Analysis of immune-mediated reactions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab and its association with effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: To study immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with nivolumab, as well as to assess whether these reactions could be predictors of further effectiveness of therapy. METHODS: Retrospective, observational and longitudinal study. All NSCLC patients who received nivolumab between February 2015-May 2020 were included. In terms of safety, irAEs and their severity were registered and to evaluate the effectiveness, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated. RESULTS: 75 patients were included. 32 patients (43%) were reported irAES. Mainly the irAEs affected the skin (36%). Followed by pneumonitis (20%), gastrointestinal reactions (12%), endocrine (12%) and hepatitis (12%). Regarding severity, 92% were moderate. The median PFS was 9.49 months on the group with irAEs versus 1.99 months on the group without irAEs group (p < 0.0001). The median OS was 17.44 months versus 7.67 months respectively (p = 0.0001). According to the incidence of irAEs developed ( = > 2 vs. 1 vs. 0), the median PFS was 20.53 versus 5.35 versus 1.99 months respectively (p < 0.0001). The median OS was 23.41 versus 15.80 versus 7.67 months, respectively (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: In a significant number of patients irAEs occur, generally of grade 1-2 severity, affecting mainly the skin, lungs and gastrointestinal system. We confirm that the development of irAEs in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab is a strong predictor of treatment effectiveness in both PFS and OS, with statistically significant results. On those patients who experience two or more immunorelated adverse events the greatest benefit has been observed.

Intervention by a clinical pharmacist carried out at discharge of elderly patients admitted to the internal medicine department: influence on readmissions and costs.

BACKGROUND: Patient education on pharmacological treatment could reduce readmissions. Our objective was to carry out a pharmacist intervention focused on providing information about high-risk medications to chronic patients and to analyse its influence on readmissions and costs. METHODS: A single-centre study with an intervention group and a retrospective control group was conducted. The intervention was carried out in all polymedicated patients ≥ 65 years who were admitted to internal medicine and signed the informed consent between June 2017 and February 2018. Patients discharged to nursing homes or long-term hospitals were excluded. The control group were all the patients who were admitted during the same months of 2014 who met the same inclusion criteria. The patients were classified according to the HOSPITAL score as having a low, intermediate, or high risk of potentially avoidable readmission. Outcome measures were 30-day readmission and cost data. To analyse the effect of the intervention on readmission, a logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: The study included 589 patients (286 intervention group; 303 control group). The readmission rate decreased from 20.13% to 16.43% in the intervention group [OR = 0.760 95% CI (0.495-1.166); p = 0.209)]. The incremental cost for the intervention to prevent one readmission was €3,091.19, and the net cost saving was €1,301.26. In the intermediate- and high-risk groups, readmissions were reduced 10.91% and 10.00%, and the net cost savings were €3,3143.15 and €3,248.71, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacist intervention achieved savings in the number of readmissions, and the net cost savings were greater in patients with intermediate and high risks of potentially avoidable readmission according to the HOSPITAL score.

Paediatric viral myocarditis successfully treated with interferon beta-1b and corticoids.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: In paediatrics, evidence regarding the treatment of viral myocarditis using interferon beta-1B is restricted to four children older than two years and there are no reported cases of infants. The objective was to describe the efficacy and safety of interferon beta-1B in two infants under one year of age with viral myocarditis. CASE SUMMARY: Two infants were admitted to the hospital presenting with respiratory symptoms. Echocardiogram showed myocardial damage. Parvovirus-B19 was detected using a PCR assay, and treatment with interferon beta-1B was initiated. Six months later, the cardiac function had recovered in both cases. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This is the first published series of cases of infants less than 1 year of age with viral myocarditis treated with interferon beta-1B.

Impact of a Pharmaceutical Care Program at Discharge on Patients at High Risk of Readmission According to the Hospital Score.

Background: A significant percentage of hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge are a result of avoidable drug-related problems. Stratifying patients according to readmission risk is key to pharmaceutical intervention (PI) design strategies to improve treatment outcomes. Objective: To assess whether a pharmaceutical care (PC) program at discharge in polymedicated patients at high potentially avoidable readmission (PAR) risk, according to the HOSPITAL score, improves 30-day readmission rate (30-dRR). Methods: This prospective controlled, quasi-experimental, 11-month study included 163 chronic polymedicated patients (>5 medications) at high PAR risk according to the HOSPITAL score. We calculated the 30-dRR and number of medication variations and Medication Regimen Complexity Index-E (MRCI-E) after PI. Results were compared with a retrospective cohort of chronic patients at high PAR risk. Results: The 30-dRR was 18.4% in the intervention group and 25.6% in the control group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.38 to 1.14). Total medication reduction (-1.28; 95% CI = -1.88 to -0.68), number of high-risk medications in chronic patients (-0.58; 95% CI = -0.9 to -0.26), and MRCI-E (-6.42; 95% CI = -8.07 to -4.76) were statistically significant (P < .001). The number of medications at discharge was associated with an increased readmission risk (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.14). Conclusions: The degree of polypharmacy and patients' treatment complexity after hospital discharge significantly reduced as a result of the PC program compared with the control group. This highlights the need for patient selection and prioritization strategies for implementing PIs focused on reducing polypharmacy and preventing drug-related problems that may cause PAR.

Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of trastuzumab: preference of HER2+ breast cancer patients and financial impact of its use.

PURPOSE: To investigate the preference of HER2+ breast cancer patients and nursing professionals for subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) trastuzumab and to evaluate the financial impact derived from the use of the SC formulation. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was carried out to investigate preferences of all patients who started treatment with SC trastuzumab while they had received the IV formulation before. The preference of nursing staff in charge of preparation and administration was also analysed. The financial impact was evaluated considering the number of preparations of SC trastuzumab and the cost of IV and SC trastuzumab, the consumables used for preparation and administration and nursing staff time for preparation. RESULTS: 76 female patients were included, 84% completed the questionnaire. Of the patients, 94% declared to be satisfied with the SC route and 88% would prefer SC administration if they had to choose between IV and SC. Time saving was the main reason to justify satisfaction and preference (48 and 45% respectively). The most common adverse event related to SC trastuzumab was post-injection pain in the injection site, experienced by 77% of the patients. SC trastuzumab was preferred by 100% of the nursing staff. Total annual savings using SC formulation instead of the IV were 35.332€. CONCLUSIONS: SC trastuzumab is preferred by patients and the nursing staff versus the IV administration. The use of SC trastuzumab reduced the cost derived from trastuzumab administration.

Safety profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: Evidence of adverse events due to drug-drug interactions. / Perfil de seguridad de nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: evidencia de eventos adversos por interacciones farmacológicas.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) in real clinical practice and to analyze the clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions in the development of adverse events. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study in which safety data of patients treated with NMV-r between April and July 2022 in an outpatient setting were evaluated. The duration of follow-up was 28 days and the number of adverse reactions reported, as well as whether they were managed on an outpatient basis or required health care, and the presence of renal and hepatic function impairment were assessed. Concomitant treatment was reviewed, identifying theoretical drug-drug interactions (TDDIs) whose severity was defined using the Lexi-interact classification. RESULTS: The study included 146 patients, 82 (56,16%) were women, whose median age was 65 years (22-95). The number of TDDIs detected and maintained during treatment with NMV-r was 164, with the percentage of patients with at least one interaction being 62,33%. The median number of TDDIs per patient was 1 (0-5). At least 1 adverse event (AE) was reported in 18 patients (11,84%). Eleven AEs were potentially related to any TDDI. Seven patients required contact with hospital assistance for AE management. Eight patients had impaired renal function and 2 had impaired liver function at 28 days. The main groups of drugs implicated in the occurrence of an AE were oral anticoagulants and calcium antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a high number of TDDIs detected were detected between NMV-r and other drugs. This study provides greater knowledge of the drugs involved in such interactions and their potential relationship with the occurrence of adverse events.

[Translated article] Safety profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir: Evidence of adverse events due to DDIs.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety profile of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) in real clinical practice and to analyse the clinical relevance of drug-drug interactions in the development of adverse events. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study in which safety data of patients treated with NMV-r between April and July 2022 in an outpatient setting were evaluated. The duration of follow-up was 28 days and the number of adverse reactions reported, as well as whether they were managed on an outpatient basis or required health care, and the presence of renal and hepatic function impairment were assessed. Concomitant treatment was reviewed, identifying theoretical drug-drug interactions (TDDIs) whose severity was defined using the Lexi-interact classification. RESULTS: The study included 146 patients. 82 (56.16%) were women, whose median age was 65 years (22-95). the number of TDDIs detected and maintained during treatment with NMV-r was 164, with the percentage of patients with at least 1 interaction being 62.33%. The median number of TDDIs per patient was 1 (0-5). At least 1 adverse event (AE) was reported in 18 patients (11.84%). 11 AEs were potentially related to any TDDI. 7 patients required contact with hospital assistance for AE management. 8 patients had impaired renal function and 2 had impaired liver function at 28 days. The main groups of drugs implicated in the occurrence of an AE were oral anticoagulants and calcium antagonists. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a high number of TDDIs detected were detected between NMV-r and other drugs. This study provides greater knowledge of the drugs involved in such interactions and their potential relationship with the occurrence of adverse events.

Influence of augmented renal clearance on the lower incidence of linezolid-related hematological toxicity. / Influencia de la hiperfiltración glomerular en la menor toxicidad hematológica inducida por linezolid.

OBJECTIVES: Linezolid is an oxazolidin commonly related to the development of hematological toxicity, being renal clearance the major factor involved in the drug clearance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of increased filtration rates in the incidence of linezolid-induced hematological toxicity by comparing augmented renal clearance (ARC) patients versus normal renal function patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted on hospitalized patients treated with linezolid for 5 days or more during 2014-2019 period. Patients with a filtration rate of ≥130 mL/min versus reference patients (60-90 mL/min) were compared. Hematological toxicity was defined as a decrease of 25% in platelets, of 25% in hemoglobin and/or 50% in neutrophils from baseline. Toxicity relevance was classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Incidence of hematological toxicity between groups was studied by chi-square and Fisher test. Furthermore, percentaje disminution of all three parameters was calculated and compared by Mann-Whitney test and treatment interruption and tranfusion requirements were registered. RESULTS: 30 ARC patients and 38 reference patients were included. Hematological toxicity was observed in 16.66% of ARC patients vs 44.74% of reference patients (p = 0.014); thrombocytopenia in 13.33% vs 36.84% (p = 0.051), anemia in 3.3% vs 10.52% (p = 0.374) and neutropenia in 10% vs 23.68% (p = 0.204). Median percentaje of platelets decrease in ARC patients was -10.36 (-193.33-62.03) vs 2.68 (-163.16-82.71) in reference patients (p = 0.333), while hemoglobin decrease was 2.50 (-12.12-25.93) vs 9.09 (-17.72-30.63) (p = 0.047) and neutrophils decrease was 9.14 (-73.91-76.47) vs 27.33 (-86.66-90.90) (p = 0.093). 10.5% of normal renal function patients reported at least one adverse event grade 3 or superior while 2.6% of them interrupted treatment and 5.2% had tranfusion requirements. No major events or interruptions were reported in ARC patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a lower incidence and clinical relevance of hematological toxicity in augmented renal clearance patients. Thrombocytopenia was the major event in both populations. This might be related to a lower exposure to the drug due to the higher clearance and likely lower therapeutic efficiency. These results suggest a potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring on high risk patients.

[Translated article] Influence of augmented renal clearance in the lower incidence of linezolid-related haematological toxicity.

OBJECTIVES: Linezolid is an oxazolidin commonly related to the development of haematological toxicity, being renal clearance the major factor involved in the drug clearance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of increased filtration rates in the incidence of linezolid-induced haematological toxicity by comparing augmented renal clearance (ARC) patients versus normal renal function patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was conducted on hospitalized patients treated with linezolid for 5 days or more during 2014-2019 period. Patients with a filtration rate of ≥130 mL/min versus reference patients (60-90 mL/min) were compared. Haematological toxicity was defined as a decrease of 25% in platelets, of 25% in haemoglobin, and/or 50% in neutrophils from baseline. Toxicity relevance was classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5. Incidence of haematological toxicity between groups was studied by chi-square and Fisher test. Furthermore, percentage diminution of all 3 parameters was calculated and compared by Mann-Whitney test and treatment interruption and transfusion requirements were registered. RESULTS: 30 ARC patients and 38 reference patients were included. Haematological toxicity was observed in 16.66% of ARC patients vs 44.74% of reference patients (P=.014); thrombocytopenia in 13.33% vs 36.84% (P=.051), anaemia in 3.3% vs 10.52% (P=.374) and neutropenia in 10% vs 23.68% (P=.204). Median percentage of platelets decrease in ARC patients was -10.36 (-193.33-62.03) vs 2.68 (-163.16-82.71) in reference patients (P=.333), while haemoglobin decrease was 2.50 (-12.12-25.93) vs 9.09 (-17.72-30.63) (P=.047) and neutrophils decrease was 9.14 (-73.91-76.47) vs 27.33 (-86.66-90.90) (P=.093). 10.5% of normal renal function patients reported at least 1 adverse event grade 3 or superior while 2.6% of them interrupted treatment and 5.2% had transfusion requirements. No major events or interruptions were reported in ARC patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a lower incidence and clinical relevance of haematological toxicity in augmented renal clearance patients. Thrombocytopenia was the major event in both populations. This might be related to a lower exposure to the drug due to the higher clearance and likely lower therapeutic efficiency. These results suggest a potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring on high risk patients.

Effectiveness and safety of the treatment of lysosomal deposit diseases: Analysis of 22 patients. / Efectividad y seguridad del tratamiento de las enfermedades de depósito lisosomal: análisis de 22 pacientes.

OBJECTIVES: Identify the efficacy variables collected in the literature for therapies used in lysosomal storage diseases (LDS), evaluate the quality of this evidence, and know the effectiveness and safety of these treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study that included patients with LDS treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) or substrate reduction therapy (SRT). Published clinical trials (CT) and LDS treatment guidelines were reviewed to select efficacy variables. Data to measure them (and adverse effects) were obtained from the medical history. RESULTS: No CTs have been found in which efficacy is evaluated with final variables, all have been surrogated. Twenty-two patients were included: eight with Gaucher disease, six with Niemann-PickC disease, two with Hunter disease, one with Morquio-A disease, and five with Pompe disease. Eight patients have responded to ERT and one to SRT with eliglustat. ERT has not been associated with adverse effects. Miglustat has produced tolerance problems, requiring a change in a patient. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness was variable according to the pathology. Regarding safety, manageable adverse reactions to SRT were associated with dosage adjustments.

Effectiveness, safety and cost analysis of dalbavancin in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: Dalbavancin is approved for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. However, there is growing evidence that other gram-positive infections could be treated with this antibiotic. A study was undertaken in a tertiary hospital in Spain to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dalbavancin in off-label indications and the potential healthcare cost savings. METHODS: A retrospective observational study including all patients treated with dalbavancin in our hospital from October 2016 to August 2019 was carried out. Demographic, clinical and safety variables were collected. Effectiveness was assessed using the clinical and microbiological resolution of the infection and the absence of hospital admissions due to the same infection in the following 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included (69.9% men, n=71; median age 72.5 years (range 56.0-84.0)). Treatment was off label in 71 cases (69.6%). The most frequent off-label indications were catheter-related bacteraemia (15.7%, n=16) and endocarditis (13.6%, n=14). All patients had previously received antibiotics. The main reason for switching to dalbavancin was patient discharge (79.4%, n=81). Dalbavancin was administered during hospitalisation in 66.7% of the patients and in the outpatient setting in 13.7%. The median reduction in length of hospital stay was 14 days per patient. A saving of about 4550 Euros per patient was estimated. 89 patients (93.7%) had clinical and microbiological resolution of the infection at the end of the study. One patient did not finish the dalbavancin infusion due to an allergic reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that dalbavancin is a safe and effective alternative to the off-label treatment of gram-positive infections. Its dosage facilitates early discharge and outpatient management of these patients.

[Lean Six Sigma in the implementation of automated dispensing systems: improving the safe use of medications in thoracic surgery.] / Lean Seis Sigma en la implantación de sistemas automatizados de dispensación: mejora del uso seguro del medicamento en cirugía torácica.

OBJECTIVE: Medications errors are a major problem that can cause a harm to inpatients. The main objective of the study was to compared medication errors in pharmacotherapeutic process before and after to carried out an intervention: to implant an automated dispensing cabine with to use Lean Six Sigma methodology. The secondary objective was to assess process performance, sigma level and defects per one million opportunities for medication error. METHODS: Quasi-experimental and randomized study carried out in a Thoracic Surgery Unit of a Spanish Hospital. A pharmaceutic recorded and assesed the medication errors detected during pre-intervention period (july-august 2017) and post-intervention period (march-april 2018). The steps analyzed were dispensing, storage and compounding/administration. The pharmacist observed a third of the medication dispensed, stored and compounded/administered during the study period. The observed medication was randomly selected using AleatorMetod.xls software. To perform the statistical analysis, Student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare quantitative variables, and Chi-square test for qualitative variables. A significance level of p<0.05 was considered. RESULTS: The pharmaceutic recorded 4,538 drugs. After intervention, medication errors were decreased a 49% in total pharmacotherapeutic process (12.06% vs 6.15%; p<0.001). In addition, errors were decreased a 91.6% (4.27% vs 0.36%; p=0.004) in the step of medication storage; and a 75.8% (22.52% vs 5.46%; p<0.001) in the step of drugs compounding/administration. However, medication errors were increased in the step of medication dispensing (4.51% vs 15.29%; p<0.001). The process performance increased a 6% (87.9% vs 93.9%), sigma level increased from 2.67 to 3.04 and defects per one million opportunities for medication error decreased a 49%. CONCLUSIONS: To implant an automated dispensing cabinet with Lean Six Sigma methodology helps create a safer environment for the inpatient, reducing medication errors in the steps of storage and preparation/administration, as well as improving the total process performance and sigma level.

OBJETIVO: Los errores de medicación son un problema importante que pueden provocar un daño en los pacientes hospitalizados. El objetivo principal del estudio fue evaluar los errores de medicación en el circuito farmacoterapéutico antes y después de realizar una intervención: implantación de un Sistema Automatizado de Dispensación con la utilización de metodología Lean Seis Sigma. El objetivo secundario fue evaluar el rendimiento del proceso, el nivel sigma y los defectos por millón de oportunidades de error en la medicación. METODOS: Estudio cuasi-experimental y aleatorizado realizado en la Unidad de Cirugía Torácica de un Hospital Español. Un farmacéutico registró y evaluó los errores detectados durante las fases pre-intervención (julio-agosto 2017) y post-intervención (marzo-abril 2018). Las etapas analizadas fueron dispensación, almacenaje y preparación/administración. El farmacéutico observó un tercio de la medicación dispensada, almacenada y preparada/administrada durante el periodo de estudio. La medicación observada fue seleccionada de forma aleatoria utilizando el software AleatorMetod.xls. Para realizar el análisis estadístico se utilizó la prueba t de Student y el test U de Mann-Whitney para comparar variables cuantitativas y la prueba Chi-cuadrado para variables categóricas. Se consideró un nivel de significación de p<0,05. RESULTADOS: Se observaron 4.538 fármacos. Tras realizar la intervención, se redujeron un 49% los errores detectados durante el circuito farmacoterapéutico global (12,06% vs 6,15%; p<0,001). Además, se redujo un 91,6% (4,27% vs 0,36%; p=0,004) los errores en la etapa de almacenaje y un 75,8% (22,52% vs 5,46%; p<0,001) en la etapa de preparación/administración. Sin embargo, hubo un aumento en la etapa de dispensación (4,51% vs 15,29%; p<0,001). El rendimiento global se incrementó un 6% (87,9% vs 93,9%), el nivel de sigma aumentó de 2,67 a 3,04 y se redujeron un 49% de defectos por millón de oportunidades de error en la medicación. CONCLUSIONES: La implantación de Sistemas Automatizados de Dispensación con metodología Lean Seis Sigma ayuda a la creación de un entorno más seguro para el paciente, disminuyendo los errores de medicación en las etapas de almacenaje y preparación/administración, además de mejorar el rendimiento global del circuito.

Interaction between valproic acid and meropenem or ertapenem in patients with epilepsy: clinical relevance and results from pharmaceutical intervention.

OBJECTIVE: The literature has described the interaction between valproic acid  and carbapenems. This interaction leads to decreases in plasma concentrations  of valproic acid. The main objectives of this study were  to assess its relevance in clinical practice, to identify variables associated with  increased seizure episode rates, and to analyse the impact of pharmaceutical intervention on avoiding the effects of this interaction. METHOD: An observational retrospective study of inpatients with epilepsy  admitted between 2016 and 2020. Their pharmacological treatment throughout  admission was recorded, and the presence of other interactions  leading to decreased plasma concentrations of valproic acid was reviewed. The  seizure rate during the year prior to admission was compared to that during  the interaction period. For every episode in which the interaction was detected, an intervention was conducted by providing the prescriber with information on  the interaction and suggesting a change of antibiotherapy as well as the  pharmacokinetic monitoring of valproic acid. RESULTS: 37 episodes were included. 58.1% of the patients were male and  median age was 70 years. In total, 56.8% of the patients received meropenem  and 43.2% received ertapenem. The median duration of  concomitant treatment with valproic acid and carbapenem was 4 days. The  incidence rate ratio was 2.60 (95% confidence interval: 1.61-4.21). Thus, this  interaction was associated with a higher seizure rate. A statistically significant  association was found between higher seizure rates and patients treated with  more than one anti-epileptic drug. Hospital pharmacists detected 24 episodes  (64.9%). In total, 17 interventions (70.8%) were accepted and 13  combinations were discontinued. Pharmacokinetic monitoring was conducted in  13 episodes (35.1%) and infratherapeutic levels were found in all of them. CONCLUSIONS: The interaction between valproic acid and meropenem or ertapenem is clinically relevant. It is recommended that this combination should be avoided provided that a viable alternative is available.  Pharmaceutical intervention may contribute to preventing seizures associated with this combination.

Objetivo: La interacción entre ácido valproico y carbapenems está descrita en  la literatura y conlleva una disminución de los niveles plasmáticos de ácido  valproico. Los objetivos son evaluar su relevancia en la práctica clínica, conocer  las variables que se asocian a un incremento de crisis epilépticas y  analizar el impacto de la intervención farmacéutica para evitar las  consecuencias de dicha interacción.Método: En este estudio observacional retrospectivo se estudiaron pacientes  con epilepsia hospitalizados entre 2016 y 2020. Se registró el tratamiento  farmacológico prescrito en el ingreso y se revisó la presencia de otras  interacciones que redujeran la concentración plasmática de ácido valproico. La  frecuencia de crisis epilépticas durante el año previo al ingreso se comparó con  la correspondiente al periodo de interacción. Se realizó una intervención  en todos los episodios con la interacción detectada informando al prescriptor  sobre la interacción y proponiendo sustitución de la antibioterapia, así como  monitorización farmacocinética de ácido valproico.Resultados: Se incluyeron 37 episodios. El 58,1% eran varones y la mediana  de edad fue de 70 años. El 56,8% de los pacientes recibió meropenem y el  43,2% restante, ertapenem. Para la duración del tratamiento concomitante  entre ácido valproico y el carbapenem prescrito  se obtuvo una mediana de 4  días. Se halló una razón de tasas de incidencia de 2,60 (intervalo de confianza  del 95%: 1,61-4,21), por lo que esta interacción se asocia a una mayor  frecuencia de crisis epilépticas. Se asoció una mayor frecuencia de crisis  estadísticamente significativa en los pacientes tratados con más de un fármaco  antiepiléptico. Los farmacéuticos hospitalarios detectaron 24  episodios (64,9%). Se aceptaron 17 intervenciones farmacéuticas (70,8%) y  se suprimieron 13 combinaciones. Se realizó monitorización farmacocinética en  13 episodios (35,1%) y en todos se hallaron niveles infraterapéuticos. Conclusiones: La interacción entre ácido valproico y meropenem o ertapenem  es clínicamente relevante y se recomienda evitarla siempre que  existan alternativas viables. La intervención farmacéutica puede contribuir a  prevenir las crisis epilépticas favorecidas por esta combinación.

Rivaroxaban and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Bleeding risk resulting from their concomitant use.

OBJECTIVE: The combination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with  rivaroxaban may result in a dual interaction (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic) depending on the type of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor employed (CYP3A4-inhibiting vs. non-CYP3A4 inhibiting).  The purpose of this study was to use real world data to determine if the type of  selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used plays a role in the risk and severity of bleeding in patients receiving rivaroxaban. Method: This was a single-center retrospective longitudinal observational study carried out between January 2016 and February 2020 in patients aged 18 years or older treated concurrently with rivaroxaban (prescribed for treatments) and a selective serotonin reuptake  nhibitor. Patients were divided into two groups according to the selective  serotonin reuptake inhibitor they received, i.e., a CYP3A4 inhibitor (group 1):  sertraline, fluoxetine and paroxetine, or a non-CYP3A4 inhibitor (group 2): citalopram and escitalopram. We analyzed the bleeding events and  everity, the daily dose of rivaroxaban used and the medication administered concomitantly. RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were included (89 in group 1 and 57 in group  2) and 35 bleeding events (24% of patients) were identified, of  which 12 were  major and 23 were minor. The bleeding rate was higher in group 1  (25.8% vs 21.0%) but there were no differences in major bleeding (10.1% vs  5.3%; p = 0.235) or minor bleeding (13.5% vs 15.8%; p = 0.496). The  bleeding rate with a daily rivaroxaban dose of 20 mg was 9% (8/89) in group 1  and 14% (8/57) in group 2 (p = 0.2137), as compared with 16.9% (15/89)  in group 1 versus 7% (4/57) in group 2 (p = 0.042) for a daily 15 mg dose. CONCLUSIONS: Although the type of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used  concurrently with rivaroxaban was not found to influence the patients' bleeding  risk, a significant increase in the risk of bleeding was  bserved based on the dose of rivaroxaban used.

OBJETIVO: La combinación de rivaroxabán e inhibidores selectivos de la recaptación de serotonina presenta un riesgo de interacción  farmacodinámica y farmacocinética que depende del tipo de inhibidor selectivo  de la recaptación de serotonina empleado, ya que algunos son inhibidores del  citocromo p450, mientras que otros no lo son. El objetivo del presente estudio  fue evaluar con datos de vida real si el tipo de inhibidor selectivo de la  recaptación de serotonina utilizado influye en la frecuencia y en la gravedad de  sangrado en pacientes anticoagulados con rivaroxabán. Método: Estudio observacional, longitudinal, retrospectivo y unicéntrico, realizado entre enero de 2016 y febrero de 2020 en pacientes ≥  18 años que recibían rivaroxabán, en indicaciones autorizadas y financiadas, y  que estaban siendo tratados concomitantemente con inhibidores selectivos de  la recaptación de serotonina. Se establecieron dos cohortes en función del  inhibidor selectivo de la recaptación de serotonina coadministrado: inhibidores  del CYP3A4 (grupo 1) ­sertralina, fluoxetina y paroxetina­, y no inhibidores  del CYP3A4 (grupo 2) ­citalopram y escitalopram­. Se analizaron los eventos  hemorrágicos, la gravedad del sangrado, la dosis diaria de rivaroxabán y la  medicación concomitante que pudiese influir en el riesgo de sangrado. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 146 pacientes (89 en el grupo 1 y 57 en el grupo  2) y se identificaron un total de 35 eventos hemorrágicos (24% de los  pacientes), de los que 12 fueron eventos mayores y 23 menores. La frecuencia  de sangrado fue ligeramente mayor en el grupo 1 que en el 2 (25,8% versus 21%), pero no se encontraron diferencias significativas entre  ambos grupos, ni tampoco en la frecuencia de sangrados mayores  (10,1% versus 5,3%; p = 0,235) o menores (13,5% versus 15,8%; p =  0,496). La frecuencia de eventos hemorrágicos con la dosis de 20 mg fue del  9% (8/89) en el grupo 1 y del 14% (8/57) en el grupo 2 (p = 0,2137), mientras que con una dosis de 15 mg la frecuencia de eventos fue del 16,9% (15/89) en el grupo 1 y del 7% (4/57) en el grupo 2 (p = 0,042). CONCLUSIONES: No se han hallado diferencias significativas en el riesgo de  sangrado según el tipo de inhibidor selectivo de la recaptación de serotonina  que se administre de forma concomitante al rivaroxabán. Sí se han observado  diferencias significativas en función de la dosis de rivaroxabán utilizada.

[Controlled supply of tocilizumab during the COVID-19 pandemic and its influence on the treatment of rheumatological patients.] / Suministro controlado de tocilizumab durante la pandemia de COVID-19 e influencia sobre el tratamiento de pacientes reumatológicos.

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous (IV) tocilizumab has been used to stop the inflammatory phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection. To preserve the largest number of IV units for this use, the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS) carried out a controlled supply of it and recommended the change to a subcutaneous presentation (SC) of tocilizumab or sarilumab in all those patients in IV tocilizumab treatment for rheumatologic indications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the change from IV tocilizumab to SC presentation due to its controlled supply during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of adult patients (>18 years old) under treatment with IV tocilizumab follow-up by the Rheumatology Service of the Hospital 12 de Octubre. The follow-up period was 3 months (March 2020-June 2020) and 39 patients were included in the study. Variables related to the patients and their treatment were collected. A descriptive analysis of the data was carried out. RESULTS: In 69.23% (n=27) of the patients, treatment was changed to SC tocilizumab (n=23) or sarilumab (n=4). 44% of patients (n=12) switched back to their original IV tocilizumab treatment. The reasons for stopping treatment with SC tocilizumab were: drug intolerance (n=4), disease worsening (n=4), and patient preference (n=1). Regarding sarilumab, the reasons were drug intolerance (n=2) and patient preference (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the patients had to return to the original treatment. The main reason was intolerance to the new treatment, followed by ineffectiveness and patient preferences.

OBJETIVO: El tocilizumab intravenoso (IV) ha sido empleado para frenar la fase inflamatoria de la infección por SARS-CoV-2. Para reservar el mayor número de unidades IV para este uso, la Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS) realizó una distribución controlada del mismo y recomendó el cambio a una presentación subcutánea (SC), fuera tocilizumab o sarilumab, en todos aquellos pacientes en tratamiento con tocilizumab IV para indicaciones reumatológicas. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar el cambio de tocilizumab IV a una presentación SC debido a su suministro controlado durante la pandemia de COVID-19. METODOS: Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo de pacientes adultos (mayores de 18 años) en tratamiento con tocilizumab IV en seguimiento por el Servicio de Reumatología del Hospital 12 de octubre (Madrid). El periodo de seguimiento fue de tres meses (marzo 2020-junio 2020) y se incluyeron 39 pacientes en el estudio. Se recogieron variables relacionadas con el paciente y su tratamiento. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo de los datos. RESULTADOS: En el 69,23% (n=27) de los pacientes se cambió el tratamiento a tocilizumab SC (n=23) o sarilumab (n=4). El 44% (n=12) de los pacientes volvieron a cambiar a su tratamiento original con tocilizumab IV. Los motivos de interrupción de tratamiento con tocilizumab SC fueron: intolerancia al fármaco (n=4), empeoramiento de la enfermedad (n=4) y preferencia del paciente (n=1). Respecto al sarilumab, los motivos fueron intolerancia al fármaco (n=2) y preferencia del paciente (n=1). CONCLUSIONES: Casi la mitad de los pacientes tuvieron que volver al tratamiento original. El principal motivo fue intolerancia al nuevo tratamiento, seguido de ineficacia y preferencias del paciente.

[Comparison of hospital consumption of immediate-release fentanyl: use or abuse?] / Comparación del consumo intrahospitalario de fentanilo de liberación inmediata en 2014 y 2017: ¿uso o abuso?

OBJECTIVE: Immediate-release fentanyl is indicated in the treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients who already receive opioids as background chronic analgesia. According to an alert issued by the Spanish Agency of Medicines, its consumption under non-authorized conditions has alarmingly increased in recent years, with a greater risk of abuse and dependence. The main objective of this study is to compare the off-label use of immediate-release fentanyl in our hospital during 2014 and 2017. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study in which immediate-release fentanyl prescriptions were compared in adult patients admitted during 2014 and 2017 in a group 5 hospital. Variables were collected by the electronic medical record. The association study between qualitative variables was calculated using the χ2 test, and quantitative variables with the t-student test. RESULTS: In 2014, 0.43 immediate-release fentanyl prescriptions were made in our center for every 100 admissions, and in 2017 0.54/100 admissions. 22.1% (n=34) prescriptions were off-label in 2014, while in 2017 31.8% (n=76) (p=0.034). Both years, the most frequent off-label indications were healing of ulcers and wounds and non-cancer chronic pain. CONCLUSIONS: The use of immediate-release fentanyl in the hospital setting has considerably increased in comparison to 2014, as well as its off-label use.

OBJETIVO: El fentanilo de liberación inmediata está indicado en el tratamiento del dolor irruptivo en pacientes oncológicos que ya reciben opiáceos como analgesia de base crónica. Según una alerta emitida por la Agencia Española del Medicamento, su consumo en condiciones distintas a las autorizadas ha aumentado de manera alarmante en los últimos años, con mayor riesgo de que se produzca abuso y dependencia. El objetivo principal del estudio fue comparar el uso de fentanilo de liberación inmediata fuera de ficha técnica en pacientes hospitalizados en nuestro centro en 2014 y 2017. METODOS: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal retrospectivo en el que se compararon las prescripciones de fentanilo de liberación inmediata en los pacientes adultos ingresados durante los años 2014 y 2017 en un hospital del grupo 5 (Hospital 12 de Octubre de Madrid). Las variables fueron recogidas mediante la historia clínica electrónica. El estudio de asociación entre las variables cualitativas se calculó mediante el test de la χ2, y las cuantitativas mediante la prueba de t-student. RESULTADOS: En 2014 se realizaron 0,43 prescripciones de fentanilo de liberación inmediata por cada 100 ingresos, y en 2017 0,54 por cada 100 ingresos. El 22,1% (n=34) de las prescripciones fueron fuera de ficha técnica en 2014, mientras que en 2017 resultaron el 31,8% (n=76) (p=0,034). Las indicaciones fuera de ficha técnica más frecuentes fueron la cura de úlceras y heridas, así como el tratamiento del dolor crónico no oncológico. CONCLUSIONES: El uso de fentanilo de liberación inmediata en el ámbito hospitalario sufre un aumento considerable en comparación con el año 2014, así como su uso fuera de las indicaciones autorizadas.

[Black precipitate in parenteral nutrition]. / Precipitado negro en nutrición parenteral.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: a black precipitate was observed in the filter during the infusion of a parenteral nutrition without lipids. There are similar findings published in which copper and sulphur (from cysteine) were found in the composition of the precipitate. Objective: to determine if copper and cysteine are involved in the formation of the precipitate. Methods: samples of the parenteral nutrition solution were taken before and after its passage through the filter. Amino acids concentrations were analysed in both samples by ion exchange chromatography and post-column derivatization with ninhydrin in a Biochrom 30 device. Copper concentrations were measured by atomic absorption spectrometry in a PerkinElmer AAnalyst™ 200 device. Results: a decrease in cysteine concentration of 29.3% was found. The concentration of copper decreased by 75.9%. Conclusions: the decrease in the concentrations of cysteine and copper in the filtered solution suggest that both are involved in the formation of the black precipitate observed in the filter.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: durante la infusión de una nutrición parenteral sin lípidos se observó un precipitado negro en el filtro. Hay hallazgos similares publicados en los que se han detectado cobre y azufre (proveniente de la cisteína) en la composición del precipitado. Objetivo: comprobar que la cisteína y el cobre intervienen en la formación del precipitado. Métodos: se tomaron muestras de la solución de nutrición parenteral antes y después de su paso por el filtro. Se analizaron en ambas muestras las concentraciones de aminoácidos mediante cromatografía de intercambio iónico y derivatización post-columna con ninhidrina en un equipo Biochrom 30 y las de cobre mediante espectrometría de absorción atómica en un equipo PerkinElmer AAnalyst™ 200. Resultados: las concentraciones de cisteína y cobre en la solución disminuyeron en un 29,3% y 75,9%, respectivamente. Conclusiones: la disminución de las concentraciones de cisteína y cobre en la solución filtrada sugieren que ambos están involucrados en la formación del precipitado negro observado en el filtro.

Use of oral antineoplastic in special situations in a third level hospital: real life results.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the effectiveness and safety of oral antineoplastic drugs  (ANEOs) that are authorized in special situations in a third-level hospital and to  compare the results obtained with the clinical evidence used for this  authorization. METHOD: Descriptive observational and retrospective study. We included all  adult patients who started treatment with ANEO in special situations during the  year 2016. We collected demographic, treatment-related and clinical variables  (overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS)). Adverse reactions and  detected interactions were collected. An unadjusted comparison was made  between the results of the available evidence and those of the study patients. RESULTS: 34 patients were treated, 50% were men, the median age was 58  years (38-80) and they presented ECOG 1 in 64.7%. Most of the treated  patients were diagnosed with advanced colorectal cancer, treated with  trifluridine-tipiracil, followed by palbociclib in breast cancer, obtaining results  similar to those of the evidence. The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 0.8- 4.8) and the 8-month SG (95% CI 3.4-12.5) for all patients. 26% of patients  required dose reduction because of treatment toxicity. We found 13 interactions,  which affected 15 patients, only two of category X. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of ANEO in special situations in our center is  similar to that of available evidence. The impact on survival is low and adverse  effects are common.

Objetivo: Analizar la efectividad y seguridad de los antineoplásicos orales  (ANEO) autorizados en situaciones especiales en un hospital de tercer nivel y  comparar los resultados obtenidos con los de la evidencia disponible empleada  para autorizar el uso de estos fármacos.Método: Estudio descriptivo observacional y retrospectivo. Se incluyeron todos  los pacientes adultos que iniciaron tratamiento con ANEO en situaciones  especiales durante el año 2016. Se recogieron variables demográficas,  relacionadas con el tratamiento, y clínicas (supervivencia global (SG),  supervivencia libre de progresión (SLP)). Se recogieron reacciones adversas e  interacciones detectadas. Se realizó una comparación no ajustada entre los  resultados de la evidencia disponible y los de los pacientes del estudio.Resultados: Treinta y cuatro pacientes recibieron tratamiento, el 50% eran  hombres, la mediana de edad fue de 58 años (38-80), y presentaron ECOG 1 el  64,7%. La mayoría de los pacientes tratados presentaban diagnóstico de cáncer colorrectal avanzado, tratados con trifluridina-tipiracil, seguidos de  palbociclib en cáncer de mama, obteniendo resultados similares a los de la evidencia. La mediana de SLP fue de 2,8 meses (IC 95% 0,8-4,8) y la SG de 8  meses (IC 95% 3,4-12,5) para todos los pacientes. El 26% de los pacientes  requirieron una reducción de la dosis debido a la toxicidad del tratamiento. Se  encontraron 13 interacciones, que afectaron a 15 pacientes; solo dos de  categoría X.Conclusiones: La efectividad de los ANEO en situaciones especiales en nuestro  centro es similar al de la evidencia disponible. El impacto en la supervivencia es  bajo y los efectos adversos son comunes.

[Precipitation limits in pediatric parenteral nutritions with organic sources of calcium and phosphate]. / Límites de precipitación en nutriciones parenterales pediátricas con fuentes de calcio y fosfato orgánicas.

OBJECTIVE: to determine if precipitation processes occur in parenteral nutrition solutions (PNs) with calcium gluconate and sodium glycerophosphate in the precipitation threshold limits of the Spanish SENPE/SEGHNP/SEFH 2008 consensus document of PN preparation. METHODS: seven PNs with different composition were prepared in triplicate: five 100 ml PNs with different concentrations of amino acids, calcium and phosphorus similar to consensus document maximum concentrations for precipitation, and two control PNs: one without calcium and phosphorus and other with high calcium and phosphorus content and low concentration of amino acids. All PNs did not contain lipids to allow correct detection of precipitates. The no lipid PNs were stored at room temperature for 20 hours, and at 35 °C for four hours. Subsequently, they filtered through a 0.2 µm filter, which was observed by electron microscopy. Because a large amount of not expected precipitates was observed, complementary studies were carried out. RESULTS: precipitates were observed in all PNs except in the control solution without calcium and phosphorus; many of them were greater than 10 µm. However, according to our studies, these crystals were produced after filtration and calcium was found in their composition, but not phosphorus. Particles from the preparation of parenteral nutrition were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: in our study we did not find calcium phosphate precipitates in the limits included in the consensus document SENPE/SEGHNP/ SEFH. However, it is possible that micro precipitates with calcium are formed. It is important to filter PNs prior to their administration.

OBJETIVO: conocer si hay precipitación en nutriciones parenterales (NP) con gluconato cálcico y glicerofosfato sódico en las cantidades límites del documento de consenso español de preparación de nutrición parenteral SENPE/SEGHNP/SEFH 2008. MÉTODOS: se prepararon por triplicado siete NP: cinco de 100 ml con concentraciones de aminoácidos, calcio y fósforo similares a las concentracionesmáximas de precipitación del documento consenso SENPE/SEGHNP/SEFH y dos controles, uno sin calcio y fósforo y otro con alto contenido de calcio y fósforo y baja concentración de aminoácidos. Las NP no contenían lípidos. Las NP se almacenaron 20 horas a temperatura ambiente y cuatro horas a 35 °C, y se filtraron con un filtro de 0,2 micras. Estos filtros se transportaron y observaron parcialmente por microscopía electrónica. Los cristales observados se analizaron por espectrometría por dispersión de rayos X a 1.000 aumentos. Al observarse gran cantidad de precipitados, que no se correspondían a los estudios publicados, se realizaron estudios complementarios para conocer su origen. RESULTADOS: en todos los casos, a excepción del control sin calcio y fósforo, se observaron precipitados. Sin embargo, estos cristales, según nuestros estudios, se produjeron después de la filtración y en su composición está el calcio, pero no el fósforo. También se observaron partículas provenientes de la preparación de nutrición parenteral. CONCLUSIONES: en nuestro estudio no encontramos precipitados de fosfato cálcico en los límites recogidos en el documento consenso SENPE/SEGHNP/SEFH. Sin embargo, es posible que se formen microprecipitados con calcio en su composición. Es importante fi ltrar las NP previamente a su administración.

[Use of leflunomide in a cytomegalovirus infection resistant: a report of a case]. / Uso de leflunomida en infección de citomegalovirus resistente: a propósito de un caso.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most common complications in transplant patients, which can lead to multiple organ failure. The 80-90% of patients are cured with intravenous treatment standard (ganciclovir), or its oral prodrug (valganciclovir). In case there is no answer, we have alternatively another antiviral, foscarnet. A small number of patients do not respond to this, having a bad prognosis. The aim is to describe the case of a double lung transplant for cystic fibrosis, and recurrent CMV infection in which the use of leflunomide gets lower and even reach undetectable viral load. DESCRIPTION OF CASE: woman, 22 year old, double lung transplant for cystic fibrosis in March 2014. The CMV serology performed was positive in the donor and negative in the recipient. Controls viral load during prophylaxis with valganciclovir were negative in the receiver until the 6th month after transplantation, at which viral load was detected in controls (2 090 IU/ml). The patient was admitted to our hospital to receive intravenous treatment with ganciclovir, after one month with intravenous therapy viral load persisted positive (42 400 IU/ml). One study of resistance showed that was resistant to ganciclovir, so began treatment with intravenous foscarnet. This drug achieved negativizar viral load, so the treatment was discontinued, continuing with fortnightly controls viral load. After two months without treatment, viral load increased to 13 665 IU/ml, why was requested to Pharmacy Service the off-label use of leflunomide, with the intention that use oral therapy, instead of intravenous therapy. The patient was treated with valganciclovir until have the authorization of use of leflunomide, although unanswered, since in March 2015, at the start of leflunomide treatment the patient had a viral load of 17 344 IU/ml. The initial regimen was 100 mg of leflunomide daily for the first five days, followed by 20 mg every 12 hours. After fifteen days of treatment viral load had fallen to 531 IU/ml, becoming undetectable in one month. After four months of treatment the patient remains with undetectable viral load without having any adverse effect associated with it. CONCLUSION: our case is an example where the use of leflunomide in CMV infection resistant to other therapies is an effective and convenient alternative for patients because it keeps undetectable viral load with an oral therapy without having to enter the hospital for intravenous treatment.

Introducción: la infección por citomegalovirus (CMV) es una de las complicaciones más habituales en pacientes trasplantados, que puede desembocar en un fallo multiorgánico. El 80-90% de los pacientes se cura con el tratamiento estándar intravenoso (ganciclovir), o su profármaco oral (valganciclovir). En caso de no responder a ellos existe como alternativa otro antivírico, foscarnet. Un pequeño número de pacientes tampoco responden a este, teniendo un mal pronóstico. Objetivo: describir el caso de una paciente con trasplante bipulmonar por fibrosis quística y recidiva de infección por CMV en la cual el uso de leflunomida consigue disminuir e incluso llegar a niveles indetectables de la carga viral. Descripción del caso: mujer de 22 años, trasplantada bipulmonar por fibrosis quística en marzo del 2014. Las serologías de CMV realizadas fueron positivas en el donante y negativas en el receptor. Los controles de la carga viral durante la profilaxis con valganciclovir fueron negativos en el receptor hasta el sexto mes después del trasplante, momento en el que se detectó carga viral en los controles (2.090 UI/ml). La paciente ingresó en nuestro hospital para recibir tratamiento intravenoso con ganciclovir, persistiendo la carga viral positiva (42.400 UI/ml) al mes del inicio con esta terapia intravenosa. Un estudio de resistencias mostró que era resistente a ganciclovir, y por ello se inició tratamiento con foscarnet intravenoso. Con este fármaco se consiguió negativizar la carga viral, por lo que se suspendió el tratamiento, continuándose con controles quincenales de la carga viral. A los dos meses sin tratamiento se observó un aumento de la carga viral hasta 13.665 UI/ml, motivo por el cual se solicitó al Servicio de Farmacia el uso fuera de ficha técnica de leflunomida, con la intención de que la paciente recibiera terapia oral en lugar de intravenosa. La paciente fue tratada con valganciclovir hasta disponer de la autorización de uso de leflunomida, aunque sin respuesta, ya que en marzo del 2015, al inicio del tratamiento con leflunomida, la paciente presentaba una carga viral de 17.344 UI/ml. La pauta inicial fue de 100 mg de leflunomida al día durante los cinco primeros días, seguida de 20 mg cada 12 horas. A los quince días de tratamiento la carga viral había disminuido hasta 531 UI/ml, volviéndose indetectable antes del mes. Después de cuatro meses de tratamiento, la paciente mantiene la carga viral indetectable sin presentar ningún efecto adverso asociado al mismo. Conclusión: nuestro caso es un ejemplo en el que el uso de leflunomida en infección por CMV resistentes a otras terapias es una alternativa eficaz y conveniente para los pacientes, ya que mantiene indetectable la carga viral con una terapia oral, sin necesidad de ingresar en el hospital para tratamiento intravenoso.