RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has potential advantages over its open equivalent open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for pancreatic disease in the neck, body and tail. Within the United Kingdom (UK), there has been no previous experience describing the role of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). This study evaluated differences between ODP, LDP and RDP. METHODS: Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy performed in the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery at the Freeman Hospital between September 2007 and December 2018 were included from a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome measure was length of hospital stay, and the secondary outcome measures were complication rates graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Of the 125 patients, the median age was 61 years and 46% were male. Patients undergoing RDP (n = 40) had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grading III compared to ODP (n = 38) and LDP (n = 47) (57% vs. 37% vs. 38%, P = 0.02). RDP had a slightly lower but not significant conversion rate (10% vs. 13%, P = 0.084), less blood loss (median: 0 vs. 250 ml, P < 0.001) and a higher rate of splenic preservation (30% vs. 2%, P < 0.001) and shorter operative time, once docking time excluded (284 vs. 300 min, P < 0.001) compared to LDP. RDP had a higher R0 resection rate than ODP and LDP (79% vs. 47% vs. 71%, P = 0.078) for neoplasms. RDP was associated with significantly shorter hospital stay than LDP and ODP (8 vs. 9 vs. 10 days, P = 0.001). While there was no significant different in overall complications across the groups, RDP was associated with lower rates of Grade C pancreatic fistula than ODP and LDP (2% vs. 5% vs. 6%, P = 0.194). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive pancreatic resection offers potential advantages over ODP, with a trend showing RDP to be marginally superior when compared to conventional LDP, but it is accepted that that this is likely to be at greater expense compared to the other current techniques.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) is a complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis in the neck and body of the pancreas often manifesting as persistent pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) or external pancreatic fistula (EPF). This systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis aimed to review the definitions, clinical presentation, intervention, and outcomes for DPDS. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases were systematically searched until February 2020 using the PRISMA framework. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the success rates of endoscopic and surgical interventions for the treatment of DPDS. Success of DPDS treatment was defined as long-term resolution of symptoms without recurrence of PFC, EPF, or pancreatic ascites. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included in the quantitative analysis comprising 1355 patients. Acute pancreatitis was the most common etiology (95.3%, 936/982), followed by chronic pancreatitis (3.1%, 30/982). DPDS commonly presented with PFC (83.2%, 948/1140) and EPF (13.4%, 153/1140). There was significant heterogeneity in the definition of DPDS in the literature. Weighted success rate of endoscopic transmural drainage (90.6%, 95%-CI 81.0-95.6%) was significantly higher than transpapillary drainage (58.5%, 95%-CI 36.7-77.4). Pairwise meta-analysis showed comparable success rates between endoscopic and surgical intervention, which were 82% (weighted 95%-CI 68.6-90.5) and 87.4% (95%-CI 81.2-91.8), respectively (P = 0.389). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic transmural drainage was superior to transpapillary drainage for the management of DPDS. Endoscopic and surgical interventions had comparable success rates. The significant variability in the definitions and treatment strategies for DPDS warrant standardisation for further research.
Asunto(s)
Seudoquiste Pancreático , Pancreatitis , Enfermedad Aguda , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Drenaje , Humanos , Conductos Pancreáticos/cirugía , Seudoquiste Pancreático/etiología , Seudoquiste Pancreático/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Risk factors for the development of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) following distal pancreatectomy (DP) need clarification particularly following the 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition. METHODS: A systemic search of MEDLINE, Pubmed, Scopus, and EMBASE were conducted using the PRISMA framework. Studies were evaluated for risk factors for the development CR-POPF after DP using the 2016 ISGPF definition. Further subgroup analysis was undertaken on studies ≥10 patients in exposed and non-exposed subgroups. RESULTS: Forty-three studies with 8864 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted rate of CR-POPF was 20.4% (95%-CI: 17.7-23.4%). Smoking (OR 1.29, 95%-CI: 1.08-1.53, p = 0.02) and open DP (OR 1.43, 95%-CI: 1.02-2.01, p = 0.04) were found to be significant risk factors of CR-POPF. Diabetes (OR 0.81, 95%-CI: 0.68-0.95, p = 0.02) was a significant protective factor against CR-POPF. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in the comparisons of pancreatic texture and body mass index. Seventeen risk factors achieved significance in a univariate or multivariate comparison as reported by individual studies in the narrative synthesis, however, they remain difficult to interpret as statistically significant comparisons were not uniform. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found smoking and open DP to be risk factors and diabetes to be protective factor of CR-POPF in the era of 2016 ISGPF definition.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatectomía , Fístula Pancreática , Humanos , Páncreas/cirugía , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Fístula Pancreática/diagnóstico , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiología , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This network meta-analysis aimed to identify the reconstruction technique associated with lowest rates of DGE following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase and MEDLINE databases was carried out using the PRISMA framework to identify all RCTs comparing reconstruction techniques of gastrojejunostomy after PD, with overall DGE as the primary endpoint. The primary outcome measure was overall DGE. Secondary outcomes were grade B/C DGE, duration of nasogastric tube, time to solid food intake, overall and grade B/C pancreatic fistula, bile leaks, reoperation, length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The search strategy identified eight RCTs including 761 patients. Six RCTs compared antecolic (n = 291 patients) and retrocolic Billroth II (n = 289 patients) reconstruction (n = 6 studies), and two RCTs compared antecolic Billroth II (n = 92 patients) and Roux-en-Y (n = 89 patients) reconstruction. Overall, antecolic Billroth II ranked best for overall and grade B/C DGE, bile leak, surgical site infection, length of stay and in-hospital mortality. Roux-en-Y was best for overall and grade B/C pancreatic fistula. CONCLUSION: Antecolic Billroth II gastroenteric reconstruction is associated with the lowest rates of delayed gastric emptying after PD amongst the currently available techniques of gastrojejunostomy reconstructions.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Gastroenterostomía/métodos , Gastroparesia/prevención & control , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Gastroparesia/epidemiología , Gastroparesia/etiología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Metaanálisis en Red , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reoperación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) after HPB surgery are poorly defined. This meta-analysis aimed to quantify the SSI rates and risk factors for SSI after pancreas and liver resection. METHODS: The PUBMED, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched using the PRISMA framework. The primary outcome measure was pooled SSI rates. The secondary outcome measure was risk factor profile determination for SSI. RESULTS: The overall rate of SSI after pancreatic and liver resection was 25.1 and 10.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). 32% of pancreaticoduodenectomies developed SSI vs 23% after distal pancreatectomy (p < 0.001). The rate of incisional SSI in the pancreatic group was 9% and organ/space SSI 16.5%. Biliary resection during liver surgery was a risk factor for SSI (25.0 vs 15.7%, p = 0.002). After liver resection, the incisional SSI rate was 7.6% and the organ space SSI rate was 10.2%. Pancreas-specific SSI risk factors were pre-operative biliary drainage (p < 0.001), chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and radiotherapy (p = 0.007). Liver-specific SSI risk factors were smoking (p = 0.046), low albumin (p < 0.001) and significant blood loss (p < 0.001). The rate of organ/space SSI in patients with POPF was 47.7% and in patients without POPF 7.3% (p < 0.001). Organ/space SSI rate was 43% in patients with bile leak and 10% in those without (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors for SSI following pancreatic and liver resections are distinct from each other, with higher SSI rates after pancreatic resection. Pancreaticoduodenectomy has increased risk of SSI compared to distal pancreatectomy. Similarly, biliary resections during liver surgery increase the rates of SSI.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatectomía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hígado , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection carries a high risk of parenchymal bleeding both intra- and post-operatively. Topical haemostatic agents are frequently used to control bleeding during hepatectomy, with multiple products currently available. However, it remains unknown which of these is most effective for achieving haemostasis and improving peri-operative outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review and random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials investigating topical haemostatic agents in hepatic resection was performed. Interventions were analysed by grouping into similar products; fibrin patch, fibrin glue, collagen products, and control. Primary outcomes were the rate of haemostasis at 4 and 10 min. RESULTS: Twenty randomized controlled trials were included in the network meta-analysis, including a total of 3267 patients and 7 different interventions. Fibrin glue and fibrin patch were the most effective interventions for achieving haemostasis at both 4 and 10 min. There were no significant differences between haemostatic agents with respect to blood loss, transfusion requirements, bile leak, post-operative complications, reoperation, or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Amongst the haemostatic agents currently available, fibrin patch and fibrin glue are the most effective methods for reducing time to haemostasis during liver resection, but have no effect on other peri-operative outcomes. Topical haemostatic agents should not be used routinely, but may be a useful adjunct to achieve haemostasis when needed.
Asunto(s)
Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , Hepatectomía/métodos , Teorema de Bayes , Adhesivo de Tejido de Fibrina/uso terapéutico , Hemostasis , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Major liver resection can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Blood loss is one of the most important factors predicting a good outcome. Although various transection methods have been reported, there is no consensus on the best technique. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to characterise and identify the best reported technique for elective parenchymal liver transection based on published randomised controlled trials (RCT's). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central to identify RCT's up to 5th June 2019 that examined parenchymal transection for liver resection. Data including study characteristics and outcomes including intraoperative (blood loss, operating time) and postoperative measures (overall and major complications, bile leaks) were extracted. Indirect comparisons of all regimens were simultaneously compared using random-effects network meta-analyses (NMA) which maintains randomisation within trials. RESULTS: This study identified 22 RCT's involving 2360 patients reporting ten parenchymal transection techniques. Bipolar cautery has lower blood loss and shorter operating time than stapler (mean difference: 85 mL; 22min) and Tissue Link (mean difference: 66 mL; 29min). Bipolar cautery was ranked first for blood loss and operating time followed by stapler and TissueLink. Harmonic scalpel is associated with lower overall complications than Hydrojet (Odds ratio (OR): 0.48), BiClamp forceps (OR: 0.46) and clamp crushing (OR: 0.41). CONCLUSION: Bipolar cautery techniques appear to best at reducing blood loss and associated with shortest operating time. In contrast, Harmonic scalpel appears best for overall and major complications. Given the paucity of data and selective outcome reporting, it is still hard to identify what is the best technique for liver resection. Therefore, further high-quality large-scale RCT's are still needed.
Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía/métodos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Cauterización , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many complications following liver transplantation are linked to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Activation of the pregnane X receptor (PXR) has been shown to alleviate this process in animal models. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the effect of early activation of human PXR (hPXR) on postoperative complications and survival following liver transplantation. METHODS: The study included deceased donor liver transplants at a single center over 6 years. Estimated hPXR activation value on day 7 (EPAV7 ) was calculated per patient based on potency/total dose of known hPXR-activating drugs administered in the first week post-transplantation. Patients were divided into low and high hPXR activation groups based on EPAV7 . RESULTS: Overall, 240 liver transplants were included. Average EPAV7 was significantly lower in patients who developed anastomotic biliary strictures (17.7 ± 5.5 vs 35.1 ± 5.7 in stricture-free patients; P = .03) and sepsis (16.4 ± 7.1 vs 34.9 ± 5.5; P = .04). Patient survival was significantly improved in the high hPXR group (5-year survival: 88.7% ± 3.8% versus 70.7% ± 5.8% [low hPXR]; P = .023). Regression analysis identified EPAV7 as a significant independent predictor of patient survival. CONCLUSION: hPXR activation within the first week of liver transplantation is a prognostic indicator of patient survival, possibly due to the associated lower biliary stricture and infection rates.
Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Donadores Vivos/provisión & distribución , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Receptor X de Pregnano/metabolismo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/metabolismo , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/metabolismo , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery offers theoretical advantages to conventional laparoscopic surgery including improved instrument dexterity, 3D visualization and better ergonomics. This review aimed to determine if these theoretical advantages translate into improved patient outcomes in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy through laparoscopic (LDP) or robotic (RDP) approaches. METHOD: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies reporting minimally invasive surgery for distal pancreatectomy. Meta-analysis of intraoperative (blood loss, operating times, conversion and R0 resections) and postoperative outcomes (overall complications, pancreatic fistula, length of hospital stay) was performed using random effects models. RESULT: Twenty non-randomised studies including 3112 patients (793 robotic and 2319 laparoscopic) were considered appropriate for inclusion. LDP had significantly shorter operating time than RDP (mean: 28, p < 0.001) but no significant difference in blood loss (mean: 52 mL, p = 0.07). RDP was associated with significantly lower conversion rates than LDP (OR 0.48, p < 0.001), but no difference in spleen preservation rate and R0 resection. There were no significant differences in overall and major complications, overall and high-grade pancreatic fistula. However, RDP was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (mean: 1, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Robotic distal pancreatectomy appears to offer some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, although both techniques appear equivalent. Importantly, the quality of evidence is generally limited to cohort studies and a high-quality randomised trial comparing both techniques are needed.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/métodos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Humanos , Complicaciones PosoperatoriasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive surgical necrosectomy and endoscopic necrosectomy, compared with open necrosectomy, might improve outcomes in necrotising pancreatitis, especially in critically ill patients. Evidence from large comparative studies is lacking. DESIGN: We combined original and newly collected data from 15 published and unpublished patient cohorts (51 hospitals; 8 countries) on pancreatic necrosectomy for necrotising pancreatitis. Death rates were compared in patients undergoing open necrosectomy versus minimally invasive surgical or endoscopic necrosectomy. To adjust for confounding and to study effect modification by clinical severity, we performed two types of analyses: logistic multivariable regression and propensity score matching with stratification according to predicted risk of death at baseline (low: <5%; intermediate: ≥5% to <15%; high: ≥15% to <35%; and very high: ≥35%). RESULTS: Among 1980 patients with necrotising pancreatitis, 1167 underwent open necrosectomy and 813 underwent minimally invasive surgical (n=467) or endoscopic (n=346) necrosectomy. There was a lower risk of death for minimally invasive surgical necrosectomy (OR, 0.53; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.84; p=0.006) and endoscopic necrosectomy (OR, 0.20; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.63; p=0.006). After propensity score matching with risk stratification, minimally invasive surgical necrosectomy remained associated with a lower risk of death than open necrosectomy in the very high-risk group (42/111 vs 59/111; risk ratio, 0.70; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.95; p=0.02). Endoscopic necrosectomy was associated with a lower risk of death than open necrosectomy in the high-risk group (3/40 vs 12/40; risk ratio, 0.27; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.88; p=0.03) and in the very high-risk group (12/57 vs 28/57; risk ratio, 0.43; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.77; p=0.005). CONCLUSION: In high-risk patients with necrotising pancreatitis, minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic necrosectomy are associated with reduced death rates compared with open necrosectomy.
Asunto(s)
Desbridamiento , Drenaje , Duodenoscopía , Páncreas/patología , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Brasil , Canadá , Desbridamiento/métodos , Drenaje/métodos , Duodenoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Alemania , Hospitales , Humanos , Hungría , India , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Necrosis , Países Bajos , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/mortalidad , Pancreatitis Aguda Necrotizante/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the investigation of patients with normal liver function tests (LFTs) and unexplained dilatation of common bile duct (CBD) and/or pancreatic duct (PD), following CT and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing linear EUS between January 2007 and August 2011 for the indication of dilated CBD and/or PD, normal LFT, and nondiagnostic cross-sectional imaging formed the study group. The study was performed as a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. RESULTS: During the study period, 83 patients (CBD and PD dilatation n = 38, PD dilatation n = 5, CBD dilatation n = 40) met the inclusion criteria and underwent EUS. Five (13.1%) of the CBD and PD groups had a new finding, which in one (2.6%) case was causal. In this group, men were significantly more likely to have a new finding (p = 0.012). Eight (20%) of the CBD group had a new finding, which in seven (17.5%) cases was causal. In the CBD group, cholecystectomy was significantly (p = 0.005) more common in those without a finding. Three (60%) of the PD group had a finding on EUS, all of which were causal, including a case of pancreatic malignancy. CONCLUSION: There is a significant yield from EUS in individuals with isolated PD dilatation and isolated CBD dilatation. Previous cholecystectomy is significantly associated with a negative EUS in the group with isolated CBD dilatation. The yield in those with CBD and PD dilatation was low and a finding was more likely in males.
Asunto(s)
Conducto Colédoco/diagnóstico por imagen , Endosonografía/métodos , Conductos Pancreáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pancreatocolangiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Conducto Colédoco/patología , Dilatación Patológica , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conductos Pancreáticos/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients with incidental pT2-T3 gallbladder cancer (IGC) after a cholecystectomy may benefit from a radical re-resection although their optimal treatment strategy is not well defined. In this Unit, such patients undergo delayed staging at 3 months after a cholecystectomy to assess the evidence of a residual tumour, extra hepatic spread and the biological behaviour of the tumour. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients who had delayed staging at 3 months after a cholecystectomy. METHODS: From July 2003 to July 2011, 56 patients with T2-T3 gallbladder cancer were referred to this Unit of which 49 were diagnosed incidentally on histology after a cholecystectomy. All 49 patients underwent delayed pre-operative staging using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) followed selectively by laparoscopy at 3 months after a cholecystectomy. Data were collected from a prospectively held database. The peri-operative and long-term outcomes of patients were analysed. SPSS software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were 38 pT2 and 11 pT3 tumours. After delayed staging, 24/49 (49%) patients underwent a radical resection, 24/49 (49%) were found to be inoperable on pre-operative assessment and 1/49 (2%) patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy and were found to be unresectable. The overall median survival from referral was 20.7 months (54.8 months for the group who had a radical re-resection versus 9.7 months for the group who had unresectable disease, P < 0.001). These results compare favourably with the reported outcome of fast-track management for incidental pT2-T3 gallbladder cancer from other major series in the literature. CONCLUSION: Delayed staging in patients with incidental T2-T3 gallbladder cancer after a cholecystectomy is a useful strategy to select patients who will benefit from a resection and avoid unnecessary major surgery.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Hallazgos Incidentales , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Laparoscopía , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Post-operative hepatic dysfunction is a major cause of concern when undertaking a liver resection. The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as a result of hepatic ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury can result in hepatocellular injury. Experimental evidence suggests that N-acetylcysteine may ameliorate ROS-mediated liver injury. METHODS: A cohort of 44 patients who had undergone a liver resection and receiving peri-operative N-acetylcysteine (NAC) were compared with a further cohort of 44 patients who did not. Liver function tests were compared on post-operative days 1, 3 and 5. Peri-operative outcome data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database within our unit. RESULTS: Administration of NAC was associated with a prolonged prothrombin time on the third post-operative day (18.4 versus 16.4 s; P = 0.002). The incidence of grades B and C liver failure was lower in the NAC group although this difference did not reach statistical significance (6.9% versus 14%; P = 0.287). The overall complication rate was similar between groups (32% versus 25%; P = ns). There were two peri-operative deaths in the NAC group and one in the control group (P = NS). CONCLUSION: In spite of promising experimental evidence, this study was not able to demonstrate any advantage in the routine administration of peri-operative NAC in patients undergoing a liver resection.
Asunto(s)
Acetilcisteína/administración & dosificación , Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Fallo Hepático/prevención & control , Daño por Reperfusión/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Fallo Hepático/etiología , Fallo Hepático/metabolismo , Fallo Hepático/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Daño por Reperfusión/etiología , Daño por Reperfusión/metabolismo , Daño por Reperfusión/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for stratification of head of pancreas and periampullary tumours into resectable, borderline resectable and locally advanced tumours is unclear as is the effect of endobiliary stents. The primary aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic performance of EUS for resectability according to stent status. DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed. All patients presenting with a solid head of pancreas mass who underwent EUS and surgery with curative intent during an 8-year period were included. Factors with possible impact on diagnostic performance of EUS were analysed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Ninety patients met inclusion criteria and formed the study group. A total of 49 (54%) patients had an indwelling biliary stent at the time of EUS, of which 36 were plastic and 13 were self-expanding metal stents (SEMS). Twenty patients underwent venous resection and reconstruction (VRR). Staging was successfully performed in 100% unstented cases, 97% plastic stent and 54% SEMS, p<0.0001. In successfully staged patients, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for classification of resectability were 70%, 70%, 70%, 42% and 88%. For vascular involvement (VI), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV were 80%, 68%, 69%, 26% and 96%. Increasing tumour size OR 0.53 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.95) was associated with a decrease in accuracy of VI classification. CONCLUSIONS: EUS has modest diagnostic performance for stratification of staging. Staging was less likely to be completed when a SEMS was in situ. Staging EUS should ideally be performed before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and biliary drainage.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Endosonografía , Humanos , Páncreas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , StentsRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Northern England has been experiencing a persistent rise in the number of primary liver cancers, largely driven by an increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) secondary to alcohol-related liver disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Here we review the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary liver cancer services and patients in our region. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with newly diagnosed liver cancer in our region. DESIGN: We prospectively audited our service for the first year of the pandemic (March 2020-February 2021), comparing mode of presentation, disease stage, treatments and outcomes to a retrospective observational consecutive cohort immediately prepandemic (March 2019-February 2020). RESULTS: We observed a marked decrease in HCC referrals compared with previous years, falling from 190 confirmed new cases to 120 (37%). Symptomatic became the the most common mode of presentation, with fewer tumours detected by surveillance or incidentally (% surveillance/incidental/symptomatic; 34/42/24 prepandemic vs 27/33/40 in the pandemic, p=0.013). HCC tumour size was larger in the pandemic year (60±4.6 mm vs 48±2.6 mm, p=0.017), with a higher incidence of spontaneous tumour haemorrhage. The number of new cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) fell only slightly, with symptomatic presentation typical. Patients received treatment appropriate for their cancer stage, with waiting times shorter for patients with HCC and unchanged for patients with ICC. Survival was associated with stage both before and during the pandemic. 9% acquired COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: The pandemic-associated reduction in referred patients in our region was attributed to the disruption of routine healthcare. For those referred, treatments and survival were appropriate for their stage at presentation. Non-referred or missing patients are expected to present with more advanced disease, with poorer outcomes. While protective measures are necessary during the pandemic, we recommend routine healthcare services continue, with patients encouraged to engage.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , COVID-19/epidemiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Liver cell adenomas (LCA) can present during pregnancy with abdominal pain and bleeding. Assessment and management at this time are complicated by concerns over fetal well-being. METHODS: We reviewed cases from our own institution, including the only laparoscopic liver resection reported in pregnancy, and systematically reviewed the literature to identify successful management strategies for this clinical dilemma. RESULTS: Two cases of surgery for bleeding liver adenoma were identified in our own institution. One case was managed with an elective laparoscopic segmental resection at 16 weeks and 1 with open surgery and successful fetal delivery at 32 weeks gestation. In the second case hepatic rupture of a 3.5-cm lesion was precipitated by diagnostic biopsy. In the world literature, spontaneous rupture of an LCA during pregnancy has been reported in 19 cases and is associated with maternal mortality and fetal loss approaching 50%. CONCLUSIONS: We advocate an aggressive approach to management of LCA in pregnancy owing to the high mortality associated with rupture. Biopsy of LCA in pregnancy is unsafe and can be complicated by rupture. Hence, patients presenting de novo with clinical or radiologic signs of bleeding or large (>5 cm) undiagnosed lesions should be offered laparoscopic resection if feasible.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/cirugía , Adenoma/complicaciones , Adenoma/patología , Adulto , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Biopsia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Neoplásicas del Embarazo/patologíaRESUMEN
Abstract Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has emerged as an alternative approach to traditional open surgery for managing isolated pathology in the body and tail of the pancreas. Experience with this technique to date is limited with only small series reported in the literature. Common difficulties with this operation are related to dissection of the pancreas from the portal vein and management of the pancreatic stump. In this paper we describe our single centre experience to date and describe strategies we have developed which we believe facilitate safe and effective laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/métodos , Páncreas/cirugía , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Fístula Pancreática/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Páncreas/patología , Pancreatectomía/instrumentación , Fístula Pancreática/patología , Espacio Retroperitoneal/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a complex disease process causing abdominal pain, diarrhoea and weight loss. The long-term nutritional implications however are not well documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate nutritional status in patients with CP over an extended time period and assess frequency and duration of CP related hospitalisation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with known CP for nutritional status (weight, BMI, and weight changes), nutritional interventions and hospital admissions were recorded. Weight was recorded at 3 points; baseline consultation, first review and most recent consultations. Number of dietitian contacts and documented evidence of nutritional advice/interventions were recorded and grouped. Nutritional status was compared in those who had dietetic input with those who did not. RESULTS: 46 consecutive subjects (34/46 male, mean age 56.15 years, 26/46 alcohol aetiology) were followed up for a mean of 5.24 years. 38/46 lost weight from baseline to review with mean percentage weight change: baseline to review = -7.36, p < 0.0001, baseline to recent = -6.70, p = 0.003, review to recent = 1.47, p = 0.581. 23/46 were reviewed by dietitian (mean 4.65 reviews). The number of dietitian reviews were positively associated with weight gain; baseline to recent (p = 0.010) and review to recent (p = 0.011). 23/46 received nutritional advice/interventions with 11 requiring enteral feeding. 29/46 experienced unplanned CP related hospital admissions (median 3) comprising 30 median total admission days. CONCLUSION: Patients with CP lose a significant amount of weight in a short time period which plateaus. Dietitian review is associated with improved nutritional status in CP.
Asunto(s)
Estado Nutricional , Pancreatitis Crónica , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis Crónica/epidemiología , Pancreatitis Crónica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal management of colorectal lung metastases (CRLM). This meta-analysis compared surgical (Surg) versus interventional (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy) and observational non-surgical (NSurg) management of CRLM. METHODS: A systematic review of the major databases including Medline, Embase, SCOPUS and the Cochrane library was performed. RESULTS: One randomized and nine observational studies including 2232 patients: 1551 (69%) comprised the Surg cohort, 521 (23%) the interventional NSurg group and 160 (7%) the observational NSurg group. A significantly higher overall survival (OS) was observed when Surg was compared to interventional NSurg at 1 year (Surg 88%, 310/352; interventional NSurg 64%, 245/383; odds ratio (OR) 2.77 (confidence interval (CI) 1.94-3.97), P = 0.001), at 3 years (Surg 59%, 857/1444; interventional NSurg 26%, 138/521; OR 2.61 (CI 1.65-4.15), P = 0.002), at 5 years (Surg 47%, 533/1144; interventional NSurg 23%, 45/196; OR 3.24 (CI 1.42-7.39), P = 0.009) and at 10 years (Surg 27%, 306/1122; interventional NSurg 1%, 2/168; OR 15.64 (CI 1.87-130.76), P = 0.031). Surg was associated with a greater OS than observational NSurg at only 1 year (Surg 92%, 98/107; observational NSurg 83%, 133/160; OR 6.69 (CI 1.33-33.58), P = 0.037) and was similar to observational NSurg at all other OS time points. Comparable survival was observed among Surg and overall NSurg cohorts at 3- and 5-year survival in articles published within the last 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Recent evidence suggests comparable survival with Surg and NSurg modalities for CRLM, contrasting to early evidence where Surg had an improved survival. Significant selection bias contributes to this finding, prompting the need for high powered randomized controlled trials and registry data.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Pulmón , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugíaRESUMEN
Objectives: We analyzed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the impact of PERT on weight change, quality of life, and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC).Methods: All RCTs indexed in PubMed, Medline and Scopus, databases reporting PEI in APC and the effect of PERT were included up to August 2020. The primary outcome measure was OS and the secondary outcome measures were weight change and quality of life.Results: Four RCTs including 194 patients (107 males) were analyzed. Ninety-eight (50.5%) patients received PERT treatment. Treatment with PERT did not show a significant effect on OS (SMD 0.12, 95% confidence interval -0.46-0.70, p = 0.46). There was no difference in change in body weight (SMD 0.53, 95% confidence interval -0.72-1.77, p = 0.21). Quality of life was not significantly different in those taking PERT compared to controls.Conclusions: This meta-analysis found no significant difference in OS, change in weight or quality of life with use of PERT in APC. However, non-uniform designs and different end points , along with smaller number of patients, limit a more in-depth analysis of outcomes. Further, RCTs are warranted to support evidence of routine use of PERT in APC.