Outcome after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Depends on Age in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease - An Analysis of Relative Survival in a Multicenter Cohort and an OCT Substudy.

BACKGROUND: Age is a strong predictor of survival in patients with coronary artery disease. In elder patients with increasing co-morbidities percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with more complications and worse outcome. The calculation of relative survival rates adjusts for the "background" mortality in the general population by correcting for age and gender. We analyzed if elder patients after elective PCI have a worse relative survival compared to younger patient groups. METHODS: A total of 8,342 patients who underwent elective PCI at two high volume centers between 1998 and 2009 were analyzed. RESULTS: The survival of our patients after PCI (observed survival) was slightly lower compared to the general population (expected survival) resulting in a slightly decreasing relative survival curve. In a multivariate Cox regression model age amongst others was a strong predictor of survival. Stratifying patients according to their age the relative survival curves of younger patients (Quartile 1: <58 years; 2,046 patients), elder patients (Quartile 3: 66-73 years; 2,090 patients) and very old patients (Quartile 4: >73 years; 2,307 patients) were similar. The relative survival of mid-aged patients (Quartile 2: 58-65 years; 1,899 patients) was better than that of all other patient groups. The profile of cardiovascular risk factors differs between the various groups resulting in different composition and burden of coronary plaques in an optical coherence tomography sub-study. CONCLUSION: Patients after elective PCI have a slightly worse long-term survival compared to the age- and sex-matched general population. This is also true for different groups of age except for mid-aged patients between 58 and 63 years. Elder patients between 66 and 73 years and above 73 years have a similar relative survival compared to younger patients below 58 years, and might therefore have similar benefit from elective PCI.

Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral or aortic mechanical prosthetic valves: a feasibility, safety, and efficacy study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with prosthetic valves have a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). We report a multicenter experience of performing pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) in this challenging, high-risk cohort of patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for sinus rhythm restoration in AF patients with mitral or aortic mechanical prosthetic valves. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with prosthetic valves (group I) who underwent RF ablation for AF between January 1, 2007, and April 30, 2009, were identified prospectively at four tertiary care centers. A matched group of 50 patients (group II) acted as controls. RESULTS: Total procedural time (199.4 ± 49 minutes vs 166.6 ± 27.5 minutes, P <.001) and fluoroscopy time (60 ± 17 minutes vs 53.8 ± 6.8 minutes, P <.01) were prolonged, with a higher incidence of atrial flutter at 3 months in group I (18% vs 6%, P = .1) compared to group II. At 12 months, 80% of patients in the valve group were in sinus rhythm after an average of 1.3 procedures, and 82% of controls were in sinus rhythm after an average 1.2 procedures (P = .9). There was a trend toward a higher nonfatal complication rate in the valve group than in the control group (8% vs 4%, P = .1). CONCLUSION: In patients with prosthetic valves, RF ablation for AF is feasible, safe, and efficacious, with a trend toward a higher nonfatal complication rate and an increased rate of postablation atrial flutter.