Timing and Patient Position During Cuff Blood Pressure Measurement Affect Myocardial Work Parameters Measured by Echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Although cuff blood pressure measurement is a critical parameter to calculate myocardial work noninvasively, there is no recommendation about when and how to measure it. Accordingly, we sought to evaluate the effects of the timing during the echo study and the patient's position on the scanning bed during the cuff blood pressure measurement on myocardial work parameter calculations. METHODS: One hundred one consecutive patients (44 women, 66 ± 14 years) undergoing clinically indicated echocardiography were prospectively enrolled. During the echocardiographic study, we measured the cuff blood pressure 4 times, using a fully automatic digital blood pressure monitor applied to the right and left arm in the same position throughout the study: BP1, before the start of the echo study, with the patient lying in the supine position; BP2, after positioning the patients on their left side to start the echo study; BP3, at the time of the acquisition of the 3 apical views (4- and 2-chamber and long-axis) used to measured left ventricular global longitudinal strain; and BP4, at the end of the echo study with the patient again in the supine position. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressureat BP1 was 147 ± 21 mm Hg. Between BP1 and BP2, it dropped by 17 ± 9 mm Hg (P < .05). Systolic blood pressure at BP3 was significantly lower than BP2 (130 ± 20 mm Hg vs 122 ± 18 mm Hg, P < .05), and at BP4 was significantly lower than at BP1 (-9 ± 13 mm Hg, P < .05). The average global longitudinal strain was -16% ± 3%. Accordingly, the global work index was 1,929 ± 441 mm Hg% at BP1, dropped to 1,717 ± 421 at BP2, decreased to 1,602 ± 351 mm Hg% at BP3, and increased to 1,815 ± 386 mm Hg% at BP4 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The timing during the echocardiography study and the patient's position on the scanning bed are critical determinants of the measured cuff systolic blood pressure and the resulting values of myocardial work parameters.

Assessing Right Atrial Size in Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation: Importance of the Right Ventricular-Focused View.

AIMS: To assess the accuracy of measuring the right atrial volume (RAV) using two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) in a right ventricular focused (RVF) view compared to the conventional apical 4-chamber (4Ch) view in patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR). We also compared the clinical correlates of the measures obtained using different methods. METHODS AND RESULTS: The accuracy of RAV measurements obtained from 2DE- 4Ch and RVF views in 384 patients with STR were compared using three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) as a reference. We used the analysis of variance to test the differences among RAVs obtained from the different 2DE and 3DE acquisitions and the receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curves to evaluate the association with the composite endpoint of hospitalization for heart failure or death. Compared to 3DE, RAV was significantly more underestimated when measurements were obtained from 4Ch rather than RVF (-24% vs. -14%, respectively, p<0.001 for both). RAV underestimation in 4Ch and RVF view was relatively larger in lower grades of STR (-28% vs. -17% in mild, -23% vs. -14% in moderate, and -19% vs. -11% in severe STR, p=0.001), and in the atrial compared to ventricular (-28% vs. -22%; p=0.002) STR. RAV measured by 3DE and RVF showed the highest area under the curve (AUC=0.67 for 3DE vs 0.64 for RVF, p=0.05), while 4Ch was significantly less related to the outcomes (AUC: 0.61, p=0.021 vs 3DE RAV). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STR, the use of RVF view improved the accuracy of 2DE RAV measurement as compared to the conventional 4Ch-derived measurements.

Right Atrial Remodeling and Outcome in Patients with Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: In patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR), right atrial remodeling (RAR) is a proven marker of disease progression. However, the prognostic value of RAR, assessed by indexed right atrial volume (RAVi) and reservoir strain (RAS), remains to be clarified. Accordingly, the aim of our study is to investigate the association with outcome of RAR in patients with STR. METHODS: We enrolled 397 patients (44% men, 72.7 ± 13 years old) with mild to severe STR. Complete two-dimensional and speckle-tracking echocardiography analysis of right atrial and right ventricular (RV) size and function were obtained in all patients. The primary end point was the composite of death from any cause and heart failure hospitalization. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 15 months (interquartile range, 6-23), the end point was reached by 158 patients (39%). Patients with RAS <13% and RAVi >48 mL/m2 had significantly lower survival rates compared to patients with RAS ≥13% and RAVi ≤48 mL/m2 (log-rank P < .001). On multivariable analysis, RAS <13% (hazard ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.43-3.11; P < .001) and RAVi > 48 mL/m2 (hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.01-2.18; P = .04) remained associated with the combined end point, even after adjusting for RV free-wall longitudinal strain, significant chronic kidney disease, and New York Heart Association class. Secondary tricuspid regurgitation excess mortality increased exponentially with values of 18.2% and 51.3 mL/m2 for RAS and RAVi, respectively. In nested models, the addition of RAS and RAVi provided incremental prognostic value over clinical, conventional echocardiographic parameters of RV size and function and RV free-wall longitudinal strain. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STR, RAR was independently associated with mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Assessment of RAR could improve risk stratification of patients with STR, potentially identifying those who may benefit from optimization of medical therapy and a closer follow-up.