Ambulatory colectomy for cancer: Results from a prospective bicentric study of 177 patients.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme after colectomy reduces postoperative morbidity and shortens the length of hospital stay. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short and midterm outcomes of ambulatory colectomy for cancer. METHODS: This was a two-centre, observational study of a database maintained prospectively between 2013 and 2021. Short-term outcome measures were complications, admissions, unplanned consultations and readmission rates. Midterm outcome measures were the delay between surgery and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, length of disease-free survival and 2-year disease-free survival rate. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients were included. The overall morbidity rate was 15% and the mortality rate was 0%. The admission rate was 13% and 11% patients left hospital within 24 h of surgery. The readmission rate was 9% and all readmissions occurred before postoperative Day 4. Eight patients underwent repeat surgery because of anastomotic fistula (n = 7) or anastomotic ileocolic bleeding (n = 1). These patients had an uneventful recovery. Sixty-one patients required adjuvant chemotherapy with a median delay between surgery and chemotherapy initiation of 35 days. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory colectomy for cancer is feasible and safe. Adjuvant chemotherapy could be initiated before 6 weeks postsurgery. The ambulatory approach may be a step forward to further improve morbidity and oncologic prognosis.

Endoscopic treatment of diastasis recti: Training method and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic treatment of diastasis rectus abdominis offers the possibility of correcting the condition without complete abdominoplasty. The purpose of this study was to develop a training method on fresh cadavers models based on a literature review on this surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The endoscopic procedure considered involved the insertion of a 10mm suprapubic trocar and of 5mm trocars in each iliac fossae. The muscle suture is done using running barbed suture. The surgery was performed on eight fresh cadavers to estimate the learning curve for this intervention, which was estimated with the CUSUM method. A systematic literature review in the PubMed database was performed, and 20 articles that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. RESULTS: The learning curve threshold was reached after 6 operations and can be separated into two phases. The most common complication of this surgery is seroma, it is encountered in 3 to 27% of cases according to the studies. Diastasis recurrence is rare, occurring in less than 2% of cases. In comparison, open surgical treatment of diastasis recti is associated with a higher risk of hematoma, skin necrosis and longer operating times. Recurrence rates are similarly low after open and endoscopic repair. Mesh reinforcement is indicated in cases of diastasis wider than 5cm, diastasis recurrence, severe musculoaponeurotic laxity, or hernia larger than 1cm. CONCLUSION: The data in the literature indicate that laparoscopic surgery is an efficient and safe approach to correct diastasis of the rectus muscles and can be offered by plastic surgeons to selected patients.

Incidence and risk factors for incisional hernia and recurrence: Retrospective analysis of the French national database.

AIM: The aim of this work was to determine the rate of incisional hernia (IH) repair and risk factors for IH repair after laparotomy. METHOD: This population-based study used data extracted from the French Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Informations (PMSI) database. All patients who had undergone a laparotomy in 2010, their hospital visits from 2010 to 2015 and patients who underwent a first IH repair in 2013 were included. Previously identified risk factors included age, gender, high blood pressure (HBP), obesity, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). RESULTS: Among the 431 619 patients who underwent a laparotomy in 2010, 5% underwent IH repair between 2010 and 2015. A high-risk list of the most frequent surgical procedures (>100) with a significant risk of IH repair (>10% at 5 years) was established and included 71 863 patients (17%; 65 procedures). The overall IH repair rate from this list was 17%. Gastrointestinal (GI) surgery represented 89% of procedures, with the majority of patients (72%) undergoing lower GI tract surgery. The IH repair rate was 56% at 1 year and 79% at 2 years. Risk factors for IH repair included obesity (31% vs 15% without obesity, p  < 0.001), COPD (20% vs 16% without COPD), HBP (19% vs 15% without HBP) and diabetes (19% vs 16% without diabetes). Obesity was the main risk factor for recurrence after IH repair (19% vs 13%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: From the PMSI database, the real rate of IH repair after laparotomy was 5%, increasing to 17% after digestive surgery. Obesity was the main risk factor, with an IH repair rate of 31% after digestive surgery. Because of the important medico-economic consequences, prevention of IH after laparotomy in high-risk patients should be considered.

Short-term Outcomes of Ambulatory Colectomy for 157 Consecutive Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy for selected consecutive patients in an ambulatory setting at two institutions. BACKGROUND: Several studies showed that an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery reduces postoperative morbidity and mortality, and shortens the length of hospital stay. The development of such a program has allowed us to gradually reduce the length of stay for colorectal surgery, until ambulatory management. METHODS: Between February, 2013 and December, 2016, all patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colectomy and meeting rigorous criteria for ambulatory surgery were included. Outcome was prospectively studied. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients (70 women) with a median age of 61 years (range 25-82 years) were included. The ambulatory rate for colectomy was 30.5%. Median operative time and length of in-hospital stay were 95 minutes (range 45-232 minutes) and 10.0 hours (range 7-14.7 hours), respectively. The admission rate was 7.0% due to operative difficulties (4 patients), medical reasons (4 patients), and social reasons (3 patients). Outcomes for these patients were uneventful and the median length of hospital stay was 3.1 days (range 1-14 days). An unscheduled consultation was necessary for 30 patients (20.5%). Nine patients required readmission (6.1%), of whom 6 required reoperation (3.8%). The overall 30-day morbidity rate was 24.8%. The mortality rate was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first case of consecutive patients undergoing ambulatory colectomy for malignant or benign disease. We demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and reproducibility of outpatient colectomy for selected patients. In our experience, 30% of patients scheduled for elective colectomy can be managed in an ambulatory setting.

Connected Surveillance for Detection of Complications After Early Discharge from Bariatric Surgery.

As part of a bariatric enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program, at-home follow-up using a novel Internet application was used to detect early complications. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this "connected surveillance" protocol over a 10-day follow-up. Patients were monitored 24/7 by a trained nursing team with daily surgeon review of patient self-reports. Morbidly obese patients (n = 281) underwent OAGB (126, 47.70%) or sleeve gastrectomy (138, 52.3%). Of 264 who completed the study (mean age 40 years [20-66]), 3 (1.1%) underwent revision for early complications; there were 6 (2.1%) readmissions and 22 (8.3%) consultations. In a bariatric surgery ERAS program, "Internet-connected surveillance" proved safe and effective in detecting 100% of early complications, and most patients were satisfied with their care.

Long-Term Outcomes After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) in Morbidly Obese Patients.

BACKGROUND: One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has gradually gained in popularity. Evidence of the validity of the technique and the quality of life in the longer term is scarce. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the longitudinal (≥ 5 years) safety, weight-loss efficacy, comorbid disease improvement, and quality of life of patients following OAGB. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent OAGB from January 2009 to December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative clinical characteristics and data through 8 years were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients completed 5 to 8 years of follow-up with a mean age of 41 ± 11.4 years (22-65). Ninety-four patients (57.6%) had undergone prior bariatric surgery (gastric band). Mean body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) at the time of OAGB was 41.2 ± 6.5 (range 30.1-50.6). Twenty-one patients (13.0%) suffered from type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), 59 (36.2%) hypertension, 31 osteoarthritis (19.0%), and 24 had obstructive sleep apnea (14.7%). At 5, 6, 7, and 8 years of follow-up, respective mean BMI reduction was 12.6 (n = 163), 11.8 (n = 100), 10.7 (n = 82), and 8.8 (n = 40). Respective mean excess weight loss was 81.8 ± 23.6%, 75.9 ± 20.8%, 69.1 ± 20.4%, and 62.3 ± 23.4%. All obesity-related comorbidities decreased significantly at follow-up time points. Five patients (3%) underwent laparoscopic reoperation within 90 days after surgery. Incidence of recurrent reflux was 14.0%. At a mean follow-up of 92 months (76-111), improved or greatly improved quality of life was reported by 86.0% of patients. CONCLUSION: OAGB provided very good weight loss, comorbidity improvement, and quality of life at follow-up of ≥ 5 years.

Medium- to Long-Term Outcomes of Gastric Banding in Adolescents: a Single-Center Study of 97 Consecutive Patients.

Morbid obesity in adolescents has been treated effectively with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). We prospectively studied 97 consecutive obese adolescents undergoing LAGB over the course of 10 years. The average patient age at surgery was 17.2 ± 0.7 years; mean body mass index, 44.9 ± 6.1 kg/m2. Excluding those lost to follow-up (n = 21), respective mean total weight loss and excess weight loss were 20.0 ± 16.6 and 46.6 ± 39.5% (n = 76, 78.4%). An ascending trend line showed a significant positive correlation between excess weight loss and follow-up duration (mean 56.0 ± 22.0 months). There was no mortality or morbidity. Nineteen patients (25.0%) underwent band removal at a mean 43.0 ± 28.0 months. LAGB proved safe and effective over the mid- and longer term; it should be strongly considered as a procedure of first intention for obese adolescents.

Should ambulatory appendectomy become the standard treatment for acute appendicitis?

Background: Appendectomy is increasingly performed as a 'short stay' or 'ambulatory' procedure, yet there is no consensus for selection of patients with acute appendicitis for ambulatory surgery (AS). We aimed to compare characteristics and outcomes of complicated and uncomplicated appendectomies performed in ambulatory vs. conventional settings, and to determine factors associated with unexpected re-consultations and re-hospitalizations. Methods: The authors reviewed a consecutive series of 185 laparoscopic appendectomies. Whenever possible, patients were offered AS, defined as 'discharge on the same working day.' Multivariable regressions were performed to determine associations of unexpected re-consultations and re-hospitalizations with surgery type (ambulatory or conventional) and patient characteristics (age, gender, obesity, symptoms, appendicolith, perforations, appendix diameter, serologic results, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and Saint-Antoine score). Results: From the initial cohort, 117 patients (63.2%) were eligible for AS, of which 8 had peri- or post-operative contraindications. Therefore, 109 patients (58.9%) were operated by AS, with median length of stay 8.5 h (range, 3.3-20.5). Ambulatory cases had a lower incidence of complications (11.9%) than conventional cases (25.0%) (p = 0.029). Uni- and multi-variable regressions revealed that unexpected re-consultations were not significantly associated with any of the pre- or peri-operative variables but that unexpected re-hospitalizations were 4 times more likely for patients with appendicolith (OR, 4.32; p = 0.04). Conclusions: Ambulatory surgery could be considered as a standard procedure for both complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Appendicolith was found to be an independent risk factor for unexpected re-hospitalization and should therefore trigger closer monitoring.

Four-Year Evolution of a Thrombophylaxis Protocol in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program: Recent Results in 485 Patients.

"Enhanced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) protocols may reduce morbidity, length of hospital stay (LOS), and costs. During the 4-year evolution of a bariatric ERAS protocol, we found that administration of thrombophylaxis selectively to high-risk morbidly obese patients (assessed postoperatively by Caprini score ≥ 3) undergoing omega loop gastric bypass ("mini" gastric bypass) or sleeve gastrectomy resulted in safe outcomes. Both procedures proved equally effective with this protocol. The vast majority of rapidly mobilized, low-risk patients did not appear to require antithrombotic heparin. Similar to other reported ERAS outcomes, our recent year's results in 485 patients included a mean LOS of 1.08 ± 0.64 days (range 1-14), with 460 (95.0%) discharged on day 1 and 99.6% by day 2. There were 13 30-day complications (2.7%), two reinterventions (0.4%), and no hemorrhages.

Experience with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Bariatric Surgery: Comparison of MGB and LSG in 374 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Strategic multidisciplinary protocols for "enhanced recovery after surgery" (ERAS) have demonstrated reductions in length of hospital stay (LOS), morbidity, and costs in conjunction with bariatric procedures. METHODS: We prospectively investigated the effectiveness and safety of an ERAS protocol with laparoscopic omega loop gastric bypass ("mini" gastric bypass, MGB) and LSG in morbidly obese patients. RESULTS: Average LOS was 1.24 days (range 1-14); 86.1% discharged on day 1; 96.9% by day 2, a value comparable or better than that of other ERAS studies vs standard care according to meta-analysis. Complications 2.9%; readmission 2.1%; reintervention 1.3%. CONCLUSION: The program was equally safe with both procedures. Postoperative antithrombotic heparin does not appear necessary in low-risk patients. Bariatric surgical ERAS programs are evolving and not yet standardized.

[Ileal pouch anal-anastomosis without protective ileostomy]. / Anatomose iléo-anale sans iléostomie de protection.

AIM: Ileo-anal anastomosis (IAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is usually associated with a defunctioning ileostomy, which may in itself cause morbidity. We report the results of a series of patients undergoing IAA without ileostomy. METHODS: Between 1993 and 1998, 84 patients underwent IAA without ileostomy: 51 for FAP, 30 for UC, 2 for non familial colonic polyposis and 1 for indeterminate colitis. Patients taking > 30 mg steroids daily were excluded. The decision not to fashion an ileostomy was taken if there were no perioperative difficulties. RESULTS: One patient died from a pulmonary embolus. Early and late complications were seen in 25 (30%) and 23 patients (27%) respectively, necessitating reoperation in 13, including three temporary ileostomies and one pouch excision for Crohn's disease. Functional results were analysed in 81 patients. Median follow-up was 22 months, the mean number of stools per day was 3.8 +/- 1. Daytime and night time continence was normal in 77 (95%) and 73 patients (90%) respectively. In 66 patients (94%) there was no urgency and in 61 (75%) no need for constipating agents. CONCLUSIONS: For a selected group of patients undergoing an IAA, a defunctioning ileostomy may be avoided. Morbidity and functional results are equivalent to those obtained with a defunctioning ileostomy