RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Despite advances in multimodality management of brain metastases, local progression following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can occur. Often, surgical resection is favored, as it frequently provides immediate symptom relief as well as pathological characterization of any residual tumor. Should the pathological specimen contain viable tumor cells, further radiation therapy is an option to sterilize the tumor bed. We evaluated the use of repeat SRS (rSRS) in lieu of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) as a means of improving local control (LC) while minimizing potential toxicity and dose to the normal brain. MATERIALS/METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients with brain metastases who underwent SRS and then surgical resection for locally recurrent or persistent disease. From 2004 to 2014, 13 consecutive patients or 15 lesions were treated with rSRS after resection, either post-operatively to the tumor bed (n = 10, 66.6%) or after a second local recurrence (n = 5, 33.3%). LC, distant brain failure (DBF), and radiation toxicity were determined using patient records, RECIST criteria v1.1, and CTCAE v4.03. RESULTS: At a median follow-up interval of 9.0 months (range 1.8-54.9 months) from time of rSRS, five patients remain alive. Following rSRS, 13 of the 15 (86.6%) lesions were locally controlled with an estimated 100% LC at 6 months and 75% LC at 1 year. However, 11 of the 15 (73.3%) treated lesions developed DBF after rSRS with 3 of 13 patients proceeding to WBRT. Two of 15 (13.3%) resulted in either grade 2 radionecrosis with grade 3 seizures or grade 3 radionecrosis. CONCLUSION: Repeat SRS represents a potential salvage therapy for patients with locally recurrent brain metastases, providing additional tumor control with acceptable toxicity, even in the setting of prior SRS and surgical resection. rSRS may be reasonable to use as an alternative to WBRT in this setting.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To establish response patterns in PET following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of malignant lung lesions. METHODS: Patients with malignant lung lesions treated with SBRT were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received 40-52 Gy in three to five equal fractions. An independent, blinded radiologist reassessed all 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose PET/computed tomography scans to determine the tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and size changes. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included in this study. Of the 47 lesions treated, there were 22 primary and 25 metastatic lung lesions. In total, 86 PET/computed tomography studies were reviewed. The mean SUVmax values decreased markedly and stabilized after 6 months following the treatment of primary lesions. Metastatic lesions showed greater variability, with an overall increase in SUVmax values until 6 months and decrease thereafter. Of the eight local failures, the mean SUVmax and size change from nadir values to biopsy-proven failure were 117 and 215%; however, it was difficult to measure the size of five lesions because of fibrotic changes. Statistical analysis revealed metastatic tumors to be associated with poorer local control (P=0.028). No correlation was found between size or pretreatment SUVmax and outcome. CONCLUSION: Anticipated SUVmax and size patterns following SBRT remain a challenge due to surrounding tissue reactions. Nonetheless, marked SUVmax changes can aid in determining local failure. Increases in size were also observed in local failures; however, localized fibrosis challenges its utility in distinguishing failures from a normal tissue response. A larger series needs to be examined to better establish the correlation of PET responses to overall survival and local control.