Association of Obesity With Lower Rates of Remission in a Colombian Cohort of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Modifiable risk factors associated with the severity of rheumatoid arthritis have been studied, including the body mass index (BMI). The aim was to compare the evolution of disease activity during 24 months of follow-up in different initial BMI groups of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHOD: Patients were classified based on their initial BMI (normal weight, overweight, and obese). Data were collected during 24 months of follow-up. At 24 months, they were reclassified based on their BMI. The proportion of patients in each BMI category was calculated. The mean differences between the initial and final DAS-28 (Disease Activity Score 28) were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results were stratified based on sex and age. Survival analysis and Mantel-Cox test for the achievement of sustained remission during follow-up were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients were included. Most patients were at the normal weight category (n = 111). Normal weight group had the highest initial score (DAS-28, 4.01). Women present higher variability in BMI and greater disease activity compared with men. Based on age group, patients between the ages 31 and 50 years are more stable in their BMI, whereas those older than 50 years had lower BMI with time. Sustained remission was achieved by 58% of patients from the normal weight group, by 57% of patients from the overweight group, and by 42% of patients from the obese group. Survival curves of the initial normal and obese groups were significantly different (p = 0.0209). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with initial obesity were less likely to achieve remission compared with patients with initial overweight or normal weight. Sex and age affects disease activity and BMI variation.

Correlation and agreement between physical and ultrasound examination after a training session dedicated to the standardization of synovitis assessment in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVES: Assessing disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients requires comprehensive quantification of tender and swollen joints. We aimed to evaluate the correlation and agreement between rheumatologists after a training session dedicated to the standardization of synovitis assessment and compare its performance with a reference imaging modality such as musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS). METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 28 and 10 joints in RA patients were evaluated by physical examination and ultrasound (US), respectively. After participating in a training session, individual joint assessment for tenderness and swelling was performed by three rheumatologists. MSUS examination was performed separately by an experimented radiologist in a standardized manner, evaluating findings according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trial (OMERACT) guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 80 RA patients were included, with a mean Disease Activity Score based on 28 joints (DAS28)-ESR of 4.02. The interobserver overall agreement and concordance rate in a total of 2240 joints assessed was 81.7% (k = 0.449, p < 0.0001) for tender joints and 66% (k = 0.227, p < 0.0001) for swollen joints. The overall concordance rate was fair (Fleiss' kappa = 0.21, p = 0.027) with an overall agreement of 67.18% yet, more joints were found to be swollen by the US assessment, compared to the physical examination (43% vs 39%). CONCLUSION: In our study population, joint tenderness showed better interobserver agreement, correlation, and concordance rate than joint swelling. When comparing the US assessment to the physical examination, a fair overall concordance rate supports the need for the implementation of training sessions dedicated to standardization in rheumatology clinics.

Rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus: Pathophysiological mechanisms related to innate immune system.

Rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus are two highly prevalent autoimmune diseases that generate disability and low quality of life. The innate immune system, a long-forgotten issue in autoimmune diseases, is becoming increasingly important and represents a new focus for the treatment of these entities. This review highlights the role that innate immune system plays in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. The role of the innate immune system in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus pathophysiology is not only important in early stages but is essential to maintain the immune response and to allow disease progression. In rheumatoid arthritis, genetic and environmental factors are involved in the initial stimulation of the innate immune response in which macrophages are the main participants, as well as fibroblast-like synoviocytes. In systemic lupus erythematosus, all the cells contribute to the inflammatory response, but the complement system is the major effector of the inflammatory process. Detecting alterations in the normal function of these cells, besides its contribution to the understanding of the pathophysiology of autoimmune diseases, could help to establish new treatment strategies for these diseases.

Correlation and agreement between physical and ultrasound examination after a training session dedicated to the standardization of synovitis assessment in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Abstract Objectives: Assessing disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients requires comprehensive quantification of tender and swollen joints. We aimed to evaluate the correlation and agreement between rheumatologists after a training session dedicated to the standardization of synovitis assessment and compare its performance with a reference imaging modality such as musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 28 and 10 joints in RA patients were evaluated by physical examination and ultrasound (US), respectively. After participating in a training session, individual joint assessment for tenderness and swelling was performed by three rheumatologists. MSUS examination was performed separately by an experimented radiologist in a standardized manner, evaluating findings according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trial (OMERACT) guidelines. Results: A total of 80 RA patients were included, with a mean Disease Activity Score based on 28 joints (DAS28)-ESR of 4.02. The interobserver overall agreement and concordance rate in a total of 2240 joints assessed was 81.7% (k = 0.449, p < 0.0001) for tender joints and 66% (k = 0.227, p < 0.0001) for swollen joints. The overall concordance rate was fair (Fleiss' kappa = 0.21, p = 0.027) with an overall agreement of 67.18% yet, more joints were found to be swollen by the US assessment, compared to the physical examination (43% vs 39%). Conclusion: In our study population, joint tenderness showed better interobserver agreement, correlation, and concordance rate than joint swelling. When comparing the US assessment to the physical examination, a fair overall concordance rate supports the need for the implementation of training sessions dedicated to standardization in rheumatology clinics.

Pharmacological treatment of scleroderma renal crisis: A systematic literature review / Tratamiento farmacológico de la crisis renal en esclerosis sistémica: una revisión sistemática de la literatura

ABSTRACT Background: Scleroderma renal crisis is a condition that affects approximately 4-6% of patients with systemic sclerosis, especially with diffuse compromise. Clinical manifestations are variable, representing a diagnostic challenge. Objective: The study aims to describe and analyze the different pharmacological treatments available for the management of scleroderma renal crisis. Materials and methods: A systematic literature review was done based on observational studies and clinical trials about the treatment of scleroderma renal crisis, using monotherapy or combined therapy. The studies were identified using electronic scientific databases, including MEDLINE PUBMED and EMBASE, in English, published between January 1990 and August 2019. Results: Eleven studies were included (ten observational studies and one open clinical trial). Of them, seven were cohorts, one case series, and two case-control studies. Overall, 1113 patients were included in the analyzed studies. All studies used angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as exposition, case definition, and/or comparison in the clinical trial. Regarding the need for dialysis, approximately 53.9% of patients required it temporarily or permanently. Approximately 6-27% of patients required temporal dialysis, and 19-78% required permanent dialysis. One-year survival range was between 64 and 84%; two-year survival was between 53 and 74%; five-year survival between 40 and 90%, and finally ten-year survival between 35 and 47%. Conclusions: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors continue to be the first line of treatment for scleroderma renal crisis by contributing to a decrease in short-term mortality. However, alternative therapeutic options are required as a high percentage of patients still require dialysis. Future clinical trials are necessary to assess the effectiveness and safety of different therapeutic options.

RESUMEN Introducción: La crisis renal es una condición que afecta aproximadamente a 4-6% de los pacientes con esclerosis sistémica, especialmente con compromiso difuso. Las manifestaciones clínicas son variables, representando un reto diagnóstico en la práctica clínica. Objetivo: El objetivo del estudio fue describir y analizar los diferentes tratamientos farmacológicos disponibles para el manejo de la crisis renal en esclerosis sistémica. Materiales y métodos: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura fue desarrollada con base en estudios observacionales y ensayos clínicos sobre el tratamiento de la crisis renal, utilizando monoterapia o terapias combinadas. Los estudios fueron identificados utilizando bases de datos científicas que incluyeron MEDLINE PUBMED y EMBASE, que estuvieran en inglés y publicados entre enero de 1990 y agosto de 2019. Resultados: Once estudios fueron incluidos (10 estudios observacionales y un ensayo clínico abierto). De estos, siete fueron cohortes, una serie de casos y dos estudios de casos y controles. En total, 1113 pacientes fueron incluidos en los estudios analizados. Todos los estudios utilizaron inhibidores de enzima convertidora de angiotensina como exposición, definición de caso y/o comparador en ensayo clínico. Sobre la necesidad de diálisis, aproximadamente 53,9% de los pacientes la requirieron de forma temporal o permanente. Aproximadamente 6-27% de pacientes requirieron diálisis temporal y 19-78% requirieron diálisis permanente. El rango de sobrevida al año fue de 64-84%; a dos arios 53-74%; a cinco arios 40-90%, y a diez arnos 35-47%. Conclusiones: Los inhibidores de enzima convertidora de angiotensina continúan siendo la primera línea de tratamiento de crisis renal en esclerosis sistémica, al contribuir en la reducción de la mortalidad a corto plazo. Sin embargo, opciones terapéuticas alternativas son requeridas, al continuar muy elevado el porcentaje de requerimiento de diálisis. Ensayos clínicos futuros son necesarios para evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de diferentes opciones terapéuticas.

Treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis / Tratamiento de la enfermedad pulmonar intersticial asociada con la esclerosis sistémica: revisión sistemática de la literatura y metaanálisis

ABSTRACT Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an immune-mediated disease characterized by small vessel vasculopathy and fibroblast dysfunction that leads to increased production of extracellular matrix. Interstitial lung disease represents one of the most common complications, by affecting almost 70% of patients with SSc. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the pharmacological treatments available for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) based on pulmonary function tests and radiologic findings. Materials and methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted. A thorough literature search was made in EMBASE, PUBMED, and Cochrane CENTRAL to collect studies published between January 2015 and July 31 of 2019. The primary outcomes were forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO), and high-resolution computed tomography findings (HR-CT). Studies using medications for the treatment of SSc-ILD including cyclophosphamide (CYC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), nintedanib, pirfenidone, or rituximab (RTX) were included. Effect measures were calculated based on available data, and a meta-analysis was made with these results. Results: We found a total of 312 studies. 49 studies were selected for full-text assessment after reading the abstracts. Finally, 14 studies were selected to be included in the final review. 2 meta-analyses, 8 clinical trials, 3 retrospective cohorts, and one nested case-control study were identified. The available evidence supports the use of CYC and MMF as the best options for the treatment of SSc-ILD, with MMF being the preferred option based on a better safety profile. Other medications such as RTX, pirfenidone, and nintedanib show potential as alternatives to CYC. The overall quality of evidence available is adequate based on generally well-designed studies. Meta-analysis was done by assessing >5% or >10% decrease of FVC when comparing pharmacological agents vs. placebo. Results show that the use of pharmacological agents is negatively associated with the worsening of FVC. However, high heterogeneity limits the number of studies used during quantitative analysis, affecting the overall results. Conclusions: Immunosuppressive therapies remain as the cornerstone of treatment of SSc-ILD, as most evidence show improvement or slow progression of pulmonary function tests by using them, especially CYC and MMF. However, more evidence is required regarding the use of alternative pharmacological agents, in search of an improvement in the quality of life of these patients.

RESUMEN Antecedentes: La esclerosis sistémica (ES) es una enfermedad mediada por el sistema inmunitario, caracterizada por vasculopatía de pequeños vasos y disfunción de los fibroblastos, que da lugar a una mayor producción de matriz extracelular. La enfermedad pulmonar intersticial representa una de las complicaciones más comunes, ya que afecta a cerca del 70% de los pacientes con ES. Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad de los tratamientos farmacológicos disponibles para la enfermedad pulmonar intersticial asociada a la esclerosis sistémica (EPI-ES) basándonos en las pruebas de función pulmonar y los hallazgos radiológicos. Materiales y métodos: Se llevó a cabo una revisión sistemática de la literatura y un metaanálisis. Se hizo una búsqueda exhaustiva de literatura en EMBASE, MEDLINE PubMed y Cochrane (CENTRAL) con el fin de recopilar los estudios publicados entre enero de 2015 y el 31 de julio de 2019. Los resultados primarios fueron la capacidad vital forzada (CVF), la capacidad de difusión del monóxido de carbono (diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, DLCO), y los hallazgos de la tomografía computarizada de alta resolución (TCAR). Se incluyeron los estudios que utilizaron medicamentos para el tratamiento de la EPI-ES, incluyendo ciclofosfamida (CYC), micofenolato de mofetilo (MMF), nintedanib, pirfenidona o rituximab (RTX). Las medidas de efecto se calcularon con base en los datos disponibles, y se hizo un metaanálisis con estos resultados. Resultados: Encontramos un total de 312 estudios. Después de leer los resúmenes, se seleccionaron 49 estudios para la evaluación del texto completo. Finalmente, se seleccionaron 14 estudios para incluirlos en la revisión final. Se identificaron dos metaanálisis, ocho ensayos clínicos, tres cohortes retrospectivas y un estudio de casos y controles anidado. La evidencia disponible respalda el uso de CYC y MMF como las mejores opciones para el tratamiento de la EPI-ES, siendo el MMF la opción preferida basada en un mejor perfil de seguridad. Otros medicamentos como RTX, pirfenidona y nintedanib muestran potencial como alternativas a la CYC. La calidad global de la evidencia disponible es adecuada ya que parte de estudios por lo general bien diseñados. El metaanálisis se realizó evaluando una disminución > 5% o > 10% de la CVF al comparar los agentes farmacológicos vs. placebo. Los resultados muestran que el uso de agentes farmacológicos se asocia negativamente con el empeoramiento de la CVF. Sin embargo, la alta heterogeneidad limita el número de estudios utilizados durante el análisis cuantitativo, afectando los resultados generales. Conclusiones: Las terapias inmunosupresoras, especialmente la CYC y el MMF, siguen siendo la piedra angular del tratamiento de la EPI-ES, ya que la mayoría de la evidencia muestra una mejoría o una progresión lenta de las pruebas de función pulmonar al usarlas. Sin embargo, se requiere más evidencia con respecto al uso de agentes farmacológicos alternativos, en busca de una mejora de la calidad de vida de estos pacientes.

Pharmacological treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary hypertension: A systematic literature review / Tratamiento farmacológico de la hipertensión pulmonar asociada a la esclerosis sistémica: revisión sistemática de la literatura

ABSTRACT Background: Systemic sclerosis is an autoimmune disease that could significantly affect internal organs, increasing the mortality associated with the disorder. Pulmonary hypertension is one of the conditions that increase the morbidity and mortality of the disease. The aim of the study was to develop a systematic literature review about the different pharmacological treatments for systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary hypertension. Materials and methods: A systematic literature review was made on Cochrane, PubMed and EMBASE. Randomized controlled clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, cohort and case-control studies using any of the available treatments such as prostacyclin analogs, endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors or soluble guanylate cyclase stimulants were included. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using Cochrane methodology for clinical trials, and the SIGN tool was applied for cohort and case-control studies. Results: Initially, 870 studies were found, and 20 studies were finally included in the systematic review after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most studies included Bosentan in the treatment strategies (N = 13). Also, most studies took data from the most important clinical trials for pharmacological treatment of pulmonary hypertension of several etiologies. Some studies using Bosentan did not give information about data regarding some outcomes. Half of the selected studies were clinical trials, of which two were randomized. The quality of these studies was good. The other half were observational studies, with moderate quality of evidence. In general, it was found that approved medications improve the 6-minute walk distance, WHO functional class, NYHA functional classification, or Borg dyspnea score, depending on the given dose in several studies, and also compound outcomes that include hospitalizations, clinical worsening, death, etc. Regarding mortality, there were significant differences in survival rates when comparing approved medications vs. placebo, being combined therapies superior to monotherapy. Measurements of hemodynamic variables such as cardiac index, pulmonary resistances, and pulmonary pressures were improved. Also, NT-proBNP levels were reduced, with some exceptions. Conclusions: In most studies with good quality of evidence, it was found an improvement in clinical and non-clinical outcomes, favoring the use of approved medications for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary hypertension.

RESUMEN Antecedentes: La esclerosis sistémica es una enfermedad autoinmune que puede afectar significativamente los órganos internos, aumentando la mortalidad asociada con dicho trastorno. La hipertensión pulmonar es una de las afecciones que aumentan la morbimortalidad de la enfermedad. El objetivo del estudio fue desarrollar una revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre los diferentes tratamientos farmacológicos para la hipertensión pulmonar asociada a la esclerosis sistémica. Materiales y métodos: Se hizo una revisión sistemática de la literatura en Cochrane, PubMed y EMBASE. Se incluyeron ensayos clínicos aleatorizados controlados, ensayos clínicos controlados, así como estudios de cohortes y de casos y controles utilizando alguno de los tratamientos disponibles, tales como los análogos de la prostaciclina, los antagonistas de los receptores de endotelina, los inhibidores de la fosfodiesterasa o los estimulantes de la guanilato ciclasa soluble. Se evaluó la calidad metodológica de los estudios utilizando la metodología Cochrane para los ensayos clínicos, y se aplicó la herramienta SIGN para los estudios de cohortes y de casos y controles. Resultados: Inicialmente se encontraron 870 estudios, de los cuales finalmente se incluyeron 20 en la revisión sistemática, después de aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión. La mayoría de los estudios incluyeron el bosentán en las estrategias de tratamiento (n = 13). Además, la mayoría de los estudios tomaron datos de los ensayos clínicos más importantes sobre el tratamiento farmacológico de la hipertensión pulmonar de diversas etiologías. Algunos estudios que utilizaron el bosentán no suministraron información sobre datos relacionados con algunos resultados. La mitad de los estudios seleccionados fueron ensayos clínicos, de los cuales dos fueron aleatorizados. La calidad de estos estudios fue buena. La otra mitad incluyó estudios observacionales, con evidencia de calidad moderada. En general, se encontró que los medicamentos aprobados mejoran la distancia en la caminata de seis minutos, la clase funcional de la OMS, la clasificación funcional de la NYHA, o el puntaje de disnea en la escala de Borg, dependiendo de la dosis administrada en los diferentes estudios, y también los desenlaces compuestos que incluyen hospitalizaciones, empeoramiento clínico, muerte, etc. En cuanto a la mortalidad, se encontraron diferencias significativas en las tasas de supervivencia al comparar los medicamentos aprobados versus placebo, siendo las terapias combinadas superiores a la monoterapia. Las mediciones de variables hemodinámicas tales como el índice cardíaco, las resistencias pulmonares y las presiones pulmonares mejoraron. Además, los niveles de NT-pro BNP se redujeron, con algunas excepciones. Conclusiones: En la mayoría de los estudios con buena calidad de evidencia, se encontró una mejoría en los desenlaces clínicos y no clínicos, que favorece el uso de los medicamentos aprobados para el tratamiento de la hipertensión pulmonar asociada a la esclerosis sistémica.