Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 6(1)2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36053610

RESUMEN

Sleep disorders in childhood are common. Melatonin is prescribed by UK community paediatricians to treat sleep disorders, but practice is not standardised. This audit reviewed melatonin prescribing within a community paediatric department in a 12-month period. 682 children received melatonin prescriptions; a random sample of 198 records were reviewed. The most common underlying condition was autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in 28%. 41% had no underlying diagnosis when melatonin was initiated and were waiting for neurodevelopmental/ASD assessment. 42% were on melatonin for at least 2 years. Further work is required to optimise melatonin prescribing practice for children and young people.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Melatonina , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Adolescente , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/diagnóstico , Niño , Humanos , Melatonina/uso terapéutico , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 5(1): e000983, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33754131

RESUMEN

Background: Advice to families to sleep infants on their backs, avoid smoke exposure, reduce excess bedcovering and avoid specific risks associated with cosleeping has greatly reduced sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) rates worldwide. The fall in rates has not been equal across all groups, and this advice has been less effective for more socially deprived families. Understanding decision-making processes of families with infants at risk would support the development of more effective interventions. Aim: To synthesise the qualitative evidence on parental decision-making for the infant sleep environment among families with children considered to be at increased risk of SUDI. Methods: This study was one of three related reviews of the literature for the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel's National Review in England into SUDI in families where the children are considered at risk of harm. A systematic search of eight online databases was carried out in December 2019. Metasynthesis was conducted, with themes extracted from each paper, starting with the earliest publication first. Results: The wider review returned 3367 papers, with 16 papers (across 13 studies) specifically referring to parental decision-making. Six overall themes were identified from the synthesis: (1) knowledge as different from action; (2) external advice must be credible; (3) comfort, convenience and disruption to the routine; (4) plausibility and mechanisms of protection; (5) meanings of safety and risk mitigation using alternative strategies; and (6) parents' own expertise, experience and instincts. Conclusion: Interventions that are intended to improve the uptake of safer sleep advice in families with infants at risk of sleep-related SUDI need to be based on credible advice with mechanisms of protection that are understandable, consistent with other sources, widened to all carers of the infant and fit within the complex practice of caring for infants.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita del Lactante , Cuidadores , Niño , Inglaterra , Humanos , Lactante , Padres , Sueño , Muerte Súbita del Lactante/epidemiología
3.
Arch Dis Child ; 105(10): 945-950, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32527717

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) for infants born after a previous SUDI in the same family, and to establish the causes of death and the frequency of child protection concerns in families with recurrent SUDI. DESIGN: Observational study using clinical case records. SETTING: The UK's Care of Next Infant (CONI) programme, which provides additional care to families who have experienced SUDI with their subsequent children. PATIENTS: Infants registered on CONI between January 2000 and December 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cause of death, presence of modifiable risk factors for SUDI and child protection concerns. RESULTS: There were 6608 live-born infants registered in CONI with 29 deaths. 26 families had 2 deaths, and 3 families had 3 deaths. The SUDI rate for infants born after one SUDI is 3.93 (95% CI 2.7 to 5.8) per 1000 live births. Cause of death was unexplained for 19 first and 15 CONI deaths. Accidental asphyxia accounted for 2 first and 6 CONI deaths; medical causes for 3 first and 4 CONI deaths; and homicide for 2 first and 4 CONI deaths. 10 families had child protection concerns. CONCLUSIONS: The SUDI rate for siblings is 10 times higher than the current UK SUDI rate. Homicide presenting as recurrent SUDI is very rare. Many parents continued to smoke and exposed infants to hazardous co-sleeping situations, with these directly leading to or contributing to the death of six siblings. SUDI parents need support to improve parenting skills and reduce risk to subsequent infants.


Asunto(s)
Hermanos , Muerte Súbita del Lactante/epidemiología , Accidentes/mortalidad , Asfixia/mortalidad , Maltrato a los Niños/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Infanticidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Materna , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Responsabilidad Parental , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología
4.
Arch Dis Child ; 104(1): 30-36, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29802134

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To develop a detailed understanding of the circumstances of sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) cases subject to serious case review (SCR). DESIGN: This was a thematic analysis of SCRs relating to cases of SUDI in England. SCRs were obtained for SUDI cases dying between 1 April 2011 and 31 March 2014. These were cases (aged 0-2 years) that presented as a SUDI and for which no clear medical or forensic cause of death was found. RESULTS: SCRs were held for 30 SUDI cases, published reports were available for 27/30. The median (range) age at death was 2 (0-19) months. Background risk factors in families included: alcohol or drug dependency in 18/27, parental mental health problems in 14/27, domestic abuse in 9/27 and parental criminal records in 13/27. Nineteen infants had received support from social care, 10/19 were subject to child protection plans. Neglect was a feature in 15/27 cases. Parents did not engage with professionals in 18/27 cases, involving social care in 14/18, health care in 13/18 and drug and substance misuse services in 5/18. Eighteen of 27 deaths occurred in highly hazardous sleep environments, 16/18 involved cosleeping and 13/16 cosleeping deaths occurred with parents who were intoxicated with alcohol or impaired by drugs. CONCLUSION: Most SUDI cases occurred in hazardous sleep environments and are potentially preventable. They occurred in families well known to services with concerns about neglect, substance misuse and poor engagement. More consideration is needed on how best to support such vulnerable families.


Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Cuidado del Lactante , Anamnesis/estadística & datos numéricos , Sueño , Muerte Súbita del Lactante , Violencia Doméstica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Violencia Doméstica/estadística & datos numéricos , Ambiente , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Cuidado del Lactante/normas , Cuidado del Lactante/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Padres/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Servicio Social/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita del Lactante/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita del Lactante/etiología , Muerte Súbita del Lactante/patología , Muerte Súbita del Lactante/prevención & control , Reino Unido/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA