Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 3, 2024 Jan 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166672

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Food bolus obstruction (FBO) leading to hospital treatment is often associated with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), stenosis, or oesophageal cancer (1). Danish national guidelines recommend that patients with FBO undergo a diagnostic upper endoscopy within two weeks of presentation to exclude possible malignancy, and histological evaluation of eight biopsies (2, 3). AIMS: The aims of this study were to (1) report the incidence and describe the causes and treatment of FBO in the North Denmark Region (NDR), (2) determine the proportion of patients who underwent upper endoscopy and biopsy according to regional and national guidelines, and (3) identify International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes applied to the hospital visits due to FBO in the NDR. METHODS: Among all acute hospital visits in the NDR in 2021, all visits with ICD-10 codes possibly reflecting FBO, as well as a random sample of 14,400 visits with unspecific ICD-10 codes (R and Z codes), were screened manually for possible FBO. Diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of all patients with FBO were recorded. RESULTS: The median patient age was 66.0 (Q1-Q3: 49.8-81.0) years, and half of the patients had experienced FBO before. Two thirds of patients (66.0%) were never diagnosed with a cause of FBO, followed by 17.3% with EoE. 30% of patients did not undergo upper endoscopy within two weeks of the hospital visit, and 50.7% were never biopsied in the oesophagus. Of 1886 hospital visits with registry ICD-10 codes that possibly reflected FBO, 8.4% were due to FBO, while FBO was present in 0.028% of the random sample of unspecific ICD-10 codes. CONCLUSIONS: Most hospitalized FBO patients in the NDR in 2021 were never diagnosed with a cause. In these patients there is a high risk of overlooked EoE or upper gastrointestinal cancers. The area needs immediate focus and changed routines to improve treatment and prevent new FBO.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Estenosis Esofágica , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Estenosis Esofágica/diagnóstico , Estenosis Esofágica/epidemiología , Estenosis Esofágica/etiología , Dinamarca/epidemiología
2.
BMC Pediatr ; 24(1): 24, 2024 01 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191332

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A low incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in children in the North Denmark Region (NDR) were measured in 2007-2017. Few of the children diagnosed before 2017 were treated to remission suggesting a lack of awareness. While there currently are no guidelines for treating EoE in Denmark, a new English guideline was published in 2022 renewing focus on the disease. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the difference of current Danish clinical practice for treatment and follow-up of EoE children in the NDR with the new English guideline from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and the British Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN). METHODS: This retrospective, register-based DanEoE cohort study included 31 children diagnosed with EoE between 2007 and 2021 in NDR. Medical records were reviewed and information about treatment and follow-up were collected. RESULTS: In 32% of the children with EoE in the NDR, first-line treatment corresponded with the new English guideline. One in 6 children were never started on any treatment even though treatment always is recommended. Histologic evaluation within 12 weeks as recommended was performed in 13% of the children. CONCLUSIONS: In Denmark focus on improving EoE treatment and follow-up for children is needed, as there is a significant difference between current clinical practice and the recommendations in the new English guideline.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Niño , Humanos , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales Infantiles , Dinamarca
3.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 12(5): 596-604, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38323511

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease of the oesophagus. Eosinophilic oesophagitis is associated with a substantial disease burden affecting the quality of life and affecting mental health. There are limited data describing the incidence of psychiatric disorders and the use of psychotropic drugs (PDs) in EoE patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to investigate whether EoE patients in Denmark have higher use of PDs, contacts with the department of psychiatry, and attempts of suicide or intentional self-harm compared with the general population after being diagnosed with EoE. METHODS: This study was a nationwide, population-based register study including 3367 EoE patients and 16,835 age- and sex-matched comparators. A register-based EoE definition was used to identify cases. Incident PD use was extracted from the prescription register and information regarding psychiatric contacts was retrieved from the Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register. RESULTS: The 5-year incidence of PD use in EoE patients was 13.8% compared to 7.1% of the matched comparators (Hazard ratio 1.83; confidence interval 1.6-2.0; p ≤ 0.001). Antidepressants were the most frequently prescribed PD, whereas antipsychotics were the least prescribed PD. Increasing age, lower educational level, and comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥1) were associated with the prescription of PDs. The risk of PD use was lower in men than in women with EoE. CONCLUSION: Treatment with PDs were more common in EoE patients after they were diagnosed than in the general Danish population, indicating that EoE patients have an increased risk of psychiatric disorders.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Psicotrópicos , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Calidad de Vida
4.
Dan Med J ; 70(2)2023 Jan 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36892219

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Gender difference in the incidence of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is well-known as more men than women are affected. However, knowledge of gender differences is lacking for most other aspects of EoE. In this population-based adult EoE cohort, the aim was to study if gender differences exist with respect to 1) clinical phenotype, 2) treatment response and 3) complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective, registry-based DanEoE cohort study of 236 adult patients with EoE (178 adult men and 58 adult women) diagnosed in 2007-2017 in the North Denmark Region. Medical registries were searched for patient records and pathology reports. RESULTS: No statistically or clinically significant differences were recorded in the phenotype regarding symptoms reported, macroscopic or histological findings at diagnosis (all p > 0.3). A comparable number of men and women were followed up symptomatically and histologically (all p > 0.3). More men than women reported "no symptoms" on proton pump inhibitor (56% men versus 39% women, p = 0.04), although the histological response was similar between genders (p = 0.4). The proportions of food bolus obstructions and dilations were comparable (all p > 0.4). CONCLUSION: This study found very few gender differences. Results suggest that men and women with EoE may receive the same treatment. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Sistema de Registros , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico
5.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol ; 47(7): 102159, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37307949

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the North Denmark Region an increased awareness of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) was observed after 2011 where a regional biopsy guideline was implemented. This resulted in an increased awareness of EoE and a 50-fold increase in the incidence of EoE patients between 2007-2017. AIMS: The aims of this study were to examine the progress in diagnostic delay, complications, PPI treatment, and follow up since 2017 in Danish patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective registry- and population-based cohort study (DanEoE2 cohort) including 346 adult patients with esophageal eosinophilia diagnosed between 2018-2021 in the North Denmark Region. The DanEoE2 cohort included all possible EoE patients by using the Danish Patho-histology registry based on the SNOMED-system. The data was analyzed and compared to the DanEoE cohort (2007-2017). RESULTS: The diagnostic delay of EoE patients diagnosed between 2018-2021 in the North Denmark Region had decreased with a median of 1.5 years (5.5 (2.0;12) years versus 4.0 (1.0;12) years, p=0.03). Strictures before diagnosis had decreased 8.4 % (11.6% versus 3.2%, p=0.003). The number of patients started on high-dose PPI increased (56% versus 88%, p<0.001). An intensified awareness regarding national guidelines and follow-up was observed as an increase in the number of histological follow up (67% versus 74%, p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons of the DanEoE cohorts showed a decrease in diagnostic delay, a decrease in stricture formation before diagnosis, and an improved guideline adherence after 2017. Future studies are needed to assess if symptomatic or histological remission on PPI treatment is more capable of predicting a patient's risk of developing complications.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Adulto , Humanos , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/tratamiento farmacológico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Constricción Patológica , Diagnóstico Tardío/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Adhesión a Directriz , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Dinamarca/epidemiología
6.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 10(7): 640-650, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36106558

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated or antigen-mediated oesophageal disease characterised by symptoms related to oesophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to estimate the incidence and prevalence of EoE in Denmark during the period 2008-2018. METHODS: Based on data from nationwide registers we identified cases of EoE using two definitions: a broad definition based solely on oesophageal biopsies registered in the Danish Pathology Register and a narrow definition also including symptoms of oesophageal dysfunction registered in the Danish National Patient Registry. The annual incidence and prevalence were standardised by sex and age in 5-year intervals to the 2013 study population. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2011, the standardised incidence of EoE was stable, but from 2011 to 2018 it increased from 3.9 (95% CI 3.3-4.4) to 11.7 (95% CI 10.8-12.6) per 100,000 person-years. Similar temporal trends were observed when using the narrow EoE definition. The increase in incidence was most pronounced in men and in individuals above 40 years of age. In children, the EoE incidence was a fourth of the incidence in adults aged 40-64 years: 4.4 (95% CI 3.2-5.6) versus 17.6 (95% CI 15.7-19.5) per 100,000 person-years. The EoE incidence varied substantially across the five regions in Denmark. Overall, the biopsy rate as well as the proportion of oesophageal biopsies with detected eosinophilia increased during the study period. CONCLUSION: This study of the entire population of Denmark during the period 2008 to 2018 shows that the incidence and prevalence of EoE is not yet plateauing and that EoE could be severely underdiagnosed, especially in children.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Adulto , Niño , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Enteritis , Eosinofilia , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/patología , Gastritis , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Prevalencia
7.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 9(8): 910-918, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34477326

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often the first drug of choice in the treatment of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), and in Denmark 8 weeks of high-dose PPI therapy is recommended as first-line treatment followed by rebiopsying, reflecting international recommendations. AIMS: To assess the population-based effectiveness of PPIs in the treatment of EoE and evaluate whether patients were treated and followed according to the regional guideline. METHODS: This is a retrospective, registry-based, DanEoE cohort study of 236 adult EoE patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2017 in the North Denmark Region. After patient file revision, the EoE diagnosis was defined according to the AGREE 2 consensus. Symptomatic PPI response was defined as complete symptom resolution and histological remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field). RESULTS: PPI treatment was initiated in 92% of the EoE patients. High- and low-dose PPIs were prescribed in 55% and 45% of the cases, respectively. When treated with high-dose PPIs, 68% of the patients were completely symptom-free, and 49% were in histological remission. In 39% of high-dose PPI-treated patients, the symptomatic and histological responses were conflicting. While treated with PPIs, complications were rare, with <5% strictures in responders and <10% in non-responders. Rebiopsying was done in 67% of the EoE patients started on PPIs. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose PPI treatment was effective in half of the EoE patients started on PPIs, but conflicting symptomatic and histological PPI responses were common. Complications were rare when PPIs were started. One-third of the patients were not rebiopsied as recommended.


Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Eosinófilos/efectos de los fármacos , Eosinófilos/patología , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Inducción de Remisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA