A new prognostic model to predict dropout from the waiting list in cirrhotic candidates for liver transplantation with MELD score <18.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) is used for organ allocation in liver transplantation (LT), but its prognostic performance is less accurate in patients with low score. We assess the outcome of patients with MELD < 18 awaiting LT, finding prognostic variables to identify a high dropout risk. METHODS: Training set consisted of 277 patients and validation cohort of 292 patients. Competing risk regression analysis, taking into account LT, was used for univariate/multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Ascites, sodium, bilirubin, albumin and glomerular filtration rate were independently associated with a 12-month dropout risk in the training set. Combining these five prognostic parameters, we calculated a new score named liver-renal-risk (LIRER). In the validation set, the 12-month LIRER concordance index showed a discrimination power [0.798, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.793-0.803] better than MELD (0.582, 95% CI 0.575-0.588), Child-Turcotte-Pugh (0.687, 95% CI 0.681-0.693), MELD-sodium (0.721, 95% CI 0.715-0.727) and MELD-ascites-sodium (0.729, 95% CI 0.724-0.735), with a remarkable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test: P = 0.91; R(2) = 0.911). Considering all study patients, the risk of wait list dropout increased with the rise in LIRER. The survival benefit analysis comparing the wait list dropout risk with the mortality of the 216 transplanted patients with same LIRER showed an important benefit for LT in patients with LIRER > 15.9. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with low MELD (<18), combination of ascites, sodium, albumin, bilirubin and renal function in a new score (LIRER) discriminates patients at high risk of medium-term adverse outcome from those in whom LT may be safely deferred.

Neurological complications after liver transplantation as a consequence of immunosuppression: univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors.

Neurological complications (NCs) can frequently and significantly affect morbidity and mortality of liver transplant (LT) recipients. We analysed incidence, risk factors, outcome and impact of the immunosuppressive therapy on NC development after LT. We analysed 478 LT in 440 patients, and 93 (19.5%) were followed by NCs. The average LOS was longer in patients experiencing NCs. The 1-, 3- and 5-year graft survival and patient survival were similar in patients with or without a NC. Multivariate analysis showed the following as independent risk factors for NC: a MELD score ≥20 (OR = 1.934, CI = 1.186-3.153) and an immunosuppressive regimen based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (OR = 1.669, CI = 1.009-2.760). Among patients receiving an everolimus-based immunosuppression, the 7.1% developed NCs, vs. the 16.9% in those receiving a CNI (P = 0.039). There was a 1-, 3- and 5-year NC-free survival of 81.7%, 81.1% and 77.7% in patients receiving a CNI-based regimen and 95.1%, 93.6% and 92.7% in those not receiving a CNI-based regimen (P < 0.001). In patients undergoing a LT and presenting with nonmodifiable risk factors for developing NCs, an immunosuppressive regimen based on CNIs is likely to result in a higher rate of NCs compared to mTOR inhibitors.

Results of salvage liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Salvage liver transplantation (SLT) is an attractive sequential strategy which combines liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), followed by liver transplant (LT) in the event of HCC recurrence or progressive liver deterioration. To compare the long-term results of SLT with primary liver transplant (PLT). METHODS: Between 2000 and 2011, 125 patients (72 transplantable) underwent LR and 226 underwent LT in our unit. The outcome of SLT was analysed in a two-step fashion: firstly, SLT (n = 28) was compared with PLT (n = 198), secondly an intention-to-treat analysis was performed on all transplantable HCC patients who underwent LR (LRT group = 72) compared to PLT (n = 198). RESULTS: The five-year overall survival (OS) was 65.4% vs. 49.2% (P = 0.63), and disease-free survival (DFS) was 89.7% vs. 80.6% (P = 0.31) for PLT and SLT respectively. Predictive factors for DFS after LT included HCC total diameter [hazard ratio (HR) 1.29 P = 0.003], alpha-foetoprotein (HR 1.002 P < 0.001) and number of HCC nodules (HR 1.317 P = 0.035), whereas viral hepatitis C positivity (HR 1.911 P = 0.03) and outside Up-to-seven criteria (HR 2.652 P < 0.001) were negative independent prediction factors of OS. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that OS at 5 years was improved in PLT vs. LRT (LRT n = 72 including SLT plus LR group) and was 69.4% vs. 42.2% (P < 0.004), with an additional increase in DFS (89.2% vs. 54.5% respectively P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Salvage liver transplantation is a safe treatment strategy, as it does not impair long-term survival. At intention-to-treat analysis, PLT showed improved survival compared with LRT.

Multicenter italian experience in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our work is to assess the clinical outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in HIV-coinfected patients. This is a multicenter study involving three Italian transplant centers in northern Italy: University of Modena, University of Bologna, and University of Udine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared 30 HIV-positive patients affected by HCC who underwent LT with 125 HIV-uninfected patients who received the same treatment from September 2004 to June 2009. At listing, there were no differences between HIV-infected and -uninfected patients regarding HCC features. Patients outside the University of California, San Francisco criteria (UCSF) were considered eligible for LT if a down-staging program permitted a reduction of tumor burden. RESULTS: HIV-infected patients were younger, they were more frequently anti-HCV positive, and a higher number of HIV-infected patients presented a coinfection HBV-HCV. Pre-LT treatments (liver resection and or locoregional treatments) were similar between the two groups. Histological characteristics of the tumor were similar in patients with and without HIV infection. No differences were observed in terms of overall survival and HCC recurrence rates. CONCLUSION: LT for HCC is a feasible procedure and the presence of HIV does not particularly affect the post-LT outcome.

Effects of mycophenolate mofetil introduction in liver transplant patients: results from an observational, non-interventional, multicenter study (LOBSTER).

The benefits of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-sparing regimens on renal function following liver transplantation (LT) have been demonstrated in clinical studies. This observational study assessed the real-life effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) introduction in LT patients. Four hundred and ninety-seven patients in whom MMF was introduced according to local standards or clinical considerations were entered. Patients were grouped by time between transplantation and start of MMF (start of study): Group A (n = 263): ≤6 d; Group B (n = 64): >6 d to ≤1 month; Group C (n = 74): >1 month to ≤1 yr; and Group D (n = 96): >1 yr. CNI sparing occurred in all groups, particularly in Groups C and D. Mean MMF doses at 12 months were 1202.7, 1363.5, 1504.7, and 1578.1 mg/d, respectively, in Groups A-D. At introduction of MMF, median glomerular filtration rate was 73.3, 81.7, 62.7, and 53.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in Groups A-D. At 12 months, this decreased to 66 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in Groups A and B, remained stable in Group C, and increased in Group D (64.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) ). Serious adverse drug reactions were lowest in Group D. In conclusion, MMF with a subsequent decrease in CNI was well tolerated and improved renal function even years after transplantation. A more forceful MMF dosing strategy with greater CNI sparing may further improve renal function.

Banked depopulated vena caval homograft: a new strategy to restore caval continuity.

This study reports one case of primary inferior vena cava (IVC) leiomyosarcoma. A 67-year-old woman was referred to the authors' clinic for evaluation. She presented complaining of epigastric and right upper abdominal quadrant pain. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography scan revealed a 5.2 × 6.4 cm heterogeneously enhancing mass involving the anteromedial aspect of the IVC, below the renal vein (segment I), deforming the duodenum. There was a partial intraluminal extension in the IVC. Laparotomic resection was performed, with total en bloc excision of the lower IVC tumor. The caval continuity was restored with concomitant interposition of a banked depopulated vena cava homograft. Histological findings showed leiomyosarcoma originating from IVC. The postoperative course was uneventful: Neither recurrence nor metastasis was evident at 4 years postsurgery.

Two-stage liver transplantation: an effective procedure in urgent conditions.

Temporary portocaval shunt and total hepatectomy is a technique used in the presence of toxic liver syndrome because of fulminant hepatic failure, hepatic trauma, primary non-function (PNF), and eclampsia. We performed this technique on four patients. An indication for anhepatic state was severe hemodynamic instability in three of them. Etiologies of these three patients were as follows: PNF after liver transplantation, ischemic hepatitis after right hepatic artery embolization, and massive reperfusion syndrome during a liver transplantation. In the fourth patient, during the liver transplantation when hepatic artery was ligated, a kidney carcinoma in the donor graft was discovered. We decided to complete the hepatectomy and to construct a temporary portocaval shunt. Mean anhepatic phases were 19 h and 15 min. All patients survived the two-stage liver transplantation procedure without major complications. Our cases demonstrated that temporary portocaval shunt while awaiting urgent liver transplantation could be an effective "bridge" in selected patients who develop toxic liver syndrome; however, a short time between portocaval shunt and transplantation and careful intensive care managements are mandatory.

Thromboelastographic changes in liver and pancreatic cancer surgery: hypercoagulability, hypocoagulability or normocoagulability?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Despite clinical and laboratory evidence of perioperative hypercoagulability, alterations in haemostasis after potentially haemorrhagic oncologic surgery are difficult to predict. This study aims to evaluate the entity, the extent and the duration of perioperative coagulative alterations following pancreas and liver oncologic surgery, by the use of both routine tests and thromboelastogram (TEG). METHODS: Fifty-six patients undergoing liver (n = 38) and pancreatic (n = 18) surgery were studied. The coagulation profile was evaluated by platelet count, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, antithrombin III and TEG at the beginning, at the end of the operation and on postoperative days 1, 3, 5 and 10. RESULTS: All preoperative coagulative screening and TEG traces were normal before incision. In the postoperative period of the liver and pancreas groups, despite an increase in prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, a reduction in antithrombin III and platelet count and normal activated partial thromboplastin time and fibrinogen, TEG evidenced a normocoagulability in the liver group, with a major tendency towards hypocoagulability in the pancreas group, as evidenced by a transient increase in R-time and K-time between postoperative days 1 and 3. During the study period, four cases of pulmonary embolism, resolved with heparin infusion, were recorded, in the absence of laboratory and thromboelastographic evidence of hypercoagulability. CONCLUSION: Despite laboratory tests evidencing hypocoagulability in both groups, TEG traces showed a normocoagulability in liver resections, whereas a transient thromboelastographic hypocoagulability was evident in patients undergoing pancreas surgery. The discrepancy between laboratory values and thromboelastographic variables was even more evident in patients undergoing major liver resections compared with minor ones. Our study supports the role of thromboelastography, despite its limitations, as a valuable tool for the evaluation of the perioperative whole coagulation process and hypercoagulability changes and to increase patient safety through better management of antithrombotic therapy.

Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria (single tumour

Sirolimus monotherapy effectiveness in liver transplant recipients with renal dysfunction due to calcineurin inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Among the adverse effects of different calcineurin inhibitors (CIs), nephrotoxicity is the most common (incidence: 18.1% at 13 y from liver transplantation) and depends on a variable degree of tubular-interstitial injury accompanied by focal glomerular sclerosis. A new immunosuppressive drug was introduced in solid organ transplant management, Sirolimus (SRL). It is a nonnephrotoxic immunosuppressor. METHODS: Twenty-six patients who developed nephrotoxicity owing to CIs, showing an increment of serum creatinine levels (>1.8 mg/dL) were switched to SRL monotherapy, initially at a dosage between 3 and 5 mg/d, and subsequently adapted to achieve trough level between 8 to 10 ng/mL. RESULTS: Patients were followed-up for a mean period of 40.3 months (range, 8.4 to 76.7) from liver transplantation. Mean follow-up after switch was 27.5 months (range, 2 to 71.2). Immunosuppression therapy was converted after a mean period of 12.8 months (range, 0.2 to 43.4). Serum creatinine, urea, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significantly improved. DISCUSSION: Patients developing renal dysfunction after liver transplantation may be successfully treated by conversion from CI to SRL. Hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia represent the principal side effects from SRL, but are treatable. Furthermore, SRL can significantly improve glucose tolerance.

Kaposi's sarcoma after liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS) is a malignant neoplasm arising from endothelial cells. HHV8-infection represents a key pathogenic determinant for the development of KS. There are no standard criteria to treat KS in immunosuppressed-individuals. Six cases (2.1%) of KS occurred in our Center among 285-recipients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) between October 2000 and November 2006. METHODS: Patients were four males and two females. Mean age was 57 years (range 44-65). Indication for LT was ESLD associated/non-associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of cyclosporine/tacrolimus associated with steroids or daclizumab. HHV8-detection was performed by the serological method before LT, and by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-analysis after KS. RESULTS: One patient had HCV-related cirrhosis and coinfection from HIV, three had HBV-related cirrhosis, two of these with coexistent HCC. The last two patients had alcoholic-cirrhosis, one with coexistent HCC. Mean time from transplantation to KS was 6.2 months (range 3.8-8.8). Three patients were treated with doxorubicin and three with switch from calcineurin-inhibitors to sirolimus. Three patients expired after 11.5, 8.8, and 7.4 months from KS diagnosis. DISCUSSION: KS should be treated by a multidisciplinary approach to obtain an early diagnosis and best management. Effective treatment with immunosuppression reduction or switch to sirolimus is mandatory and can induce complete regression.

High dose rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction in living related liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Induction with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) has been reported to be effective in cadaveric liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare two immunosuppressive protocols in adult living-related liver transplantation (LRLT). METHODOLOGY: From May 2001 through May 2003, 34 LRLT were performed. The first 17 patients (group 1) were treated with tacrolimus (TAC) and steroids. The next 17 patients (group 2) were treated with a steroid-sparing protocol using RATG. RESULTS: The one-year patient and graft survival was respectively 76.5% and 64.7% for group 1 and 88.2 and 76.5% for group 2 (p = 0.037 and p = NS, respectively). Incidence of acute cellular rejection was 41.2% in group 1 compared to 47% in group 2 (p = NS). Mean daily TAC dose at 6 months was 6.5 +/- 1.1 mg/day in group 1 and 3.2 +/- 0.9 mg/day in group 2 (p < 0.001). In group 1, 41.1% experienced CMV infection compared to 11.7% in group 2 (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that this approach of RATG induction followed by postoperative, steroid-free, and low-dose TAC is safe and provides for adequate immunosuppression and similar outcome when compared to controls treated with standard TAC and steroid immunosuppression.

The use of intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain relief after liver resection: a comparison with epidural analgesia.

An epidural catheter is used in some institutions for postoperative analgesia after liver surgery. However, anesthesiologists may not feel comfortable leaving a catheter in the epidural space because of concern about coagulation disturbances and possible bleeding complications caused by impaired liver function. In this study, we tested a single-shot intrathecal morphine technique and compared it to a continuous epidural naropine infusion for postoperative analgesia in liver surgery. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to an epidural analgesia group (EP group; n = 25) and an intrathecal analgesia group (IN group; n = 25). The quality of analgesia assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS), the side effects, and the additional IV analgesic requirements were recorded. We did not observe any signs of cord compression. Time to first pain drug requirement was longer in the EP group compared to the IN group (25 +/- 18.5 h versus 12 +/- 10.3 h; P < 0.05). In both groups, the VAS remained less than 30 mm throughout the 48-h follow-up period. Consumption of IV morphine with a patient-controlled analgesia device in the IN group was larger (mostly from 24 to 48 h after surgery) than the EP group (12.0 +/- 5.54 mg versus 3.1 +/- 2.6 mg, respectively; P < 0.01). The incidence of vomiting was 4% in both groups, whereas the incidence of pruritus (16% versus 0%) and nausea (16% versus 4%) was more frequent in the IN group. No postdural puncture headache and no spinal hematoma occurred. After liver resection, a single dose of intrathecal morphine followed by patient-controlled morphine analgesia can provide satisfactory postoperative pain relief. The quality of this treatment, according to the VAS, is not inferior to continuous epidural analgesia up to 48 h after surgery.

Arteroportal fistulas between the accessory right hepatic, gastroduodenal and superior mesenteric arteries and portal vein: a difficult technical problem to overcome in liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Fistulous communications between the accessory right hepatic (ARHA), gastroduodenal (GD), and superior mesenteric (SMA) arteries and the portal vein (PV) may represent a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT). MATERIAL: A patient with HCV-related liver cirrhosis and progressive liver decompensation underwent preoperative LT work-up. Doppler ultrasound (DU), Angiography and MRI revealed arteroportal fistulas (APF) and diversion of mesenteric-splenoportal flow through spontaneous splenorenal shunts (SSRS) in the systemic circulation. The patient was transplanted and the ARHA and GDA were distally sectioned; the HA was anastomosed to the donor HA; the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) was detached from the splenopancreatic venous bed by sectioning and ligating the Henle trunk, by ligating an posterior-inferior pancreatic vein and, finally, by positioning an iliac vein interposition graft between the SMV and the donor PV. The postanastomotic SMV trunk and recipient PV were ligated below and above the pancreatic head, respectively. RESULTS: Reperfusion and late liver function were good. DU and MRI studies showed an effective portal flow and the maintenance of a normal splenopancreatic vein outflow through the SSRS. DISCUSSION: APF represent a serious clinical problem, particularly in patients who need LT. The persistence of arterial flow into the PV is dangerous for the long-term liver function. A particular surgical strategy, strictly tailored to the hemodynamic conditions, has to be planned. CONCLUSIONS: Extrahepatic multiple APF would no longer to represent a contraindication to LT, although this claim needs to be confirmed in the light of further experience and a longer-term follow-up.

A Bayesian methodology to improve prediction of early graft loss after liver transplantation derived from the liver match study.

BACKGROUND: To generate a robust predictive model of Early (3 months) Graft Loss after liver transplantation, we used a Bayesian approach to combine evidence from a prospective European cohort (Liver-Match) and the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. METHODS: Liver-Match included 1480 consecutive primary liver transplants performed from 2007 to 2009 and the United Network for Organ Sharing a time-matched series of 9740 transplants. There were 173 and 706 Early Graft Loss, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified as significant predictors of Early Graft Loss: donor age, donation after cardiac death, cold ischaemia time, donor body mass index and height, recipient creatinine, bilirubin, disease aetiology, prior upper abdominal surgery and portal thrombosis. RESULTS: A Bayesian Cox model was fitted to Liver-Match data using the United Network for Organ Sharing findings as prior information, allowing to generate an Early Graft Loss-Donor Risk Index and an Early Graft Loss-Recipient Risk Index. A Donor-Recipient Allocation Model, obtained by adding Early Graft Loss-Donor Risk Index to Early Graft Loss-Recipient Risk Index, was then validated in a distinct United Network for Organ Sharing (year 2010) cohort including 2964 transplants. Donor-Recipient Allocation Model updating using the independent Turin Transplant Centre dataset, allowed to predict Early Graft Loss with good accuracy (c-statistic: 0.76). CONCLUSION: Donor-Recipient Allocation Model allows a reliable donor and recipient-based Early Graft Loss prediction. The Bayesian approach permits to adapt the original Donor-Recipient Allocation Model by incorporating evidence from other cohorts, resulting in significantly improved predictive capability.

Absence of viable HCC in the native liver is an independent protective factor of tumor recurrence after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) are still a matter of debate. The absence of viable tumor in the native liver, due to effectiveness of pre-LT locoregional treatment or liver resection, is an intriguing prognostic factor that had never been evaluated. METHODS: Between November 2000 and December 2011, 210 LTs were performed in patients with evidence of HCC and cirrhosis. RESULTS: Fifty-three (25.2%) patients did not show any evidence of active residual HCC in the native liver (Group NVH), whereas 157 (74.8%) patients showed viable HCC (Group VH). All patients in Group NVH were treated before LT with a multimodal approach combining transarterial chemoembolization, liver resection, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, or sorafenib, whereas, in Group VH, 110 of the 157 (70.1%) patients received bridging therapy (P<0.001). HCC recurrence occurred in none of the patients in Group NVH (0%) and in 25 (15.9%) patients in Group VH (P=0.003). Liver resection was the most effective treatment in obtaining absence of HCC on liver explantation. The results of multivariate analysis showed that existence of pathologic HCC findings outside of the University of California-San Francisco criteria (P=0.001; odds ratio, 4; confidence interval, 1.7-9.2) and the presence of viable HCC (P=0.003; odds ratio, 5.9; confidence interval, 1.5-17.6) were independently associated with HCC recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The histologic absence of viable HCC in the native liver after LT and morphologic criteria, due to the high effectiveness of pre-LT bridging treatments, is a highly positive prognostic factor against HCC recurrence after LT.