RESUMEN
Cancer cachexia is associated with poor immunotherapeutic outcomes. This prospective observational study longitudinally evaluated the role of cachexia-related circulating cytokines in predicting the risk and benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in advanced lung cancer. Forty-one circulating cytokines at baseline and after one cycle of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade treatment were measured in patients with advanced lung cancer between 2019 and 2020. The cachexia-related cytokines were identified by comparing the levels of circulating cytokines between cachectic and non-cachectic patients. Among 55 patients, 49.1% were diagnosed with cachexia at the beginning of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy. Baseline levels of the circulating cytokines IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, and IP-10 were significantly higher in cachectic patients. In contrast, the level of eotaxin-1 was lower in cachectic patients than in those without cachexia. Higher IL-6 at baseline and during treatment was associated with a greater risk of immune-related adverse events, while higher IL-10 at baseline was linked to worse overall survival. More importantly, increased eotaxin-1 after one cycle of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade treatment was associated with higher objective response and better overall survival. A blood-based, cachexia-related cytokine assay may yield potential biomarkers for the early prediction of clinical response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and provide clues for improving the outcomes of cachectic patients.
RESUMEN
The anti-programmed cell death-1 protein monoclonal antibody, pembrolizumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor. While it improves the prognoses of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, it has been reported to induce various kinds of immune-related adverse events, including hepatotoxicity. Despite the frequency of hepatotoxicity, there is only limited information available regarding the pathophysiology and treatment. We herein report a 48-year-old man with lung adenocarcinoma who was treated with pembrolizumab and developed cholestatic liver injury. In this case, the importance of evaluating the histology of hepatotoxicity and the effectiveness of ursodeoxycholic acid for cholestatic liver injury is indicated.