Outcomes in Patients with Vasodilatory Shock and Renal Replacement Therapy Treated with Intravenous Angiotensin II.

OBJECTIVE: Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy in severe vasodilatory shock is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Angiotensin II treatment may help these patients by potentially restoring renal function without decreasing intrarenal oxygenation. We analyzed the impact of angiotensin II on the outcomes of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock 3 trial. SETTING: ICUs. PATIENTS: Patients with acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy at initiation of angiotensin II or placebo (n = 45 and n = 60, respectively). INTERVENTIONS: IV angiotensin II or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary end point: survival through day 28; secondary outcomes included renal recovery through day 7 and increase in mean arterial pressure from baseline of ≥ 10 mm Hg or increase to ≥ 75 mm Hg at hour 3. Survival rates through day 28 were 53% (95% CI, 38%-67%) and 30% (95% CI, 19%-41%) in patients treated with angiotensin II and placebo (p = 0.012), respectively. By day 7, 38% (95% CI, 25%-54%) of angiotensin II patients discontinued RRT versus 15% (95% CI, 8%-27%) placebo (p = 0.007). Mean arterial pressure response was achieved in 53% (95% CI, 38%-68%) and 22% (95% CI, 12%-34%) of patients treated with angiotensin II and placebo (p = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy at study drug initiation, 28-day survival and mean arterial pressure response were higher, and rate of renal replacement therapy liberation was greater in the angiotensin II group versus the placebo group. These findings suggest that patients with vasodilatory shock and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy may preferentially benefit from angiotensin II.

Rates for HEDIS Screening for Diabetic Nephropathy Quality Measure May Be Overstated.

The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) is used by health plans to measure and report on quality and performance. This study evaluated the appropriateness of the prescription drug compliance step for the Medical Attention for Nephropathy quality measure for patients with diabetes. Data from national commercial claims for 28,348,363 persons were reviewed. The study applied the standard HEDIS specifications for compliance in medical attention for nephropathy for diabetic patients. Evaluation of the third and final process (evidence of angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers [ARBs]) found that the addition of this step contributed 14% to 16% of the numerator, bringing the final rate to the >80% range. Yet, presence of a prescription for an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not confirm microalbuminuria. Only 1% of the persons satisfying Step 3 had evidence of microalbuminuria in years prior and none in the reporting year. Use of these medications does not obviate the need for a nephropathy screening in diabetics. Inclusion of these medications as numerator compliance leads to overreporting and may contribute to underscreening of a population at risk.

Clinical Experience With IV Angiotensin II Administration: A Systematic Review of Safety.

OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin II is an endogenous hormone with vasopressor and endocrine activities. This is a systematic review of the safety of IV angiotensin II. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane. STUDY SELECTION: Studies in which human subjects received IV angiotensin II were selected whether or not safety was discussed. DATA EXTRACTION: In total, 18,468 studies were screened by two reviewers and one arbiter. One thousand one hundred twenty-four studies, in which 31,281 participants received angiotensin II (0.5-3,780 ng/kg/min), were selected. Data recorded included number of subjects, comorbidities, angiotensin II dose and duration, pressor effects, other physiologic and side effects, and adverse events. DATA SYNTHESIS: The most common nonpressor effects included changes in plasma aldosterone, renal function, cardiac variables, and electrolytes. Adverse events were infrequent and included headache, chest pressure, and orthostatic symptoms. The most serious side effects were exacerbation of left ventricular failure in patients with congestive heart failure and bronchoconstriction. One patient with congestive heart failure died from refractory left ventricular failure. Refractory hypotensive shock was fatal in 55 of 115 patients treated with angiotensin II in case studies, cohort studies, and one placebo-controlled study. One healthy subject died after a pressor dose of angiotensin II was infused continuously for 6 days. No other serious adverse events attributable to angiotensin II were reported. Heterogeneity in study design prevented meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Adverse events associated with angiotensin II were infrequent; however, exacerbation of asthma and congestive heart failure and one fatal cerebral hemorrhage were reported. This systematic review supports the notion that angiotensin II has an acceptable safety profile for use in humans.

Treatment of acute kidney injury with cast nephropathy.

Nearly 50% of patients with multiple myeloma develop renal disease; acute kidney injury (AKI) from cast nephropathy, or "myeloma kidney" is the most common type. Development of AKI is associated with worse 1-year survival and reduces the therapeutic options available to patients. Therefore, there is a great need to develop more effective therapies. Cast nephropathy is due to the interaction and aggregation of filtered free light chains (FLCs) and Tamm- Horsfall protein (THP) causing intratubular obstruction and damage. The key to treating cast nephropathy is rapid lowering of FLCs as this correlates with renal recovery. Newer chemotherapy agents lower FLCs and have been referred to as "renoprotective". However there remains great interest in using various extracorporeal therapies to remove serum FLCs. Initially, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was thought to improve renal outcomes in cast nephropathy based on small trials. The largest randomized trial of TPE, however, failed to show any benefit. A newer technique is extended high cut-off hemodialysis (HCO-HD). This modality uses a high molecular weight cut-off filter to remove FLCs. To date, trials with HCO-HD in patients with cast nephropathy have been encouraging. However, there are no randomized trials demonstrating the benefit of HCOHD when used in addition to newer chemotherapeutic regimens. Until these studies are available, HCO-HD cannot be recommended as standard of care.

The effect of the selective cytopheretic device on acute kidney injury outcomes in the intensive care unit: a multicenter pilot study.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is characterized by deterioration in kidney function resulting in multisystem abnormalities. Much of the morbidity and mortality associated with AKI result from a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). This study described herein is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter US study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Selective Cytopheretic Device (SCD) treatment on AKI requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in the ICU. The study enrolled 35 subjects. The mean age was 56.3±15. With regard to race, 71.4% of the subjects were Caucasian, 22.9% were Black, and 5.7% were Hispanic. Average SOFA score was 11.3±3.6. Death from any cause at Day 60 was 31.4%. Renal recovery, defined as dialysis independence, was observed in all of the surviving subjects at Day 60. The results of this pilot study indicate the potential for a substantial improvement in patient outcomes over standard of care therapy, which is associated with a greater than 50% 60-day mortality in the literature. The SCD warrants further study in scientifically sound, pivotal trial to demonstrate reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness.

Myoglobin removal using high-volume high-flux hemofiltration in patients with oliguric acute kidney injury.

BACKGROUND: Rhabdomyolysis can cause acute kidney injury (AKI). It remains controversial whether or not myoglobin can be removed from the circulation with extracorporeal therapy and decrease the incidence of AKI. Therefore, we examined myoglobin removal in a series of 11 patients with oliguric AKI treated with high-volume hemofiltration. METHODS: Patients received prefilter hemofiltration using a polysulphone filter with a molecular size cutoff of 65 kDa and a surface area of 1.7 m(2). Sieving coefficients and myoglobin clearances were calculated at 6, 12, and 24 h after the start of hemofiltration. RESULTS: The mean sieving coefficient was 0.158, and the mean myoglobin clearance was 8.7 ml/min. CONCLUSION: Despite the use of high-volume hemofiltration, the removal of myoglobin was negligible. In patients with normal renal function, the anticipated amount of extracorporeal removal would not significantly impact renal exposure to myoglobin.

Onconephrology.

Current advances in cancer chemotherapeutics have remarkably helped in rapid and definitive treatment options. However, these potent chemotherapeutics have been associated with severe renal toxicities that later impact treatment options. Acute kidney injury is common in patients with cancer. In hospitalized patients with cancer, acute kidney injury is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and costs. This article provides an overview of acute kidney injury caused by cancer or its treatment, including prerenal, tubular, glomerular diseases, infiltrative disease, tumor lysis syndrome, anticancer drug nephrotoxicity, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-related acute kidney injury, and cancer-associated thrombotic microangiopathy.

Positive Fluid Balance and Association with Post-Traumatic Acute Kidney Injury.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in severely injured trauma patients and is associated with poor outcomes. A positive fluid balance is associated with AKI and poor long-term renal outcomes among general ICU and cardiac surgery patients. Currently, the optimal endpoint of resuscitation of severely injured trauma patients is unknown, which may result in excess fluid administration. We hypothesized that positive fluid balance is common after severe trauma and is associated with increased AKI development. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort study of adult (≥16 years old) trauma patients requiring ICU admission from January 2017 to June of 2017 was conducted. Patients were excluded for early death, rhabdomyolysis, or previous history of end-stage renal disease or congestive heart failure. Acute kidney injury within 7 days of admission was defined according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes creatinine-based criteria. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 364 patients, 74% were male. The median age was 41 years (interquartile range [IQR] 27 to 59 years), and the median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 18 (IQR 10 to 29). Positive fluid balance (>2 L) was observed in 49% of patients. Acute kidney injury was diagnosed in 105 (29%) patients. After adjustment, there was an increased risk of AKI with a positive fluid balance >2 L (relative risk [RR] 1.98 [95% CI 1.24 to 3.17]). Additionally, the risk of AKI incrementally increased by 1.22 with each liter fluid positive above a zero balance (95% CI 1.11 to 1.34). CONCLUSIONS: Positive fluid balance in excess of 2 L at 48 hours occurs in half of severely injured trauma patients, and fluid positivity is independently and incrementally associated with AKI development. Fluid responsiveness should be investigated as an end point of post-traumatic resuscitation to prevent unnecessary fluid administration and subsequent AKI.

Urinary cell cycle arrest proteins urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease 2 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 predict acute kidney injury after severe trauma: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Recognition and clinical diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) after trauma is difficult. The majority of trauma patients do not have a known true baseline creatinine, which makes application of the guidelines set forth by the international guidelines difficult to apply. Use of alternative biomarkers of renal dysfunction in trauma patients may be beneficial. We hypothesized that urinary tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease 2 (TIMP-2) × insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP-7) would accurately predict AKI development in severely injured trauma patients. METHODS: A prospective observational study of adult (≥16 years old) trauma intensive care unit (ICU) patients was performed between September 2018 to March 2019. Urine was collected on ICU admission and was measured for TIMP-2 × IGFBP-7. Univariate, multivariable, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed using the optimal threshold generated by a Youden index. MAIN RESULTS: Of 88 included patients, 75% were male, with a median injury severity score was 27 (interquartile range [IQR], 17-34), and age of 40 years (IQR, 28-54 years). Early AKI developed in 39 patients (44%), and of those, 7 (8%) required dialysis within 48 hours. Patients without early AKI had a TIMP-2 × IGFBP-7 of 0.17 U (IQR, 0.1-0.3 U), while patients with early AKI had a TIMP-2 × IGFBP-7 of 0.46 U (IQR, 0.17-1.29 U; p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, TIMP-2 × IGFBP-7 was associated with AKI development (p = 0.02) and need for dialysis (p = 0.03). Using the optimal threshold 0.33 U to predict AKI, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.731, with an accuracy of 0.75, sensitivity of 0.72, and specificity of 0.78. CONCLUSION: Urinary TIMP-2 × IGFBP-7 measured on ICU admission accurately predicted 48-hour AKI and was independently associated with AKI and dialysis requirement after trauma and is a promising screening tool for treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, prospective, observational study, level III.

Complications of continuous renal replacement therapy.

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is commonly used in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Many studies show that compared with intermittent hemodialysis, continuous therapy has superior hemodynamic stability, metabolic clearance, and volume control. Despite these benefits, no survival advantage can be demonstrated with its use. Although study design explains much of this paradox, it is also quite plausible that the complications associated with CRRT negate its potential benefits in the critically ill patient. We summarize the common complications associated with the use of CRRT.

Efficacy and safety of renal tubule cell therapy for acute renal failure.

The mortality rate for patients with acute renal failure (ARF) remains unacceptably high. Although dialysis removes waste products and corrects fluid imbalance, it does not perform the absorptive, metabolic, endocrine, and immunologic functions of normal renal tubule cells. The renal tubule assist device (RAD) is composed of a conventional hemofilter lined by monolayers of renal cells. For testing whether short-term (up to 72 h) treatment with the RAD would improve survival in patients with ARF compared with conventional continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), a Phase II, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label trial involving 58 patients who had ARF and required CRRT was performed. Forty patients received continuous venovenous hemofiltration + RAD, and 18 received CRRT alone. The primary efficacy end point was all-cause mortality at 28 d; additional end points included all-cause mortality at 90 and 180 d, time to recovery of renal function, time to intensive care unit and hospital discharge, and safety. At day 28, the mortality rate was 33% in the RAD group and 61% in the CRRT group. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that survival through day 180 was significantly improved in the RAD group, and Cox proportional hazards models suggested that the risk for death was approximately 50% of that observed in the CRRT-alone group. RAD therapy was also associated with more rapid recovery of kidney function, was well tolerated, and had the expected adverse event profile for critically ill patients with ARF.

Choice of Reference Creatinine for Post-Traumatic Acute Kidney Injury Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after trauma is associated with poor outcomes. According to current guidelines, a diagnosis of AKI should be made based on an increase in serum creatinine from a reference value. However, a true reference is often unknown in patients presenting with traumatic injury. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal reference creatinine estimate for post-traumatic AKI diagnosis and staging. The optimal reference estimate was defined by a high incidence, strong prognostic ability, and incrementality at each stage. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cohort study of adult trauma patients (older than 16 years) requiring ICU admission between 2009 and 2018 (n = 8,026) at a single Level I trauma center. AKI was determined using the following 4 reference creatinine estimates: Modified Diet of Renal Diseases (MDRD), Trauma MDRD, admission creatinine, and the first-day creatinine nadir. Inclusivity was assessed by incidence of AKI diagnosed with different reference creatinine estimates; prognostic ability was assessed by multivariable modified Poisson regression; and incrementality was assessed by correlation of mortality risk by AKI stage. RESULTS: There was a wide range of AKI incidence, from 21% when using admission creatinine to 76% using the Trauma MDRD. The MDRD reference creatinine estimate resulted in an AKI incidence of 41% and a diagnosis that was both prognostic of mortality and incremental with each AKI stage. All other reference estimates resulted in AKI diagnoses that were either not prognostic or not incremental. CONCLUSIONS: Reference creatinine estimate determines the clinical importance of AKI diagnoses. In this study, the MDRD reference resulted in optimal AKI diagnoses.

Risk Predictors for Postcontrast Acute Kidney Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI) after contrast-media procedures in a broader cohort of patients than previously reported. DATA SOURCES: Comprehensive medical and pharmacy commercial claims data from 2012 to 2014. DATA COLLECTION AND EXTRACTION METHODS: Claims associated with contrast-media procedures for 2,737,020 persons between January 1, 2012 and November 30, 2014, were reviewed. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The overall incidence of AKI after a contrast-media procedure was 0.85%. AKI occurred in 26% of cases that had two or more contrast procedures within 30 days, compared with 9% of non-AKI cases. Although the incidence of postcontrast AKI was low, 10% of patients who developed AKI had a recent previous episode of AKI. In cases when AKI had occurred within 180 days of contrast administration, the odds of subsequent kidney injury was 9.39. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there is a low risk (0.85%) of developing an AKI after a procedure with contrast-media consistent with several recent studies. However, in adults with a recent history of AKI, physicians must consider this history as a risk factor for subsequent AKI.

Prolonged renal failure secondary to antithymocyte globulin treatment in severe aplastic anemia.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of acute renal failure in a patient with severe aplastic anemia after administration of antithymocyte globulin (ATG). CASE SUMMARY: A 41-year-old man diagnosed with severe aplastic anemia was treated with ATG and cyclosporine. After one dose of ATG (3012 mg, 40 mg/kg), the patient developed anuric acute renal failure, with serum creatinine 3.4 mg/dL (1.2 mg/dL at baseline) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 29 mg/dL (13 mg/dL at baseline), which required intermittent hemodialysis. Renal failure resolved with cessation of the drug, serum creatinine and BUN returned to baseline levels, and the patient no longer required hemodialysis. DISCUSSION: ATG is a purified and concentrated gamma globulin, primarily a monomeric immunoglobulin G from hyperimmune serum of horses. It is widely used to treat severe aplastic anemia and to manage acute transplant rejection. This patient had no other confounding factors for the cause of the renal failure. An objective causality assessment using the Naranjo probability scale suggested that ATG was the probable cause of the acute renal failure. Primary glomerular disease was not excluded, as a renal biopsy was not performed. CONCLUSIONS: The association between renal injury and administration of ATG remains unclear; therefore, we recommend that renal function be assessed and carefully monitored prior to and after administration of ATG.

Interstitial nephritis secondary to bevacizumab treatment in metastatic leiomyosarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of interstitial nephritis associated with the administration of bevacizumab. CASE SUMMARY: A 26-year-old man diagnosed with metastatic rectal leiomyosarcoma was treated with intravenous bevacizumab 5 mg/kg and received a total of 3 doses at 2 week intervals. His creatinine had increased from 1.0 mg/dL at baseline to 1.6 mg/dL after 2 doses of bevacizumab and to 4.7 mg/dL after the third dose, prompting admission. Acute renal failure was diagnosed, and hemodialysis was initiated. A renal biopsy revealed interstitial nephritis. Renal failure resolved with cessation of the drug, and the patient did not require further hemodialysis. DISCUSSION: Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor. Bevacizumab has shown efficacy in treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma and colorectal cancer and has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Our patient had no other confounding factors that might have caused renal failure. The presence of primary glomerular disease was excluded by biopsy. According to the Naranjo probability scale, bevacizumab was the probable cause of acute renal failure in this patient. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab can cause acute renal failure by inducing interstitial nephritis. Renal function should be monitored during bevacizumab therapy.

Renal disease in patients with cancer.

Kidney disease is very common in patients with cancer. Nephrologists are vital members of the multidisciplinary care team for these patients. Given the high prevalence of comorbidities in patients treated for active malignancy, it is not surprising that these individuals frequently develop renal diseases that are common among other hospitalized patients, such as those arising from sepsis, hypotension or use of nephrotoxic agents (e.g. radiocontrast or antimicrobial agents). The role of the nephrologist in these cases differs little with respect to the presence or absence of cancer. On the other hand, there are several renal syndromes that are unique to patients with cancer, being caused either by the cancer itself or by its treatment. These syndromes are reviewed here. In addition, patients who are receiving chemotherapy often require dialysis for either acute or chronic kidney disease. Unfortunately, there is very little information on the clearance characteristics of most chemotherapeutic agents. In cancer patients with renal disease, both the timing of administration and the dose-adjustment of chemotherapy must rely on clinical experience and close clinical observation.