Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 112(37): 11684-9, 2015 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26283352

RESUMEN

Sign languages used by deaf communities around the world possess the same structural and organizational properties as spoken languages: In particular, they are richly expressive and also tightly grammatically constrained. They therefore offer the opportunity to investigate the extent to which the neural organization for language is modality independent, as well as to identify ways in which modality influences this organization. The fact that sign languages share the visual-manual modality with a nonlinguistic symbolic communicative system-gesture-further allows us to investigate where the boundaries lie between language and symbolic communication more generally. In the present study, we had three goals: to investigate the neural processing of linguistic structure in American Sign Language (using verbs of motion classifier constructions, which may lie at the boundary between language and gesture); to determine whether we could dissociate the brain systems involved in deriving meaning from symbolic communication (including both language and gesture) from those specifically engaged by linguistically structured content (sign language); and to assess whether sign language experience influences the neural systems used for understanding nonlinguistic gesture. The results demonstrated that even sign language constructions that appear on the surface to be similar to gesture are processed within the left-lateralized frontal-temporal network used for spoken languages-supporting claims that these constructions are linguistically structured. Moreover, although nonsigners engage regions involved in human action perception to process communicative, symbolic gestures, signers instead engage parts of the language-processing network-demonstrating an influence of experience on the perception of nonlinguistic stimuli.


Asunto(s)
Sordera/rehabilitación , Gestos , Lingüística , Lengua de Signos , Adulto , Mapeo Encefálico , Análisis por Conglomerados , Femenino , Humanos , Lenguaje , Desarrollo del Lenguaje , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Movimiento , Plasticidad Neuronal , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto Joven
2.
Cogn Neuropsychol ; 29(1-2): 85-103, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22871205

RESUMEN

Models of working memory (WM) have been instrumental in understanding foundational cognitive processes and sources of individual differences. However, current models cannot conclusively explain the consistent group differences between deaf signers and hearing speakers on a number of short-term memory (STM) tasks. Here we take the perspective that these results are not due to a temporal order-processing deficit in deaf individuals, but rather reflect different biases in how different types of memory cues are used to do a given task. We further argue that the main driving force behind the shifts in relative biasing is a consequence of language modality (sign vs. speech) and the processing they afford, and not deafness, per se.


Asunto(s)
Sordera/psicología , Memoria a Corto Plazo/fisiología , Personas con Deficiencia Auditiva , Lengua de Signos , Humanos
3.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 127(11-12): 472-6, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25829263

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient education is essential for a safe and efficient oral anticoagulant treatment. We examined if a newly launched booklet with information on anticoagulant treatment with warfarin improved patient knowledge and the time spent in the therapeutic-range (TTR). METHODS: Standardized questionnaire was administered to 235 consecutive patients on warfarin to assess their baseline knowledge and readministered it 2 months after they received the booklet. A control group of 51 patients was interviewed only after the booklet had been distributed. RESULTS: Patient's knowledge at the baseline was unsatisfying (mean questionnaire score: 11/16) and a substantial progress was achieved after the educational intervention (mean questionnaire score: 13/16, p = 0.001). TTR is significantly increased after the intervention (63.4 ± 22.3 vs. 74.6 ± 23.8 %; p < 0.01). The mean questionnaire score and TTR after education were not different in the intervention and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge about oral anticoagulant treatment and TTR is increased after the issue of the booklet in the majority of patients. However, for a small group of patients with unimproved knowledge new forms of education are needed.


Asunto(s)
Alfabetización en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Folletos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Eslovenia/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA