Prevalence and prognostic significance of adrenergic escape during chronic beta-blocker therapy in chronic heart failure.

AIMS: Like aldosterone escape to ACE-inhibitors, adrenergic escape (AE) to beta-blockers appears conceivable in chronic heart failure (CHF), as generalized systemic neurohumoral activation has been described as the pathophysiological basis of this syndrome. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and prognostic value of AE with respect to different beta-blocker agents and doses. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, observational study of 415 patients with systolic CHF receiving chronic stable beta-blocker therapy. AE was defined by norepinephrine levels above the upper limit of normal. Irrespective of the individual beta-blocker agents used and the dose equivalent taken, the prevalence of AE was 31-39%. Norepinephrine levels neither correlated with heart rate (r=0.02; 95% CI: -0.08-0.11; P=0.74) nor were they related to underlying rhythm (P=0.09) or the individual beta-blocker agent used (P=0.87). The presence of AE was a strong and independent indicator of mortality (adjusted HR: 1.915; 95% CI: 1.387-2.645; chi2: 15.60). CONCLUSION: We verified the presence of AE in CHF patients on chronic stable beta-blocker therapy, irrespective of the individual beta-blocker agent and the dose equivalent. As AE might indicate therapeutic failure, the determination of AE could help to identify those patients with CHF that might benefit from more aggressive treatment modalities. Heart rate, however, is not a surrogate for adrenergic escape.

Clinical characteristics, morbidity, and prognostic value of concomitant coronary artery disease in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (dCMP) might present coronary artery disease (CAD) concomitant to dCMP and prognostic differences between ischemic heart disease and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy have been described. Clinical characteristics and prognostic implications of concomitant CAD in patients with dCMP are largely unknown. METHODS: A total of 1,263 patients with chronic systolic dysfunction from dCMP-of these 67.1 % (n = 847; 72.3 % men) without and 32.9 % (n = 416; 80.8 % men) with concomitant CAD were included and baseline clinical characteristics noted. They were followed prospectively for 36.3 (20.8-65.0) months, representing 5,168 patient-years. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint; and decompensation requiring hospitalisation as well as the combined endpoint thereof were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Independent significant predictors of CAD were smoking status (current smoker: OR 2.68, 95 % CI 1.61-4.46; p < 0.001; past smoker: OR 2.52, 95 % CI 1.40-4.52; p < 0.005; each vs. non-smoker), presence of dyslipidemia (OR 3.46, 95 % CI 2.23-5.35; p < 0.001), age (OR 1.06, 95 % CI 1.04-1.08; p < 0.001), and female sex (OR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.29-0.81; p = 0.005). The presence of CAD was not a significant predictor of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 0.74, 95 % CI 0.36-1.54; p = 0.42), morbidity (adjusted HR 1.48, 95 % CI 0.55-3.99; p = 0.44), or the combined endpoint (HR 0.65, 95 % CI 0.24-1.78; p = 0.40). CONCLUSION: Concomitant CAD is common in patients with dCMP. Clinical predictors of its presence are largely coincident with classic risk factors in the general population. The presence of concomitant CAD appears not to be associated with adverse prognosis (morbidity or mortality) in patients with dCMP.