RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The investigational AS04-adjuvanted herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) glycoprotein D (gD2) subunit prophylactic vaccine ('HSV vaccine'; GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines) has been shown to be well tolerated in adults, but limited data exist for pre-teen and adolescent girls, a likely target population. The primary objective of this study was to compare the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) over 12 months between HSV vaccine recipients and saline recipients (placebo control group) in pre-teen and adolescent girls. The immunogenicity of the HSV vaccine was also assessed. METHODS: Healthy girls aged 10-17 years, stratified by age (10-15 years; 16-17 years), were randomised 2:1:1 to receive the HSV vaccine, a hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix™; HAV control) or placebo (saline) according to a 0-, 1-, 6-month schedule. Participants and study personnel not involved in the preparation or administration of vaccines were blinded to treatment. Safety and immunogenicity analyses were performed overall and by age (10-15 years; 16-17 years) and HSV serostatus. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the percentage of subjects with SAEs was observed between the HSV and saline group, or between the HSV and pooled control (HAV and saline) groups. The HSV vaccine was well tolerated, although a higher incidence of solicited local symptoms was observed in the HSV group than in the control group. Neither age nor HSV serostatus at the time of study entry had an impact on the safety profile of this vaccine. The HSV vaccine was immunogenic regardless of pre-vaccination HSV serostatus. Higher anti-gD geometric mean concentrations were observed in HSV-1 seropositive participants than in HSV-1 seronegative participants. CONCLUSION: The HSV vaccine had an acceptable safety profile, and was well tolerated and immunogenic when administered to girls aged 10-17 years regardless of age or HSV pre-vaccination serostatus.
Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Herpes Genital/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Herpesvirus/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Herpesvirus/inmunología , Adolescente , Niño , Método Doble Ciego , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/patología , Femenino , Herpes Genital/inmunología , Herpesvirus Humano 2/inmunología , Vacunas contra Herpesvirus/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Placebos/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Subunidad/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Subunidad/efectos adversos , Vacunas de Subunidad/inmunología , Proteínas del Envoltorio Viral/inmunologíaRESUMEN
The immunogenicity and reactogenicity profiles of three doses each of Engerix-B(R) (10 microg hepatitis B surface antigen) and Recombivax(R) (5 microg hepatitis B surface antigen), given on a 0, 1, 6 month schedule to healthy adolescents were compared in a single-blind, randomized clinical trial. One month following the third dose, seroprotection rates after Engerix-B and Recombivax were similar (99 and 98%, respectively). The geometric mean titre (GMT) was statistically significantly higher following vaccination with Engerix-B (3961 vs. 1001 mIU/ml; P=0.0001, Fisher's exact test). Most of the symptoms reported were mild or moderate in intensity and transient. There were no vaccine-related serious adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/farmacología , Vacunas Sintéticas/farmacología , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Anticuerpos contra la Hepatitis B/sangre , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/inmunología , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Masculino , Seguridad , Método Simple Ciego , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Acute hepatitis A superimposed on chronic liver disease (CLD) has been associated with severe or fulminant hepatitis. An open, multicenter study was performed to compare the safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in patients with CLD with that in healthy subjects. A secondary objective was to compare the safety of the hepatitis A vaccine with that of a commercial hepatitis B vaccine in subjects with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 475 subjects over the age of 18 years were enrolled into 1 of 5 groups according to history, serological data, and previous diagnosis. Patients in groups 1 (healthy adults), 2 (chronic hepatitis B), 3 (chronic hepatitis C), and 5 (other CLD not caused by viral hepatitis) were vaccinated with two doses of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, 6 months apart. Patients in group 4 (chronic hepatitis C) received 3 doses of a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, according to a 0-, 1-, and 6-month schedule. Local injection-site symptoms were the most common reactions reported following vaccination in all groups (35.5% of all doses), with the hepatitis B vaccine eliciting fewer injection-site symptoms than the hepatitis A vaccine (19.8% compared with 37.5%). Although a higher percentage of healthy subjects (93%) seroconverted after a single dose of the hepatitis A vaccine than did subjects with chronic hepatitis C (73.7%) or CLD of nonviral etiologies (83.1%), more than 94% of all vaccinees were seropositive for anti-HAV after the complete vaccination course. At each time point, a lower geometric mean concentration of anti-HAV was observed for each group of CLD patients compared with the healthy control subjects. In conclusion, hepatitis A vaccine was well tolerated and induced a satisfactory immune response in patients with chronic hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis C, and miscellaneous CLD.