Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 60
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Intern Med ; 293(6): 694-703, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36682036

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Millions of people have now been vaccinated against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, it is still unclear which antibody levels provide protection against mortality. It is further unknown whether measuring antibody concentrations on hospital admission allows for identifying patients with a high risk of mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether anti-SARS-CoV2-spike antibodies on hospital admission predict in-hospital mortality in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicentre cohort study on 1152 hospitalized patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 with a polymerase chain reaction-based assay. Patients were classified by vaccination status. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies were determined on hospital admission. The investigated end point was in-hospital mortality for any cause. RESULTS: Spike antibodies on hospital admission were significantly lower in non-survivors in both non-vaccinated (73 U/ml, 95%CI 0-164 vs. 175 U/ml, 95%CI 124-235, p = 0.002) and vaccinated patients (1056 U/ml, 95%CI 701-1411 vs. 1668 U/ml, 95%CI 1580-1757, p < 0.001). Further, spike antibodies were significantly lower in fully vaccinated and boostered patients who died compared to those who survived (mean 883 U/ml, 95%CI 406-1359 vs. 1292 U/ml, 95%CI 1152-1431, p = 0.017 and 1485 U/ml, 95%CI 836-2133 vs. 2050 U/ml, 95%CI 1952-2149, p = 0.036). Patients infected with the currently prevailing Omicron variant were three times more likely to die if spike antibodies were <1200 U/ml (OR 3.458, 95%CI 1.562-7.656, p = 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, this value increased to an aOR of 4.079 (95%CI 1.809-9.198, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anti-SARS-CoV2 spike-antibody levels on hospital admission are inversely associated with in-hospital mortality. Hospitalized patients with lower antibody levels have a higher risk of mortality.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Hospitales
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 143: 107016, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38521446

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Despite high global vaccination coverage, it remains unclear how vaccination and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies affect immune responses and inflammation levels in patients with COVID-19. It is further unclear whether the inflammatory response differs depending on antibody levels and whether the combination of antibody and inflammation levels in COVID-19 patients affects mortality rates. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study that included 1031 hospitalized COVID-19 patients from five hospitals. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike antibodies, interleukin-6 (IL6), and CRP were measured on hospital admission. The prespecified endpoint was all-cause in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We observed significantly lower levels of CRP (P<0.001) and IL6 (P<0.001) in patients with antibody levels above 1200 BAU/ml. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients with high levels of inflammatory markers (CRP>6 mg/dl or IL6>100 pg/ml) combined with low levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike antibodies (<1200 BAU/ml) were approximately 8 times more likely to die than patients with low inflammatory responses and high antibody levels (CRP: aHR 7.973, 95% CI 2.744-23.169, P<0.001; IL6: aHR 8.973, 95% CI 3.549-22.688, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients presenting with high inflammatory markers and low antibody levels exhibited the highest mortality risks. Higher antibody levels are associated with lower levels of inflammation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reactiva , COVID-19 , Inflamación , Interleucina-6 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Interleucina-6/sangre , Interleucina-6/inmunología , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Inflamación/sangre , Inflamación/inmunología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años
3.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 136(Suppl 3): 44-60, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743083

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous coronary intervention is a well-established revascularization strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The safety and feasibility of performing these procedures on a same-day discharge basis for selected patients has been studied in a large number of mostly nonrandomized trials. An up to date literature review should focus on trials with radial access, representing the current standard for coronary procedures in Austria and other European countries. METHODS: The aim of this consensus statement is to review the most recent evidence for the safety and feasibility of performing same-day discharge procedures in selected patients. A structured literature search was performed using prespecified search criteria, focusing on trials with radial access procedures. RESULTS: A total of 44 clinical trials and 4 large meta-analyses were retrieved, spanning 21 years of clinical evidence from 2001 to 2022. The outcome data from a wide range of clinical settings were unanimous in showing no negative effect on early (24 h) or late (30 day) major adverse events after same-day discharge coronary procedures. Based on nine prospective trials a comprehensive meta-analysis was compiled. Using 1­month major adverse events data the pooled odds ratio of same-day discharge versus overnight stay procedures was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.35-01.24; p = 0.19; I2 0%), indicating a noninferiority in carefully selected patients. CONCLUSION: Outcome data from same-day discharge coronary intervention trials with radial access confirm the robust safety profile showing no increase in the risk of major adverse events compared to overnight stay.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Alta del Paciente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Austria , Factores de Riesgo , Prevalencia
4.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 136(Suppl 3): 61-74, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743084

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous coronary intervention is a well-established revascularization strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. Recent technical advances such as radial access, third generation drug-eluting stents and highly effective antiplatelet therapy have substantially improved the safety profile of coronary procedures. Despite several practice guidelines and a clear patient preference of early hospital discharge, the percentage of coronary procedures performed in an outpatient setting in Austria remains low, mostly due to safety concerns. METHODS: The aim of this consensus statement is to provide a practical framework for the safe and effective implementation of coronary outpatient clinics in Austria. Based on a structured literature review and an in-depth analysis of available practice guidelines a consensus statement was developed and peer-reviewed within the working group of interventional cardiology (AGIK) of the Austrian Society of Cardiology. RESULTS: Based on the available literature same-day discharge coronary procedures show a favorable safety profile with no increase in the risk of major adverse events compared to an overnight stay. This document provides a detailed consensus in various clinical settings. The most important prerequisite for same-day discharge is, however, adequate selection of suitable patients and a structured peri-interventional and postinterventional management plan. CONCLUSION: Based on the data analysis this consensus document provides detailed practice guidelines for the safe operation of daycare cathlab programs in Austria.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Alta del Paciente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Austria , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/normas , Alta del Paciente/normas , Cardiología/normas , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Tiempo de Internación , Atención Ambulatoria/normas
5.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 12(8)2024 Jul 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39203980

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Despite the currently prevailing, milder Omicron variant, coronary artery disease (CAD) patients constitute a major risk group in COVID-19, exhibiting 2.6 times the mortality risk of non-CAD patients and representing over 22% of non-survivors. No data are currently available on the efficacy of antibody levels in CAD patients, nor on the relevance of vaccination status versus antibody levels for predicting severe courses and COVID-19 mortality. Nor are there definitive indicators to assess if individual CAD patients are sufficiently protected from adverse outcomes or to determine the necessity of booster vaccinations. METHODS: A prospective, propensity-score-matched, multicenter cohort study comprising 249 CAD patients and 903 controls was conducted. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike antibodies were measured on hospital admission. Prespecified endpoints were in-hospital mortality, intensive care, and oxygen administration. RESULTS: After adjustment for potential confounders, CAD patients exhibited 4.6 and 6.1-times higher mortality risks if antibody levels were <1200 BAU/mL and <182 BAU/mL, respectively, compared to CAD patients above these thresholds (aOR 4.598, 95%CI 2.426-8.714, p < 0.001; 6.147, 95%CI 2.529-14.941, p < 0.001). Risk of intensive care was 3.7 and 4.0 (p = 0.003; p < 0.001), and risk of oxygen administration 2.6 and 2.4 times higher below these thresholds (p = 0.004; p = 0.010). Vaccination status was a weaker predictor of all three outcomes than both antibody thresholds. CONCLUSION: Antibody levels are a stronger predictor of outcome in CAD patients with COVID-19 than vaccination status, with 1200 BAU/mL being the more conservative threshold. Measuring anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in CAD patients may ensure enhanced protection by providing timely booster vaccinations and identifying high-risk CAD patients at hospital admission.

6.
JCI Insight ; 9(20)2024 Oct 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39435658

RESUMEN

BACKGROUNDDespite the currently prevailing, milder Omicron variant of COVID-19, older adults remain at elevated risk of hospital admission, critical illness, and death. Loss of efficacy of the immune system, including reduced strength, quality, and durability of antibody responses, may render generalized recommendations on booster vaccinations inadequate. There is a lack of data on the efficacy of antibody levels in older adults and on the utility of vaccination status versus antibody levels as a correlate of protection. It is further unclear whether antibody levels may be used to guide the timing of booster vaccinations in older adults.METHODSWe conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study comprising hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies were measured on hospital admission. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Patients were stratified by age, antibody levels, and vaccination status. Multiple logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were conducted.RESULTSIn total, 785 older patients (≥60 years of age [a]) and 367 controls (<60a) were included. After adjusting for confounders, risk of mortality, ICU admission, endotracheal intubation, and oxygen administration was 4.9, 2.6, 6.5, and 2.3 times higher, respectively, if antibody levels were < 1,200 BAU/mL (aOR, 4.92 [95%CI, 2.59-9.34], P < 0.0001; aOR, 2.64 [95%CI, 1.52-4.62], P = 0.0006; aOR, 6.50 [95%CI, 1.48-28.47], P = 0.013; aOR, 2.34 [95%CI, 1.60-3.343], P < 0.0001). Older adults infected with the Omicron variant were approximately 6 times more likely to die if antibody levels were < 1,200 BAU/mL (aOR, 6.3 [95% CI, 2.43-16.40], P = 0.0002).CONCLUSIONAntibody levels were a stronger predictor of in-hospital mortality than vaccination status. Monitoring antibody levels may constitute a better and more direct approach for safeguarding older adults from adverse COVID-19 outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Humanos , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/prevención & control , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Inmunización Secundaria
7.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 136(Suppl 14): 559-569, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39311980

RESUMEN

Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is an interventional supplement to medical treatment in patients with arterial hypertension. While the first sham-controlled trial, SYMPLICITY HTN­3 was neutral, with improved procedural details, patient selection and follow-up, recent randomized sham-controlled trials of second-generation devices show a consistent blood pressure lowering effect of RDN, as compared to sham controls. These new data and the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) premarket approval of two RDN devices are the basis for the present recommendations update.This joint position paper from the Austrian Society of Hypertension, together with the Austrian Society of Nephrology and the Working Group of Interventional Cardiology from the Austrian Society of Cardiology includes an overview about the available evidence on RDN and gives specific recommendations for the work-up, patient selection, pretreatment, procedural management and follow-up in patients undergoing RDN in Austria. Specifically, RDN may be used in clinical routine care, together with lifestyle measures and antihypertensive drugs, in patients with resistant hypertension (i.e. uncontrolled blood pressure on 3 antihypertensive drugs) and in those with uncontrolled hypertension, after adequate work-up, if institutional, patient-related and procedural conditions are fulfilled.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Hipertensión , Simpatectomía , Humanos , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Austria , Cardiología/normas , Hipertensión/cirugía , Hipertensión/terapia , Riñón/inervación , Nefrología/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Simpatectomía/métodos , Simpatectomía/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Card Fail ; 19(1): 25-30, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23273591

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Elevated serum phosphate levels are associated with excess risk for cardiovascular mortality in patients with and without chronic kidney disease and with increased risk for incident heart failure. We determined the association of serum phosphate concentrations with disease severity and long-term outcome in patients with overt heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical and laboratory parameters of 974 ambulatory heart failure patients were evaluated. Prevalence of elevated phosphate levels (>4.5 mg/dL) was 5.8% in men and 6.0% in women. Phosphate was significantly correlated with disease severity as assessed by New York Heart Association class, left ventricular ejection fraction, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (P < .01, respectively). Multivariate sex-stratified Cox regression analysis adjusted for various clinically relevant covariates revealed baseline phosphate to be independently associated with death from any cause or heart transplantation (HR 1.26 [95% CI 1.04-1.52]; P < .001). This relation was maintained in patients with and without chronic kidney disease. After categorization based on quartiles of phosphate levels, a graded, independent relation between phosphate and outcome was observed (P for trend <.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a graded, independent relation between serum phosphate and adverse outcome in patients with stable heart failure. Also, serum phosphate was related to disease severity. These findings further highlight the clinical importance of serum phosphate in cardiovascular disease.


Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/sangre , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Fosfatos/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Pruebas de Función Cardíaca , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Fosfatos/metabolismo , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia
9.
J Clin Med ; 12(15)2023 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37568470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that both lipid levels and anti-severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody levels are associated with outcome in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). While both parameters have separately been implicated in the neutralization and clearance of pathogens during severe infections, it is currently unclear whether the interplay of these parameters affects outcome in COVID-19. We therefore aimed to determine whether there was a relationship between lipoproteins, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and COVID-19 mortality. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter cohort study, we recruited 1152 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from five hospitals. Total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies were measured on hospital admission. The investigated endpoint was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: LDL-C, HDL-C, and TC were significantly lower in non-survivors than in survivors (mg/dL, 95%CI; 56.1, 50.4-61.8 vs. 72.6, 70.2-75.0, p < 0.001; 34.2, 31.7-36.8 vs. 38.1, 37.2-39.1, p = 0.025; 139.3, 130.9-147.7 vs. 157.4, 54.1-160.6, p = 0.002). Mortality risk increased progressively with lower levels of LDL-C, HDL-C, and TC (aOR 1.73, 1.30-2.31, p < 0.001; 1.44, 1.10-1.88, p = 0.008; 1.49, 1.14-1.94, p < 0.001). Mortality rates varied between 2.1% for high levels of both LDL-C and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and 16.3% for low levels of LDL-C and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (aOR 9.14, 95%CI 3.17-26.34, p < 0.001). Accordingly, for total cholesterol and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, mortality rates varied between 2.1% and 15.0% (aOR 8.01, 95%CI 2.77-23.18, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The combination of serum lipid levels and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is strongly associated with in-hospital mortality of patients with COVID-19. Patients with low levels of LDL-C and total cholesterol combined with low levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies exhibited the highest mortality rates.

10.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 18326, 2023 10 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37884649

RESUMEN

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) constitute one of the most vulnerable subgroups in COVID-19. Despite high vaccination rates, a correlate of protection to advise vaccination strategies for novel SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and lower mortality in this high-risk group is still missing. It is further unclear what antibody levels provide protection and whether pre-existing organ damage affects this threshold. To address these gaps, we conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study on 1152 patients with COVID-19 from five hospitals. Patients were classified by diabetes and vaccination status. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike-antibodies, creatinine and NTproBNP were measured on hospital admission. Pre-specified endpoints were all-cause in-hospital-mortality, ICU admission, endotracheal intubation, and oxygen administration. Propensity score matching was applied to increase comparability. We observed significantly lower anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike-antibodies in diabetic non-survivors compared to survivors (mean, 95% CI 351BAU/ml, 106-595 vs. 1123, 968-1279, p < 0.001). Mortality risk increased two-fold with each standard deviation-decrease of antibody levels (aHR 1.988, 95% CI 1.229-3.215, p = 0.005). T2D patients requiring oxygen administration, endotracheal intubation and ICU admission had significantly lower antibody levels than those who did not (p < 0.001, p = 0.046, p = 0.011). While T2D patients had significantly worse outcomes than non-diabetic patients, the differences were less pronounced compared to propensity-score-matched non-diabetic patients. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies on hospital admission are inversely associated with oxygen administration, endotracheal intubation, intensive care and in-hospital mortality in diabetic COVID-19 patients. Pre-existing comorbidities may have a greater impact on outcome than diabetes status alone.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Oxígeno
11.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 42(2): 153-63, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21806605

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although abnormal liver morphology and function have long been recognized, characterization and importance of liver dysfunction in heart failure are poorly defined. This study sought to investigate the relevance of circulating liver function tests (LFTs) in an unselected chronic heart failure (CHF) cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1032 consecutive ambulatory patients with CHF were enrolled from 2000 to 2008. Clinical and laboratory variables including LFTs were collected at study entry. Follow-up (median 36 months) was available in 1002 (97·1%) patients. The endpoint was defined as death from any cause or heart transplantation. Hazard ratios (HR) for transplant-free survival were estimated per log unit using Cox proportional hazard regression models for sex-stratified data. RESULTS: Sex-specific prevalence of cholestatic enzyme elevation was 19·2% as opposed to elevated transaminases in 8·3%. Cholestatic enzymes, but not transaminases, were significantly associated with severity of heart failure syndrome and backward failure. The endpoint was recorded in 339 patients (33·8%). T-Bil, γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were associated with adverse outcome in bivariate models. Of these, GGT [HR 1·22 (1·06, 1·41); P = 0·006] and ALP [HR 1·52 (1·09, 2·12); P = 0·014] were independently associated with the endpoint after adjustment for a wide array of clinical and laboratory predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Liver dysfunction is frequent in CHF and characterized by a predominantly cholestatic enzyme profile that is associated with disease severity and prognosis. Thus, we propose a cardio-hepatic syndrome in CHF. Future studies are needed to clarify the exact mechanisms of organ interaction.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Hepatopatías/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hígado/enzimología , Hepatopatías/enzimología , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
12.
Biomedicines ; 10(12)2022 Nov 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36551808

RESUMEN

We aimed to ascertain the real-world diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy in combination with free light chain (FLC) assessment for transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis (CA) using the histopathological diagnosis derived from endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) as a reference standard. We retrospectively analyzed 102 patients (22% women) with suspected CA from seven Austrian amyloidosis referral centers. The inclusion criteria comprised the available results of bone scintigraphy, FLC assessment, and EMB with histopathological analysis. ATTR and AL were diagnosed in 60 and 21 patients (59%, 21%), respectively, and concomitant AL and ATTR was identified in one patient. The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of Perugini score ≥ 2 for ATTR CA were 95% and 96%. AL was diagnosed in three out of 31 patients (10%) who had evidence of monoclonal proteins and a Perugini score ≥ 2. When excluding all patients with detectable monoclonal proteins (n = 62) from analyses, the PPV of Perugini score ≥ 2 for ATTR CA was 100% and the NPV of Perugini score < 2 for ATTR CA was 79%. Conclusively, ATTR CA can be diagnosed non-invasively in the case of a Perugini score ≥ 2 and an unremarkable FLC assessment. However, tissue biopsy is mandatory in suspected CA in any other constellation of non-invasive diagnostic work-up.

13.
J Card Fail ; 17(7): 577-84, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21703530

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and total bilirubin (T-Bil) are elevated and of prognostic significance in chronic heart failure (CHF). This study sought to compare these novel cardiovascular risk markers in CHF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 1,087 ambulatory patients from our heart failure program. Long-term follow-up was available in 1,056 patients. The combined end point was defined as death of any cause or heart transplantation. Prevalence of elevated GGT was 43% in men and 48% in women, that of T-Bil 17% and 8%, respectively. Both variables were significantly correlated with severity of heart failure. GGT and T-Bil were associated with transplant-free survival in bivariate analysis (P values <.001 and .006, respectively). However, GGT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.44; P < .001), but not T-Bil, remained an independent predictor of prognosis in the multivariate model. Also, categorized GGT levels beyond the gender-specific normal ranges were predictive of the combined end point (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23-1.95). Elevation of both GGT and T-Bil further increased the risk of reaching the end point (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.74-3.18). CONCLUSIONS: GGT and T-Bil are associated with disease severity in CHF. However, only GGT is independently associated with adverse outcome. Our findings further highlight the clinical importance of GGT in cardiovascular disease.


Asunto(s)
Bilirrubina/sangre , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/sangre , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , gamma-Glutamiltransferasa/sangre , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 133(15-16): 750-761, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33755758

RESUMEN

This position statement is an update to the 2011 consensus statement of the Austrian Society of Cardiology (ÖKG) and the Austrian Society of Cardiac Surgery (ÖGTHG) for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Due to a number of recently published studies, broadening of indications and recommendations of medical societies and our own national developments, the ÖKG and the ÖGHTG wish to combine the 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease with a national position paper and to focus on certain details for the application in Austria. Thus, this position statement serves as a supplement and further interpretation of the international guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Cardiología , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Austria , Humanos
15.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther ; 11(3): 726-735, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34295699

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Randomised controlled trials have shown diverse results for radial access in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Moreover, it is questionable whether radial access improves outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing PPCI. We aimed to investigate the outcome according to access site in patients with or without cardiogenic shock, in daily clinical practice. METHODS: For the present analysis we included 9,980 patients undergoing PPCI between 2012 and 2018, registered in the multi-centre, nationwide registry on PCI for myocardial infarction (MI). In-hospital mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and net adverse clinical events (NACE) until discharge were compared between 4,498 patients with radial (45%) and 5,482 patients with femoral (55%) access. RESULTS: Radial compared to femoral access was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (3.5% vs. 7.7%; P<0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed reduced in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43 to 0.75]. Furthermore, MACE (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.78) as well as NACE (OR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.75) occurred less frequently in patients with radial access. Interaction analysis with cardiogenic shock showed an effect modification, resulting in lower mortality in PCI via radial access in patients without, but no difference in those with cardiogenic shock (OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.96). CONCLUSIONS: Radial access for patients with acute MI undergoing PPCI is associated with improved survival in a large contemporary cohort of daily practice. However, this beneficial effect is restricted to hemodynamically stable patients.

16.
Herz ; 35(1): 11-6, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20140784

RESUMEN

Heart transplantation is an established therapeutic modality in patients with end-stage heart failure. In the 1st year after transplantation acute cellular rejection is still important. The diagnosis of acute cellular rejection is based on the histological evaluation of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) specimens. EMB is an invasive procedure with a definite risk and poor tolerance in some patients. Imaging methods like echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging as well as intracardiac ECG have been used for noninvasive diagnosis of acute cellular rejection. In addition, a large number of circulating biomarkers have been evaluated for noninvasive diagnosis of rejection. B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin and inflammatory markers are the most important biomarkers in this field. Although these parameters are useful, none of them has the potential to replace EMB as the gold standard for diagnosis of rejection. In the near future microarray technology might get important for diagnosis of acute cellular rejection. Using microarray technique gene expression profiles can be detected, which are associated with an increased risk for rejection. Ongoing studies will demonstrate, whether microarrays can at least reduce the number of EMBs.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/sangre , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Rechazo de Injerto/sangre , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Corazón , Biopsia , Endocardio/patología , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Rechazo de Injerto/genética , Rechazo de Injerto/patología , Trasplante de Corazón/patología , Humanos , Mediadores de Inflamación/sangre , Miocardio/patología , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico/sangre , Análisis de Secuencia por Matrices de Oligonucleótidos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Troponina/sangre
17.
J Clin Med ; 9(7)2020 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32664309

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) and its associated restrictions could affect ischemic times in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of the COVID-19 outbreak on ischemic times in consecutive all-comer STEMI patients. We included consecutive STEMI patients (n = 163, median age: 61 years, 27% women) who were referred to seven tertiary care hospitals across Austria for primary percutaneous coronary intervention between 24 February 2020 (calendar week 9) and 5 April 2020 (calendar week 14). The number of patients, total ischemic times and door-to-balloon times in temporal relation to COVID-19-related restrictions and infection rates were analyzed. While rates of STEMI admissions decreased (calendar week 9/10 (n = 69, 42%); calendar week 11/12 (n = 51, 31%); calendar week 13/14 (n = 43, 26%)), total ischemic times increased from 164 (interquartile range (IQR): 107-281) min (calendar week 9/10) to 237 (IQR: 141-560) min (calendar week 11/12) and to 275 (IQR: 170-590) min (calendar week 13/14) (p = 0.006). Door-to-balloon times were constant (p = 0.60). There was a significant difference in post-interventional Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 in patients treated during calendar week 9/10 (97%), 11/12 (84%) and 13/14 (81%; p = 0.02). Rates of in-hospital death and re-infarction were similar between groups (p = 0.48). Results were comparable when dichotomizing data on 10 March and 16 March 2020, when official restrictions were executed. In this cohort of all-comer STEMI patients, we observed a 1.7-fold increase in ischemic time during the outbreak of COVID-19 in Austria. Patient-related factors likely explain most of this increase. Counteractive steps are needed to prevent further cardiac collateral damage during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

18.
Herz ; 34(4): 299-304, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19575161

RESUMEN

Myocarditis is the reason for sudden cardiac death in 5-22% of athletes < 35 years of age. Actually, parvovirus B19 and human herpes virus 6 are the most important pathogens. Clinical presentation of myocarditis is heterogeneous, with all courses between asymptomatic and fulminant reported. Especially in athletes it is important to take subtle discomforts seriously and initiate further evaluation. Electrocardiogram, laboratory parameters, serologic markers, and echocardiography are helpful in diagnosis of myocarditis, but are not specific. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the heart has become an important tool in the evaluation of patients with myocarditis and allows noninvasive appraisal of myocardial inflammation using late enhancement. However, MRI is not able to assess viral persistence. Therefore, endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the gold standard in diagnosis of myocarditis. When considering EMB in these athletes one should not ignore spontaneous healing in 50% of patients with myocarditis. Contrariwise, specific therapy (e.g., immunosuppression, interferon, immunoglobulins) for myocarditis is only feasible after getting results of EMB. When myocarditis is verified, athletes have to withdraw from sport for at least 6 months. Before restarting physical activity, a detailed examination is necessary and most of the patients will undergo another EMB. For prevention of myocarditis and sudden cardiac death it is recommended to stop elite sport for 4 weeks after an unspecific infection. Whether moderate sport can be started earlier is unclear.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Miocarditis/diagnóstico , Miocarditis/prevención & control , Deportes , Humanos , Miocarditis/complicaciones
20.
Cardiology ; 110(4): 241-8, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18073479

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess whether different coronary plaque types as classified by multislice computed tomography (CT) are retrospectively correlated with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in an unselected study population. METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients were examined with 16-slice CT coronary angiography. Coronary plaque types were classified as calcifying type 1, mixed (calcifying > non-calcifying) type 2, mixed (non-calcifying > calcifying) type 3, and non-calcifying type 4. Patients who had an ACS within 17 days were included. All patients underwent invasive coronary angiography. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (92%) had coronary plaques evaluated by CT: 18 type 1 (31%), 10 type 2 (17%), 16 type 3 (28%) and 14 type 4 (24%). The presence of a non-calcifying plaque component (types 2-4; 40 of 63 patients, 63%) was correlated with ACS (n = 15; 24%) (p < 0.001). Only type 3 was significantly correlated with ACS (p = 0.01), but plaque types 2 and 4 were not. The diagnostic accuracy of CT for detection of stenosis >50% in proximal segments was: sensitivity 98%, specificity 90%, negative predictive value 97%, positive predictive value 97% per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed calcifying/non-calcifying plaques with a predominantly non-calcifying component (type 3) as classified by multislice CT are retrospectively correlated with ACS.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/etiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Calcinosis/complicaciones , Calcinosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/clasificación , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA