RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with Parkinson's disease might develop treatment-resistant axial dysfunction after bilateral subthalamic stimulation. OBJECTIVES: To study whether lateralized stimulation (unilateral 50% amplitude reduction) for ≥21 days results in ≥0.13 m/s faster gait velocity in the dopaminergic ON state in these patients, and its effects on motor and axial function, quantitative gait and speech measures, quality of life, and selected cognitive tasks. METHODS: Randomized, double-blinded, double-crossover trial. RESULTS: In 22 participants (51-79 years old, 15 women), there were no significant changes in gait velocity, quality of life, cognitive, and speech measures. Reducing left-sided amplitude resulted in a 2.5-point improvement in axial motor Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) (P = 0.005, uncorrected) and a 1.9-point improvement in the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (P = 0.024, uncorrected). CONCLUSIONS: Lateralized subthalamic stimulation does not result in meaningful improvement in gait velocity in patients with Parkinson's disease who develop treatment-resistant axial dysfunction after bilateral subthalamic stimulation. Left subthalamic overstimulation may contribute to axial deterioration in these patients. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Núcleo Subtalámico , Anciano , Estimulación Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Femenino , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/etiología , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/terapia , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Núcleo Subtalámico/fisiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A randomized trial suggested that reducing left-sided subthalamic stimulation amplitude could improve axial dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: To explore open-label tolerability and associations between trial outcomes and asymmetry data. METHODS: We collected adverse events in trial participants treated with open-label lateralized settings for ≥3 months. We explored associations between trial outcomes, location of stimulation and motor asymmetry. RESULTS: 14/17 participants tolerated unilateral amplitude reduction (left-sided = 10, right-sided = 4). Two hundred eighty-four left-sided and 1113 right-sided stimulated voxels were associated with faster gait velocity, 81 left-sided and 22 right-sided stimulated voxels were associated with slower gait velocity. Amplitude reduction contralateral to shorter step length was associated with 2.4-point reduction in axial MDS-UPDRS. Reduction contralateral to longer step length was associated with 10-point increase in MDS-UPDRS. CONCLUSIONS: Left-sided amplitude reduction is potentially more tolerable than right-sided amplitude reduction. Right-sided more than left-sided stimulation could be associated with faster gait velocity. Shortened step length might reflect contralateral overstimulation.