RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ammonium persulfate (APS), an oxidizing agent used in hair products, manufacturing, and pool/spa water, can cause skin reactions, including allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: To characterize positive patch test reactions to APS (2.5% petrolatum). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients tested to the North American Contact Dermatitis Group screening series from 2015 to 2018. RESULTS: Of 10,526 patients, 193 (1.8%) had positive patch test reactions to APS. Compared with APS-negative patients, APS-positive patients were significantly more likely to be male (43.2% vs 28.0%; P < .0001); have primary hand dermatitis (30.2% vs 22.0%; P = .0064), scattered generalized dermatitis (25.5% vs 17.9%; P = .0064), or trunk dermatitis (8.9% vs 4.9%; P = .0123); and have dermatitis that is occupationally related (22.2% vs 10.9%; P < .0001). More than half of the APS-positive reactions were currently relevant (57.0%); 19 (9.8%) were related to occupation, especially hairdressers (68.4%). Swimming pools/spas (23.3%) and hair care products (19.2%) were the most common sources of APS. LIMITATIONS: Immediate reactions and follow-up testing were not captured. CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients positive to APS was 1.8%. APS positivity was significantly associated with male sex and hand dermatitis. Swimming pool/spa chemicals were important sources of APS exposure.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Preparaciones para el Cabello , Alérgenos , Sulfato de Amonio , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Eccema/complicaciones , Femenino , Preparaciones para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , América del Norte , Oxidantes , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversos , Vaselina , Estudios Retrospectivos , AguaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Personal care products (PCPs) are commonly responsible for allergic contact dermatitis and irritant contact dermatitis. PCP use was historically associated with females, but male-targeted PCPs are increasingly being marketed. OBJECTIVE: To characterize and compare males with PCP-related contact dermatitis (MPCPs) and females with PCP-related contact dermatitis (FPCPs). METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data (1996-2016). RESULTS: Four thousand six hundred eighty of 16,233 men (28.8%) and 12,730 of 32,222 (39.5%) women had a PCP identified as a source of irritant contact dermatitis or a positive patch test reaction. The proportion of PCP-related dermatitis in both sexes significantly increased (>2.7-fold) over the decade of study. Compared with FPCPs, a larger proportion of MPCPs were older or had trunk or extremity dermatitis (P < .0001). MPCPs were twice as likely to have soaps as a source while FPCPs were twice as likely to have hair care products (P < .0001). The most common PCP-related North American Contact Dermatitis Group allergens for both sexes were methylisothiazolinone (MPCP 28.8% and FPCP 21.5%), fragrance mix I (MPCP 22.3% and FPCP 20.1%), balsam of Peru (MPCP 18.5% and FPCP 14.1%), quaternium-15 (MPCP 16.1% and FPCP 12.3%), and paraphenylenediamine (MPCP 11.5% and FPCP 11.1%). LIMITATIONS: Patient population referred for suspected contact dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: PCP-related dermatitis is increasing. Sites of involvement and relevant PCP sources are distinct between sexes. Male and female variation in exposure history may explain differences in reactivity to some allergen groups.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Irritante/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Cosméticos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Transversales , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Irritantes , Masculino , América del Norte/epidemiología , Pruebas del Parche , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Scalp conditions are often multifactorial. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with scalp involvement and patch-testing outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data (1996-2016). Study groups included patients with scalp involvement (≤3 anatomic sites coded) with or without additional sites. RESULTS: A total of 4.8% of patients (2331/48,753) had scalp identified as 1 of up to 3 affected anatomic sites. Approximately one-third of "scalp-only" individuals had a specific primary diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis (38.6%), followed by seborrheic dermatitis (17.2%) and irritant contact dermatitis (9.3%). When adjacent anatomic sites were affected, allergic contact dermatitis was more frequently identified as the primary diagnosis (>50%). The top 5 currently clinically relevant allergens in scalp-only patients were p-phenylenediamine, fragrance mix I, nickel sulfate, balsam of Peru, and cinnamic aldehyde. Methylisothiazolinone sensitivity was notable when adjacent anatomic sites were involved. The top 3 specifically identified sources for scalp-only allergens were hair dyes, shampoo/conditioners, and consumer items (eg, hair appliances, glasses). LIMITATIONS: Tertiary referral population. CONCLUSION: Isolated scalp involvement was less likely to be associated with allergic contact dermatitis than when adjacent anatomic sites were involved. Overlap with multiple diagnoses was frequent, including seborrheic dermatitis, irritant dermatitis, other dermatoses, or all 3. p-Phenylenediamine was the most common allergen.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/patología , Dermatitis Irritante/patología , Pruebas del Parche , Dermatosis del Cuero Cabelludo/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Canadá/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/etiología , Dermatitis Atópica/patología , Dermatitis Irritante/epidemiología , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/etiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/patología , Anteojos , Femenino , Tinturas para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Preparaciones para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Humanos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Especificidad de Órganos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dermatosis del Cuero Cabelludo/epidemiología , Dermatosis del Cuero Cabelludo/etiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Eyelid dermatitis is a common dermatologic complaint. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with eyelid dermatitis. METHODS: Retrospective analysis (1994-2016) of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data. RESULTS: Of 50,795 patients, 2332 (4.6%) had eyelid dermatitis only, whereas 1623 (3.2%) also had dermatitis of the eyelids and head or neck. Compared with patients without eyelid involvement (n = 26,130), groups with eyelid dermatitis only and dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck were significantly more likely to be female, white, and older than 40 years, and to have a history of hay fever, atopic dermatitis, or both (P < .01). Final primary diagnoses included allergic contact dermatitis (eyelid dermatitis only: 43.4%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 53.5%), irritant contact dermatitis (eyelid dermatitis only: 17.0%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 9.8%), and atopic dermatitis (eyelid dermatitis only: 13.1%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 13.8%). Top 5 currently relevant allergens included nickel sulfate (eyelid dermatitis only: 18.6%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 22.5%), fragrance mix I (eyelid dermatitis only: 16.5%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 18.3%), methylisothiazolinone (eyelid dermatitis only: 16.5%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 17.7%), gold sodium thiosulfate (eyelid dermatitis only: 14.7%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 11.4%), and balsam of Peru (eyelid dermatitis only: 11.9%; dermatitis of the eyelid and head or neck: 12.6%). Both eyelid-involvement groups were significantly more likely to react to gold sodium thiosulfate, carmine, shellac, dimethylaminopropylamine, oleamidopropyl dimethylamine, and thimerosal (P < .05) compared with the no eyelid involvement group. LIMITATIONS: Lack of specific distribution patterns of eyelid dermatitis and no long-term follow-up data. CONCLUSION: Patch testing remains a critical tool in evaluating patients with eyelid dermatitis.
Asunto(s)
Blefaritis/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Seborreica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Blefaritis/etiología , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Atópica/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/etiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Párpados/patología , Femenino , Cabeza/patología , Humanos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Metales/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuello/patología , Especificidad de Órganos , Pruebas del Parche , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tensoactivos/efectos adversos , Tiazoles/efectos adversos , Timerosal/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hand eczema (HE) is a heterogeneous and burdensome disorder. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the clinical characteristics, etiologies and allergen relevance in adults with HE referred for patch testing. METHODS: Retrospective analysis (2000-2016) of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data (n = 37,113). RESULTS: Overall, 10,034 patients had HE, with differences of overlap between allergic contact, irritant contact, and atopic dermatitis. Allergic contact HE fluctuated, whereas atopic HE steadily increased, and irritant HE decreased over time. HE was associated with higher proportions of positive patch tests (67.5% vs 63.8%; χ2, P < .0001). The five most common clinically relevant allergens were methylisothiazolinone, nickel, formaldehyde, quaternium-15, and fragrance mix I. HE was associated with significantly higher odds of positive patch test reactions and clinical relevance in 13 and 16 of the 25 most common allergens, respectively, including preservatives, metals, topical medications, and rubber accelerators. LIMITATIONS: No data on HE phenotype. CONCLUSION: HE in adults was associated with higher proportions of positive patch tests, with a heterogeneous profile of allergens. Patch testing remains an important tool in the evaluation of patients with HE.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatosis de la Mano/diagnóstico , Pruebas del Parche , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Canadá/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Irritante/epidemiología , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Seborreica/epidemiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/etiología , Eccema/diagnóstico , Eccema/epidemiología , Femenino , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/etiología , Humanos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Metales/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Data regarding teledermatology for patch testing are limited. OBJECTIVES: Compare patch test readings and final interpretation by two in-person dermatologists (IPDs) with eight teledermatologists (TDs). METHODS: Patch tested patients had photographs taken of 70 screening series of allergens at 48 hours and second readings. Eight TDs reviewed photos and graded reactions (negative, irritant, doubtful, +, ++, +++) at 48 hours and second readings; in addition, they coded a final interpretation (allergic, indeterminant, irritant, negative) for each reaction. TDs rated overall image quality and confidence level for each patient and patch test reaction, respectively. Percentage of TD-IPD agreement based on clinical significance (success, indeterminate, and failure) was calculated. Primary outcome was agreement at the second reading. RESULTS: Data were available for 99, 101, and 66 participants at 48 hours, second reading, and final interpretation, respectively. Pooled failure (+/++/+++ vs negative) at second reading was 13.6% (range 7.9%-20.4%). Pooled failure at 48 hours and final interpretation was 5.4% (range 2.9%-6.8%) and 24.6% (range 10.2%-36.8%), respectively. Confidence in readings was statistically correlated with quality of images and disagreement. CONCLUSION: For patch testing, teledermatology has significant limitations including clinically significant pooled failure percentages of 13.6% for second readings and 24.6% for final interpretation.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Irritante/diagnóstico , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Pruebas del Parche/normas , Consulta Remota , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Competencia Clínica , Dermatólogos/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Visita a Consultorio Médico , Fotograbar/normas , AutoimagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the relationship between nummular (discoid) eczema (NE) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). OBJECTIVE: To examine trends, associations, and clinical relevance of ACD in patients with NE who were referred for patch testing. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 38 723 patients from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. RESULTS: Overall, 748 patients (1.9%) were diagnosed with NE; 23.9% had a concomitant diagnosis of ACD. The prevalence of NE fluctuated over time between 2001 and 2016, with no overall change in prevalence in diagnosed NE. In multivariable logistic regression models, NE increased steadily with age and was associated with male sex and Asian and other race/ethnicity, and inversely associated with a history of atopic dermatitis (AD) and hay fever. Patients with NE had lower proportions of one or more positive allergic reactions and lower odds of a positive reaction in multiple individual allergens. The most commonly relevant allergens in patients with NE were formaldehyde 2.0% aq., methylisothiazolinone, quaternium 15, fragrance mix I, and propylene glycol. CONCLUSION: NE is a heterogeneous disorder with distinct subsets of lesional distributions and a profile of relevant allergens, especially formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers. Nearly one in four patients with NE had ACD, supporting the role of patch testing in patients with NE.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Eccema/epidemiología , Eccema/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , América del Norte/epidemiología , Pruebas del Parche , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the relationship between psoriasis and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations with ACD, related clinical characteristics, and common positive and clinically relevant allergens of patients with a final diagnosis of psoriasis who were referred for patch testing. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 38 723 patients from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. RESULTS: Patients with a final diagnosis of psoriasis had lower proportions of ACD than those without psoriasis (32.7% vs 57.8%). In multivariable logistic regression models, psoriasis was inversely associated with female sex, Black or Asian race, and history of atopic dermatitis and hay fever. Patients with a final diagnosis of psoriasis were less likely to have one or more positive allergic patch-test reactions or to have a current clinically relevant patch-test reaction to the majority of the most commonly positive and/or relevant allergens. The most clinically relevant allergens included nickel sulfate, methylisothiazolinone, and fragrance mix I. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of patients who were referred for patch testing with a final diagnosis of psoriasis were also diagnosed with ACD. In select patients with suspected psoriasis who also have a clinical presentation suggestive of ACD, patch testing may be helpful.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , América del Norte/epidemiología , Pruebas del Parche , Prevalencia , Psoriasis/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the characteristics of patients with negative patch test (NPT) results. OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with NPT results. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 34,822 patch tested patients. NPT results were defined as negative or irritant final interpretations of all North American Contact Dermatitis Group screening allergens and no relevant allergens on supplemental series. RESULTS: Almost one-third of patients (n = 10,888 [31.3%]) had NPT results. Patients with NPT results were significantly more likely to be male (P < .0001), be age 40 years or younger (P = .0054), be nonwhite (P = .0005), and have dermatitis primarily having a scattered generalized distribution (P = .0007) or primarily located on the lips (P = .0214) or eyelids (P = .0364). However, the absolute differences in age, race, and site were small and may not be clinically meaningful. Patients with NPT results were significantly less likely to have occupationally related skin disease (P < .0001). Overall, 8.3% of patients with NPT results had occupationally related skin disease, with precision production worker/machine operator (28.5%), health care worker (17.0%), and mechanic/repairer (7.5%) being the most commonly related occupations. In all, 22.9% of patients with NPT results had relevant irritants and 41.6% of irritants were occupationally related; cosmetics/health care products and soaps were common sources for both occupationally related and non-occupationally related irritants. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective cross-sectional study of tertiary referral population. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NPT results have distinct characteristics.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis por Contacto/diagnóstico , Pruebas del Parche , Adulto , Anciano , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Animales , Comorbilidad , Materiales de Construcción/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Irritante/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Irritante/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Productos Domésticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Especificidad de Órganos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nickel is a common allergen. OBJECTIVE: To examine the epidemiology of nickel sensitivity in North America. METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 44,097 patients patch tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group from 1994 to 2014. Nickel sensitivity was defined as a positive patch test for nickel. We evaluated the frequency of nickel sensitivity and patient demographics. For each positive reaction to nickel, we tabulated clinical relevance, occupational relatedness, and exposure sources. RESULTS: The average frequency of nickel sensitivity was 17.5% (1994-2014). Nickel sensitivity significantly increased over time (from 14.3% in 1994-1996 to 20.1% in 2013-2014 [P < .0001]). Nickel-sensitive patients were significantly more likely to be female, young, nonwhite, and atopic (have eczema and asthma) and/or have dermatitis affecting the face, scalp, ears, neck, arm, or trunk (P values ≤ .0474). Overall, 55.5% of reactions were currently clinically relevant; this percentage significantly increased over time (from 44.1% in 1994-1996 to 51.6% in 2013-2014 [P < .0001]). The rate of occupational relatedness was 3.7% overall, with a significant decrease over time (from 7.9% in 1994-1996 to 1.9% in 2013-2014 [P < .0001]). Jewelry was the most common source of nickel contact. LIMITATIONS: Tertiary referral population. CONCLUSIONS: Nickel allergy is of substantial public health importance in North America. The frequency of nickel sensitivity in patients referred for patch testing has significantly increased over a 20-year period.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Níquel/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Vestuario/efectos adversos , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Joyas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Níquel/inmunología , América del Norte/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Pruebas del Parche , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nickel is a common allergen responsible for allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: To characterize nickel sensitivity in children and compare pediatric cohorts (≤5, 6-12, and 13-18 years). METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 1894 pediatric patients patch tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group from 1994 to 2014. We evaluated demographics, rates of reaction to nickel, strength of nickel reactions, and nickel allergy sources. RESULTS: The frequency of nickel sensitivity was 23.7%. Children with nickel sensitivity were significantly less likely to be male (P < .0001; relative risk, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.75) or have a history of allergic rhinitis (P = .0017; relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.90) compared with those who were not nickel sensitive. In the nickel-sensitive cohort, the relative proportion of boys declined with age (44.8% for age ≤5, 36.6% for age 6-12, and 22.6% for age 13-18 years). The most common body site distribution for all age groups sensitive to nickel was scattered/generalized, indicating widespread dermatitis. Jewelry was the most common source associated with nickel sensitivity (36.4%). LIMITATIONS: As a cross-sectional study, no long-term follow-up was available. CONCLUSIONS: Nickel sensitivity in children was common; the frequency was significantly higher in girls than in boys. Overall, sensitivity decreased with age. The most common source of nickel was jewelry.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Níquel/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Distribución por Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Hipersensibilidad/fisiopatología , Incidencia , Masculino , Níquel/inmunología , América del Norte/epidemiología , Pruebas del Parche , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Distribución por SexoAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Seborreica , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Seborreica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Seborreica/epidemiología , Humanos , América del Norte , Pruebas del Parche , Estudios RetrospectivosAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Tinturas para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Fenilendiaminas/inmunología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Dermatitis Irritante/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/inmunología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tinturas para el Cabello/química , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , América del Norte/epidemiología , Fenilendiaminas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores SexualesAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Tatuaje , Humanos , Tinta , Pruebas del Parche , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Equipo de Protección Personal/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Industria de la Construcción , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/etiología , Masculino , Industria Manufacturera , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas del Parche , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Relatively little is known about the epidemiology of allergic contact dermatitis in older individuals. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the frequency of positive and clinically relevant patch test reactions in older individuals (≥ 65 years old) referred for patch testing, and to compare these results with those of adults (≤ 64-19 years) and children (<18 years). DESIGN: This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data from 1994 to 2008. RESULTS: A total of 31,942 patients (older n = 5306; adults n = 25,028; children n = 1608) were patch tested. The overall frequency of at least one allergic reaction in older individuals was 67.3% as compared with 66.9% for adults (P = .5938) and 47% for children (P = .0011). Reaction rates that were statistically higher in older individuals as compared with both adults and children included: Myroxylon pereirae, fragrance mix I, quaternium-15, formaldehyde, imidazolidinyl urea, diazolidinyl urea, neomycin, bacitracin, methyldibromo glutaronitrile, methyldibromo glutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol, ethyleneurea melamine formaldehyde mix, and carba mix (P values < .0004). Patch test reaction rates that were significantly lower in older individuals than both comparison groups included: nickel, thimerosal, and cobalt (P values < .0001). LIMITATIONS: Referral population was a limitation. CONCLUSIONS: Older individuals were more likely to have at least one positive patch test reaction as compared with children, but had similar rates to adults. The frequency of positive reactions to specific allergens differed by age group, most likely as a result of exposures.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Pruebas del Parche , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alérgenos/inmunología , Antibacterianos/inmunología , Cobalto/inmunología , Estudios Transversales , Ditiocarba , Guanidinas/inmunología , Humanos , Metenamina/análogos & derivados , Metenamina/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Myroxylon/inmunología , Níquel/inmunología , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Conservadores Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiram/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ethylhexylglycerin (EHG) is a recently recognized contact allergen. OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study were to characterize individuals with positive patch test reactions to EHG and to analyze reaction strength, clinical relevance, and allergen sources. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of the patients patch tested to EHG (5% petrolatum) by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (2013-2018). RESULTS: Of 15,560 patients tested to EHG, 39 (0.25%) had positive (final interpretation of "allergic") reactions. Most were female (71.8%) and/or older than 40 years (76.9%). There were no statistically significant differences between age, sex, or atopic history when compared with EHG-negative patients. The most common anatomic sites of dermatitis were the face (28.2%) and scattered generalized distribution (25.6%). Most EHG-positive reactions were + (35.9%) or ++ (33.3%). Current clinical relevance was high (79.5%); none, however, were related to occupation. Personal care products were the most common source of exposure to EHG (59.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Ethylhexylglycerin is a rare contact allergen; the positive frequency of 0.25% is similar to other low allergenic preservatives including parabens, benzyl alcohol, and phenoxyethanol. The patch test concentration of 5.0% seems to be nonirritating. Although relatively uncommon, EHG reactions were usually clinically relevant (79.5%), often because of moisturizers/lotions/creams.
Asunto(s)
Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Éteres de Glicerilo/efectos adversos , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Vaselina/efectos adversos , Adulto , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Carvone, a flavoring agent, may cause allergic contact dermatitis. This study summarizes patch test reactions to carvone in patients tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2009 to 2018. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients positive to carvone (5% petrolatum). Demographics were compared with those of patients who were negative. Other analyses included reaction strength, clinical relevance, coreactivity with other fragrance/flavor allergens, and exposure sources. RESULTS: Of 24,124 patients tested to carvone, 188 (0.78%) were positive. As compared with carvone-negative patients, carvone-positive patients were significantly more likely older than 40 years (P = 0.0284). Women (76.1%) and/or facial involvement (33.0%) were common in the carvone-positive group but not statistically different from carvone-negative patients; 73.3% (n = 138) of the reactions were currently relevant. Relevant sources were personal care products (46.3%, n = 87) and food (14.3%, n = 27). Coreactivity with other fragrance/flavor markers was present in 60.6% of carvone-positive patients, most commonly fragrance mix I (34.6%), balsam of Peru (24.5%), and cinnamic aldehyde (15.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Ten-year prevalence of carvone sensitivity was 0.78%. Most carvone-positive patients were female, were older than 40 years, and/or had facial dermatitis. Personal care products were the most common source. Two-fifths of carvone reactions would have been missed by relying on other fragrance/flavoring allergens.