Analysis of Diagnostic Delay and its Impact on Lung Cancer Survival: Results From the Spanish Thoracic Tumor Registry.

BACKGROUND: Early detection is crucial to improve lung cancer survival rates. Delays in diagnosis might negatively impact the prognosis of the disease. This study aims to analyze the diagnostic delay in lung cancer patients and describe if there is an association between delay and survival. METHODS: The data source used was the Thoracic Tumor Registry of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group. This analysis was restricted to lung cancer cases with information on the first date of consultation by symptoms and date of diagnosis. The delay was calculated as the number of days between the two dates. A descriptive analysis was performed, and ordinal logistic regressions were fitted with delay as the dependent variable. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were performed. RESULTS: 22,755 lung cancer cases were included. Never smokers were 1.16 (95%CI: 1.06-1.27) times more likely to register longer delay than smokers. Stage 0-I-II cases had a 3.09 (95%CI: 2.88-3.32) higher risk of longer delay compared to III-IV stages. Overall, 5-year survival rate after diagnosis was 23.64% (95%CI: 22.88-24.41). In those categorized as having the shortest delay 5-year survival was 17.67% (95%CI: 16.31-19.07) and in the extreme delay it was 32.98% (95%CI: 31.28-34.69) (p<0.001). Adjusted mortality risk was higher in those with the shortest delay (HR 1.36, CI95%: 1.30-1.43) in comparison with the extreme delay. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic delay is short among Spanish lung cancer patients, indicating a relatively quick diagnostic process. Extreme delays appear to be associated with higher survival rates, possibly attributed to slow-growing tumors, earlier stage at diagnosis or basically the natural history of this disease.

EGFR first- and second-generation TKIs-there is still place for them in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients.

Identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a molecular target has radically changed the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from standard chemotherapy to personalized, targeted therapy. First-, second- and third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are now available for the treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. This review will focus on the clinical development of first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs. We will emphasize on essential points like the head-to-head comparison among EGFR TKIs, their activity on brain metastases, mechanisms of resistance, as well as their combination with anti-angiogenic compounds, other targeted therapies, or immunotherapy. The efficacy of first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs in early-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC will be also finally reviewed.

BRAF Mutations Classes I, II, and III in NSCLC Patients Included in the SLLIP Trial: The Need for a New Pre-Clinical Treatment Rationale.

BRAF V600 mutations have been found in 1-2% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved treatment of dabrafenib plus trametinib and progression free survival (PFS) of 10.9 months. However, 50-80% of BRAF mutations in lung cancer are non-V600, and can be class II, with intermediate to high kinase activity and RAS independence, or class III, with impaired kinase activity, upstream signaling dependence, and consequently, sensitivity to receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitors. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of 185 newly diagnosed advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients (Spanish Lung Liquid versus Invasive Biopsy Program, SLLIP, NCT03248089) was examined for BRAF and other alterations with a targeted cfDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay (Guardant360®, Guardant Health Inc., CA, USA), and results were correlated with patient outcome. Cell viability with single or combined RAF, MEK, and SHP2 inhibitors was assessed in cell lines with BRAF class I, II, and III mutations. Out of 185 patients, 22 had BRAF alterations (12%) of which seven patients harbored amplifications (32%) and 17 had BRAF mutations (77%). Of the BRAF mutations, four out of 22 (18%) were V600E and 18/22 (82%) were non-V600. In vitro results confirmed sensitivity of class III and resistance of class I and II BRAF mutations, and BRAF wild type cells to SHP2 inhibition. Concomitant MEK or RAF and SHP2 inhibition showed synergistic effects, especially in the class III BRAF-mutant cell line. Our study indicates that the class of the BRAF mutation may have clinical implications and therefore should be defined in the clinical practice and used to guide therapeutic decisions.

Integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and src homology 2 domain-containing phosphatase 2 (SHP2): Novel targets in EGFR-mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BACKGROUND: The activation of multiple signaling pathways jeopardizes the clinical efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Integrin-linked kinase (ILK) regulates the interactions between tumor cells and extracellular environment to activate signaling pathways and promote cell proliferation, migration, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Src homology 2 domain-containing phosphatase 2 (SHP2) is essential for receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation. METHODS: We analyzed tumor ILK, ß-receptor subunit glycoprotein 130 (gp130), SHP2, and stromal hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) mRNA expression in baseline tumor specimens of advanced EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC patients treated with EGFR TKIs. RESULTS: ILK, when highly expressed, was an independent poor prognostic factor for the progression-free survival of the patients, both in the univariate (hazard ratio [HR for disease progression, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.37-4.52; P = .0020]) and in the multivariate (HR 3.74; 95% CI, 1.33-10.56; P = .0126) Cox regression model. Patients with high SHP2 expression had an almost 13-month shorter progression-free survival (P = .0094) and an 18-month shorter overall survival (P = .0182) in comparison to those with low SHP2 mRNA expression. INTERPRETATION: The levels of ILK and SHP2 could be predictive for upfront combinatory therapy of EGFR TKIs plus SHP2 or ILK inhibitors. FUND: A grant from La Caixa Foundation, an Instituto de Salud Carlos III grant (RESPONSE, PIE16/00011), an Instituto de Salud Carlos III grant (PI14/01678), a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks European Grant (ELBA No 765492) and a Spanish Association Against Cancer (AECC) grant (PROYE18012ROSE).

Profile of alectinib for the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): patient selection and perspectives.

Discovered in 2007, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements positive (ALK+) lung cancers compose a small subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with rapidly expanded treatments. There are currently several ALK inhibitors, including crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib which have been licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of ALK+ NSCLC patients. Along with the multiple therapies, the survival of this subtype of NSCLC has been significantly expanded, even for patients whose disease has spread in the brain. Alectinib (Alecensa), a specific ALK and rearranged during transfection tyrosine kinase inhibitor is approved as first-line therapy for metastatic ALK+ NSCLC patients. It is additionally approved for ALK+ NSCLC previously treated with crizotinib. The main aim of this review is to assemble on the efficacy of alectinib for the treatment of ALK+ NSCLC, to elaborate the activity of the drug in the central nervous system, and to debate on which is the position of this compound in the treatment course of ALK+ lung cancer patients.

Association of PALB2 Messenger RNA Expression with Platinum-Docetaxel Efficacy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) is essential for homologous recombination repair. We examined mRNA levels of DNA repair genes, including partner and localizer of BRCA2 gene (PALB2), ring finger protein 8 gene (RNF8), replication timing regulatory factor 1 gene (RIF1), ATM serine/threonine kinase gene (ATM), and tumor protein p53 binding protein 1 gene (53BP1) as predictive biomarkers for cisplatin-docetaxel in the European phase III BRCA1, DNA repair associated (BRCA1)-receptor-associated protein 80 (RAP80) expression customization (BREC) phase III clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00617656). METHODS: The study was a prespecified secondary objective of the BREC trial. We assessed mRNA levels of PALB2 and four more DNA repair genes (RNF8, RIF1, ATM and 53BP1) as biomarkers in tissue from 177 patients with cisplatin-docetaxel-treated NSCLC. We examined the relationship of gene expression levels with progression-free survival, overall survival, and response. RESULTS: In 177 patients with NSCLC (who had a median age of 62 years and included 140 men and 91 patients with adenocarcinoma), only high PALB2 mRNA expression was predictive in the progression-free survival Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.83, p = 0.0080). PALB2 was also predictive of overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.90, p = 0.0266). Among the 158 patients evaluable for response, high PALB2 mRNA expression was predictive of response to cisplatin-docetaxel. Specifically, an objective response rate of 77% to cisplatin-docetaxel was observed for patients with high PALB2 mRNA expression compared with a rate of only 23 % for those with low PALB2 mRNA expression (p = 0.0448). CONCLUSIONS: High PALB2 mRNA expression identified patients with NSCLC who significantly benefited from cisplatin-docetaxel chemotherapy in the European BREC phase III clinical trial. The combination of chemotherapy with immunotherapy will become the standard of care, and a predictive marker of response to chemotherapy may accurately guide therapeutic decision making.

Challenges and unanswered questions for the next decade of immune-oncology research in NSCLC.

Over the last 20 years there have been great advances in the treatment of lung cancer. Immune checkpoint blockade together with targeted therapies have provided oncologists with the means to improve survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and patients with a better quality of life and therapies with manageable toxicity. Maybe in a short period of time the possibility of a cure in metastatic NSCLC will be raised. Therefore, continued research into new drugs, biomarkers and especially combination therapies is necessary in order to expand the clinical benefit of the current treatments to a broader population of NSCLC patients. The purpose of our review is to highlight our thoughts about potential mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy that, if better explored, can provide us with both biomarkers to predict response to these therapies and partners to combine with and prolong the benefit of immune checkpoint blockade. We are presenting our own experience of immunotherapy with a case report from our institution.