Heterogeneity in physician's job preferences in a dual practice context - Evidence from a DCE.

Many countries are facing challenges in recruiting and retaining physicians, particularly in regions where the public and private sectors compete for doctors. Understanding the factors influencing physicians' job choices can help inform policies aimed at attracting and retaining this valuable workforce. This study aims to elicit the strength of physicians' preferences regarding various job-related aspects, including earnings, time flexibility, discussion of clinical cases, frequency of facilities and equipment updates, training opportunities and autonomy in decision making. To achieve this, a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) was administered to 697 physicians. Each participant completed a series of eight choice tasks, where they had to choose between two hypothetical jobs differing in these attributes with levels mirroring positions in the public and private sectors in Portugal. The resulting choices were analysed using mixed logit, generalized multinomial logit and latent classes models to account for diverse unobserved variations in physicians' preferences and to explore preference heterogeneity across different observable characteristics. Jobs that offered more autonomy and training opportunities were strongly preferred, as physicians would require additional compensation to work with reduced autonomy (equivalent to 28.62% of gross income) or less frequent training (equivalent to 22.75%). This study also shows that the ranking of the job characteristics is similar between physicians working exclusively in the public sector and those engaged in dual practice. Nevertheless, public sector physicians place more emphasis on the availability of frequent training possibilities and frequent updates of facilities and equipment compared to their counterparts in dual practice. These findings contribute to existing knowledge by highlighting the significance of non-monetary attributes and shedding light on the preferences of physicians across various employment scenarios. They offer valuable insights for policy development aimed at influencing physicians' allocation of time between sectors.

[Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the Medical Curricula in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Analysis].

INTRODUCTION: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has gained relevance as a method of prevention for HIV in certain people and settings. Following the publication of the guideline on PrEP prescribing in Portugal, we aimed to assess the knowledge of Portuguese Medical Students about PrEP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was sent to Medical students of Portuguese Medical Schools. We conducted a descriptive analysis of the results and an analytic cross-sectional study to identify factors associated with "knowing about PrEP", "having had one class about PrEP" and "identifying eligible groups correctly". RESULTS: Of the 796 students that responded to the survey, 64.6% were aware of what PrEP is. Of these, 34.44% acquired this knowledge during their training. Out of the total amount of respondents, 4.77% could identify correctly and completely the eligible groups for PrEP. As the training years went by, the probability of being aware of PrEP, having had one class about PrEP, and identifying the eligible groups correctly, increased. Of the sixth-year students, 43.48% had had one class about PrEP and among the students that were aware of PrEP, 28% identified what the eligible groups were. After adjusting for the school year, we found differences between Medical Schools regarding the outcomes. The association between the different ways of learning about PrEP and the ability to correctly identify eligible groups for PrEP was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The differences between Medical Schools could be harmonized through changes in the medical curricula that would allow this topic to be addressed more often.

Introdução: A profilaxia pré-exposição (PrEP) ganhou relevância como método de prevenção do VIH em determinados indivíduos e contextos. Após a entrada em vigor das normas para prescrição em Portugal, pretendemos aferir o conhecimento em relação à PrEP entre os estudantes de Medicina em Portugal.Material e Métodos: Foi enviado um questionário online aos estudantes de Medicina das escolas médicas portuguesas. Foi feita uma análise descritiva dos resultados e um estudo transversal analítico para identificar fatores associados a "conhecer a PrEP", "ter tido uma aula de PrEP", e "identificar grupos elegíveis corretamente".Resultados: Dos 796 estudantes que responderam, 64,6% sabiam o que era a PrEP. Destes, 34,44% obteve conhecimento sobre a mesma durante a sua formação. Entre os respondentes, 4,77% identificaram correta e completamente os grupos elegíveis. Com o avançar do ano letivo, a probabilidade de conhecer a PrEP, ter tido uma aula de PrEP e identificar os grupos corretamente aumentava. No sexto ano, 43,48% tinham tido uma aula sobre PrEP e entre os que conheciam a PrEP, 28% identificaram os grupos elegíveis. Existem diferenças entre as escolas médicas após ajustamento para o ano letivo em relação aos resultados obtidos. A forma como se tomou conhecimento da PrEP não alterou de forma estatisticamente significativa a capacidade de identificar corretamente grupos elegíveisConclusão: As diferenças entre as escolas médicas poderão ser harmonizadas. Esta temática poderá ser reforçada nos respetivos currículos.