Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 55
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artif Organs ; 45(3): 254-262, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32936936

RESUMEN

The Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) has become an important adjunct treatment modality in bridging patients with end-stage heart failure to recovery or orthotopic heart transplantation (HTx). We compared the outcome of patients directly bridged to HTx with the Impella 5.0 versus patients without mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Patients with no previous sternotomy or MCS, who were transplanted between September 2014 and March 2019 were included in this retrospective analysis. Impella 5.0 was implanted using surgical access and transesophageal echocardiography guidance. Forty-two out of 155 transplanted patients fulfilled the insertion criteria. Eight (19%) were bridged with Impella 5.0 to HTx. Recipient and donor baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. There were no significant differences in survival between the groups at 30-day (94% no MCS vs. 87.5% Impella group, P = .47) or 6 months (94% vs. 87.5%, P = .51). Patients on Impella 5.0 showed a significant recovery of hemodynamic parameters and end-organ function. Average duration of support to HTx was 16 ± 17 days. Impella 5.0, when used in suitable patients in a timely fashion can be a good strategy for bridging patients to HTx. The axillary approach allows for early extubation and mobilization. Outcomes of patients bridged to HTx with Impella 5.0 in acute cardiogenic shock are comparable to those of patients with no MCS.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón/estadística & datos numéricos , Corazón Auxiliar/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantación de Prótesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Choque Cardiogénico/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque Cardiogénico/complicaciones , Choque Cardiogénico/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
2.
Artif Organs ; 45(3): 271-277, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32885472

RESUMEN

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) serves as a conventional short-term mechanical circulatory assist to support heart and lung functions. The short-term ventricular assist devices (ST-VAD) can, on the contrary, offer only circulatory support. A combination of VAD and oxygenator (Oxy-VAD) could help overcome this potential disadvantage. This is a retrospective case note study of patients supported on ST-VAD which required adding an oxygenator for extra respiratory support. The oxygenator was introduced in the ST-VAD circuit, either on the left or the right side. Twenty-two patients with the etiology of refractory cardiogenic shock in decompensation were supported on Oxy-VAD between years 2009 and 2019 at tertiary care . All patients were classified into class-I INTERMACS with a mean SOFA Score of 14 ± 2.58. 86.4% of patients were already on mechanical support pre-ST-VAD implant, 80% on VA-ECMO. The BiVAD implant accounted for 63.6%, followed by LVAD and RVAD with 27.3% and 9.1%. Mean duration of the ST-VAD was 8.5 days. The oxygenator was introduced in 14 RVAD and 8 LVAD circuits. The oxygenator was successfully weaned in 54.5% while ST-VAD was explanted in 31.8%. Discharge to home survival was 22.7%. Oxy-VAD proves a viable, and probably, a better option to VA-ECMO in acute cardiorespiratory decompensation. It offers organ-specific tailor-made support to the right and/or left heart and/or lungs. While on Oxy-VAD support, each organ performance can be assessed independently, and the assistance of the specifically improved organ can be weaned off without discontinuing the support for the rest.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/instrumentación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Oxigenadores , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Estudios Prospectivos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Transpl Int ; 33(12): 1788-1798, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32989785

RESUMEN

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to expand the lung donor pool. We aimed to assess whether DCD affected the need for perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and perioperative outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) as compared to donation after brain death (DBD). All consecutive LTxs performed between April 2017 and March 2019 at our tertiary center were analyzed. Donor and recipient preoperative characteristics, utilization of ECMO, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between DCD and DBD LTx. Multivariate models (frequentist and Bayes) were fitted to evaluate an independent effect of DCD on the intra- and postoperative need for ECMO. Out of 105 enrolled patients, 25 (23.8%) were DCD LTx. Donors' and preoperative recipients' characteristics were comparable between the groups. Intraoperatively, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was more common in DCD LTx (56.0% vs. 36.2%), but the adjusted difference was minor (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.64-2.12; P = 0.613). MCS duration, and first and second lung ischemia time were longer in the DCD group. Postoperatively, DCD recipients more commonly required ECMO (32.0% vs. 7.5%) and the difference remained considerable after adjustment for the pre- and intraoperative covariates: RR = 4.11 (95% CI 0.95-17.7), P = 0.058, Bayes RR = 4.15 (95% CrI 1.28-13.0). Sensitivity analyses (two DCD-DBD matching procedures) supported a higher risk of postoperative ECMO need in DCD patients. Incidence of delayed chest closure, postoperative chest drainage, and renal replacement therapy was higher in the DCD group. Early postoperative outcomes after DCD LTx appeared generally comparable to those after DBD LTx. DCD was associated with a higher need for postoperative ECMO which could influence clinical outcomes. However, as the DCD group had a significantly higher use of EVLP with more common ECMO preoperatively, this might have contributed to worse outcomes in the DCD group.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Trasplante de Pulmón , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Teorema de Bayes , Muerte Encefálica , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos
4.
Artif Organs ; 42(12): 1125-1131, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30443997

RESUMEN

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is now a routine therapy for advanced heart failure. Minimally invasive approach via thoracotomy for LVAD implantation is getting popular due to its potential advantage over the conventional sternotomy approach in terms of reduced risk at re-operation due to sternal sparing. We compared the approaches (thoracotomy and sternotomy) to determine the superiority. Minimally invasive approach involved fitting of the LVAD inflow cannula into left ventricle apex via left anterior thoracotomy and anastomosis of outflow graft to ascending aorta via right anterior thoracotomy. In the sternotomy approach, both the procedures were performed via sternotomy. Outcomes in patients after LVAD implantation were compared depending on these approaches for the surgery. Two hundred and five continuous flow LVAD implantations performed between July 2006 and June 2015 at a single center were divided based on surgical approach, that is, sternotomy (n = 180) and thoracotomy (n = 25) groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in relation to patient demographics, preoperative hemodynamic parameters, laboratory markers, or risk factors. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of postoperative hemodynamic parameters, laboratory markers, bleeding and requirement of blood products, intensive care unit, and hospital stay or complications of LVAD surgery. There were no significant differences in terms of long-term survival (Log-Rank P = 0.953), however, thoracotomy, compared to sternotomy approach, incurred significantly less requirement of temporary right ventricular assist (4 vs. 19.4%, P = 0.041). Minimally invasive bilateral thoracotomy approach for LVAD implantation in addition to benefits of sternal sparing avoids dilatation of right ventricle and reduces chances of right ventricular failure requiring temporary right ventricular assist.


Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esternotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Toracotomía/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Perfusion ; 32(2): 171-173, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27625335

RESUMEN

Spontaneous left main coronary artery dissection is a rare cause of acute coronary events or sudden cardiac death, constituting less than 1% of all epicardial coronary artery dissections. It is often fatal and is mostly recognized at post-mortem examination in young victims of sudden death. More than 70% of the reported cases occurred in women, particularly during pregnancy and the peripartum period and those on oral contraceptives. The clinical presentation is highly variable and prognosis varies widely, depending predominantly on the speed of diagnosis. Treatment options include medical therapy, revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and mechanical circulatory support in cases of cardiogenic shock. We report a case of spontaneous dissection of the left main stem coronary artery, with extension into the left coronary territory, which occurred in a 41-year-old lady, complicated by profound cardiogenic shock requiring recovery with extracorporeal mechanical circulatory support after salvage myocardial revascularization.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/complicaciones , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/terapia , Vasos Coronarios/patología , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Choque Cardiogénico/complicaciones , Choque Cardiogénico/terapia , Enfermedades Vasculares/congénito , Adulto , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Miocardio/patología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogénico/cirugía , Enfermedades Vasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugía , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapia
6.
Clin Transplant ; 30(3): 202-9, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26663465

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The risk-benefit for utilizing cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) in lung transplantation (LTx) remains debatable. This study compares outcomes after LTx utilizing different CPB strategies - elective CPB vs. off-pump vs. off-pump with unplanned conversion to CPB. METHODS: A total of 302 LTx performed over seven yr were divided into three groups: "off-pump" group (n = 86), "elective on-pump" group (n = 162), and "conversion" group (n = 54). The preoperative donor and recipient demographics and baseline characteristics and the postoperative outcomes were analyzed; 1:1 propensity score matching was used to identify patients operated upon using elective CPB who had risk profiles similar to those operated upon off-pump (propensity-matching 1) as well as those emergently converted from off-pump to CPB (propensity-matching 2). RESULTS: Preoperative group demographic characteristics were comparable; however, the "off-pump" patient group was significantly older. The "conversion" group had a significantly greater number of patients with primary pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis, preoperative mechanical ventilation, and preoperative extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Postoperatively, patients from the "conversion" group had significantly poorer PaO2 /FiO2 ratios upon arrival in intensive care unit (ICU) and at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively, and they required more prolonged ventilation, longer ICU admission, and they experienced an increased need for ECLS than the other groups. Overall, cumulative survival at one, two, and three yr was significantly worse in patients from the "conversion" group compared to the "off-pump" and "elective on-pump" groups - 61.9% vs. 94.4% vs. 86.9%, 54.4% vs. 90.6% vs. 79.5% and 39.8% vs. 78.1% vs. 74.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). The "off-pump" group had significantly better PaO2 /FiO2 ratios, and a significantly shorter duration of ventilation, ICU stay, and hospital length of stay when compared to the propensity-matched "elective on-pump" group. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes and overall survival between the "converted" group and the propensity-matched "elective on-pump" group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite segregation of unplanned CPB conversion cases from elective on-pump cases, patients with comparable preoperative demographic/risk profiles demonstrated better early postoperative outcomes and, possibly, an improved early survival with an off-pump strategy. A considerable proportion of high-risk patients require intraoperative conversion from off-pump to CPB, and this seems associated with suboptimal outcomes; however, there is no significant benefit to employing an elective on-pump strategy over emergent conversion in the high-risk group.


Asunto(s)
Puente Cardiopulmonar , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Pulmonares/cirugía , Trasplante de Pulmón , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Periodo Posoperatorio , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
7.
Clin Transplant ; 30(4): 421-8, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26840975

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available about lung transplantation (LTx) from donors suffering cardiac arrest (CA) prior to actual donation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of LTx performed between January 2007 and September 2012 was done with the focus on CA in donors. The recipients were grouped depending on the history of donor CA and CA duration (downtime) as: No cardiac arrest ("NoCA"), CA downtime less than 20 min ("CA < 20"), and CA downtime equal to or more than 20 min ("CA > 20"). Early and mid-term outcomes after LTx were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: A total of 237 LTx were performed during the study period. One hundred eighty-eight patients received organs from "NoCA" donors, 25 from "CA < 20" donors, and 24 patients from "CA > 20" donors. There was a trend toward better overall cumulative survival in both CA groups (log rank p = 0.076) whereas the survival in the "CA > 20" group was significantly better than in the "NoCA" group in the subgroup analysis (log rank p = 0.045). Freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) also increased with increase in CA duration, although it did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of lungs from donors with a history of CA is safe and feasible. Longer duration of cardiac arrest may improve the outcomes after the LTx in terms of survival and freedom from BOS.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Donante , Paro Cardíaco , Enfermedades Pulmonares/cirugía , Trasplante de Pulmón , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
8.
J Surg Res ; 195(1): 311-4, 2015 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25617972

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Donation after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) has lead to an increase in organ availability. However, because of medical, logistic, and ethical issues, the use of hearts from DCD donors for transplantation is not generally considered to be feasible. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of ex vivo resuscitation and assessment of the porcine heart after circulatory death using the organ care system (OCS). METHODS: Cardiocirculatory death was induced in five pigs by cessation of mechanical ventilation. No heparin was administered. The agonal time (AT) was calculated as the time between a reduction of blood pressure <50 mm Hg or a fall in saturation beneath 70% and the cessation of electrical activity. After a further 15 min of warm ischemia, hearts were procured and implanted into the OCS, mimicking the actual clinical scenario for other organs. Thus, procured grafts were assessed ex vivo over a period of 4 h. RESULTS: Four hearts were successfully resuscitated on the system (AT 8, 15, 20, and 34 min) Three grafts had excellent visual contractility and lactate trends and were considered to be transplantable. One graft (AT 34 min) had an increased lactate and abnormal contractility being unsuitable for transplantation. One heart with 48-min AT could not be resuscitated. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that hearts from nonheparinized DCD porcine donors can be successfully resuscitated using the OCS in a scenario, which closely simulates clinical conditions.


Asunto(s)
Muerte , Preservación de Órganos , Perfusión/métodos , Animales , Ácido Láctico/análisis , Masculino , Modelos Animales , Porcinos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos
9.
Clin Transplant ; 29(4): 383-92, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25659973

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Lung transplantation (LTx) remains the definitive treatment for end-stage lung failure, whereas chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) represents one of the main diagnoses leading to the indication for a transplant. We sought to assess long-term outcomes after LTx in patients diagnosed with COPD and analyze factors influencing outcome in this frequent patient cohort. METHODS: Between January 2007 and November 2013, a total of 88 LTx were performed in patients with COPD in our institution. Patients with emphysema associated with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency were excluded from this observation. The study design was a retrospective review of the prospectively collected data. A large number of pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables were analyzed including long-term survival and freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Furthermore, impact of different variables on survival was analyzed. RESULTS: Preoperative donor data indicated a large proportion of marginal donors. While the overall cumulative survival after six yr was 57.4%, the results in terms of BOS-free survival in long-term follow-up were 39.7% after six yr. Patients with COPD were also associated with a low incidence (2.3%) of the need for postoperative extracorporeal life support (ECLS). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results after LTx in patients with COPD are acceptable with excellent survival, freedom from BOS, and low use of ECLS postoperatively despite permanently increasing proportion of marginal organs used.


Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis Obliterante/mortalidad , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia
10.
Artif Organs ; 39(2): 179-81, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25039430

RESUMEN

Central extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is an effective treatment method of cardiogenic shock patients with or without lung failure. However, complications like infection and bleeding are common. The classical implantation approach requires full sternotomy, mobilization of the heart, with the well-known risks of bleeding and mediastinal infections. We present our minimally invasive technique for central ECLS through a nonsternotomy incision. Minimized right-sided thoracotomy is performed. Flexible arterial and venous cannulas are tunneled toward the right thoracotomy incision through the eighth intercostal space. A sewing ring is secured to the right atrium and a tube graft is anastomosed to the ascending aorta. Following full-dose heparinization, the arterial cannula is inserted with the tip into the vascular graft of the ascending aorta and the venous cannula via the ring into the right atrium. After meticulous deairing, the central ECLS is set at full flow.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/instrumentación , Corazón Auxiliar , Sistemas de Manutención de la Vida/instrumentación , Choque Cardiogénico/cirugía , Aorta/cirugía , Cateterismo , Diseño de Equipo , Atrios Cardíacos/cirugía , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/instrumentación , Toracotomía
11.
Artif Organs ; 39(3): 212-9, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25175547

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to evaluate gender differences regarding outcome after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cfLVAD) implantation. The study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Included were 24 consecutive female cfLVAD recipients and 24 male recipients (62.5% HeartMate II, 37.5% HeartWare) who received their devices between July 2007 and May 2013. Subjects were matched using propensity score analysis based on age, diagnosis, body surface area, preoperative mechanical circulatory support, heart failure severity score (INTERMACS class), and comorbidities. Female patients were significantly sicker before operation. After propensity score matching, there were no statistically significant differences in demographics or clinical baseline characteristics between male and female LVAD recipients. Also, there was a trend towards a longer postoperative intensive care unit stay in the female group (median 9 days [interquartile range 5-17] versus 15 days [interquartile range 8-33]; P < 0.061) and higher postoperative bilirubin values (median 14 mmol/L [interquartile range 10-17] versus 21 mmol/L [interquartile range 13-30]). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of outcome (P < 0.569). The overall survival was comparable between the two groups (log rank P < 0.389). Half (50%) of female patients required inotropic support for more than 7 days compared with 21.7% in the male group (P < 0.048). Half (50%) of female recipients required short-term postoperative right ventricular assist device implantation compared with 16.7% in the male group (P < 0.014). In conclusion, cfLVAD implantation as a bridge to transplantation is associated with longer duration of inotropic support and higher requirement for postoperative mechanical right ventricular support in women with similar survival rates. Further studies are required to identify additional demographic and clinical factors that modulate outcomes and will enhance the ability to risk-stratify cfLVAD recipients.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón/métodos , Corazón Auxiliar , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Listas de Espera , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Artif Organs ; 39(4): 336-42, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25345547

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects and outcome of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) therapy in patients with preoperative acute hepatic failure. The study design was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Included were 42 patients who underwent cf-LVAD implantation (64.3% HeartMate II, 35.7% HeartWare) between July 2007 and May 2013 with preoperative hepatic failure defined as elevation of greater than or equal to two liver function parameters above twice the upper normal range. Mean patient age was 35 ± 12.5 years, comprising 23.8% females. Dilated cardiomyopathy was present in 92.9% of patients (left ventricular ejection fraction 17.3 ± 5.9%). Mean support duration was 511 ± 512 days (range: 2-1996 days). Mean preoperative laboratory parameters for blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, total bilirubin, and alanine aminotransferase were 9.5 ± 5.4 mg/dL, 110.3 ± 42.8 µmol/L, 51.7 ± 38.3 mmol/L, and 242.1 ± 268.6 U/L, respectively. All parameters decreased significantly 1 month postoperatively. The mean preoperative modified Model for Endstage Liver Disease excluding international normalized ratio score was 16.03 ± 5.57, which improved significantly after cf-LVAD implantation to 10.62 ± 5.66 (P < 0.001) at 7 days and 5.83 ± 4.98 (P < 0.001) at 30 days postoperatively. One-year and 5-year survival was 75.9 and 48.1%, respectively. 21.4% of the patients underwent LVAD explantation for myocardial recovery, 16.7% were successfully transplanted, and 7.1% underwent LVAD exchange for device failure over the follow-up period. Patients with preexisting acute hepatic failure are reasonable candidates for cf-LVAD implantation, with excellent rates of recovery and survival, suggesting that cf-LVAD therapy should not be denied to patients merely on grounds of "preoperative elevated liver enzymes/hepatopathy."


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar , Fallo Hepático Agudo/complicaciones , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/terapia , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Adulto , Remoción de Dispositivos , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Trasplante de Corazón , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Fallo Hepático Agudo/diagnóstico , Fallo Hepático Agudo/mortalidad , Fallo Hepático Agudo/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Diseño de Prótesis , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/mortalidad , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven
13.
Artif Organs ; 39(2): 118-25, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24841499

RESUMEN

The Synergy Micro-pump is the smallest implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and provides partial flow support up to 4.25 L/min. It was shown that early intervention with this device can provide substantial benefits to patients with severe heart failure not yet sick enough for a full-support LVAD. However, as it can be inserted via small incisions with no need for sternotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass, it might be beneficial for selected high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Synergy Micro-pump in patients in INTERMACS class 1-2. From February 2012 to August 2013, 13 patients with severe heart failure were supported with the Synergy Pocket Micro-pump. Patients were divided into two groups according to INTERMACS class: the high-risk group (INTERMACS class 1-2) and the low-risk group (INTERMACS class 3-4). There were seven patients in INTERMACS class 1-2 and six in INTERMACS class 3-4. Patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared. There were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics, and mean support time was 108 ± 114 days in the high-risk group and 238 ± 198 days in the low-risk group. Also, there were no significant differences in perioperative characteristics or in the rate of postoperative adverse events. The overall survival was comparable between the two groups (one late death in each group, log-rank P = 0.608). Two patients from the high-risk group were upgraded to a full-support LVAD (P = 0.462) after 65 ± 84.9 days of mean support. One patient from the high-risk group and two patients from the low-risk group were successfully transplanted (P = 0.559). The use of the Synergy Micro-pump in INTERMACS 1-2 patients is feasible and is associated with similar postoperative outcome as in patients in INTERMACS 3-4. Carefully selected patients with severe heart failure could benefit due to the small size of the pump; however, further studies and medium-term follow-up are required.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Auxiliar , Adulto , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia
16.
Transpl Int ; 27(11): 1183-91, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25070600

RESUMEN

Lung transplantation (LTx) from "extended donor criteria" donors may reduce significantly organ shortage. However, its influence on results remains unclear. In this study, we evaluate retrospectively the results of LTx from donors outside standard criteria: PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 300 mmHg, age over 55 years, and history of smoking > 20 pack-years. Two hundred and forty-eight patients underwent first time LTx in our institution between January 2007 and January 2013. Seventy-nine patients (Group I) received organs from "extended donor criteria" and 169 patients (Group II) from "standard donor criteria." Recipients' and donors' demographics, perioperative variables, and outcome were compared. Donors from Group I were significantly older [median (interquartile range)]: 52.5 (44;58) vs. 42 (28.5;48.5) years (P < 0.001) with lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio: 366 ± 116.1 455 ± 80.5 mmHg (P < 0.001), higher incidence of smoking history: 57.7% vs. 41.8% (P = 0.013), and more extensive smoking history: 24(15;30) vs. 10(3.75;14) pack-years (P < 0.001). Other parameters were comparable. Recipients' gender, diagnosis, percentage of patients operated on pump and receiving double LTx were also comparable. Recipients from Group I were significantly older: 50 (42;57) vs. 44 (29.5;53.5) years (P = 001). There were no differences observed in recipients' prevalence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade 3 over first three postoperative days, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care and hospital length of stay, prevalence of rejection, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival (Group I vs. II) were also similar: 88.6% vs. 91.7%, 83.2% vs. 84.6%, and 59% vs. 68.2% (log rank P = 0.367). Carefully selected donor lungs from outside the standard acceptability criteria may expand existing donor pool with no detrimental effect on LTx outcome.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Donante/métodos , Trasplante de Pulmón , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto , Muerte Encefálica , Bronquiolitis Obliterante/etiología , Muerte , Selección de Donante/normas , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Disfunción Primaria del Injerto/etiología , Respiración Artificial , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
J Artif Organs ; 17(4): 370-2, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25103222

RESUMEN

In this case report, we describe a 66-year-old patient with a massive LV aneurism which resulted after myocardial infarction. Due to severe LV function impairment, it was decided to perform left ventricular reconstruction surgery and, at the same time, left ventricular assist device implantation as a bridge to transplantation. The entire procedure was completed without using any patch material. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home after 18 days. After 1-year follow-up no adverse events were observed.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Ventrículos Cardíacos/cirugía , Corazón Auxiliar , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Anciano , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
ASAIO J ; 67(8): 862-868, 2021 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34039886

RESUMEN

Recent advances in the management of patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) have led to an increased number of patients who may develop heart failure and require heart transplantation (HTx). The purpose of this study was to evaluate early and mid-term postoperative outcomes after HTx with the use of Organ Care System (OCS) in a cohort of ACHD patients transplanted at our tertiary center. All consecutive HTx performed from January 2015 to January 2019 at our institution were analyzed. Donor and recipient preoperative characteristics, intraoperative course, and perioperative clinical outcomes were evaluated. Nine patients with median age of 44 years (range 17-61 years) underwent isolated HTx for end-stage ACHD during the study period. Mean cold ischemic time was 84 ± 17 minutes. Postoperatively, four patients (44%) needed venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (1-7 days). One patient (11%) required surgical re-exploration for bleeding. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality were 11% and 22%, respectively. In our experience, despite the challenges of transplantation in ACHD, these patients can be successfully transplanted with the use of the OCS in a highly specialized center. Careful donor and recipient selection are of paramount importance.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas , Trasplante de Corazón , Adolescente , Adulto , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Donantes de Tejidos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33904268

RESUMEN

Ex vivo lung perfusion is an indispensable tool in the armamentarium of any lung transplant center. It helps to increase an already shrinking donor pool by offering a chance to assess suboptimal donor lungs in a systematic manner and improve them by treating them with low-molecular-weight perfusate. We offer a stepwise guide to carry out ex vivo lung perfusion on the donor lungs and criteria to accept them for transplants.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Donante/métodos , Circulación Extracorporea/métodos , Trasplante de Pulmón , Pulmón/fisiología , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Perfusión/métodos , Humanos , Pulmón/patología , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Donantes de Tejidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA