Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Apixaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor administered in fixed doses, may simplify the treatment of venous thromboembolism. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, we compared apixaban (at a dose of 10 mg twice daily for 7 days, followed by 5 mg twice daily for 6 months) with conventional therapy (subcutaneous enoxaparin, followed by warfarin) in 5395 patients with acute venous thromboembolism. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent symptomatic venous thromboembolism or death related to venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcomes were major bleeding alone and major bleeding plus clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 59 of 2609 patients (2.3%) in the apixaban group, as compared with 71 of 2635 (2.7%) in the conventional-therapy group (relative risk, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 1.18; difference in risk [apixaban minus conventional therapy], -0.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.3 to 0.4). Apixaban was noninferior to conventional therapy (P<0.001) for predefined upper limits of the 95% confidence intervals for both relative risk (<1.80) and difference in risk (<3.5 percentage points). Major bleeding occurred in 0.6% of patients who received apixaban and in 1.8% of those who received conventional therapy (relative risk, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.55; P<0.001 for superiority). The composite outcome of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 4.3% of the patients in the apixaban group, as compared with 9.7% of those in the conventional-therapy group (relative risk, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.55; P<0.001). Rates of other adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed-dose regimen of apixaban alone was noninferior to conventional therapy for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism and was associated with significantly less bleeding (Funded by Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00643201).

Apixaban for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Apixaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor that can be administered in a simple, fixed-dose regimen, may be an option for the extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, we compared two doses of apixaban (2.5 mg and 5 mg, twice daily) with placebo in patients with venous thromboembolism who had completed 6 to 12 months of anticoagulation therapy and for whom there was clinical equipoise regarding the continuation or cessation of anticoagulation therapy. The study drugs were administered for 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 2486 patients underwent randomization, of whom 2482 were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism or death from venous thromboembolism occurred in 73 of the 829 patients (8.8%) who were receiving placebo, as compared with 14 of the 840 patients (1.7%) who were receiving 2.5 mg of apixaban (a difference of 7.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0 to 9.3) and 14 of the 813 patients (1.7%) who were receiving 5 mg of apixaban (a difference of 7.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 4.9 to 9.1) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rates of major bleeding were 0.5% in the placebo group, 0.2% in the 2.5-mg apixaban group, and 0.1% in the 5-mg apixaban group. The rates of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were 2.3% in the placebo group, 3.0% in the 2.5-mg apixaban group, and 4.2% in the 5-mg apixaban group. The rate of death from any cause was 1.7% in the placebo group, as compared with 0.8% in the 2.5-mg apixaban group and 0.5% in the 5-mg apixaban group. CONCLUSIONS: Extended anticoagulation with apixaban at either a treatment dose (5 mg) or a thromboprophylactic dose (2.5 mg) reduced the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism without increasing the rate of major bleeding. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer; AMPLIFY-EXT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00633893.).

A dose-ranging study evaluating once-daily oral administration of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban in the treatment of patients with acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: the Einstein-DVT Dose-Ranging Study.

We performed a randomized dose-ranging study, double-blind for rivaroxaban doses and open-label for the comparator (low-molecular-weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists) to assess the optimal dose of rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis. A total of 543 patients with acute deep-venous thrombosis received rivaroxaban 20, 30, or 40 mg once daily or comparator. Treatment lasted for 84 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the 3-month incidence of the composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolic complications and asymptomatic deterioration in thrombotic burden as assessed by comparison of ultrasound and perfusion lung scanning at day 84 with baseline. The main safety outcome was the composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. A total of 449 (83%) of the 543 patients could be included in the per-protocol population. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 6.1%, 5.4%, and 6.6% of the rivaroxaban 20-, 30-, and 40-mg treatment groups, respectively, and in 9.9% of those receiving standard therapy. The main safety outcome occurred in 5.9%, 6.0%, and 2.2% of the rivaroxaban 20-, 30-, and 40-mg treatment groups, respectively, and in 8.8% of those receiving standard therapy. These results with simple fixed-dose oral regimens justify phase 3 evaluations (www.ClinicalTrials.gov no.NCT00395772).

The risk of iatrogenic bleeding in acute coronary syndromes and long-term mortality.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review examines the association between bleeding and adverse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome and explores mechanisms behind this association and strategies for reducing bleeding complications in acute coronary syndrome. RECENT FINDINGS: Bleeding is a common complication of antithrombotic treatment in acute coronary syndrome, and major bleeding occurs in around 5% of patients. Important risk factors for major bleeding include increasing age, female sex, renal impairment, and invasive procedures. Recent studies suggest that major bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndrome is independently associated with an increase of early and long-term morbidity and mortality. This may be due to the direct effects of anaemia and hypovolaemia, the treatment modification or withdrawal, or the adverse effects of transfusion. Bleeding complications may be reduced by use of new antithrombotic agents and by improved attention to dosing with current agents. SUMMARY: Future studies should examine the effects on overall morbidity and mortality of strategies designed to reduce bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome. There is a need to apply uniform definitions of bleeding severity. Future trials should report all clinically relevant bleeding outcomes and transfusions. Studies are needed to investigate methods to reduce the risk of bleeding, better understand mechanisms of adverse outcome after bleeding, and establish best practice for the management of bleeding including appropriate use of transfusion in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Clinical presentation and course of bleeding events in patients with venous thromboembolism, treated with apixaban or enoxaparin and warfarin. Results from the AMPLIFY trial.

Apixaban, a direct acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC), was found to be non-inferior to and safer as enoxaparin followed by warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the AMPLIFY trial. Information is needed on how bleeding events with DOACs present and develop. In this post-hoc analysis, the clinical presentation and course of all major and clinically relevant non major (CRNM) bleeding events in the AMPLIFY trial were blindly classified by three investigators, using pre-designed classification schemes containing four categories. Odds ratios (OR) for classifying as category three or four (representing a more severe clinical presentation and course) were calculated between apixaban and enoxaparin/warfarin. In total, 63 major and 311 CRNM bleeding events were classified. Of the major bleeds, a more severe clinical presentation occurred in 28.5 % of apixaban versus 44.9 % of enoxaparin/warfarin related recipients (OR 0.49, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.14-1.78). A severe clinical course was observed in 14.3 % and in 12.2 %, respectively (OR 1.19, 95 %CI 0.21-6.69). Of the CRNM bleeding events, a more severe clinical presentation and extent of clinical care was found in 25 % of apixaban recipients compared to 22.7 % in the enoxaparin/warfarin group (OR 1.13, 95 %CI 0.65-1.97). The clinical presentation and course of major and CRNM bleeds were similar in apixaban and enoxaparin/warfarin treated patients. This finding should reassure physicians and patients that even in the absence of a specific reversal agent, apixaban is a convenient and safe choice for VTE.

Warfarin and acetaminophen interaction.

A 74-year-old man who was receiving warfarin for atrial fibrillation experienced an abrupt increase in his international normalized ratio (INR) after taking acetaminophen. To investigate this effect, the patient's anticoagulation therapy was stabilized, and he was given acetaminophen 1 g 4 times/day for 3 days. His INR rose from 2.3 before receiving acetaminophen to 6.4 on the day after acetaminophen was discontinued. Warfarin was stopped for 2 days, and the patient's INR returned to 2.0. Warfarin was restarted at the same dosage, and his INR remained within 2.0-3.0 for 6 months. Factor VII activity decreased from 29.4% before acetaminophen therapy to 15.5% when his INR was 6.4, and factor X activity fell from 27.0% to 20.2%. His warfarin plasma concentration was 1.54 microg/ml before acetaminophen compared with 1.34 microg/ml when his INR was 6.4. No significant changes in drug intake, clinical status, diet, or lifestyle were noted. Changes in INR of this magnitude with the addition of another drug during stable anticoagulation therapy suggest a drug interaction. The lack of an increase in warfarin plasma concentration associated with the increased INR suggests a possible pharmacodynamic mechanism for this interaction. Acetaminophen or a metabolite may enhance the effect of oral coumarin anticoagulants by augmenting vitamin K antagonism. Thus, the anticoagulant effect of warfarin may be significantly elevated after only a few days of acetaminophen therapy. Patients receiving warfarin should be counseled to have their INR monitored more frequently when starting acetaminophen at dosages exceeding 2 g/day.

Darexaban (YM150) versus enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty: a randomised phase IIb dose confirmation study (ONYX-3).

This double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, phase IIb study (NCT00902928) evaluated different dosing regimens of darexaban compared with enoxaparin (randomised 1:1:1:1:1 to 15 mg twice daily [bid], 30 mg once daily [qd], 30 mg bid or 60 mg qd or enoxaparin 40 mg qd) in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Patients, investigators, pharmacists and sponsor were all blinded to treatment allocation. Darexaban administration started 6-10 hours (h) post-surgery. Enoxaparin 40 mg qd administration started 12 ± 2 h before surgery. Treatment continued for 35 days. Bilateral venography was performed on Day 10 ± 2. The primary efficacy outcome was total VTEs (composite of proximal/distal deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) or death, at Day 12. Total VTE rates were similar across all groups. There was no apparent difference in efficacy between once- and twice-daily darexaban (odds ratio [OR] 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.42; p=0.988), or total daily dose (30 mg/day vs 60 mg/day; OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.57-1.15; p=0.244). There was no significant difference in major and/or clinically relevant non-major bleeding between darexaban qd or bid, or between total daily doses of 30 mg or 60 mg, and also for any dosing regimen of darexaban vs enoxaparin. Darexaban was well tolerated, without signs of liver toxicity. In conclusion, darexaban, administered qd or bid, and at total daily doses of 30 mg or 60 mg, appears to be effective for VTE prevention and was well tolerated. Data suggest no significant differences between a once- or twice-daily dosing regimen.

Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this article is to summarize the published literature concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral anticoagulant drugs that are currently available for clinical use and other aspects related to their management. METHODS: We carried out a standard review of published articles focusing on the laboratory and clinical characteristics of the vitamin K antagonists; the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate; and the direct factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban RESULTS: The antithrombotic effect of each oral anticoagulant drug, the interactions, and the monitoring of anticoagulation intensity are described in detail and discussed without providing specific recommendations. Moreover, we describe and discuss the clinical applications and optimal dosages of oral anticoagulant therapies, practical issues related to their initiation and monitoring, adverse events such as bleeding and other potential side effects, and available strategies for reversal. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large amount of evidence on laboratory and clinical characteristics of vitamin K antagonists. A growing body of evidence is becoming available on the first new oral anticoagulant drugs available for clinical use, dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Idraparinux versus standard therapy in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients: a subgroup analysis of the Van Gogh DVT trial.

Standard treatment with heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists is frequently complicated by bleeding and recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients with VTE. To compare the efficacy, safety and overall survival of long-term idraparinux treatment to standard therapy in cancer patients we conducted a post-hoc analysis in the subgroup of non-active and active cancer patients included in the Van Gogh DVT clinical trial. The cancer patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and without pulmonary embolism (PE) were randomised to standard treatment or a once-weekly subcutaneous injection of idraparinux (2.5 mg), a synthetic pentasaccharide. 421 cancer patients were included. A total of 220 patients received idraparinux and 201 were allocated to standard therapy for three months (8%) or six months (92%). A recurrent VTE was observed during the first six months in 2.5% (n=5) of the idraparinux recipients compared to 6.4% (n=12) in the standard therapy group (hazard ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.14-1.11). The rate of bleeding was comparable (odds ratio 0.89, 95% CI; 0.50-1.59). The outcomes were similar at three months after randomisation in all patients. Of the idraparinux recipients, 22.7% (n=50) died during the study period compared to 48 patients (23.9%) in the standard treatment group (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% CI; 0.66-1.48). In conclusion, no significant safety or survival differences were observed between cancer patients with DVT treated with idraparinux for six months compared to standard therapy. Fewer recurrent VTEs were observed in the idraparinux group; however, this was not statistically significant and also because of study limitations this should be interpreted with caution.

Physician compliance with guidelines for deep-vein thrombosis prevention in total hip and knee arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Despite evidence-based guidelines for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention after total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA), many patients may not receive effective prophylaxis. Our objective was to analyze data from the multinational Global Orthopaedic Registry (GLORY) to evaluate the compliance of surgeons with the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines for VTE prevention. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from 8160 patients who had undergone a primary, unilateral, elective THA (n = 3950) or TKA (n = 4210), and had at least 3 months of follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: Almost all patients received a form of recommended prophylaxis. Compliance with guidelines in terms of type, duration, start time, and dose was achieved for 47% of THA and 61% of TKA patients in the USA, and 62% of THA and 69% of TKA patients outside the USA. Warfarin use, mostly in the USA, was fully compliant in 33% of THA and 48% of TKA patients. Low-molecular-weight heparin use was fully compliant in 63% of THA and 72% of TKA patients in the USA, and 67% of THA and 73% of TKA patients outside the USA. CONCLUSION: Although almost all THA and TKA patients both inside and outside the USA received prophylaxis, a large proportion did not receive treatment in accordance with the ACCP guidelines. Our study may have overestimated the use of recommended prophylaxis as some participating investigators may have had a specific interest in VTE prophylaxis. Furthermore, although analyses were restricted to approximately three-quarters of patients who had outpatient follow-up data, their characteristics were similar to those in the entire population.

Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in older acute medical patients: randomised placebo controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of the anticoagulant fondaparinux in older acute medical inpatients at moderate to high risk of venous thromboembolism. DESIGN: Double blind randomised placebo controlled trial. SETTING: 35 centres in eight countries. PARTICIPANTS: 849 medical patients aged 60 or more admitted to hospital for congestive heart failure, acute respiratory illness in the presence of chronic lung disease, or acute infectious or inflammatory disease and expected to remain in bed for at least four days. INTERVENTIONS: 2.5 mg fondaparinux or placebo subcutaneously once daily for six to 14 days. OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary efficacy outcome was venous thromboembolism detected by routine bilateral venography along with symptomatic venous thromboembolism up to day 15. Secondary outcomes were bleeding and death. Patients were followed up at one month. RESULTS: 425 patients in the fondaparinux group and 414 patients in the placebo group were evaluable for safety analysis (10 were not treated). 644 patients (75.9%) were available for the primary efficacy analysis. Venous thrombembolism was detected in 5.6% (18/321) of patients treated with fondaparinux and 10.5% (34/323) of patients given placebo, a relative risk reduction of 46.7% (95% confidence interval 7.7% to 69.3%). Symptomatic venous thromboembolism occurred in five patients in the placebo group and none in the fondaparinux group (P = 0.029). Major bleeding occurred in one patient (0.2%) in each group. At the end of follow-up, 14 patients in the fondaparinux group (3.3%) and 25 in the placebo group (6.0%) had died. CONCLUSION: Fondaparinux is effective in the prevention of asymptomatic and symptomatic venous thromboembolic events in older acute medical patients. The frequency of major bleeding was similar for both fondaparinux and placebo treated patients.

Travel, venous thromboembolism, and thrombophilia.

Current evidence indicates that prolonged air travel predisposes to venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. An effect is seen once travel duration exceeds 6 to 9 hours and becomes obvious in long-haul passengers traveling for 12 or more hours. A recent records linkage study found that increase in thrombosis rate among arriving passengers peaked during the first week and was no longer apparent after 2 weeks. Medium- to long-distance travelers have a 2- to 4-fold increase in relative thrombosis risk compared with nontravelers, but the averaged absolute risk is small (approximately one symptomatic event per 2 million arrivals, with a case-fatality rate of approximately 2%) and there is no evidence that thrombosis is more likely in economy class than in business- or first-class passengers. It remains uncertain whether and to what extent thrombosis risk is increased by short-distance air travel or prolonged travel by motorcar, train, or other means. Most travelers who develop venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism also have one or more other predisposing risk factors that may include older age, obesity, recent injury or surgery, previous thrombosis, venous insufficiency, malignancy, hormonal therapies, or pregnancy. Limited (though theoretically plausible) evidence suggests that factor V Leiden and the prothrombin gene mutation predispose to thrombosis in otherwise healthy travelers. Given that very many passengers with such predispositions do not develop thrombosis, and a lack of prospective studies to link predisposition with disease, it is not now possible to allocate absolute thrombosis risk among intending passengers or to estimate benefit-to-risk ratios or benefit-to-cost ratios for prophylaxis. Randomized comparisons using ultrasound imaging indicate a measurable incidence of subclinical leg vein thrombosis after prolonged air travel, which appears to increase with travel duration and is reduced by graded pressure elastic support stockings. Whether this surrogate outcome measure translates into clinical benefit remains unknown, but support stockings are likely to be more effective and have less adverse effects than the use of aspirin.

Management options for thrombophilias.

Thrombophilias may be inherited or acquired, continuing or transient, and may contribute strongly or weakly to thrombosis. They may predispose to venous thromboembolism alone or also to artery occlusion. Advice on management must recognize these variations. The presence of an inherited thrombophilia should not alter the intensity of anticoagulant therapy, given that antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency, factor V Leiden, and the prothrombin G20210A mutation are not unusually anticoagulant resistant. However, they can increase the optimal treatment duration after a first thromboembolic event. Optimal duration depends on the balance between thrombosis risk off treatment and bleeding risk during extended anticoagulant therapy, and needs to be separately estimated for each individual with thrombosis and thrombophilia. The higher the thrombosis risk and the lower the bleeding risk, the longer the optimal treatment duration. This balance favors continued (but perhaps not indefinite) therapy in antithrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiency, and perhaps also in patients with the factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutations if their bleeding risk is low. Thrombosis that complicates active malignancy, the antiphospholipid syndrome, or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia needs special consideration: recent clinical trials suggest that low molecular weight heparins are more effective than warfarin in thrombosis with cancer, and that a more intense warfarin effect is not needed for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and thrombosis. Debate continues about the place of screening for presymptomatic but affected relatives of patients with thrombosis and an inherited predisposition. It is essential that any family testing be done only with the informed consent of all concerned. Given consent, there is general support for family testing in antithrombin, protein C, or protein S deficiency and where the factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutation is strongly penetrant and expressed. There is, however, a strong argument that any testing in families in which clotting factor polymorphisms are weakly expressed should be restricted to young women when they consider hormonal contraception or pregnancy, given that these acquired factors multiply the risk.

Travel and venous thrombosis.

Debate continues about whether and to what extent travel predisposes to venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE). Almost certainly, the strength of any association was greatly exaggerated in recent press reports. Conclusions from case-control studies vary, with some finding no excess of recent travel among patients with venous thromboembolism and others reporting a two-four fold excess. The strongest evidence that prolonged air travel predisposes to thrombosis comes from the travel history of people who present with PE immediately after landing. Two independent analyses suggest that the risk of early embolism increases exponentially with travel times beyond 6 hours and may reach 1:200,000 passengers traveling for more than 12 hours. The most likely explanation is venous stasis in the legs from prolonged sitting, and there is evidence (preliminary and controversial) that elastic support stockings may prevent deep vein thrombosis in people who travel long-distances. There is an urgent need for more and better studies to define the absolute hazard from travel-related thrombosis and the personal risk factors that may contribute. Without these, it is difficult to give a balanced account to people who intend to travel or to consider definitive prevention trials. Case reports suggest that in most cases, travel-related thrombosis has affected people who were also at risk because of previous thrombosis, recent injury, or other predispositions. This makes it sensible to target such "at risk" people with advice about hazards and precautions, at least until formal study validates some other approach.

Heparin pentasaccharide.

Fondaparinux (a synthetic heparin analogue) (Sanofi-Synthelabo; Paris, France and Organon Research; Oss, The Netherlands) is the subject of intense recent clinical evaluation for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism. The drug replicates the sulphated antithrombin-binding pentasaccharide sequence in heparin and induces potent and specific antithrombin-mediated anti-Xa activity with excellent bioavailability and a long circulating half-life of 18 hours that makes it ideal for once-daily subcutaneous dosing. Its very short chain length ensures this heparin pentasaccharide (PS) is devoid of anti-factor IIa activity. No need for laboratory monitoring is anticipated. Fondaparinux does not cross-react ex vivo with the anti-platelet antibodies responsible for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Fondaparinux was evaluated in four large, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III trials of deep vein thrombosis prevention after major joint surgery where the PS given after surgery was compared with a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). LMWH was started before surgery in two comparisons and soon after surgery in the others. The trials shared the same blindly adjudicated efficacy and safety endpoints: efficacy was measured by recording subclinical deep vein thrombosis detected by screening with bilateral venography, plus clinically suspected and confirmed symptomatic thrombosis and embolism; safety was indicated by the rate of major bleeding. Bleeding was considered major if it caused death or reoperation, affected an internal organ, or was overt and associated with a bleeding index of 2 or more. By comparison with LMWH, 2.5 mg/d of the PS beginning 4 to 8 hours after wound closure reduced venous thromboembolism rates by 56% and 26% after elective hip replacement, 63% after knee replacement, and 62% after hip fracture surgery. In three studies and overall, the effect was statistically very significant and included similarly reduced rates of proximal deep vein thrombosis. In absolute terms, the DVT rates with PS are the lowest yet seen after major joint surgery. Trends toward more major bleeding with PS in three studies were statistically significant in one trial. PS did not increase risks from reoperation, internal bleeding, or death because of bleeding, because between-group differences were caused entirely by an excess of patients with a raised bleeding index. Post hoc analysis suggests this excess can be explained by too-early postoperative drug administration and may be avoided without loss of efficacy by giving the first PS injection 6 to 8 hours after surgery. Results of phase III treatment trials for DVT/PE will soon be available, but studies in coronary artery disease are less advanced.