Retreatment with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir with or without lead-in interferon-ß injections in patients infected with genotype 1b hepatitis C virus after unsuccessful daclatasvir/asunaprevir therapy.

AIM: To improve the therapeutic efficacy of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) for the retreatment of patients after daclatasvir/asunaprevir (DCV/ASV), a customized therapy with or without lead-in interferon (IFN)-ß injections was formulated according to the types of resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) in the non-structural protein (NS)5A region of genotype 1b hepatitis C virus (HCV). METHODS: Thirty-three patients failing prior DCV/ASV received SOF/LDV for 12 weeks. Patients with HCV carrying unfavorable NS5A-RAS and/or those previously treated with simeprevir were given lead-in IFN-ß injections twice a day for 2 weeks; sequential changes in the NS5A-RAS during the injection period were evaluated using deep sequencing. RESULTS: Lead-in injections were not undertaken in 27 patients; a sustained viral response (SVR) was achieved in 26 patients, while viral relapse occurred in 1 patient with HCV carrying NS5A-L28M/R30H/Y93H mutations. Among the 6 patients receiving lead-in injections, viral relapse occurred in 2 patients who had an unfavorable IFN-λ3-related gene single nucleotide polymorphism allele; both patients had been previously treated with simeprevir, and HCV carrying NS5A-L31V/Y93H mutations had emerged after DCV/ASV. Deep sequencing revealed no changes in the NS5A-RAS profiles during the lead-in injection period in either patient. In contrast, in a patient with a favorable allele who was infected with similar unfavorable HCV strains, NS5A-L31/Y93 wild-type strains appeared during the injection period, enabling an SVR. CONCLUSION: Using customized therapies based on the NS5A-RAS profiles, a high SVR rate was obtained after SOF/LDV in patients failing prior DCV/ASV. Lead-in IFN-ß injections did not improve the efficacy in patients with HCV carrying unfavorable NS5A-RAS except in those with a favorable IFN-λ3-related gene allele.

Usefulness of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as second-line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: To clarify the efficacy of atezolizumab (ATZ) plus bevacizumab (BEV) as the second-line therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: The subjects were 82 patients with HCC receiving ATZ/BEV, including 33 patients with previous therapies with molecular-targeted agents (MTA). Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated using contrast-enhanced CT according to the mRECIST. RESULTS: The Child-Pugh scores were 5, 6,7 and 8 in 40, 35, 5 and 2 patients, respectively, and the extents of HCC progression were BCLC stage A, B and C in 3, 31 and 48 patients, respectively. Early therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in 67 patients, and percentages of patients achieving CR/PR/SD/PD until 12 weeks were 3.0%/29.9%/49.3%/17.9%, respectively, indicating ORR of 32.8% and DCR of 82.1%, The ORR was higher in MTA-naïve patients (40.5%) than in those after discontinuation of lenvatinib due to PD (7.7%, P = 0.0410), while the DCR was equivalent between both patients (83.3% vs 80.0%, P = 0.1184), and the multivariate analysis revealed previous MTA therapies with lenvatinib alone as a factor to deteriorate the ORR (HR of 4.846 (P = 0.0619)). The OS rates at 24 and 48 weeks were 86% and 72%, respectively, and the rates did not differ between MTA-naïve and MTA-experienced patients. Multivariate analyses revealed that achievement of CR, PR or SD and peripheral neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were associated with a favorable outcome (HR of 0.124, P<0.0001 and 0.351, P = 0.0303). CONCLUSIONS: ATZ/BEV merits consideration even for MTA-experienced patients, since the OS was equivalent to those in MTA-naïve patients despite of an unfavorable early therapeutic efficacy.

Therapeutic efficacy of lenvatinib for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma based on the middle-term outcome.

AIM: This study sought to clarify the usefulness of lenvatinib for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: The subjects were 69 patients with HCC receiving lenvatinib; the median age was 73 years, and 14 and 67 patients had been previously treated with regorafenib and/or sorafenib and therapies without molecular-targeted agents, respectively. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated using contrast-enhanced CT images obtained 4-8 weeks after the start of lenvatinib and the middle-term outcome using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The baseline Child-Pugh scores were 5, 6 and 7 in 31, 32 and 6 patients, respectively, and the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grades were 1, 2a and 2b in 20, 20 and 29 patients, respectively. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages following downsizing after prior treatment were A, B and C in 17, 22 and 30 patients, respectively. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in 54 patients, and the percentages of patients achieving CR, PR, SD and PD were 3.7%, 44.4%, 37.0%, and 14.8%, respectively. The ALBI scores deteriorated significantly between 4 and 12 weeks after the start of therapy, compared with the baseline. The cumulative survival rates at 48 weeks were significantly higher among patients achieving CR/PR (95.5%) than among those showing no response (54.3%). Multivariate analyses revealed that the BCLC stages and the serum AFP levels were significantly associated with therapeutic efficacy, while the mALBI grade was associated with the middle-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: A favorable middle-term outcome was obtained in patients with HCC receiving lenvatinib, especially in those manifesting grades 1/2a mALBI at baseline, despite the deterioration in ALBI scores during treatment.