RESUMEN
Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can be associated with neurologic complications, data on noninfectious etiologies are scanty. Therefore, we analyzed the incidence, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and influence on outcomes of noninfectious neurologic complications (NCs) in 971 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allo-HSCT at our center between January 2000 and December 2016. We evaluated NCs affecting the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS). The median duration of follow-up of survivors was 71 months (range, 11 to 213 months). A total of 467 patients received a matched sibling donor (MSD) transplant, 381 received umbilical cord blood (UCB), 74 received a haploidentical transplant, and 49 received a matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplant. One hundred forty-nine (15.3%) NCs were documented at a median of 78 days after transplantation (range, 5 days before to 3722 days after). The cumulative incidence risk of developing NC was 7.5% (95% confidence interval, 6% to 8.2%) at day +90 and 13% at 5 years. The 5-year cumulative incidence of NCs was 10.8% after MSD allo-HSCT and 15.3% after alternative donor (UCB, MUD, haploidentical) allo-HSCT (Pâ¯=â¯.004). There were 101 (68%) CNS complications, including encephalopathy, n = 46 (31%); headache, n = 20 (13%); stroke, nâ¯=â¯15 (10%); seizures, n = 9 (6%), posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, nâ¯=â¯6 (4%), and myelopathy, nâ¯=â¯5 (3%). PNS complications (32%) included neuropathies, nâ¯=â¯25 (17%), and myopathies and neuromuscular junction disorders, nâ¯=â¯23 (17%), with 17% of the total PNS complications being immune-related. In multivariable analysis, donor type other than MSD, age ≥40 years, development of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV (hazard ratio [HR], 3.3; P < .00001), and extensive chronic GVHD (HR, 3.2; Pâ¯=â¯.0002) were independently associated with increased risk of NCs. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 21% in patients who developed NCs and 41% for those who did not (P < .0001). This difference in OS was observed in patients developing CNS NCs, but not in those developing PNS complications. In conclusion, our study reveals NCs as a frequent and heterogeneous complication that, when affecting CNS, is associated with poor prognosis following allo-HSCT.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Aloinjertos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/etiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crónica , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/mortalidad , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/etiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/mortalidad , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been considered a risk factor for development of platelet transfusion refractoriness. The objective of this study was to assess the platelet transfusion refractoriness rate in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from different sources. We retrospectively reviewed the charts and transfusion records of patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation at our institution between 2013 and 2015. The evaluation of post-transfusion platelet count was assessed for each transfusion given, from day of progenitor infusion to day 30 after transplantation. Of 167 patients included in this study, 101 received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) and 66 received umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Overall, the percentage of platelet transfusions with a 14-h CCI lower than 5000 was 59.3%, being these data significantly higher for UCBT (67.6%) than for PBSCT (31.0%). Seventy-eight percent of patients underwent UCBT become refractory, while 38.6% of patients who received PBSCT were refractory. Factors associated to platelet refractoriness were lower CD34+ cell dose infused, higher number of antibiotics used, presence of anti-HLA I antibodies, and reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. Platelet refractoriness is a frequent and complex adverse event and remains a therapeutic challenge in the management of patients undergoing HSCT. There is a higher rate of platelet refractoriness in patients who received UCBT as compared to patients who received PBSCT.
Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Transfusión de Plaquetas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hematológicas/mortalidad , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Transfusión de Plaquetas/mortalidad , Transfusión de Plaquetas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Trasplante Homólogo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anti-D alloimmunization can occur when platelets from RhD-positive donors are transfused to RhD-negative patients, due to red blood cell residues in the platelet concentrates. METHODS: Our objective was to analyze the anti-D alloimmunization rate in a selected group of women under 55 years of age diagnosed with acute leukemia over an 18-year period. We focused the analysis on RhD-negative patients who received RhD-positive platelet transfusions. RESULTS: From January 1998 to October 2016, 382 women under 55 years were diagnosed with acute leukemia. A total of 56 patients were RhD-negative, and 48 (85.7%) received RhD-positive platelets. The median number of platelet concentrates transfused per patient was 23, and 48% of all platelet transfusions were RhD-positive. The 48 RhD-negative patients received a total of 949 RhD-positive platelet concentrates. Two patients developed anti-D: a 36-year-old woman with M3 acute myeloblastic leukemia and a 52-year-old patient with a secondary acute myeloblastic leukemia. CONCLUSION: We conclude that there is a need for agreement in the transfusion guidelines on the recommendation of anti-D alloimmunization prophylaxis. We suggest a possible benefit in favor of anti-D prophylaxis in childbearing women with acute leukemia.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Transfusión Sanguínea/métodos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a thrombotic microangiopathy caused by anti-ADAMTS13 antibodies. Caplacizumab is approved for adults with an acute episode of iTTP in conjunction with plasma exchange (PEX) and immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to analyze and compare the safety and efficacy of caplacizumab vs the standard of care and assess the effect of the concomitant use of rituximab. A retrospective study from the Spanish TTP Registry of patients treated with caplacizumab vs those who did not receive it was conducted. A total of 155 patients with iTTP (77 caplacizumab, 78 no caplacizumab) were included. Patients initially treated with caplacizumab had fewer exacerbations (4.5% vs 20.5%; P < .05) and less refractoriness (4.5% vs 14.1%; P < .05) than those who were not treated. Time to clinical response was shorter when caplacizumab was used as initial treatment vs caplacizumab used after refractoriness or exacerbation. The multivariate analysis showed that its use in the first 3 days after PEX was associated with a lower number of PEX (odds ratio, 7.5; CI, 2.3-12.7; P < .05) and days of hospitalization (odds ratio, 11.2; CI, 5.6-16.9; P < .001) compared with standard therapy. There was no difference in time to clinical remission in patients treated with caplacizumab compared with the use of rituximab. No severe adverse event was described in the caplacizumab group. In summary, caplacizumab reduced exacerbations and refractoriness compared with standard of care regimens. When administered within the first 3 days after PEX, it also provided a faster clinical response, reducing hospitalization time and the need for PEX.