohort who did not received IV HSA during PN was manually selected, matching several variables. Subsequently, both cohorts were propensity-score matched, resulting in 2 final cohorts: the cohort receiving IV HSA (ALB) and the cohort not receiving IV HSA (NOALB). RESULTS: A total of 42 patients, 21 in each cohort, entered the study. Both cohorts were similar in demographics, anthropometrics, comorbidities, diagnoses, PN composition, and severity of the disease, biochemistry, and nutrition markers. Patients in the ALB cohort received IV HSA at a dose of 30.0 g/day during 5 days. The ALB cohort presented higher values of final serum albumin level and serum albumin level change from baseline, but also presented lower values of final non-serum-albumin plasma protein levels and their change and lower final prealbumin. In addition, bilirubin in the ALB cohort increased, whereas it decreased in the NOALB cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving IV HSA and PN for several days increased serum albumin level, but decreased non-serum-albumin plasma protein levels. In addition, bilirubin clearance could be slightly impaired in these patients.