Reduced neural baroreflex sensitivity is related to enhanced endothelial function in patients with end-stage liver disease.

OBJECTIVES: Reduced baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is a frequent complication in end-stage liver disease, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. We investigated the mechanical and neural components of BRS. Increased nitric oxide (NO) production has been reported in end-stage liver failure. Based on earlier experiments, we hypothesised that enhanced endothelial function might affect baroreflex function. Therefore, we explored the relation between endothelial function and the components of BRS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 24 patients and 23 controls. BRS was determined by the spontaneous sequence method. Mechanical component was characterised by the distensibility coefficient (DC) of common carotid artery. Neural component was estimated as the ratio of integrated BRS and DC. Endothelial function was quantified by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. RESULTS: Integrated BRS was reduced in patients [7.00 (5.80-9.25) vs. 11.1 (8.50-14.80) ms/mmHg]. The mechanical component was not different in the two groups, whereas neural component showed significant reduction in patients (3.54 ± 1.20 vs. 4.48 ± 1.43 ms/10-3). FMD was higher in patients (9.81 ± 3.77 vs. 5.59 ± 1.36%). FMD and neural BRS were directly related in controls (r = 0.62), but inversely related in patients (r = -0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Baroreflex impairment in end-stage liver disease might be explained by deterioration of the neural component, while the mechanical component appears to be preserved. Endothelial NO may enhance BRS in health; however, central endothelial overproduction of NO likely contributes to the reduction of neural component of BRS in patients awaiting liver transplantation.

[Screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow up of hepatitis C virus related liver disease. National consensus guideline in Hungary from 22 September 2017]. / A hepatitis C-vírus-fertozés szurése, diagnosztikája, antivirális terápiája, kezelés utáni gondozása. Magyar konszenzusajánlás. Érvényes: 2017. szeptember 22-tol.

The treatment of hepatitis C is based on a national consensus guideline updated six-monthly according to local availability and affordability of approved therapies through a transparent allocation system in Hungary. This updated guideline incorporates some special new aspects, including recommendations for screening, diagnostics, use and allocation of novel direct acting antiviral agents. The indication of therapy in patients with no contraindication is based on the demonstration of viral replication with consequent inflammation and/or fibrosis in the liver. Non-invasive methods (elastographies and biochemical methods) are preferred for liver fibrosis staging. The budget allocated for these patients is limited. Interferon-based or interferon-free therapies are available for the treatment. Due to their limited success rate as well as to their (sometimes severe) side-effects, the mandatory use of interferon-based therapies as first line treatment can not be accepted from the professional point of view. However, they can be used as optional therapy in treatment-naïve patients with mild disease. As of interferon-free therapies, priority is given to those with urgent need based on a pre-defined scoring system reflecting mainly the stage of the liver disease, but considering also additional factors, i.e., hepatic decompensation, other complications, activity and progression of liver disease, risk of transmission and other special issues. Approved treatments are restricted to the most cost-effective combinations based on the cost per sustained virological response value in different patient categories with consensus amongst treating physicians, the National Health Insurance Fund of Hungary and patients' organizations. Interferon-free treatments and shorter therapy durations are preferred. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(Suppl 1): 3-23.

[Diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis B and D. National consensus guideline in Hungary from 22 September 2017]. / A hepatitis B- és D-vírus-fertozés diagnosztikája, antivirális kezelése. Magyar konszenzusajánlás. Érvényes: 2017. szeptember 22-tol.

Diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis D virus infection mean for the patient to be able to maintain working capacity, to increase quality of life, to prevent cancer, and to prolong life expectancy, while the society benefits from eliminating the chances of further transmission of the viruses, and decreasing the overall costs of serious complications. The guideline delineates the treatment algorithms from 22 September 2017 set by a consensus meeting of physicians involved in the treatment of these diseases. The prevalence of HBV infection in the Hungarian general population is 0,5-0,7%. The indications of treatment are based upon viral examinations (including viral nucleic acid determination), determinations of disease activity and stage (including biochemical, pathologic, and/or non-invasive methods), and excluding contraindications. To avoid unnecessary side effects and for a cost-effective approach, the guideline stresses the importance of quick and detailed virologic evaluations, the applicability of transient elastography as an acceptable alternative of liver biopsy in this regard as well as the relevance of appropriate consistent follow-up schedule for viral response during therapy. The first choice of therapy in chronic HBV infection can be pegylated interferon for 48 weeks or continuous entecavir or tenofovir therapy. The latter two must be continued for at least 12 months after hepatitis B surface antigen seroconversion. Lamivudine is no longer the first choice; patients currently taking lamivudine must switch if the response is inadequate. Appropriate treatment of patients taking immunosuppressive medications is highly recommended. Pegylated interferon based therapy is recommended for the treatment of concomitant hepatitis D infection. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(Suppl 1): 24-37.

[Benign liver tumours - current diagnostics and therapeutic modalities]. / A jóindulatú májdaganatok korszerû diagnosztikája és kezelési elvei.

The most common benign liver tumours are haemangiomas, focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma. We perform a review of the literature and show the current diagnostic and therapeutic modalities based on the EASL Clinical Practice Guideline. With the widespread use of ultrasound, the detection of liver lesions is increased. They are usually found in women of childbearing age with atypical abdominal pain or incidentally. Contrast-enhanced US, CT or MRI are usually necessary for differential diagnosis. In atypical appearance or in malignancy suspect cases biopsy could be performed. For symptomatic patients conservative therapy can be sufficient. In haemorrhagic cases transarterial embolisation can be useful, also for tumour size decreasing before surgery. In patients with persisting symptoms, with vessel or soft tissue compression effect or in malignancy suspect cases definitive surgical treatment is advised. In men with hepatocellular adenoma primary resection is appropriate because of the higher risk for malignant transformation. As alternative treatment options radiofrequency ablation, irradiation, chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy or liver transplantation are published.

[Screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow up of hepatitis C virus related liver disease. National consensus guideline in Hungary from 15 October 2016]. / A hepatitis C-vírus-fertozés szurése, diagnosztikája, antivirális terápiája, kezelés utáni gondozása. Magyar konszenzusajánlás. Érvényes: 2016. október 15-tol.

Treatment of hepatitis C is based on a national consensus guideline updated six-monthly according to local availability and affordability of approved therapies through a transparent allocation system in Hungary. This updated guideline incorporates some special new aspects, including recommendations for screening, diagnostics, use and allocation of novel direct acting antiviral agents. Indication of therapy in patients with no contraindication is based on demonstration of viral replication with consequent inflammation and/or fibrosis in the liver. Non-invasive methods (elastographies and biochemical methods) are preferred for liver fibrosis staging. The budget allocated for these patients is limited. Therefore, expensive novel direct acting antiviral combinations as first line treatment are reimbursed only, if the freely available, but less effective and more toxic pegylated interferon plus ribavirin dual therapy deemed to prone high chance of adverse events and/or low chance of cure. Priority is given to those with urgent need based on a pre-defined scoring system reflecting mainly the stage of the liver disease, but considering also additional factors, i.e., hepatic decompensation, other complications, activity and progression of liver disease, risk of transmission and other special issues. Approved treatments are restricted to the most cost-effective combinations based on the cost per sustained virological response value in different patient categories with consensus amongst treating physicians, the National Health Insurance Fund and patient's organizations. Interferon-free treatments and shorter therapy durations are preferred. Orv. Hetil., 2017, 158(Suppl. 1), 3-22.

[Diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis B and D. National consensus guideline in Hungary from 15 October 2016]. / A hepatitis B- és D-vírus-fertozés diagnosztikája, antivirális kezelése. Magyar konszenzusajánlás. Érvényes: 2016. október 15-tol.

Diagnosis and treatment of HBV/HDV infection means for the patient to be able to maintain working capacity, to increase quality of life, to prevent cancer, and to prolong life expectancy, while society benefits from eliminating the chances of further transmission of the viruses, and decreasing the overall costs of serious complications. The guideline delineates the treatment algorithms for 2017 set by a consensus meeting of physicians involved in the treatment of these diseases. The prevalence of HBV infection in the Hungarian general population is 0.5-0.7%. The indications of treatment is based upon viral examinations (including viral nucleic acid determination), determinations of disease activity and stage (including biochemical, pathologic, and/or non-invasive methods), and excluding contraindications. To avoid unnecessary side effects and for cost-effective approach the guideline stresses the importance of quick and detailed virologic evaluations, the applicability of elastography as an acceptable alternative of liver biopsy in this regard, as well as the relevance of appropriate consistent follow up schedule for viral response during therapy. The first choice of therapy in chronic hepatitis B infection can be pegylated interferon for 48 weeks or continuous entecavir or tenofovir therapy. The latter two must be continued for at least 12 months after hepatitis B surface antigen seroconversion. Adefovir dipivoxil is recommended mainly in combination therapy. Lamivudine is no longer a first choice; patients currently taking lamivudine must switch if response is inadequate. Appropriate treatment of patients taking immunosuppressive medications is highly recommended. Pegylated interferon based therapy is recommended for the treatment of concomitant hepatitis D infection. Orv. Hetil., 2017, 158(Suppl. 1) 23-35.

Quantitative morphometric and immunohistochemical analysis and their correlates in cirrhosis--A study on explant livers.

BACKGROUND: Reproducible structural analysis was made on cirrhotic human liver samples in order to reveal potential connections between morphological and laboratory parameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Large histological samples were taken from segment VII of 56 cirrhotic livers removed in connection with liver transplantation. Picro Sirius red and immunohistochemically (smooth muscle actin [SMA], cytokeratin 7 [CK7], Ki-67) stained sections were digitalized and morphometric evaluation was performed. RESULTS: The Picro Sirius-stained fibrotic area correlated with the average thickness of the three broadest septa, extent of SMA positivity, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) values and it was lower in the viral hepatitis related cirrhoses than in samples with non-viral etiology. The extent of SMA staining increased with the CK7-positive ductular reaction. The proliferative activity of the hepatocytes correlated positively with the Ki-67 labeling of the ductular cells and inversely with the septum thickness. These data support the potential functional connection among different structural components, for example, myofibroblasts, ductular reaction and fibrogenesis but challenges the widely proposed role of ductular cells in regeneration. CONCLUSION: Unbiased morphological characterization of cirrhotic livers can provide valuable, clinically relevant information. Similar evaluation of routine core biopsies may increase the significance of this 'Gold Standard' examination.

Predictive value of psychosocial assessment for the mortality of patients waiting for liver transplantation.

Selecting suitable candidates for liver transplantation is the most challenging task of pre-transplant evaluation. In addition to somatic assessment, psychosocial evaluation has been proven important in identifying patients at high risk of potential failure. The Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS) is a widely used rating instrument for the assessment of psychosocial risk factors before liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to explore the predictive value of TERS for mortality in liver transplant patients before and after transplantation. The medical records of patients referred for psychiatric evaluation before liver transplantation between 2003 -2013 were analysed. Administering TERS was part of the pre-transplant evaluation. The TERS scores of patients who died before and after transplantation were compared with those who survived following transplantation. One hundred and sixteen patients were referred for pre-transplant psychiatric evaluation. Patients with successful liver transplants scored significantly lower on TERS than those who died before transplantation (30.65 ± 6.06 vs. 34.75 ± 8.25, p = .031). Patients who died after transplantation scored significantly better on TERS than those who died before transplantation (28.79 ± 2.81 vs. 34.75 ± 8.25, p = .003). There was no significant difference between the deceased and surviving transplanted patients' TERS scores (28.79 ± 2.81 vs. 31.19 ± 6.66, p = .365). TERS appears to be a suitable rating instrument to help select candidates who have higher chance to survive prior to transplantation but it could not predict post-transplant mortality.

A hepatitis B- és D-vírus-fertozés diagnosztikája, antivirális kezelése. Magyar konszenzusajánlás. Érvényes: 2015. szeptember 12-tol.

Diagnosis and treatment of HBV/HDV infection means for the patient to be able to maintain working capacity, to increase quality of life, to prevent cancer, and to prolong life expectancy, while society benefits from eliminating the chances of further transmission of the viruses, and decreasing the overall costs of serious complications. The guideline delineates the treatment algorithms for 2016 set by a consensus meeting of physicians involved in the treatment of these diseases. The prevalence of HBV infection in the Hungarian general population is 0.5-0.7%. The indications of treatment is based upon viral examinations (including viral nucleic acid determination), determinations of disease activity and stage (including biochemical, pathologic, and/or non-invasive methods), and excluding contraindications. To avoid unnecessary side effects and for cost-effective approach the guideline stresses the importance of quick and detailed virologic evaluations, the applicability of elastography as an acceptable alternative of liver biopsy in this regard, as well as the relevance of appropriate consistent follow up schedule for viral response during therapy. The first choice of therapy in chronic hepatitis B infection can be pegylated interferon for 48 weeks or continuous ente- cavir or tenofovir therapy. The latter two must be continued for at least 12 months after hepatitis B surface antigen seroconversion. Adefovir dipivoxil is recommended mainly in combination therapy. Lamivudine is no longer a first choice; patients currently taking lamivudine must switch if response is inadequate. Appropriate treatment of patients taking immunosuppressive medications is highly recommended. Pegylated interferon based therapy is recommended for the treatment of concomitant hepatitis D infection. Orv. Hetil., 2015, 156(Suppl. 2) 25-36.

Hepatitis C-vírus-fertozés: diagnosztika, antivirális terápia, kezelés utáni gondozás. Magyar konszenzusajánlás. Érvényes: 2015. szeptember 12-tol.

Approximately 70.000 people are infected with hepatitis C virus in Hungary, more than half of whom are not aware of their infection. From the point of infected individuals early recognition and effective treatment of related liver injury may prevent consequent advanced liver diseases and complications (liver cirrhosis, liver failure and liver cancer) and can increase work productivity and life expectancy on one hand. From socioeconomic aspect, this could also prevent further spread of the virus as well as reduce substantially long term financial burden of related morbidity. Available since 2003 in Hungary, pegylated interferon + ribavirin dual therapy can clear the virus in 40-45% of previously not treated (naïve), and in 5-21% of previous treatment-failure patients. Addition of a direct acting first generation protease inhibitor drug (boceprevir or telaprevir) to the dual therapy increases the chance of sustained virologic response to 63-75% and 59-66%, respectively. These two protease inhibitors are available and financed for a segment of Hungarian patients since May 2013. Between 2013 and February 2015, other direct acting antiviral interferon-free combination therapies have been registered for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, with a potential efficacy over 90% and typical short duration of 8-12 weeks. Indication of therapy includes exclusion of contraindications to the drugs and demonstration of viral replication with consequent liver injury, i.e., inflammation and or fibrosis in the liver. Non-invasive methods (eleastography and biochemical methods) are accepted and preferred for staging liver damage (fibrosis). For initiation of treatment accurate and timely molecular biology tests are mandatory. Eligibility for treatment is a subject of individual central medical review. Due to budget limitations tharpy is covered only for a proportion of patients by the National Health Insurance Fund. Priority is given to those with urgent need based on a Hungarian Priority Index system reflecting primarily the stage of liver disease, and considering also additional factors, i.e., activity and progression of liver disease, predictive factors of treatment and other special issues. Approved treatments are restricted to the most cost-effective combinations based on the cost per sustained virologic response value in different patient categories with consensus between professional organizations, National Health Insurance Fund and patient organizations. More expensive therapies might be available upon co-financing by the patient or a third party. Interferon-free treatments and shorter therapy durations preferred as much as financially feasible. A separate budget is allocated to cover interferon-free treatments for the most-in-need interferon ineligible/intolerant patients, and for those who have no more interferon-based therapy option. Orv. Hetil., 2015, 156(Suppl. 2), 3-24.

Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of hepatitis C virus related liver disease. Hungarian national consensus guideline.

Approximately 70,000 people are infected with hepatitis C virus in Hungary, and more than half of them are not aware of their infection. From the point of infected individuals early recognition and effective treatment of related liver injury may prevent consequent advanced liver diseases and complications (liver cirrhosis, liver failure and liver cancer) and can increase work productivity and life expectancy. From a socioeconomic aspect, this could also prevent further spread of the virus as well as reduce substantially long term financial burden of related morbidity. Pegylated interferon + ribavirin dual therapy, which is available in Hungary since 2003, can clear the virus in 40-45% of previously not treated (naïve), and in 5-21% of previous treatment-failure patients. Addition of a direct acting first generation protease inhibitor drug (boceprevir or telaprevir) to the dual therapy increases the chance of sustained viral response to 63-75% and 59-66%, respectively. These two protease inhibitors are available and financed for a segment of Hungarian patients since May 2013. Between 2013 and February 2015, other direct acting antiviral interferon-free combination therapies have been registered for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, with a potential efficacy over 90% and typical short duration of 8-12 weeks. Indication of therapy includes exclusion of contraindications to the drugs and demonstration of viral replication with consequent liver injury, i.e., inflammation and / or fibrosis in the liver. Non-invasive methods (elastography and biochemical methods) are accepted and preferred for staging liver damage (fibrosis). For initiation of treatment as well as for on-treatment decisions, accurate and timely molecular biology tests are mandatory. Eligibility for treatment is a subject of individual central medical review. Due to budget limitations therapy is covered only for a proportion of patients by the National Health Insurance Fund. Priority is given to those with urgent need based on a Hungarian Priority Index system reflecting primarily the stage of liver disease, and considering also additional factors, i.e., activity and progression of liver disease, predictive factors of treatment and other special issues. Approved treatments are restricted to the most cost-effective combinations based on the cost per sustained viral response value in different patient categories with consensus between professional organizations, National Health Insurance Fund and patient organizations. More expensive therapies might be available upon co-financing by the patient or a third party. Interferon-free treatments and shorter therapy durations preferred as much as financially feasible. A separate budget is allocated to cover interferon-free treatments for the most-in-need interferon ineligible/intolerant patients, and for those who have no more interferon-based therapy option. Orv. Hetil., 2015, 156(Suppl. 1), 3-23.

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic hepatitis B and D. Hungarian national consensus guideline.

Diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis B and D virus infections mean that the patient is able to maintain working capacity, increase quality of life, prevent cancer, and prolong life expectancy, while the society benefits from eliminating the chances of further transmission of the viruses, and decreasing the overall costs of serious complications. The guideline delineates the treatment algorithms for 2015, which is agreed on a consensus meeting of specialists involved in the treatment of the above diseases. The prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection in the Hungarian general population is 0.5-0.7%. The indications of treatment is based upon viral examinations (including viral nucleic acid determination), determinations of disease activity and stage (including biochemical, pathologic, and/or non-invasive methods), and excluding contraindications. To avoid unnecessary side effects and for cost-effective approach the guideline emphasizes the importance of quick and detailed virologic evaluations, the applicability of transient elastography as an acceptable alternative of liver biopsy in this regard, as well as the relevance of appropriate consistent follow up schedule for viral response during therapy. The first choice of therapy in chronic hepatitis B infection can be pegylated interferon for 48 weeks or continuous entecavir or tenofovir therapy. The latter two must be continued for at least 12 months after hepatitis B surface antigen seroconversion. Adefovir dipivoxil is recommended mainly in combination therapy. Lamivudine is no longer a first choice; patients currently taking lamivudine must switch if response is inadequate. Appropriate treatment of patients taking immunosuppressive medications is highly recommended. Pegylated interferon based therapy is recommended for the treatment of concomitant hepatitis D infection. Orv. Hetil., 2015, 156(Suppl. 1), 25-35.

[Hepatitis C: diagnosis, anti-viral therapy, after-care. Hungarian consensus guideline]. / Hepatitis C-vírus-fertozés: diagnosztika, antivirális terápia, kezelés utáni gondozás. Magyar konszenzusajánlás.

Approximately 70,000 people are infected with hepatitis C virus in Hungary, and more than half of them are not aware of their infection. From the point of infected individuals early recognition and effective treatment of related liver injury may prevent consequent advanced liver diseases and complications (liver cirrhosis, liver failure and liver cancer) and can increase work productivity and life expectancy. Furthermore, these could from prevent further spread of the virus as well as reduce substantially long term financial burden of related morbidity, as a socioeconomic aspect. Pegylated interferon + ribavirin dual therapy, which is available in Hungary since 2003, can clear the virus in 40-45% of previously not treated (naïve), and in 5-21% of previous treatment-failure patients. Addition of a direct acting first generation protease inhibitor drug (boceprevir or telaprevir) to the dual therapy increases the chance of sustained viral response to 63-75% and 59-66%, respectively. These two protease inhibitors are available and financed for a segment of Hungarian patients since May 2013. Between 2013 and February 2015, other direct acting antivirals and interferon-free combination therapies have been registered for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C with a potential efficacy over 90% and typically with a short duration of 8-12 weeks. Indication of therapy includes exclusion of contraindications to the drugs and demonstration of viral replication with consequent liver injury, i.e., inflammation and/or fibrosis in the liver. Non-invasive methods (elastography and biochemical methods) are accepted and preferred for staging liver damage (fibrosis). For initiation of treatment accurate and timely molecular biology tests are mandatory. Eligibility for treatment is a subject of individual central medical review. Due to budget limitations therapy is covered only for a proportion of patients by the National Health Insurance Fund. Priority is given to those with urgent need based on a Hungarian Priority Index system reflecting primarily the stage of liver disease, and considering also additional factors, i.e., activity and progression of liver disease, predictive factors of treatment and other special issues. Approved treatments are restricted to the most cost-effective combinations based on the cost per sustained viral response value in different patient categories with consensus between professional organizations, National Health Insurance Fund and patient organizations. More expensive therapies might be available upon co-financing by the patient or a third party. Interferon-free treatments and shorter therapy durations preferred as much as financially feasible. A separate budget is allocated to cover interferon-free treatments for the most-in-need interferon ineligible/intolerant patients, and for those who have no more interferon-based therapy option.

MicroRNA profile before and after antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients for hepatitis C virus cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence is a major challenge after liver transplantation. Significant dysregulated expression of HCV receptors (i.e. claudin-1, occludin, tetraspanin CD81, scavenger receptor type B1) has been shown recently during HCV infection. This might facilitate hepatocytic entry and reinfection of HCV. MicroRNAs (miRs) play role in the regulation of gene expression. We aimed to characterize miR expression profiles related to HCV infection and antiviral therapy in adult liver transplant recipients, with special emphasis on miRs predicted to target HCV receptors. METHODS: Twenty-eight adult liver transplant recipients were enrolled in the study. Paired biopsies were obtained at the time of HCV recurrence and at the end of antiviral treatment. MiRs for HCV receptors were selected using target prediction software. Expression levels of miR-21, miR-23a miR-34a, miR-96, miR-99a*, miR-122, miR-125b, miR-181a-2*, miR-194, miR-195, miR-217, miR-221, and miR-224 were determined by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: miR-99a* and miR-224 expressions were increased in HCV recurrence samples, while miR-21 and miR-194 were decreased in comparison to normal liver tissue. Increased expressions of miR-221, miR-224, and miR-217 were observed in samples taken after antiviral therapy when compared with HCV recurrence samples. High HCV titer at recurrence was associated with higher level of miR-122. CONCLUSIONS: Samples at recurrence of HCV and after antiviral therapy revealed distinct HCV-related miR expression profiles, with significant dysregulation of those miRNAs potentially targeting mRNAs of HCV receptors. In particular, miR-194 and miR-21 might be involved in the regulation of HCV receptor proteins' expression during HCV infection and antiviral therapy.

[Progress of the liver transplantation programme in Hungary]. / A hazai májátültetési program fejlodése.

The history of organ transplantation in Hungary dates back to 50 years, and the first succesful liver transplantation was performed in the United States in that time as well. The number of patients with end stage liver disease increased worldwide, and over 7000 patients die in each year due to liver disease in Hungary. The most effective treatment of end-stage liver disease is liver transplantation. The indications of liver transplantation represent a wide spectrum including viral, alcoholic or other parenchymal liver cirrhosis, but cholestatic liver disease and acute fulminant cases are also present in the daily routine. In pediatric patients biliary atresia and different forms of metabolic liver disorders represent the main indication for liver transplantation. The results of liver transplantation in Hungary are optimal with over 80% long-term survival. For better survival individual drug therapy and monitoring are introduced in liver transplant candidates.

[Hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation in Hungary. Trends over the past 10 years]. / Hepatitis C-vírus-fertozés kiújulása májátültetés után. Mi változott az elmúlt 10 évben?

INTRODUCTION: Management of hepatitis C virus recurrence is a challenge after liver transplantation. AIM: The aim of the authors was to analyse the outcome of liver transplantation performed in hepatitis C virus positive patients during the past ten years and to compare recent data with a previous report of the authors. METHOD: The authors retrospectively evaluated the data (donors, recipients, perioperative characteristics, patient and graft survival, serum titer of hepatitis C virus RNA, histology) of 409 patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2003 and 2012. RESULTS: 156 patients were transplanted due to hepatitis C virus associated liver cirrhosis (38%). Worse outcome was observed in these patients in comparison to hepatitis C virus negative recipients. The cumulative patient survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 year were 80%, 61%, 51% in the hepatitis C virus positive group and 92%, 85%, 79% in the hepatitis C virus negative group, respectively (p<0.001). The cumulative graft survival rates at 1, 5 and 10 year were 79%, 59% and 50% in hepatitis C virus positive and 89%, 80% and 70% in hepatitis C virus negative patients (p<0.001). Hepatitis C virus recurrence was observed in the majority of the patients (132 patients, 85%), mainly within the first year (83%). The authors observed recurrence within 6 months in 71 patients (56%), and within 3 months in 26 patients (20%). The mean hepatitis C virus recurrence free survival was 243 days. Higher rate of de novo diabetes was detected in case of early recurrence. The cumulative patient survival rates at 1, 3, 5, 10 years were 98%, 89.5%, 81% and 65% when hepatitis C virus recurrence exceeded 3 months and 64%, 53%, 30.5% and 30.5% in patients with early recurrence (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Poor outcome of liver transplantation in hepatitis C virus positive patients is still a challenge. Hepatitis C virus recurrence is observed earlier after liver transplantation in comparison with a previous report of the authors. De novo diabetes occurs more frequently in case of early recurrence. Despite an immediate start of antiviral treatment, early recurrence has a significant negative impact on the outcome of transplantation.

The effect of steroid pretreatment of deceased organ donors on liver allograft function: a blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Brain death-associated inflammatory response contributes to increased risk of impaired early liver allograft function, which might be counterbalanced by steroid pretreatment of the organ donor. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to elucidate whether steroid pretreatment of liver donors improves early liver allograft function, prevents rejection and prolongs survival. METHODS: A placebo-controlled blinded randomized clinical trial was performed in three different centers in Austria and Hungary between 2006 and 2008. Ninety deceased organ donors received either 1000 mg of methylprednisolone or placebo 6h before recovery of organs. The primary end point was the concentration slope of transaminases within the first week. The secondary end point included survival and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) within 3 years after transplantation. RESULTS: Of the 90 randomized donors, 83 recipients were eligible for study. The trajectories of ALT and AST were not different between treatments (p=0.40 and p=0.13, respectively). Eight subjects died in the steroid and 13 in the placebo group within 3 years after engraftment (RR=0.63 95% CI [0.29,1.36], p=0.31). Eleven recipients experienced biopsy-confirmed rejection (BCAR) in the steroid and 11 in the placebo group (RR=1.02 95% CI [0.50,2.10], p=1.00). No effect modification could be identified in the predefined strata of donor age, sex, cold ischemic time, and cause of donor death. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid pretreatment of organ donors did not improve outcomes after liver transplantation.

Evolution of liver transplant waiting list in Hungary between 1995 and 2019. / Májvárólista 1995-2019: a hazai adatok nemzetközi összehasonlítása.

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A májtranszplantációs program részeként 1995 óta létezik folyamatosan vezetett várólista Magyarországon. Célkituzés: A legfontosabb várólista-paraméterek megállapítása és nemzetközi összehasonlítása. Módszer: A szerzok az 1995. január 1. és 2019. december 31. között elso májátültetés céljából várólistára helyezett betegek adatait elemezték. Eredmények: Összesen 1722 beteget helyeztek várólistára, 1608 felnottet, 114 gyermeket. A férfiak aránya 51,2%, az átlagéletkor 45,6 év. Az évente regisztrált új jelöltek száma 25 év során közel az ötszörösére emelkedett. A listára helyezés leggyakoribb indikációja a víruseredetu cirrhosis volt (n = 451). Ezt követte a cholestaticus (n = 314) és az alkoholos májbetegség (n = 264). Rosszindulatú daganat, 82%-ban hepatocellularis carcinoma miatt 215 beteget regisztráltak. Krónikus betegségekben az átlagos Model for End-Stage Liver Disease pontszám a regisztráláskor 13,5 volt. A 2018. december 31-ig listára helyezettek (n = 1618) 61%-a részesült májátültetésben, 24%-a várakozás közben meghalt, 7%-a a mutétre alkalmatlanná vált. A mutét elotti medián várakozási ido 248 nap volt a krónikus és 2 nap az akut betegek listáján. A transzplantált tumoros betegek (n = 132) szignifikánsan rövidebb ideig vártak mutétre (medián 115,5 nap), mint a többi krónikus beteg (n = 803, medián 282 nap). Az Eurotransplanthoz való csatlakozás utáni idoszakban (2013. július 1. és 2018. december 31. között) a transzplantációs arány növekedett (67%), a várólista-halálozás (meghaltak + mutétre alkalmatlanná váltak) 24%-ra csökkent. Megbeszélés: A várólista folyamatos bovülése hozzájárult a hazai májátültetési program fejlodéséhez. A hazai várólista diagnózis szerinti összetétele a mások által közöltekkel nagyrészt egyezik. A transzplantáltak aránya a nemzetközi átlagnak megfelelo. A várólista-halálozás és a mutét elotti várakozási ido a magyarországinál alacsonyabb donációs aktivitású vagy jelentosen nagyobb várólistával rendelkezo országokéhoz hasonló. Következtetés: Várólista-paramétereink javításához a transzplantációk számának további növelése szükséges. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(8): 301-311. INTRODUCTION: The Hungarian liver transplant program including waiting list started in 1995. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the wait-list parameters and comparing them with those in the literature. METHOD: Data of patients listed for primary liver transplantation between 1995 and 2019 were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1722 recipient candidates were registered on the liver transplant waiting list: 1608 adults (51.2% men) with mean age of 45.6 year and 114 patients aged <18 year. Virus-induced cirrhosis was the leading indication of listing (n = 451) and cholestatic liver diseases (n = 314) and alcoholic cirrhosis (n = 264) thereafter. The mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 13.5 for those with chronic disease. 61% of 1618 patients listed before December 31, 2018 underwent liver transplantation and 31% were removed from the wait-list for death or clinical deterioration. After joining Eurotransplant (period of 01. 07. 2013-31. 12. 2018), the transplant rate was 67%, the waiting list removal due to death/too sick for operation decreased to 24%. The median waiting time till transplantation was 248 days for those on elective and 2 days on acute list. Patients grafted with malignancy (n = 132) waited significantly shorter time than those with chronic non-malignant liver disease (median 115.5 versus 282 days). DISCUSSION: The composition of our waiting list by primary liver disease was similar to that of countries with large burden of hepatitis C. Transplant rate was average, wait-list mortality and waiting time were in line with those observed in low-donation countries or in the case of large volume waiting list. CONCLUSION: Listing of increasing the number of patients contributed to evolution of our liver transplant program. To improve our parameters, increasing transplant activity is warranted. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(8): 301-311.

Optimizing Survival for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Report and Current Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading primary liver tumor and a main indication for transplant. Transplant criteria are based on clinicopathologic features, meanwhile adequate downstaging and molecular mechanisms are getting more attention in evolving therapeutic algorithm of HCC. The aim of our study was to overview the results of the Hungarian Liver Transplant Program in the field of HCC and introduce new aspects of personalized treatment options. METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of survival and tumor recurrence of HCC-associated liver transplant recipients between October 2013 and December 2020. Patients were categorized in Milan criteria (MC), beyond MC but within University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), and beyond UCSF criteria groups after pathologic examination of the explanted liver. Demographic data and preoperative locoregional treatments were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 529 primer liver transplants were performed, 88 because of HCC. A total of 87 patients had underlying cirrhosis because of hepatitis C (54%), alcohol-related liver disease (33.7%), hepatitis B (4.5%), or unknown etiology. A total of 55.6% of the patients had at least one locoregional treatment. A total of 67.4% of the patients were within MC, 5.6% were within UCSF criteria, and 27% were beyond UCSF criteria. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 80%, 79%, and 75%. The outcome was better in early-stage tumors, but the difference was not significant (P = .745) CONCLUSIONS: The favorable survival in our department legitimates the strict transplant criteria of HCC. Adequate locoregional therapy as downstaging can expand recipient pool. Molecular tumor profiling may lead to personalized treatment of HCC.

Steroid pretreatment of deceased donors and liver allograft function - Ten years follow-up of a blinded randomized placebo controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Within the last decade numerous attempts have been reported in order to expand the donor pool and alleviate organ shortage in the setting of liver transplantation. Aim of this blinded randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effect of donor steroid pretreatment on outcomes after liver transplantation. METHODS: We performed an international, multi-center double-blinded randomized placebo controlled trial. Donors received 1000 mg methylprednisone or placebo before organ procurement. Primary endpoint were patient and graft survival. Secondary end points were rate of BPAR and liver functions trajectories after transplantation. Follow up was 10 years. RESULTS: There was no effect of steroid pretreatment vs. placebo on overall patient survival (50% vs. 46%, p = n.s.) as well as graft survival (47% vs. 51%, p= n.s.). Further donor steroid pretreatment did not alter the rate of biopsy proven acute rejections (34% steroid group vs. 36% placebo, p = n.s.). Evaluating short term and long term graft function, steroid pretreatment had minor effect on immediate liver function trajectories within the first 2 weeks after transplantation. This was not seen in long-term follow up. CONCLUSION: In conclusion we found no evidence that donor steroid pretreatment translates in improved outcomes after liver transplantation.