Follow-up Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Darvadstrocel (Mesenchymal Stem Cell Treatment) in Patients With Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: ADMIRE-CD Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Darvadstrocel is an expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy for the treatment of complex perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease. Safety and efficacy outcomes from the clinical trial known as "Adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells for induction of remission in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease," or ADMIRE-CD (NCT01541579), from up to 52 weeks posttreatment were previously reported. Here, the outcomes from an extended 104-week follow-up are reported. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of darvadstrocel at 2 years post-treatment in patients with Crohn's disease and complex perianal fistulas. DESIGN: This was a phase 3 double-blind randomized controlled study (ADMIRE-CD) in patients with perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease. SETTINGS: This study extension was conducted in multiple hospitals across 7 European countries and Israel. PATIENTS: Forty patients entered the extended follow-up period: 25 patients in the darvadstrocel treatment group and 15 in the control group. INTERVENTIONS: Darvadstrocel or saline solution (control group) was administered once, locally, after fistula tract curettage and internal opening closure (with previous seton placement). All patients were permitted to continue ongoing medical treatments for fistulas. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment-emergent serious adverse events were recorded through week 104. Clinical remission, defined as closure of all treated external openings that were draining at baseline despite gentle finger compression, was assessed at week 104. RESULTS: Of 40 patients, 37 completed the extended follow-up. Through week 104, 7 treatment-emergent serious adverse events were reported, of which 4 occurred between weeks 52 and 104. At week 104, clinical remission was reported in 14/25 (56%) patients in the darvadstrocel group and 6/15 (40%) patients in the control group. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the small number of patients who entered the extended follow-up period, and no imaging examinations were performed at the 104-week time point. CONCLUSIONS: Darvadstrocel was well tolerated and clinical remission after treatment with darvadstrocel may be sustained for up to 104 weeks in patients with perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B812.ClinicalTrials.gov No: NCT01541579. ESTUDIO DE SEGUIMIENTO PARA EVALUAR LA SEGURIDAD Y EFICACIA A LARGO PLAZO DE DARVADSTROCEL TRATAMIENTO CON CLULAS MADRE MESENQUIMALES EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN PERIANAL FISTULIZANTE ENSAYO CONTROLADO ALEATORIZADO DE FASE ADMIRECD: ANTECEDENTES:Darvadstrocel es una terapia con células madre mesenquimales alogénicas expandidas derivadas de tejido adiposo para el tratamiento de fístulas perianales complejas en pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn. Los resultados del ensayo clínico conocido como "Células madre mesenquimales derivadas de tejido adiposo para la inducción de la remisión en la enfermedad de Crohn fistulizante perianal" o ADMIRE-CD (NCT01541579), en cuanto a la seguridad y eficacia hasta 52 semanas después del tratamiento, fueron previamente informados. Seguidamente, se presentan los resultados de un seguimiento extendido de 104 semanas.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la seguridad y eficacia a largo plazo de darvadstrocel a dos años del tratamiento en pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn y fístulas perianales complejas.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de fase 3, aleatorizado, a doble ciego, controlado (ADMIRE-CD) en pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn perianal fistulizante.DESARROLLO:Esta extensión del estudio se realizó en varios hospitales de siete países europeos e Israel.PACIENTES:Cuarenta pacientes participaron en la extensión de seguimiento: tratamiento con darvadstrocel (n = 25); grupo control (n = 15).INTERVENCIONES:Se administró Darvadstrocel o solución salina (grupo control) una vez, localmente, tras el legrado del trayecto fístuloso y cierre del orificio interno (con la colocación previa de setón). A todos los pacientes se les permitió continuar con los tratamientos médicos en curso para las fístulas.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los eventos de efectos adversos graves derivados del tratamiento se registraron hasta la semana 104. La remisión clínica, definida como el cierre de todas las aberturas externas tratadas que drenaban al inicio espontáneamente o por compresión suave de los dedos, fue evaluado en la semana 104.RESULTADOS:Del total de 40 pacientes, 37 completaron la extensión de seguimiento. Hasta la semana 104, se reportaron 7 eventos de efectos adversos graves resultantes del tratamiento, de los cuales 4 ocurrieron entre las semanas 52 y 104. En la semana 104, se reportó remisión clínica en 14/25 (56%) pacientes en el grupo de darvadstrocel y 6/15 (40%) pacientes en el grupo de control.LIMITACIONES:Solo una pequeña cantidad de pacientes participaron en el período de seguimiento extendido y no se realizaron exámenes por técnicas de imagen en la visita a 104 semanas.CONCLUSIONES:Darvadstrocel fue bien tolerado y la remisión clínica después del tratamiento con darvadstrocel puede mantenerse hasta 104 semanas en pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn perianal fistulizante. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B812. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto and Dr Julian Panés.)ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT01541579.

Safety and Efficacy of Intracoronary Infusion of Allogeneic Human Cardiac Stem Cells in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

RATIONALE: Allogeneic cardiac stem cells (AlloCSC-01) have shown protective, immunoregulatory, and regenerative properties with a robust safety profile in large animal models of heart disease. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and feasibility of early administration of AlloCSC-01 in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: CAREMI (Safety and Efficacy of Intracoronary Infusion of Allogeneic Human Cardiac Stem Cells in Patients With STEMI and Left Ventricular Dysfunction) was a phase I/II multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%, and infarct size ≥25% of left ventricular mass by cardiac magnetic resonance, who were randomized (2:1) to receive AlloCSC-01 or placebo through the intracoronary route at days 5 to 7. The primary end point was safety and included all-cause death and major adverse cardiac events at 30 days (all-cause death, reinfarction, hospitalization because of heart failure, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and stroke). Secondary safety end points included major adverse cardiac events at 6 and 12 months, adverse events, and immunologic surveillance. Secondary exploratory efficacy end points were changes in infarct size (percentage of left ventricular mass) and indices of ventricular remodeling by magnetic resonance at 12 months. Forty-nine patients were included (92% male, 55±11 years), 33 randomized to AlloCSC-01 and 16 to placebo. No deaths or major adverse cardiac events were reported at 12 months. One severe adverse events in each group was considered possibly related to study treatment (allergic dermatitis and rash). AlloCSC-01 elicited low levels of donor-specific antibodies in 2 patients. No immune-related adverse events were found, and no differences between groups were observed in magnetic resonance-based efficacy parameters at 12 months. The estimated treatment effect of AlloCSC-01 on the absolute change from baseline in infarct size was -2.3% (95% confidence interval, -6.5% to 1.9%). CONCLUSIONS: AlloCSC-01 can be safely administered in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction early after revascularization. Low immunogenicity and absence of immune-mediated events will facilitate adequately powered studies to demonstrate their clinical efficacy in this setting. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02439398.

Broader conceptualization of remission assessed by the remission from depression questionnaire and its association with symptomatic remission: a prospective, multicenter, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Goals of treating major depressive disorder (MDD) include achieving remission and avoiding relapse. It is possible that patients may have a broader view of remission than what is captured via clinician-rated scales. This patient perspective may, in turn, have an impact on treatment outcomes. METHODS: The association between a broader conceptualization of remission, based on the Remission from Depression Questionnaire (RDQ) score at baseline, and being in symptomatic remission after 6 months was evaluated in subjects (N = 613) with MDD in symptomatic remission at baseline (17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAMD-17] ≤7). Specific aspects of depression were assessed from physician and patient perspectives as secondary endpoints. A backwards selection strategy was used to statistically model remission status and determine association of factors with potential to influence remission. RESULTS: At month 6, after adjustment for baseline HAMD-17 score, there was no association between baseline RDQ score and symptomatic remission status (HAMD-17), relapse, composite remission status, healthcare resource utilization, or quality of life. There was no association between functional impairment scores at baseline (Sheehan Disability Scale and Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale) and symptomatic remission status (HAMD-17) at month 6. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that RDQ-constructs are independent from symptomatic remission. Symptom severity at study entry appeared to be the only significant predictor of eventual relapse during the 6-month follow-up period. However, our results also suggest that the current definition of remission that is based on symptom reduction should be further elaborated and that alternative or additional definitions should be considered in determining remission.

Spanish medical students' attitudes and views towards mental health and psychiatry: a multicentric cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the attitudes towards mental illness and psychiatry among fifth year Spanish medical students. METHODS: The study included 171 students from three medical schools located in different areas of Spain: Cádiz; UCA (n = 113), Madrid; San Pablo-CEU (n = 22), and Barcelona; UAB (n = 36). They responded, prior to their undergraduate medical course in psychiatry, to the AMI questionnaire to measure the attitudes towards mental illness and to Balon's adapted questionnaire to investigate their view towards psychiatry. RESULTS: The students (93.4 %) had a positive attitude towards mental illness (AMI). Attitudes towards psychiatry were fairly positive with a few negative views, specifically regarding the role of psychiatrists (items 11 and 13) and the prestige of the specialty (item 16). There were some statistically significant differences between the three medical schools in the perception of psychiatry as a medical discipline. A better attitude towards mental illness was associated with a better view of the overall merits of psychiatry. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that Spanish medical students do not have a negative attitude towards mental illness and they have a good perception of psychiatry, although there are still some misconceptions about this specialty. These student's attitudes could favor an appropriate management of patients suffering from mental illness.

Bioequivalence and Safety of Bilastine 20 mg Orodispersible Tablets and Conventional Tablets: A Randomized, Single-Dose, Two-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Orodispersible tablets (ODT) rapidly dissolve in the oral cavity and can improve patient's convenience. This pharmacokinetic study assessed the bioequivalence of a novel 20 mg ODT formulation of bilastine compared with bilastine 20 mg tablets in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. METHODS: A phase I, single-center, open-label, two-period, two-sequence crossover randomized clinical trial was conducted. The study comprised two periods, in which participants were administered a single oral dose of bilastine 20 mg in the form of ODT as the test product, or conventional tablets as the reference product, and a washout of 7 days between each period. Blood samples were collected for up to 72 h. Bioequivalence was established if the 90% confidence intervals of the Cmax and AUC0-t were within the acceptance range (80-125%). Safety was evaluated at the follow-up visit (days 4-7 after the second dose) and throughout the study. RESULTS: A total of 42 healthy volunteers were randomized, and 41 completed the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable for both formulations after a single dose of 20 mg. Bilastine ODT and conventional tablets were bioequivalent as the 90% confidence intervals of the test over reference ratios were within the predefined range (80-125%). Both formulations were well tolerated and showed a similar safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Bilastine ODT was bioequivalent to the reference treatment formulated as conventional tablets when administered as a single oral dose of 20 mg under fasting conditions. Both formulations showed a similar tolerability and safety profile, with no serious adverse events or significant analytical alterations reported. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 2019-004071-39. Date of authorization: 10 December 2019.

Comparative inhibition by oral bilastine, parenteral dexchlorpheniramine, and a new bilastine parenteral (i.v. and i.m.) formulation of histamine-induced wheal and flare response: A randomised phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: Bilastine is a well-known non-sedating second-generation antihistamine authorised worldwide for the symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (seasonal and perennial) and urticaria with proven efficacy and good safety and tolerability profile. When the oral route is not suitable or a rapid onset of action is preferred, parenteral formulations represent an effective treatment option. However, the parenteral formulations currently available are sedating antihistamines. The objective of this research was to compare the peripheral anti-H1 activity of different bilastine formulations (i.v., i.m. and oral) and dexchlorpheniramine among them also versus placebo. METHODS: This was a single-dose, randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I clinical study performed on 25 adult healthy volunteers that compared the peripheral antihistaminic activity of a single dose of bilastine 12 mg i.v., bilastine 12 mg i.m., bilastine 20 mg oral tablets and dexchlorpheniramine 5 mg i.m. among them and versus placebo by inhibiting the histamine-induced wheal and flare (W&F) response. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability were also evaluated. RESULTS: All bilastine formulations showed a rapid onset of action (15 min for parenteral and 30 min for the oral formulation), and the maximum effect in both wheal (i.v. 74.44 %; i.m.:74.29 %; oral 70,27 %) and flare area reduction (i.v. and i.m. 80.63 %; oral 77.67 %), was significantly larger compared to dexchlorpheniramine i.m. (25.85 % for wheal and 28.65 % for flare) and placebo (1.35 % for wheal and 4.02 % for flare). A more pronounced reduction in itching score was reached for bilastine oral, followed by i.m. and i.v. formulations. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported during the study, and 8 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 5 subjects, all resolved without sequelae. For psychomotor assessments, dexchlorpheniramine i.m. showed a fast onset of drowsiness, as well as decreased attention and coordination when compared to all bilastine formulations and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: All bilastine formulations showed a peripheral H1-blocking effect inducing a significantly greater inhibition of the wheal and flare response as compared to dexchlorpheniramine i.m. or placebo and provided a greater reduction of the itching sensation score. This study reconfirmed that bilastine has no sedative effect, even in a parenteral formulation. These results suggest that new bilastine parenteral formulation (i.v. or i.m.) may represent a suitable alternative for patients requiring immediate treatment of histamine-mediated type I hypersensitivity reactions, such as acute urticaria, or in those cases where oral administration is not possible.

Residual symptoms and functioning in depression, does the type of residual symptom matter? A post-hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: The degrees to which residual symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) adversely affect patient functioning is not known. This post-hoc analysis explored the association between different residual symptoms and patient functioning. METHODS: Patients with MDD who responded (≥50% on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; HAMD-17) after 3 months of treatment (624/930) were included. Residual core mood-symptoms (HAMD-17 core symptom subscale ≥1), residual insomnia-symptoms (HAMD-17 sleep subscale ≥1), residual anxiety-symptoms (HAMD-17-anxiety subscale ≥1), residual somatic-symptoms (HAMD-17 Item 13 ≥1), pain (Visual Analogue Scale ≥30), and functioning were assessed after 3 months treatment. A stepwise logistic regression model with normal functioning (Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale ≥80) as the dependent variable was used. RESULTS: After 3 months, 59.5% of patients (371/624) achieved normal functioning and 66.0% (412/624) were in remission. Residual symptom prevalence was: core mood symptoms 72%; insomnia 63%; anxiety 78%; and somatic symptoms 41%. Pain reported in 18%. Factors associated with normal functioning were absence of core mood symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 8.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6-16.7), absence of insomnia symptoms (OR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7), episode length (4-24 weeks vs. ≥24 weeks [OR 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.6]) and better baseline functioning (OR 1.0; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1). A significant interaction between residual anxiety symptoms and pain was found (p = 0.0080). CONCLUSIONS: Different residual symptoms are associated to different degrees with patient functioning. To achieve normal functioning, specific residual symptoms domains might be targeted for treatment.

Systematic depression screening in high-risk patients attending primary care: a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Systematic screening for depression in high-risk patients is recommended but remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of such screening in everyday clinical practice on depression recognition. METHODS: A pragmatic, cluster randomized, controlled study that randomized primary care physicians (PCPs) in Spain either to an intervention or control group. The intervention group (35-PCPs) received training in depression screening and used depression screening routinely for at least 6 months. The control group (34-PCPs) managed depression in their usual manner. Adherence to (1-6; never-very frequently), feasibility (1-4; unfeasible-very feasible), and acceptance (1-5; very poor-very good) of the screening were evaluated. Underrecognition (primary outcome) and undertreatment rates of major depressive disorder (MDD) in the two groups were compared 6 months after randomization in a random sample of 3737 patients assigned to these PCPs using logistic regression adjusting for the clustering effect. RESULTS: No significant differences were found for recognition rates (58.0% vs. 48.1% intervention vs. control; OR [95%CI] 1.40 [0.73-2.68], p = 0.309). The undertreatment rate did not differ significantly either (p = 0.390). The mean adherence to depression screening was 4.4 ± 1.0 ('occasionally'), the mean feasibility was 3.1 ± 0.5 ('moderately feasible'), and the mean acceptance was 4.2 ± 0.6 ('good'). CONCLUSIONS: This research was not able to show effectiveness of the systematic screening for MDD in high-risk patients on depression recognition in primary care. The poor adherence to screening implementation could partially explain the results. These reflect the difficulties of putting into practice the clinical guidelines usually based on interventional research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01662817.

Remission and functioning in major depressive disorder.

Evidence from numerous clinical studies has shown that the optimal goal for the treatment of depression is remission. Remission implies that the signs and symptoms of the disease are absent or virtually absent, which is typically associated with a return to the patient s previous daily functioning. Functioning in depression is a broad concept that covers different domains. There are many validated instruments for its assessment, these being reviewed in this article. Furthermore, recovering the pre-morbid level of functioning level is increasingly being identified as a significant target in addition to symptomatic remission. In this sense, functional recovery has been associated with better prognosis of depression and is also a clinical goal expressed by the patient. Several factors, like complete remission of symptoms, with no residual symptoms, maintenance of remission, quality of remission, early remission, have been identified as contributors to functional recovery. In order to facilitate the clinical outcomes, evaluation of and search for symptomatic remission as well as functional recovery need to be integrated into the clinical practice.

Disease Burden, Treatment Patterns, and Economic Impact of Rectovaginal Fistulas in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Findings from a Retrospective, Observational, Longitudinal Study Based on US Claims Databases.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's-related rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) greatly impact quality of life and are notoriously difficult to treat. The aim of this study was to assess the burden of recurrent episodes of care for RVF and its economic impact. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of administrative US claims databases was conducted. Eligible patients were female adults, with a diagnosis code for Crohn's disease with or without a diagnosis/procedural code for RVF. For the RVF cohort, rates of recurrence of RVF episodes of care were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and direct healthcare costs were compared between the RVF cohort and RVF-free cohort. RESULTS: Mean ages in the RVF cohort (n = 963) and RVF-free cohort (n = 56,564) were 47.2 and 50.8 years, with a mean follow-up period of 58.7 and 49.8 months, respectively. For the RVF cohort, the probability of having a second RVF episode of care within 2 years of the first one was estimated to be 35.9% and of having a third episode within 2 years of the second was 47.8%. During the first 2 years, the RVF cohort had 67% more inpatient admissions than the RVF-free cohort with each RVF episode of care being associated with 16% more admissions. The estimated incremental cost associated with having RVF was US$17,561, with an incremental cost of US$11,607 for each additional RVF episode of care. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study highlights the significant impact of RVF in patients with Crohn's disease with regard to repeat interventions and associated HCRU and direct healthcare costs, suggesting novel therapeutics are needed in this patient population.

Early switch strategy in patients with major depressive disorder: a double-blind, randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: Antidepressant switch is a commonly used strategy in the absence of an adequate response, but optimum timing is not well established. We compared the efficacy of an early and a conventional antidepressant switch strategy in patients with major depressive disorder. METHODS: Patients with no or minimal improvement (<30% reduction in baseline 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAMD17] score) after 4 weeks on escitalopram 10 mg/d were randomized to either early switch strategy with duloxetine 60 to 120 mg/d for 12 weeks (arm A) or conventional switch strategy (arm B): 4 further weeks on escitalopram 10 to 20 mg/d; then, in case of nonresponse (response, ≥ 50% reduction in HAMD17), switch to duloxetine 60 to 120 mg/d for 8 weeks, or continued escitalopram in responders. Co-primary end points were time to confirmed response and remission (HAMD17, ≤ 7). Strategies were compared using Kaplan-Meier, logistic regression, and repeated-measures analyses. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent (566 of 840) of patients showed no or minimal improvement and were randomized to arm A (282 patients) or arm B (284 patients). No between-strategy differences in time to confirmed response (25% Kaplan-Meier estimates, 3.9 vs 4.0 weeks, P = 0.213) or remission (6.0 vs 7.9 weeks, P = 0.075) were found. Rates of confirmed responders were similar (64.9% vs 64.1%); however, more patients randomized to early switch achieved confirmed remission (43.3% vs 35.6%; P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Although no differences in the primary end points were found, a higher remission rate was seen with the early switch strategy. Our findings suggest that further investigations to reevaluate the conventional approach to antidepressant switch strategy would be worthwhile.

Optimal cutoff point of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression according to normal levels of social and occupational functioning.

The main goal in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) is to achieve remission, defined as the resolution of symptoms and the return to normal levels of functionality. However, the clinical assessment of remission is usually merely based on scores of symptomatic rating scales. One of the most widely used scales to measure remission is the HAM-D(17), in which remission is defined as a score ≤ 7. Nevertheless, several studies have shown that this cutoff could be too high when also functioning is considered. This is a post-hoc analysis of a 6-month prospective study, performed over a sample of 292 Spanish patients with MDD, in order to find the optimal cutoff in the HAM-D(17) scale, considering normal levels of functionality, evaluated by the SOFAS; by means of plotting Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves. Our results show that a score of ≤ 5 maximized both sensitivity and specificity for identifying normal levels of functionality with respect to other scores, and thus agree with previous works, which suggest that a cutoff ≤ 7 might be too high to consider remission in patients with MDD, when normal levels of functioning are taken into account.

Functional impairment related to painful physical symptoms in patients with generalized anxiety disorder with or without comorbid major depressive disorder: post hoc analysis of a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is the most frequent anxiety disorder in primary care patients. It is known that painful physical symptoms (PPS) are associated with GAD, regardless the presence of comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD). However the specific role of such symptoms in patients' functional impairment is not well understood. The objective of the present study is to assess functional impairment related to the presence of PPS in patients with GAD. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of a cross-sectional study. Functioning, in the presence (overall pain score >30; Visual Analog Scale) or absence of PPS, was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) in three groups of patients; 1) GAD and comorbid MDD (GAD+MDD+), 2) GAD without comorbid MDD (GAD+MDD-), 3) controls (GAD-MDD-). ANCOVA models were used. RESULTS: Of those patients with GAD+MDD+ (n = 559), 436 (78.0%) had PPS, compared with GAD+MDD- (249 of 422, 59%) and controls (95 of 336, 28.3%). Functioning worsened in both GAD groups in presence of PPS (SDS least squares mean total score: 16.1 vs. 9.8, p < 0.0001, GAD+MDD+; 14.3 vs. 8.2, p < 0.0001, GAD+MDD-). The presence of PPS was significantly associated with less productivity. CONCLUSIONS: Functional impairment related to the presence of PPS was relevant. Clinical implications should be considered.

Efficacy of lifestyle interventions in physical health management of patients with severe mental illness.

Awareness of the importance of maintaining physical health for patients with severe mental illnesses has recently been on the increase. Although there are several elements contributing to poor physical health among these patients as compared with the general population, risk factors for cardiovascular disease such as smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and obesity are of particular significance due to their relationship with mortality and morbidity. These patients present higher vulnerability to cardiovascular risk factors based on several issues, such as genetic predisposition to certain pathologies, poor eating habits and sedentary lifestyles, high proportions of smokers and drug abusers, less access to regular health care services, and potential adverse events during pharmacological treatment. Nevertheless, there is ample scientific evidence supporting the benefits of lifestyle interventions based on diet and exercise designed to minimize and reduce the negative impact of these risk factors on the physical health of patients with severe mental illnesses.

Remission in schizophrenia: results from a 1-year follow-up observational study.

OBJECTIVES: This study used the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group operational-severity criteria to, a) provide descriptive data on prevalence and stability of symptomatic remission, b) attempt a criterion (concurrent) validation of this measure of remission, and c) explore correlates of remission stability. METHODS: From an unselected sample of 1010 stable outpatients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR), a subgroup of 452 (44.8%) in symptomatic remission was followed for 1 year. Of these, 376 were re-evaluated in a research diagnostic assessment. In addition to relevant sociodemographic and clinical data, measures included symptoms, depression, functioning, social cognition, attitudes towards medication, and quality of life. Estimates of point prevalence are provided. Correlates of remission were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: Symptomatic remission at baseline correlated with better premorbid adjustment, better social cognition, good treatment compliance, younger age, the absence of comorbid substance abuse, current or past participation in psychotherapy, and a lack of past participation in rehabilitation. After 1 year, 338 out of the 376 (89.9%) patients re-evaluated were found again in remission. In this assessment, better premorbid adjustment, good treatment compliance, and improvement of depressive symptoms and social cognition during follow-up again correlated with remission. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that symptomatic remission (as defined above) has considerable criterion validity and is a realistic goal in the treatment of schizophrenia. Attaining and sustaining remission may warrant better clinical and functional outcomes for patients.

Relationship of somatic symptoms with depression severity, quality of life, and health resources utilization in patients with major depressive disorder seeking primary health care in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between the characteristics of somatic symptoms and depression severity, quality of life (QOL), and health resources utilization in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in primary care setting. METHOD: This cross-sectional, nationwide epidemiologic study, carried out in 1150 primary care patients with DSM-IV-defined MDD, evaluated the characteristics of somatic symptoms by means of the Standardized Polyvalent Psychiatric Interview. Depression severity and QOL were evaluated by means of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and the Physical and Mental Component Summaries of the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form Health Survey. Health resources utilization was measured in terms of doctor consultations and hospitalizations. The associations were assessed by means of adjusted analyses. The study was carried out from April 2004 to July 2004. RESULTS: Disability associated with somatic symptoms and number of somatic symptoms were strongly associated with increased depression severity (2.45 and 0.29 increase in SDS score, respectively) and health resources utilization (odds ratios of 1.42 and 1.04, respectively). Associated disability, frequency, and persistence during leisure time of somatic symptoms were strongly associated with poorer QOL. In contrast, we found a weaker relationship between duration and intensity of somatic symptoms and depression severity, QOL, and health resources utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Of the studied somatic symptom characteristics, somatic symptom-associated disability and number of somatic symptoms are strongly associated with increased depression severity and health resources utilization, as well as with decreased QOL. Our results may help physicians identify relevant characteristics of somatic symptoms to more effectively diagnose and treat depression in primary care patients.

The Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study: 3-year results of antipsychotic treatment discontinuation and related clinical factors in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: This article presents the long-term results in terms of antipsychotic medication maintenance and factors influencing it in a representative sample of patients with schizophrenia recruited in the SOHO study within Spain. METHODS: The SOHO was a prospective, 3-year observational study of the outcomes of schizophrenia treatment in outpatients who initiated therapy or changed to a new antipsychotic performed in 10 European countries with a focus on olanzapine. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyse the time to treatment discontinuation and the Cox proportional hazards model to investigate correlates of discontinuation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In total, 1688 patients were included in the analyses. Medication maintenance at 3years varied with the antipsychotic prescribed, being highest with clozapine (57.6%, 95% CI 39.2-74.5), followed by olanzapine (48.3%, 95% CI 45.1-51.5); and lowest with quetiapine (19.0%, 95% CI 13.0-26.3). Treatment discontinuation was significantly less frequent with olanzapine than with risperidone (p=0.015), depot typical (p=0.001), oral typical antipsychotics (p<0.001) or quetiapine (p<0.001); but not than with clozapine (p=0.309). Longer maintenance was also associated with higher social abilities and better cognitive status at baseline; in contrast, a shorter time to discontinuation was associated with the need for mood stabilisers during follow-up. This study emphasises the different value of antipsychotics in day-to-day clinical practice, as some of them were associated with longer medication maintenance periods than others. This study has some limitations because of possible selection and information biases derived from the non-systematic, non-randomised allocation to treatments and the existence of unobserved covariates that may influence the outcome.

Duloxetine in the treatment of major depressive disorder: an open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic and highly disabling condition. Existing pharmacotherapies produce full remission in only 30% to 40% of treated patients. Antidepressants exhibiting dual reuptake inhibition of both serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) may achieve higher rates of remission compared with those acting upon a single neurotransmitter. In this study, the safety and efficacy of duloxetine, a potent dual reuptake inhibitor of 5-HT and NE, were examined. METHODS: Patients (N = 533) meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD received open-label duloxetine (60 mg once a day [QD]) for 12 weeks during the initial phase of a relapse prevention trial. Patients were required to have a 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD17) total score >or=18 and a Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) score >or=4 at baseline. Efficacy measures included the HAMD17 total score, HAMD17 subscales, the CGI-S, the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale, Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for pain, and the Symptom Questionnaire, Somatic Subscale (SQ-SS). Quality of life was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and the Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS). Safety was evaluated by recording spontaneously-reported treatment-emergent adverse events, changes in vital signs and laboratory analytes, and the Patient Global Impression of Sexual Function (PGI-SF) scale. RESULTS: The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events was 11.3%. Treatment-emergent adverse events reported by >or=10% duloxetine-treated patients were nausea, headache, dry mouth, somnolence, insomnia, and dizziness. Following 12 weeks of open-label duloxetine therapy, significant improvements were observed in all assessed efficacy and quality of life measures. In assessments of depression severity (HAMD17, CGI-S) the magnitude of symptom improvement continued to increase at each study visit, while for painful physical symptoms the onset of improvement was rapid and reached a maximum after 2 to 3 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: In this open-label phase of a relapse prevention study, duloxetine (60 mg QD) was shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of MDD.

Symptomatic remission and social/vocational functioning in outpatients with schizophrenia: prevalence and associations in a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Progress in therapeutic options for schizophrenia has revived long-term expectations of researchers, practitioners and patients. At present, definitions of therapeutic outcome include both maintained symptomatic remission and appropriate functioning in a conceptual framework that targets patient's recovery as the ultimate goal. We aimed to know the prevalence and clinical features of patients with schizophrenia achieving these outcomes. METHODS: A multi-centre, cross-sectional study was performed in more than 100 mental health facilities within Spain. Recently published consensus-based operational criteria for symptomatic remission and the Global Assessment of Functioning scale were used to evaluate outcomes. Other clinical aspects like depressive symptoms, social cognition, premorbid adjustment and patients' attitudes to medication were also evaluated. RESULTS: Data from 1010 patients were analysed. Of these, 452 (44.8%) were at clinical remission, but only 103 (10.2%) showed an adequate social and/or vocational functioning. Factors predicting both outcomes were better pre-morbid adjustment (odds ratio, OR=1.56) and better social cognitive function (OR=1.14). Other factors, like treatment adherence, current or past psychotherapy and patient's age were not associated to functionality but only to clinical remission. Current substance use and previous rehabilitation were associated to a lower likelihood of symptomatic remission. CONCLUSION: Although symptomatic remission in patients with schizophrenia is a realistic and reachable goal, future efforts should be directed to a sustained appropriate functioning in these patients.

[Bipolar disorder in Spain: functional status and resource use on the basis of the Spanish sample of the observational, Pan European EMBLEM study]. / El trastorno bipolar en España: Estado funcional y consumo de recursos según la muestra española del estudio observacional paneuropeo EMBLEM.

RATIONALE: There are very few data as to the social and occupational adaptation of patients with bipolar disorder in Spain and even less is known about the resource use they generate. OBJECTIVE: To determine the functional status and healthcare resource use of the Spanish sample of the pan European EMBLEM (European Mania in Bipolar Longotudinal Evaluation of Medication) study of bipolar patients in manic or mixed phase. METHOD: The EMBLEM study recruited 3536 patients, 312 of whom (8.82%) were enrolled in Spain. Patients had to be adults with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder who were initiating at the discretion of their treating psychiatrist oral treatment for an acute manic phase. They were evaluated using the Spanish versions of rating scales for the severity of mania (Young Mania Rating Scale), bipolar disorder (CGI BD) for mania, depression and hallucinations delusions, and depression (HAMD 5 item version of the Hamilton Scale); the Life Chart Method (LCM) and 2 items of the SLICE of LIFE were used to evaluate functioning. Information was collected on healthcare resource utilization during the preceding year. RESULTS: Sixty three percent of the patients presented with moderate to very severe work related difficulties in the year preceding his her manic episode. Forty percent of the patients failed to comply either totally or partly with their prescribed treatment. Subjects required an average of 1.5 hospitalizations during the year prior to enrollment, with a mean stay of approximately 10 days, and between 7 and 8 outpatient visits per year.