Cagrilintide is not associated with clinically relevant QTc prolongation: A thorough QT study in healthy participants.

AIMS: The combination of cagrilintide and semaglutide (CagriSema) is being developed for the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes. The objective of this thorough QT study was to confirm that cagrilintide does not result in a clinically relevant prolongation in cardiac repolarization compared with placebo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a double-blind study (NCT05804162) in which healthy participants were randomized to cagrilintide, administered as a once-weekly subcutaneous injection dose escalated to 4.5 mg, or a placebo. The primary end point was the time-matched change from baseline in Fridericia heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTcF) at 12-, 24-, 48- and 72 h after the last cagrilintide 4.5-mg dose. To conclude that cagrilintide does not induce a clinically relevant prolongation, the upper limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the treatment difference at each of the four time points must fall below 10 ms. To establish QT assay sensitivity, participants in the placebo arms received a single 400-mg oral moxifloxacin dose as a positive control and moxifloxacin placebo in a nested cross-over fashion. RESULTS: A total of 105 participants received cagrilintide (n = 53) or placebo (n = 52). No clinically relevant QTcF prolongation occurred after the last cagrilintide 4.5-mg dose; the upper limits of the two-sided 90% CIs of the placebo-adjusted QTcF changes from baseline were below 10 ms at all time points. QT assay sensitivity was demonstrated with moxifloxacin as a positive control. CONCLUSIONS: Cagrilintide did not result in clinically relevant QTcF prolongation, indicating no increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

A Phase 1 study of the long-acting anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody GSK3511294 in patients with asthma.

AIMS: GSK3511294 is a humanized anti-interleukin (IL)-5 monoclonal antibody (mAb) engineered for extended half-life and improved IL-5 affinity versus other anti-IL-5 mAbs. This study examined its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and effect on blood eosinophil counts. METHODS: This was a double-blind, parallel-group, single-ascending-dose, multicenter, Phase 1 study (205 722;NCT03287310) in patients with asthma and a blood eosinophil count ≥200 cells µL-1 . Patients were randomized 3:1 within dose cohorts to receive a single subcutaneous dose of GSK3511294 (2, 10, 30, 100 or 300 mg) or placebo and followed for up to 40 weeks to assess safety (primary endpoint), ratio to baseline in blood eosinophil count, plasma PK parameters and frequency/titers of binding antidrug antibodies (all secondary). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients received the study drug and completed the study. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 92% of placebo-treated and 81% of GSK3511294-treated patients. There were no AEs leading to study withdrawal or serious AEs; hypersensitivity (one event in one patient) and injection-site reaction (three events in two patients) occurred infrequently. Marked reductions (>48%) in blood eosinophil count were seen from 24 hours post-dose with all GSK3511294 doses but not placebo; suppression was maintained for longer with increasing dose (82% and 83% adjusted reductions vs placebo with 100 and 300 mg, respectively, at week 26). PK were linear and dose proportional over the dose range; terminal half-life was 38-53 days. CONCLUSIONS: GSK3511294 was well tolerated, with linear and dose proportional PK, extended half-life and blood eosinophil count reduction, supporting less frequent dosing versus other anti-IL-5 mAbs.

Characterisation of pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability in a first-in-human study for AZD8154, a novel inhaled selective PI3Kγδ dual inhibitor targeting airway inflammatory disease.

AIMS: This 3-part, randomised, phase 1 first-in-human study (NCT03436316) investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AZD8154, a dual phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) γδ inhibitor developed as a novel inhaled anti-inflammatory treatment for respiratory disease. METHODS: Healthy men, and women of nonchildbearing potential, were enrolled to receive single and multiple ascending inhaled doses of AZD8154 in parts 1 and 3 of the study, respectively, while part 2 characterised the systemic PK after a single intravenous (IV) dose. In part 1, participants received 0.1-7.7 mg AZD8154 in 6 cohorts. In part 2, participants were given 0.15 mg AZD8154 as an IV infusion. In part 3, AZD8154 was given in 3 cohorts of 0.6, 1.8 and 3.1 mg, with a single dose on Day 1 followed by repeated once-daily doses on Days 4-12. RESULTS: In total, 78 volunteers were randomised. All single inhaled, single IV and multiple inhaled doses were shown to be well tolerated without any safety concerns. A population PK model, using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling, was developed to describe the PK of AZD8154. The terminal mean half-life of AZD8154 was 18.0-32.0 hours. The geometric mean of the absolute pulmonary bioavailability of AZD8154 via the inhaled route was 94.1%. CONCLUSION: AZD8154 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, with no reports of serious adverse events and no clinically significant drug-associated safety concerns reported in healthy volunteers. AZD8154 demonstrated prolonged lung retention and a half-life supporting once-daily dosing.

A randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel group, single-dose phase I study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic similarity between SB12 (a proposed eculizumab biosimilar) and eculizumab (Soliris) in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and immunogenicity between SB12 (a proposed eculizumab biosimilar) and the reference product (RP) eculizumab (i.e., European Union (EU)-sourced Soliris and United States (US)-sourced Soliris). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this phase I study, healthy adult subjects were randomized to receive a 300-mg dose of SB12 or RP eculizumab via intravenous infusion. The PK endpoints were area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity and to the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum serum concentration. Bioequivalence for the PK endpoints was determined if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of geometric least squared means (Lsmeans) were within the pre-defined bioequivalence margins of 80.00 - 125.00%. PD, safety, and immunogenicity were also investigated. RESULTS: The 90% CIs of the geometric Lsmeans ratios of the PK endpoints were fully contained within the pre-defined bioequivalence margin. PD profiles and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events across treatment groups were comparable. Incidence of anti-drug antibodies was also comparable between all groups, and a positive result for neutralizing antibodies was not detected. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated PK bioequivalence and similar PD, safety, and immunogenicity profiles of SB12 to both reference eculizumab products.

Results from a Phase 1/2 trial of BB2603, a terbinafine-based topical nano-formulation, in onychomycosis and tinea pedis.

BB2603 is a nano-formulation of the antifungal drug terbinafine with the polymer polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) as an excipient to enhance solubility and drug delivery to skin and nails. BB2603 is delivered topically using a low-velocity spray. It is being developed in different strength formulations for the treatment of fungal infections of the nail and skin, including onychomycosis and tinea pedis, with BB2603-1 (0.01% terbinafine) tested in the present trial. The aim of this study was to assess systemic exposure, safety and tolerability of BB2603-1 compared with Lamisil® AT 1% spray and BB2603-1 vehicle control in onychomycosis and tinea pedis. Preliminary mycological and clinical activity were also investigated. This was a single-centre Phase 1/2, randomised, partially blinded, active- and vehicle-controlled, parallel-group trial in 46 subjects with onychomycosis associated with tinea pedis. Part 1 investigated BB2603-1 versus Lamisil AT 1% spray and BB2603-1 vehicle (4 weeks treatment). Part 2 investigated BB2603-1 versus BB2603-1 vehicle (additional 48 weeks treatment). No measurable systemic exposure of terbinafine was shown over 52 weeks of treatment with BB2603-1. BB2603-1 had an excellent safety and tolerability profile with no drug-related safety findings and no evidence of skin sensitisation. BB2603-1 showed preliminary evidence of anti-dermatophyte activity, demonstrated by a reduction in dermatophyte positive cultures and a reduction in microscopic evidence of dermatophytes. The pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy data from this trial support further development of the topical terbinafine-based nano-formulation BB2603 in fungal infections of the skin and nail, including onychomycosis and tinea pedis.

Comparison of autoinjector with accessorized prefilled syringe for benralizumab pharmacokinetic exposure: AMES trial results.

OBJECTIVE: We compared the pharmacokinetic exposure following a single subcutaneous dose of benralizumab 30 mg using either autoinjectors (AI) or accessorized prefilled syringes (APFS). APFS and AI functionality and reliability for at-home benralizumab delivery have been demonstrated in the GREGALE and GRECO studies, respectively. METHODS: In the open-label AMES study (NCT02968914), 180 healthy adult men and women were randomized to one of two device (AI or APFS) and three injection site (upper arm, abdomen, or thigh) combinations. Randomization was stratified by weight (<70 kg, 70-84.9 kg, and ≥85 kg). Blood eosinophil counts were measured on Days 1, 8, 29, and 57. RESULTS: Benralizumab pharmacokinetic exposure was similar between AI and APFS. Geometric mean ratios (AI/APFS) (90% CI) were 92.8% (87.4-98.6) and 94.5% (88.2-101.2) for two area under the concentration‒time curve measurements (AUClast and AUCinf). Benralizumab exposure was approximately 15-30% greater for thigh vs. abdomen or upper arm administration. Exposure was slightly greater for APFS vs. AI regardless of injection site or weight class. These differences were unlikely to be clinically relevant, as eosinophil depletion was achieved consistently with both devices at all injection sites. No device malfunctions were reported. No new or unexpected safety findings were observed. CONCLUSION: Benralizumab pharmacokinetic exposure was similar between AI and APFS, with consistent blood eosinophil count depletion observed with both devices. These results support benralizumab administration with either AI or APFS, providing patients and physicians increased choice, flexibility, and convenience for potential at-home delivery.

Efficacy and safety of AZD7594, an inhaled non-steroidal selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator, in patients with asthma: a phase 2a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids reduce inflammation in asthma but chronic use may cause adverse effects. AZD7594, an inhaled non-steroidal selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator, has the potential of an improved risk-benefit profile. We investigated the safety and efficacy of AZD7594 in asthma. METHODS: This phase 2a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study enrolled adults with asthma aged 18 to 75 years. Patients were treated with budesonide 200 µg twice daily for 2-3 3 weeks (run in part one). If controlled, as demonstrated by an asthma control questionnaire-5 score of < 1.5, patients entered a three-week run-in (part two) where they received a short acting bronchodilator alone. Thereafter, patients with a fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) ≥25 ppb and pre-dose FEV1 40 to 90% predicted were randomized to one of nine treatment sequences. Each patient received placebo and two of three dose levels of AZD7594 (58, 250, 800 µg) once daily via inhalation, in 14-day treatment periods, separated by three-week washout periods. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in morning trough FEV1 versus placebo on day 15. Secondary endpoints included measures of airway inflammation and asthma control. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were randomized and received at least 1 dose of treatment, 48 patients completed the study. Overall 52 patients received placebo, 34 received AZD7594 58 µg, 34 received AZD7594 250 µg, and 34 received AZD7594 800 µg. AZD7594 800 µg demonstrated a significant improvement in Day 15 morning trough FEV1versus placebo (LS means difference 0.148 L 95% CI 0.035-0.261, p = 0.011), with a dose-dependent response seen in the 250 µg (0.076 L -0·036-0·188, p = 0.183) and 58 µg (0·027 L -0·086-0·140, p = 0.683). All secondary endpoints showed statistically significant improvement at the 800 µg dose. All doses demonstrated a significant reduction in FENO at day 15 p < 0.01. No statistically significant difference in plasma cortisol level was observed between AZD7594 and placebo at any dose. AZD7594 was considered safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Two-week treatment with AZD7594 demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit profile in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Further clinical studies are needed to fully characterize AZD7594. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02479412 .

Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and effect on serum uric acid of the myeloperoxidase inhibitor AZD4831 in a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase I study in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: Myeloperoxidase activity can contribute to impaired vascular endothelial function and fibrosis in chronic inflammation-related cardiovascular disease. Here, we investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the myeloperoxidase inhibitor, AZD4831. METHODS: In this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I, first-in-human study, healthy men in five sequential cohorts were randomized 3:1 to receive a single oral dose of AZD4831 (5, 15, 45, 135 or 405 mg) or placebo, after overnight fasting. After at least 7 days' washout, one cohort additionally received AZD4831 45 mg after a high-calorie meal. RESULTS: Forty men participated in the study (eight per cohort: AZD4831, n = 6; placebo, n = 2). AZD4831 distributed rapidly into plasma, with a half-life of 38.2-50.0 hours. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased proportionally with dose (AUC0-∝ slope estimate 1.060; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9943, 1.127). Increases in maximum plasma concentration were slightly more than dose proportional (slope estimate 1.201; 95% CI 1.071, 1.332). Food intake reduced AZD4831 absorption rate but did not substantially affect overall exposure or plasma half-life (n = 4). Serum uric acid concentrations decreased by 71.77 (95% CI 29.15, 114.39) and 84.42 (58.90, 109.94) µmol L-1 with AZD4831 135 mg and 405 mg, respectively. Maculopapular rash (moderate intensity) occurred in 4/30 participants receiving AZD4831 (13.3%). No other safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: AZD4831 was generally well tolerated, rapidly absorbed, had a long plasma half-life and lowered uric acid concentrations after single oral doses in healthy men. These findings support the further clinical development of AZD4831.

Pharmacokinetics of indacaterol and mometasone furoate delivered alone or in a free or fixed dose combination in healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: QMF149 is a fixed-dose combination of the long-acting ß2 agonist, indacaterol and the corticosteroid, mometasone furoate that is currently under development for treatment of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We describe here a study designed to assess any pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or biopharmaceutical interaction between indacaterol and mometasone furoate when administered via the Breezhaler(®) device, either alone or in a free or fixed combination (QMF149) in healthy adult subjects. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, four-way crossover study, subjects were randomized to receive indacaterol acetate 150 µg, mometasone furoate 320 µg, alone and as free combination of the individual components, or QMF149 (indacaterol acetate 150 µg/mometasone furoate 320 µg) once daily for 14 days in each period, followed by a 7-day washout between periods. PK profiles were characterized on Day 14 up to 168 h post-dose. RESULTS: Indacaterol AUC0-24h,ss and Cmax,ss after administration of QMF149 were 13% [ratio: 1.13; 90%CI: 1.09, 1.17] and 18% [ratio: 1.18; 90%CI: 1.12, 1.25] higher, respectively, than indacaterol monotherapy. Mometasone furoate AUC0-24h,ss and Cmax,ss after administration of QMF149 were 14% [ratio: 1.14; 90%CI: 1.09, 1.20] and 19% [ratio: 1.19; 90%CI: 1.13, 1.26], higher, respectively than mometasone furoate monotherapy. The majority (three of four comparisons between QMF149 and monotherapy) of the 90% confidence intervals of the between-treatment ratios for AUC0-24h,ss and Cmax,ss were within the 0.80 to 1.25 interval and therefore fulfilled bioequivalence criteria. The 90% confidence interval for Cmax,ss for MF for the QMF149 vs. monotherapy comparison was [1.13, 1.26]. Although no definitive data can be provided on the basis of the present study results, it is unlikely that the small observed differences in expsoure are clinically meaningful. Multiple inhaled doses of indacaterol and mometasone furoate, when administered alone, in free combination or as QMF149 were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The QMF149 fixed dose combination treatment showed comparable systemic exposure to the free combination and monotherapy treatments in terms of AUC0-24h,ss and Cmax,ss for both indacaterol and mometasone furoate, indicating an absence of clinically relevant PK or biopharmaceutical interactions. These data support further development of QMF149 without dose adjustment.

A randomized phase l pharmacokinetic study comparing SB4 and etanercept reference product (Enbrel®) in healthy subjects.

AIMS: SB4 has been developed as a biosimilar of etanercept. The primary objective of the present study was to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence between SB4 and European Union -sourced etanercept (EU-ETN), SB4 and United States-sourced etanercept (US-ETN), and EU-ETN and US-ETN. The safety and immunogenicity were also compared between the treatments. METHODS: This was a single-blind, three-part, crossover study in 138 healthy male subjects. In each part, 46 subjects were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive a single 50 mg subcutaneous dose of the treatments (part A: SB4 or EU-ETN; part B: SB4 or US-ETN; and part C: EU-ETN or US-ETN) in period 1, followed by the crossover treatment in period 2 according to their assigned sequences. PK equivalence between the treatments was determined using the standard equivalence margin of 80-125%. RESULTS: The geometric least squares means ratios of AUCinf , AUClast and Cmax were 99.04%, 98.62% and 103.71% (part A: SB4 vs. EU-ETN); 101.09%, 100.96% and 104.36% (part B: SB4 vs. US-ETN); and 100.51%, 101.27% and 103.29% (part C: EU-ETN vs. US-ETN), respectively, and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals were completely contained within the limits of 80-125 %. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable, and the incidence of the antidrug antibodies was lower in SB4 compared with the reference products. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated PK equivalence between SB4 and EU-ETN, SB4 and US-ETN, and EU-ETN and US-ETN in healthy male subjects. SB4 was well tolerated, with a lower immunogenicity profile and similar safety profile compared with those of the reference products.

Clinical assessment of potential drug interactions of faldaprevir, a hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor, with darunavir/ritonavir, efavirenz, and tenofovir.

BACKGROUND: Faldaprevir is a potent, once-daily hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor. Studies were performed to investigate potential drug interactions between faldaprevir and the commonly used antiretrovirals darunavir/ritonavir, efavirenz, and tenofovir to guide the coadministration of faldaprevir with these agents in human immunodeficiency virus/HCV-coinfected patients. METHODS: In 3 open-label, phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, healthy adult volunteers received (1) darunavir/ritonavir (800 mg/100 mg once daily) with and without faldaprevir (240 mg once daily); (2) faldaprevir (240 mg twice daily) with and without efavirenz (600 mg once daily); or (3) faldaprevir (240 mg twice daily) or tenofovir (300 mg once daily) alone and in combination. To assess potential drug interactions, geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for PK parameters were calculated. Safety was evaluated. RESULTS: Efavirenz decreased faldaprevir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by 35%, Cmax by 28%, and Cmin by 46%, consistent with induction of CYP3A by efavirenz. Tenofovir decreased faldaprevir AUC by 22%, which was not considered to be clinically relevant. Faldaprevir had no clinically relevant effects on darunavir or tenofovir PK (15% and 22% AUC increase, respectively). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profiles of faldaprevir and the antiretrovirals being examined. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically significant interactions were observed between faldaprevir and darunavir/ritonavir or tenofovir. A potentially clinically relevant decrease in faldaprevir exposure was observed when coadministered with efavirenz; this decrease can be managed using the higher of the 2 faldaprevir doses tested in phase 3 trials (240 mg once daily as opposed to 120 mg once daily).

Omalizumab in patients with allergic (IgE-mediated) asthma and IgE/bodyweight combinations above those in the initially approved dosing table.

BACKGROUND: When first approved in the European Union (EU), the omalizumab dosing table had upper bodyweight and IgE limits of 150 kg and 700 IU/mL, respectively. In this study, we assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of omalizumab in patients with IgE/bodyweight combinations above those in the original dosing table. METHODS: A multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study assessed the safety, PK and PD of omalizumab in 32 patients with mild-to-moderate allergic (IgE-mediated) asthma. Patients received two subcutaneous injections of omalizumab at one of three dosage levels (450, 525, or 600 mg), chosen according to baseline IgE (300-2000 IU/mL) and bodyweight (40-150 kg), with a 14-day interval between injections. RESULTS: Overall, 69 adverse events (AEs), none of them serious, were reported by 26 (81.3%) patients. Analysis of laboratory measurements, vital signs and ECG data revealed no adverse findings of clinical relevance. The PK profile was consistent with previous data for lower doses. Mean maximum decrease of free IgE from screening was ≥99% for all three doses, and mean free IgE concentrations remained <25 ng/mL for at least 2 weeks after the second dose. The reductions in free IgE were consistent with levels previously associated with clinical improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and PK/PD findings from this study are consistent with previous data, and supported the extension of the omalizumab dosing table to include those patients with higher IgE/bodyweight combinations. Clinical trial registry and registration number: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00546143).

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 and reference denosumab in healthy males.

BACKGROUND: This Phase I study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity of GP2411 proposed denosumab biosimilar to reference denosumab (a monoclonal antibody for specific pro-resorptive conditions). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthy males (28-65 years, 50-90 kg) were randomized to a single sub-therapeutic subcutaneous injection of 35 mg GP2411, EU-Xgeva® or US-Xgeva®, and followed for 39 weeks. The primary endpoints were AUCinf, AUClast, and Cmax. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-two participants completed treatment. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) (AUCinf, AUClast, and Cmax) and 95% CI of the geometric mean ratios of AUEC of % change from baseline in serum CTX were fully contained within the prespecified equivalence margins (0.80, 1.25), demonstrating similarity. The occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with GP2411, EU-Xgeva® and US-Xgeva® was similar (72.9%, 76.0%, and 71.0% of participants, respectively). Most were Grade 1 or 2, <30% were treatment-related, and there was only one TEAE-related study discontinuation. Rates of positive anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were similar (57.8%, 64.9%, and 69.1% of participants respectively), but immunogenicity was only borderline detectable and of very low magnitude. Ninety-nine percent of positive ADAs were transient. CONCLUSION: GP2411 demonstrated similarity with EU-Xgeva® and US-Xgeva® in PK, PD, safety, and immunogenicity in this population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2019-001651-39.

Denosumab is a biological treatment that inhibits bone degradation. It is very effective in conditions characterized by elevated bone degradation, such as osteoporosis in women who have gone through the menopause, and in the treatment of specific bone cancers. However, the cost of the original patented denosumab ('reference denosumab') treatment may result in fewer eligible patients receiving denosumab treatment. A biosimilar is highly similar to the original treatment but at a lower price, enabling more patients to benefit.GP2411 is being developed as a proposed biosimilar to denosumab. This Phase I clinical trial was the first clinical trial to compare GP2411 to the EU and US versions of the reference denosumab (EU-Xgeva® and US-Xgeva®). All three products were given at a dose of 35 mg to 502 healthy males. The dose was lower than the dose that would be used in clinical practice to provide a more sensitive evaluation of similarity. Healthy males were chosen because they have fewer hormonal fluctuations than females, and are considered the most appropriate population for detecting differences in pharmacological effects of denosumab.The results demonstrate that GP2411 proposed denosumab biosimilar is highly similar to the reference products in absorption, distribution, and elimination, and other outcomes, including bone turnover. The incidence of adverse events was also comparable, most adverse events were very mild, and GP2411 was not associated with a higher rate of immune reactions.These results support its continued development and GP2411 may, in future, enable more patients to benefit from denosumab treatment.

Omalizumab protects against allergen- induced bronchoconstriction in allergic (immunoglobulin E-mediated) asthma.

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab has been shown to suppress responses to inhaled allergens in allergic asthma patients with pretreatment immunoglobulin E (IgE) ≤700 IU/ml. To extend current dosing tables, we evaluated the potential of high omalizumab doses to block allergen-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with higher IgE levels. METHODS: Asthmatic adults (18-65 years; body weight 40-150 kg) were divided into groups according to screening IgE (group 1: 30-300 IU/ml; group 2: 700-2,000 IU/ml) and randomized 2:1 to omalizumab/placebo every 2 or 4 weeks for 12-14 weeks. Allergen bronchoprovocation (ABP) testing was performed before treatment and at weeks 8 and 16. The primary efficacy endpoint, the early-phase allergic response (EAR), was defined as the maximum percentage drop in forced expiratory volume in 1 s during the first 30 min after ABP. Serum free IgE was determined as a pharmacodynamic endpoint, and the exhaled fractional concentration of nitric oxide (FE(NO)) was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included in the study. Omalizumab improved EAR; at week 8, EAR was 23.1% for placebo, 9.3% in group 1 (p = 0.018 versus placebo) and 5.6% in group 2 (p < 0.001). At week 16, EAR was 20%, 11.8% (p = 0.087) and 5.1% (p < 0.001), respectively. Free IgE decreased in groups 1 and 2 and remained <50 ng/ml in all patients during weeks 6-16. Omalizumab completely suppressed FE(NO) increases after ABP in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab blocked early asthmatic responses over a broad range of IgE/body weight combinations. Extending the dosing tables enables omalizumab to benefit a wider range of patients.

Vericiguat: A Randomized, Phase Ib, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, QTc Interval Study in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Vericiguat is indicated for the treatment of symptomatic chronic heart failure in adult patients with reduced ejection fraction who are stabilized after a recent decompensation event. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of vericiguat on QT interval in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). METHODS: This was a randomized, phase Ib, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study. Vericiguat once daily was up-titrated from 2.5 mg to 5 mg and then to 10 mg (treatments A, B, and C) at 14-day intervals. Positive control was moxifloxacin 400 mg (single dose on day 8 or day 50; placebo on other days [treatment D]). We evaluated the placebo-adjusted change from baseline of the Frederica-corrected QTc interval (QTcF), pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of vericiguat. RESULTS: In total, 74 patients with CCS, with mean (standard deviation) age 63.4 (8.0) years, were included and 72 patients completed the study. At each timepoint up to 7 h after administration, mean placebo-corrected change in QTcF from baseline was < 6 ms and the upper limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval of the mean was below the 10-ms threshold for clinical relevance. Moxifloxacin confirmed the assay sensitivity. Median time of maximum concentration of vericiguat was 4.5 h post-dose. The adverse event profile of vericiguat was consistent with its mechanism of action, and the findings did not indicate any safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS: As part of an integrative risk assessment, this study demonstrated no clinically relevant corrected QT prolongation with vericiguat 10 mg once daily at steady state. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03504982.

Vericiguat is approved for treating worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. As part of the safety evaluation of vericiguat, this study assessed its effect on the QT interval of the electrocardiogram. An electrocardiogram measures electrical activity of the heart. The QT interval is the time from the start of the Q wave to the end of the T wave. A longer than normal QT interval indicates an increased chance for abnormal heart rhythms. Usually, a QT study is conducted at high doses in healthy volunteers. Previous studies indicated that high doses of vericiguat may cause increased changes in blood pressure in healthy volunteers. Therefore, this study was performed in patients at a normal therapeutic dose. Patients with chronic coronary syndromes were enrolled rather than patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, because they have fewer electrocardiogram abnormalities. The starting dose of vericiguat was 2.5 mg once daily, and the dose was increased to 5 mg and then to 10 mg at 14-day intervals. Placebo was tested for comparison and moxifloxacin (400 mg), a drug known to increase the QT interval, was tested to confirm that the study could detect a change in the QT interval. An increase in the QT interval of more than 10 ms was considered clinically relevant. Of 74 patients included, 72 completed the study. At each timepoint (up to 7 h after dosing), the difference between the QT change for vericiguat and placebo was less than 10 ms; therefore, vericiguat does not prolong the QT interval to a clinically relevant extent.

Efficacy of apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibition in subjects with mild-to-moderate hyperlipidaemia.

AIMS: Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein (apo) B synthesis inhibitor, has been shown to produce potent reductions in apoB and LDL-cholesterol levels in animal models as well as healthy human volunteers. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mipomersen monotherapy with or without dose loading in subjects with mild-to-moderate hyperlipidaemia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty subjects with LDL-cholesterol levels between 119 and 266 mg/dL were enrolled into five cohorts at a 4:1 randomization ratio of active to placebo. Two 13-week dose regimens were evaluated at doses ranging from 50 to 400 mg/week. Mipomersen produced dose-dependent reductions in all apoB containing lipoproteins. In the 200 and 300 mg/week dose cohorts, mean reductions from baseline in LDL cholesterol were -45 ± 10% (P= 0.000) and -61 ± 8% (P= 0.000), corresponding to a -46 ± 11% (P= 0.000) and -61 ± 7% (P= 0.000) decrease in apoB levels. Triglyceride levels were also lowered with median reductions up to 53% (P= 0.021). The most common adverse events were injection site reactions. Seven of 40 subjects (18%) showed consecutive transaminase elevations >3× upper limit of normal. Five of these subjects received 400 mg/week, four of whom had apoB levels below the limit of detection. As a consequence, the 400 mg/week cohort was discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: Mipomersen administered as monotherapy in subjects with mild-to-moderate hyperlipidaemia produced potent reductions in all apoB-containing lipoproteins. Higher doses were associated with hepatic transaminase increases.

Nanoparticle-based oral formulation can surprise you with inferior in vivo absorption in humans.

Particle size reduction leads to an increase in the drug dissolution rate, which in turn can lead to a substantial increase in the bioavailability of a poorly soluble compound. To improve bioavailability, a practically insoluble investigational drug, ODM-106, was nanomilled and capsule formulations with three different drug amounts were prepared for the first-in-man study. Fast in vitro dissolution was achieved from all the capsules containing different amounts of drug nanoparticles but in the clinical study, surprisingly, low bioavailability was observed from the highest capsule strength (100 mg) in comparison to a lower strength (10 mg). In order to study further the discrepant in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC), a discriminative dissolution method was developed. It was noticed that the degree of supersaturation increased significantly as the stabilizers' concentration within the dried nanoformulations was increased. Hypromellose provided a physical barrier between nanoparticles to prevent aggregation during drying. SLS on the other hand improved wettability and provided supersaturation. The drug load, nanoparticle/polymer/surfactant/filler ratios and selected drying step were discovered to be critical to the nanoformulations' performance. Aggregation of nanoparticles, in the absence of optimal stabilizer concentration, compromised dissolution due to decreased surface area. In conclusion, the early development of a discriminative dissolution method and cautious selection of the nanoparticle/polymer ratio before manufacturing clinical batches is recommended.

Diurnal variation in DLCO and non-standardized study procedures may cause a false positive safety signal in clinical trials.

Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was measured in a phase I single ascending dose study after inhalation of AZD8154 or placebo in healthy participants at baseline (DLCOBaseline) and follow-up (DLCOFollow-up) 6 days after dosing. Initially, DLCOFollow-up timepoint was 2 h earlier than the DLCOBaseline timepoint and clinically significant decreases in DLCOFollow-up (absolute change up to 19% from baseline and DLCO%predicted values less than 70) were observed then. The observed reduction in DLCOFollow-up was confirmed as a false positive finding after alignment of DLCO timings. As a consequence, when DLCO is used in clinical studies, measurements should be strictly standardized in relation to time of the day.

Tezepelumab Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability After Administration via Vial-and-syringe, Accessorized Prefilled Syringe, or Autoinjector: A Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers.

PURPOSE: Tezepelumab is an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin monoclonal antibody therapeutic in development for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. In ongoing Phase III studies, tezepelumab is administered via subcutaneous (SC) injections using a vial-and-syringe (V-S). This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, safety, and tolerability of tezepelumab administered subcutaneously via V-S versus via an accessorized prefilled syringe (APFS) or autoinjector (AI). METHODS: This single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study was conducted in healthy volunteers aged 18-65 years. Participants, stratified according to weight (50 to <70 kg, 70 to <80 kg, or 80-90 kg), were randomized evenly to 9 groups representing injections to the abdomen, thigh, or upper arm via V-S, APFS, or AI. Tezepelumab PK parameters over 113 days were evaluated after a single 210-mg SC dose. The primary end points were comparison of Cmax and AUC0-∞ between device groups. Further PK parameters, immunogenicity, safety (including injection site reactions [ISRs] and injection site pain [visual analog scale]) were also assessed. FINDINGS: A total of 315 adults were randomized to treatment. Geometric mean ratios for comparisons between device groups of Cmax, AUC0-∞, and AUC0-last were close to 1, with 90% CIs all within the range of 0.8-1.25, meeting bioequivalence criteria. PK variables were also similar between devices across injection sites and weight categories. Across devices, thigh injection resulted in slightly higher exposure than upper arm injection, and abdomen injection resulted in exposure similar to or slightly lower than thigh injection; however, these differences were not clinically meaningful. Treatment-emergent anti-tezepelumab antibodies were present in 3 (2.9%), 1 (1.0%), and 0 participants in the V-S, APFS, and AI groups, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 15.0% of participants overall (V-S, 10.7%; APFS, 18.1%; AI, 16.0%), including ISRs in 1 (1.0%), 3 (2.9%), and 3 (2.8%) participants in the V-S, APFS, and AI groups. Median visual analog scale pain score (0-100 mm scale) was 2 mm immediately after injection and was 0 mm at 30 min for all groups. IMPLICATIONS: Tezepelumab PK parameters after a single 210-mg SC dose were comparable when administered via V-S, APFS, or AI. In all groups, immunogenicity rate and injection site pain were low, and ISRs were uncommon. These findings support administration of tezepelumab via APFS or AI, in addition to V-S, providing patients and physicians with greater choice and the potential convenience of at-home use. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03989544.