Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 21(6): e13166, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31487755

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is common in thoracic organ transplant recipients. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir are used for both prophylaxis and treatment of this infection, but intolerance and treatment failure are common. Letermovir has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of CMV infection when used for prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. However, there are no data on its efficacy in thoracic organ transplantation. METHODS: We examined the use of letermovir for either CMV prophylaxis (primary and secondary) or treatment in heart and lung transplant recipients at our institution from February 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. RESULTS: Nine total patients received letermovir at our institution (8 lung transplant, 1 heart transplant) during the study period. Letermovir was prescribed for CMV prophylaxis in eight patients (primary prophylaxis in two patients and secondary prophylaxis in 6 patients), and for treatment of CMV DNAemia in two cases. One patient received letermovir for both secondary prophylaxis and treatment on separate occasions. Three out of 8 (37.5%) patients receiving letermovir for prophylaxis developed CMV DNAemia during prophylaxis. One patient treated for CMV disease had clinical failure with a sharp rise in serum CMV DNA PCR. The other patient treated for low-grade CMV DNAemia initially had a slight rise in CMV DNA PCR, but has since had a sustained response. No major side effects were experienced, and 2 patients reported minor side effects. CONCLUSION: Letermovir was well tolerated with only minor side effects reported; however, the rate of development of CMV DNAemia on prophylaxis was considerable. Further study of the dosing and efficacy of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis or treatment in thoracic organ transplant recipients is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Acetatos/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Citomegalovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Quinazolinas/administración & dosificación , Acetatos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Citomegalovirus/efectos de los fármacos , Citomegalovirus/genética , Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/sangre , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/virología , ADN Viral/sangre , ADN Viral/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quinazolinas/efectos adversos , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Respir Med ; 103(12): 1816-21, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19682883

RESUMEN

Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS) complicates the course of many lung transplant recipients. It carries significant risk of morbidity and mortality, but its course is difficult to characterize. We evaluated the prognostic utility of the 6min walk test (6MWT) obtained after the onset of BOS in 42 patients. This was compared to the prognostic significance of changes in the FEV(1). The median time between the onset of BOS and the 6MWT was 109 days. The median decline in the FEV(1) from baseline to BOS onset was 25.7%, while the median change over the ensuing 3 months was 12.5%. Neither of these was predictive of subsequent mortality. The 6MWT yielded averages in the resting saturation, lowest saturation, distance walked and maximal Borg scores of 97%, 90.2%, 323m and 2.35, respectively. The best of these parameters in discriminating survival was the distance. Patients who walked further than 330m had a median survival of 1178 days versus 263 days for those who walked less (p<0.0001). We conclude that the 6MWT provides important prognostic information in patients with BOS and might perform better than spirometry. Use of this test might allow different clinical phenotypes to be discerned.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis Obliterante/mortalidad , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Adulto , Bronquiolitis Obliterante/etiología , Bronquiolitis Obliterante/fisiopatología , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Síndrome , Caminata
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA